This comment was left by a reader in response to this post from a teacher who had worked in the Brighter Choice charter chain in Albany. A few years ago, this chain was described as “the holy grail” of charter schools. Since then, some of its charters have been closed for poor performance and two more are on the chopping block:
Hi, I too worked in an Albany Charter and now work in the Albany City School District. I can agree with the post that there are a lot of teachers and administrators who really care about the kids and want to do everything they can to help them. In my time in the charter school I met and learned from a few really fantastic and committed teachers. I can also say most of these teachers and administrators are generally very young and inexperienced. The majority of administrators do not have administrative licenses. The majority of the teachers are still completing their Master’s degree and have limited-no experience.
The problem with the Albany Charters is the Brighter Choice Foundation and the tone of the schools. They need to make their money and run the schools like a business. The BCF (which is somehow now called the Albany Charter School Network, not sure why?!) sits on the third floor of the MS that may close. Mr.Carroll, Bender, and the other white, wealthy and older men who run this organization make no effort to get to know the students or interact with the staff. They park in their reserved spots and jet to their cushy offices to send down orders. I don’t really understand how the school can have Board Members who carry the lease of the school and profit from it, work for the BCF or have other clear, financial interests in the school. I think they should have to post all of their board meeting materials in the same manner ACSD does (http://albanyschools.org/district/board/2014-15/12-11/12-11-14.documents.html). Perhaps the public should start attending their board meetings. It is strange that although each school has a separate charter, the four board meetings happen at one time, in one building. I have never seen an agenda or minutes of a meeting, but I understand they are only an hour or two long as well.
There is too much pressure on the students, teachers and administrators. Yes, they do not expel as many kids but I have seen them “counsel out” a large, large number of students. They suspend students, have their parents come in and eventually say “maybe the district schools will be a better fit for your family”. The Brighter Choice Middle Schools also do not enroll students in the 7th or 8th grades because “it takes so long to teach the expectations of the school that at 7th grade it is too late”. Their special ed. and ELL population is limited and entirely different than the population of ACSD. They have no self-contained classrooms for students with autism, learning disabilities or emotional disturbances. They have no ELLs who are refugees and have never been to school or learned to read. This is probably a good thing for these students because they teach directly to the test and rarely differentiate instruction. The inexperienced and young teachers are pressured by administrators (who are in turn pressured by the Foundation) to drill test prep and test taking skills. They rarely read novels. Students are pulled during Sci/SS (which they receive in rotation instead of daily) for AIS services. With the high focus on test prep, students receive little to no humanities education. Lunches are often silent and the students do not even have the freedom to stand up to throw away their own lunches. The students know little freedom, so they often rebel any chance they get.
The interesting thing about the Brighter Choice MS for Boys and Girls failing is that it is in a way very reflective of both the Albany Charter Schools and the fact that it is not easy to run an effective urban middle school. The majority of the students at BCMS-Girls and Boys are from the area charter elementary schools. This means that the elementary schools (BCCS-Girls, Boys, Henry Johnson, ACC) are not preparing the students for the challenges of middle school as well. Could it be that there is no “quick fix” to better urban middle schools?
I imagine the BCF will put up a big fight to keep these schools open as they stand to lose a lot of money if this building closes. I imagine their deep pockets will end up keeping this school open for a few more years. I am sure Cuomo will fight tooth and nail for his friends at the Foundation as well.

My heart goes out to the kids and the staff mentioned in the posting.
In the posting I particularly noticed the disconnect between those running/profiting from the charter operation and those studying in/working in the charters. In addition there was the usual litany of what seems to be SOP in the heavy hitters among charter operators/owners regarding the kinds of students they let in, exclude, keep in, or push out.
Cage busting achievement gap crushing 21st century creative disruption in education—
The Full Monty.
And folks, it ain’t a pretty sight.
😎
LikeLike
This school sounds like a test prep camp from the People’s Republic of the United States. They not offering anything new or innovative, and there is familiar theme of trying to weed out the more difficult or different students to show some positive test results. It sounds like a lifeless, drab school with a narrow focus. A real comprehensive school would enrich the lives the students so much more. Even a fully functioning library would encourage students to learn how to enjoy reading, and it would probably help reading skills more than test prep.http://www.scribd.com/doc/201757382/The-Power-of-Reading-Stephen-Krashen#scribd
LikeLike
I shake my head. Young, inexperienced teachers that do little but teach to the test. Not wise enough, or secure in their abilities to tell truth to administration. When is the public going to demand experienced, professional teachers, knowledgeable in both content and pedagogy. I should know, I was that inexperienced teacher once myself. Luckily I had wise counsel to help guide me in professional growth.
LikeLike
It would be very helpful to know exactly what parts of public school law and regulations these charters must adhere to. The writer says that the majority of administrators do not hold admin licenses–this is a requirement for public school admins.
If the state believes that administrators in the schools must hold a valid administrative certificate, then why are administrators in these charters not held to that rule?
LikeLike
But they aren’t public schools, are they?
They say they are when they ask for the tax dollars, but say they aren’t when they want to hide what they’ve done with the cash.
No accountability, or at the very least, not enough of it.
LikeLike
Principals and Vice Principals aren’t held to the same standard either. Where in a public school will you find 25 y.o. principals? Never. You’re supposed to get the proper certifications and have experience. Then again, charters hire uncertified teachers too, without degrees in the proper subjects, and without experience – just like TNTP and TFA “teachers” with 5 weeks of boot camp teaching summer school to 8 kids. Go figure. And, the charters gift masters degrees to their scabs. Its a racket. Try it in public school, it doesn’t fly. There has to be a definitive lawsuit judging that charters are private and as such do not deserve public taxpayer dollars – or that they are public and should abide by the same rules, regulations and laws that the rest of us uphold.
LikeLike
Mitchell Robinson, the charter laws vary from state to state. In some states, teachers need no certification, or only a small percentage of them do. Clearly, having certified administrators is another “hoop and hurdle” that some states think unnecessary. In North Carolina, when the charter law was being written, charter employees were exempted from the requirement of criminal background checks. That may not have made it into the final version of the law. I’ll have to check and see if it did.
LikeLike
Test prep is cheap, easy, and very patronizing. It is the worst of what schools can make possible. All wallet and no heart is a recipe for failure even when the playing field is tilted in your direction.
LikeLike
“I don’t really understand how the school can have Board Members who carry the lease of the school and profit from it, work for the BCF or have other clear, financial interests in the school. ”
I don’t understand it either. It’s not like we have to reinvent the concepts of “conflicts of interest” and “ethics” for this one category of contractors. Why are charter schools different? How do they justify ignoring what are long-standing general “good governance” issues? How does restricting clear conflicts of interest and demanding financial reporting have anything to do with students or “education”, even? I’m not seeing the reason for the unique status.
LikeLike
Charter schools will never be able to educate ‘ALL’ children as well as public schools do. Getting that message across is the challenge.
Eventually the charter school movement will fail, but not soon enough.
About 17 of the 950 students where I am principal attend charter or cyber-charter schools. About half make it there. It is not effective for ‘all’ students so many jump from cyber-charter to cyber-charter and eventually end up coming back to the public school. Why? They realize that the charter schools can’t provide the same level of services or opportunities. The general public may figure that out but how much damage will be done by then?
Charter schools also miss out on the top teacher candidates when hiring. Here in Pennsylvania, most aspiring teachers desire a position in a public school. Why? Economics. Top salaries above $90k and great benefits to go with it. I hired four new teachers last year. Top notch candidates. All with teaching experience already. I interviewed several charter school and private school teachers looking to move to the public school, they didn’t make the cut, so the charter schools get to keep them. Not that they were bad; they just weren’t the best candidates. Public schools get the best candidates as teachers.
Many who support charter schools also support testing as an ‘accountability’ measure. But charter schools lag behind public schools when measured by test scores. That is clearly the case in PA and I would guess other states as well.
Charter schools will never be able to provide opportunities for all students; special ed, ELL, and behavior problems as well. Even if we have to expel a student for behavior, we have to provide that child an education. It may be in an alternative setting, but it is an education. What other option is there for our future and the future of that child? Charter schools just can’t do that.
And this is what the public must figure out.
LikeLike
The details you provide are helpful & hopeful. I’m seeing just from your example of one public school in Pa– a state which has suffered more state cuts to public ed than many– that school ‘consumers’ do indeed ‘vote with their feet’ when provided school choice– and end up choosing the public school! Which means you’re right, charters will ultimately fail, except in those areas where the state has managed to stamp out the p.s. system.
But judging from the York Pa situation, looks like laws have been rigged so that even an area with plenty of industry to support it can be tricked into losing their public schools. Here’s hoping your new gov can right some of the wrongs.
LikeLike