Progressive activist Norman Solomon was a Sanders delegate to the Democratic convention in 2016. He now is national director of RootsAction. In this article in LA Progressive, he warns that Trump is a neofascist and that his re-election will end all hope for progressive change.
He quotes Noam Chomsky:
But here’s a key point: People who deny or downplay the real threat of neo-fascism consolidating itself via Trump’s re-election are, in effect, serving as enablers for the forces of the virulent extreme right that already controls so much of the U.S. government.
“It’s important to remember that right now, the issue of greatest urgency is to get rid of the malignancy in the White House,” Noam Chomsky said in an interview last week. “If we don’t do that, everything else pales into insignificance. To keep this for another four years means racing to the abyss on global warming, possibly reaching irreversible tipping points, sharply increasing the threat of nuclear war, stuffing the judiciary with young, ultra-right, mostly unqualified lawyers who will guarantee that anything to the left of Attila the Hun can’t survive for a generation, and on and on. This is top priority.”
In that video interview with The Intercept, Chomsky added: “There’s a thing called arithmetic. You can debate a lot of things, but not arithmetic. Failure to vote for Biden in this election in a swing state amounts to voting for Trump. Takes one vote away from the opposition, same as adding one vote to Trump. So, if you decide you want to vote for the destruction of organized human life on Earth. . . then do it openly. . . . But that’s the meaning of ‘Never Biden.’”

Yes, Trump is a neo-fascist. He is trying to mold the entire United States into the form of his own “malignant” personality disorders. On a larger scale, that’s a working definition of neo-fascism. CBK
LikeLike
Which Virus?
The solutions to this virus are known:
Testing,
Social Distancing,
Wash your Hands and Disinfecting
Scientific Medical Research Data and a Vaccine,
Which virus? No, not (only) the pandemic; the ONE IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
O’Henry would love this one.
The president’s strategy (man putting those two words together was hard to type) is:
Block testing
Massive crowds (a.k.a. rallies, parties, back to school, malls open…)
Ingesting disinfectant (a.k.a. (although he was serious) mockery of the problem
Deny science (a.k.a. conspiracy theories, scapegoat W.H.O and doctors, hocus-pocus malaria drugs)
To get rid of the virus in the White House we need:
Testing – Who are these people who support him and afraid to speak (Senators, Cabinet, some Governors, Representatives). Make them speak. Call Them out.
Social Distancing (free press (please) Name, call out, and isolate the crazies from the elected from the profiteers from the bullies…)
Wash your Hands and Disinfecting – VOTE, protest, expose gerrymandering, free press, get facts to the fox-only crowd, expose corporate offenses
Science and A Vaccine – facts and voting at every level of government
LikeLike
This is science fiction or the most outrageous fiction come to life: Trump as president. And what does the Democratic party come up with to face off with Trump? Joe Biden, sigh. Already I am hearing many liberals/progressives saying that they will not vote for Biden because he appears to be senile and because of the sexual assault charges from Tara Reade. As opposed to Trump? I’m with Chomsky and Cornel West on this conundrum. Vote for Biden, vote Democratic to stop the fascist-in-chief and the armed neo-Nazi militia types who are parading around state capitals armed to the teeth with semi-automatic weaponry of every sort. These far right wing militia types are terrorists who are trying to intimidate people with their weapons arsenals.
If only we had a leader like Justin Trudeau who is banning semi-automatics after the worst mass shooting in modern Canadian history.
Justin Trudeau: “These weapons were designed for one purpose and one purpose only: to kill the largest number of people in the shortest amount of time. There is no use and no place for such weapons in Canada,” Trudeau said on Friday. “Effective immediately, it is no longer permitted to buy, sell, transport, import, or use military-grade assault weapons in this country.”
LikeLike
Anyone who chooses not to vote or votes third party is actually voting for four more years of Trump.
LikeLike
I disagree.
I live in Tennessee. There ain’t no way Biden’s gonna win here. I’m also old, and tire of voting for people that don’t share my values. Biden doesn’t even come close to sharing my values (based upon both his record and his public positions). In fact, Biden is simply a somewhat less extreme Trump. Therefore, I’m freed to vote my conscious. And, if we all could do that, we wouldn’t have trump.
Oh, sure, I’ll be blamed if Trump wins again, but the blaming will be done by people that want to point the finger elsewhere (a Trump tactic). The truth is that the Democratic Party is not serving the People’s needs. Instead of allowing a People’s candidate to have any traction, they make sure a corporate stooge gets the nomination. There needs to be a major change.
LikeLike
That’s why Bernie is keeping his delegates, but aren’t you in danger of “cutting off your nose to spite your face”? I do not understand your opposition to Biden, especially in the face of what a Trump presidency has done to us and will do if he is allowed to win. Whoever is elected president will have a major job helping the country weather and recover from this pandemic. Do you truly believe there is a chance that Trump can do that? I shudder to think what will remain of this country if Trump wins another term.
LikeLike
I agree that Biden is a weak candidate. As someone that cares for the future of this country, I will show up and vote for him as it is my duty to try to protect what is left of our democracy. I saw an interview with AOC this week. She said, ” I will not endorse Biden, but I will vote for him in November.” She also said she didn’t know if Biden could be transformative, but at least, it would stop the bleeding.
LikeLike
I am already seeing the “Never Biden” stuff among my friends. I understand where these people are coming from. Biden was absolutely my last choice among the Democratic candidates. The guy who positions himself as “working class Joe” has long put the interests of the bankers of his home state of Delaware above those of ordinary people, has long carried water for the U.S. healthcare racketeers, behaved appallingly in the Anita Hill hearings, etc.
But the political reality, now, is that a vote against Biden is a vote for Trump. Might as well put a MAGA sign on your front yard.
Most of my “Never Biden” friends are worked up about Tara Reade, so it’s important, I think, that they understand this:
In 2016, Russian intelligence, at the behest of Vladimir Putin, expended enormous resources to get Donald Trump, the moronavirus, elected President of the United States. One of our political parties still has not grasped the singular strangeness and dire significance of this fact.
In 2018, Reade. an American lawyer and former aide to Senator Biden, penned an article in Medium that can only be described as a love letter to Putin. In the article, she says that “everything you learned about Russia” is “wrong”; that “Putin scares the power elite in America because he is a compassionate, caring, visionary leader” “beloved by Russia” and “keeping a calm focus on his own country’s development and future.”
Reade previously claimed that when she worked for Biden, she experienced unwanted sexual harassment. This was evidently intense enough that, at the time, she reported it to her mother and to friends. Now, when Biden is running for president, she has elevated her charge to one of digital rape. And the Medium article has been deleted (though it was available via the Wayback Machine, which archives old web pages; that’s where I found it).
This charge, given Ms. Reade’s astonishing article in Medium, coming at this from a person with such feelings about Putin, who in turn has so strongly promoted Trump, smells to high heaven. To think otherwise seems, to me, astonishingly naive.
Is Vlad at it again? Our intelligence services say, in fact, that he is. I think that these facts raise serious questions about Reade’s allegation.
And we know what Trump is. A second term for this man would be a catastrophe.
LikeLike
I don’t believe Tara Reade. Allegedly Biden grabbed her in a public hallway in the Senate Office Building where they both worked and she his hand under her skirt. Why a public hallway? That’s reckless, and any man who did that must have done it multiple times.
If she had experienced the sexual assault she described, she would have made it public in 1993. She could have made it public on 2008, when Biden was running for Vice President. She could have gone public at the outset of the #MeToo movement when so many other women did. She could have gone public when Biden entered the race for President. She did not.
Men who do what she claimed don’t do it once and then never again. Think Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump.
I don’t know her motivation, but it’s very odd to remain silent until after Biden emerged as the presumptive nominee.
This article has more info about Reade.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And more than a little disturbing that she changed her allegation a year after she posted that love letter to Putin, who has put enormous intelligence resources into getting Trump elected and reelected
LikeLike
Four more years of this moron in office and our democracy may never recover.
LikeLike
Emphatically agree, Diane!
LikeLike
Reade’s newest story doesn’t pass any kind of smell test. She actually has absolutely no corroborating witnesses to the new details she just added about Biden now sexually assaulting her. Her brother did not confirm it but then changed his mind and confirmed it? The supposedly corroborating witnesses have not corroborating anything but her complaining about Biden and/or the other women in the office whom she didn’t like.
What is most problematic is that Reade has a long history of lying about things in order to gain a financial advantage. None of Kavanaugh’s accusers whose accounts were taken seriously had lived lives in which they were constantly caught out lying about things. There may have been some women like that accusing Kavanaugh but their accounts were not taken seriously. Dr. Ford and the classmates at Yale whose accounts were ignored by the media and the Republicans had not had a history of making up facts for financial benefit. Anita Hill did not have a history of grift and lying.
What really made me doubt her story was when I read Tara’s self-serving e-mails to the horse charity she had cheated to get them to pay a personal bill, and then her outrageous threats to them after SHE was the person who had done wrong!
It is very possible that someone who has lived a life of grifting and lied about many things is telling the truth when she offers up her 4th or 5th version of what happened to her. But there comes a time when there has to be a minimal amount of truthfulness in someone’s past to make their account believable.
LikeLike
Another detail in Tara Reade’s story makes no sense.
She says that Senator Biden sexually assaulted her in the basement of the Senate Office Building.
I tried to imagine the scene. Why were they in the basement?
Anyone who has ever visited a Senate Office building and had the privilege of going to the basement knows that it is the busiest part of the building other than the front door. Senators go to the basement to catch an underground trolley that takes them to the U.S. Capitol, where they vote. It is busy, as senators and staff members go back and forth, and has tight security. The thought that Biden would choose such a busy corridor to assault a woman is unimaginable.
LikeLike
In very recent times, we have made enormous strides toward combating everyday sexism. Men of a certain age grew up in a Mad Men world in which behaviors now considered unacceptable were common. Few men of Senator Biden’s age did not have a learning curve there, and it may well be the case that he has not always been sensitive to this, but the charge now being leveled is quite serious and of another degree altogether. The facts that Putin worked against Trump’s previous opponent, she praised Putin effusively, and this story has taken its current form once Biden became the presumptive candidate for the Democratic nomination all give me pause. Of one thing I am certain, and Diane Ravitch has been clear about this, another four years of Donald Trump would be an unmitigated disaster for our country, and Senator Biden is our hope to rid our beloved country of that menace. So, I hesitate even to talk about this and raised it only because of the danger that this charge poses to the removal of Trump from office at the ballot box. Trump is the evil we know. I truly believe that there has never been an election in the U.S. as important as this one is.
LikeLike
Anyone who cares about the future of America needs to vote for the democratic candidate in November. Getting Trump out of office has to happen and then we can start repairing the damage he had caused. I personally believe we need a celebrity publicity blitz (like the buzz for Obama) that supports Biden and gets younger voters out in huge numbers.
LikeLike
There is a lot of hypocrisy among the “I’d rather have Trump than Biden” folks on the left (who are almost always white and therefore in a position of privilege that they don’t acknowledge.)
They dismiss people like Bernie Sanders or Cornell West as lying and untrustworthy when they ignore everything that Bernie is saying and claim that they have superior knowledge and no one should believe Bernie that the most important thing is to defeat Trump.
I think most of them would never have voted for a Democrat even if it were Bernie. Obviously, they only trust Bernie as long as he is a useful tool to excuse their support of Trump, and as soon as Bernie supports something that doesn’t help make sure Trump is re-elected, they suddenly decide Bernie is a doddering old fool who doesn’t know what he is talking about.
LikeLike
An excellent article. My only quibble is that the Idiot is not neo- anything. He’s as old-fashioned a fascist as there has ever been.
LikeLike
Nailed it again, Greg
LikeLike
I never thought that I would live to see an entire political party in the United States get completely behind an insane, fascist puppet and criminal installed in the Presidency by the Russian kleptocratic state. But here we are. It’s all extremely frightening. The stakes in a U.S. election have never been higher. These are dangerous times. Who is this subhuman now in the Whiter House? The answer to that question is clear: he’s the fellow who screamed at his Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security because she would not order people to shoot poor, unarmed refugees at our border. This may all seem like some twisted nightmare of a B-grade horror film, but it’s quite real. The future of democracy and decency are at stake. But as bad as that is, things are actually even worse. The world faces several severe existential crises, including the threat of nuclear war in the age of hypersonic missiles, pandemic disease, growing inequality, the emergence of fascist governments around the globe, severe water shortages, environmental damage so severe as to have destroyed 58 percent of wild vertebrates since 1975, and global warming that is killing our oceans and spreading disease and disrupting food production. Chomsky is right. There is a real possibility that we could not survive this unless we wake the ____ up soon.
LikeLike
There are lots of brilliant people in the world, but Chomsky’s brilliance is of another order altogether. In his other field of linguistics, thousands and thousands of brilliant people were working over the past sixty years or so, but every major revolution that occurred in that field was due to this one man. He writes an article, and the field changes utterly and moves far, far forward. And he’s done this again and again. The only comparable figure I can think of is Pablo Picasso in art, who, like Chomsky, redefined his field completely time and time again, leaving others to work in his vein, to follow the paths he blazed. The word “genius” is overused. Chomsky is the real thing. What he has to say about language and about our political situation bears attending to closely. Unfortunately, many people are so far beneath him in intelligence that they can’t tell the difference between genius and a “stable genius,” which, it seems, is someone with the understanding (and less of the morals) of a barnyard animal.
LikeLike
As an old farmer, I would like to defend the barnyard animal from such an attack.
LikeLike
‘Unfortunately, many people are so far beneath him in intelligence that they can’t tell the difference between genius and a “stable genius,”…’
Whoa, Bob, I am very uncomfortable with your choice of words. I find it difficult to understand the virulent actions of Trump supporters without wondering what could possibly be going through their heads, but somehow I find it difficult to imagine Chomsky making such a comment and not just because it would be incredibly arrogant and elitist.
LikeLike
That is not Chomsky’s comment; it’s mine. My children had gerbils smarter than Trump is. Am I being elitist in saying that? Well, this is the guy who thinks that one might try injecting disinfectant and that the Continental Army took over the airports during the Revolutionary War. I rest my case.
LikeLike
I didn’t mean to imply he did say that. I meant to say he wouldn’t. I know there is a strong anti-intellectual meme, so the phrasing struck me as condescending and likely to support the backlash. You are far from an elitist in the way you absorb information on a myriad of topics whether its source may be “plebeian” or not. I can’t deny that I am similarly frustrated by the continued support for Trump, but even though I am repulsed and angered by the actions like those of the zealots who invaded the Michigan state house, I am far more repulsed and enraged by those who spread the propaganda that draws these people in. Their “intelligence” is hardly in question.
LikeLike
You make good points, speduktr, and I am properly chastised. You reminded me of a story written by a friend of mine back when he was only 17 years old but could already put simple Saxon words together in wondrous ways. It was about a fellow who went off the college to become a scholar, got his doctorate, but could never put out of his mind the friend of his childhood and youth and the object of his adult desire, his long-time companion, whom he had left behind because she hadn’t his brains. In the story, he finally realizes that he needs to become good enough for her and go back and marry her.
LikeLike
I don’t mean to chastize you, Bob. I am sure you could go back through my comments and find a time or two where I judged others much too harshly and probably sounded rather self righteous. I suspect it comes a bit from being the mediator (a middle child) in my own family. My two younger sisters remember me with a hand planted on each of their foreheads as they tried to hit each other. 🙂 I guess I am hoping for a time when we can at least tolerate each other enough to work toward a common purpose whether we agree totally on what that means or how we get there.
LikeLike
Oh Lord, no, speduktr. I totally agree with you. I needed to have someone tell me to watch my language there! LOL. I highly value intelligence, but intelligence is not a monolithic thing. There are literally billions of intelligences, and we all have unique gifts, even the most cognitively challenged of us. I do need to be more careful in my language. In the case of Trump, his low intelligence and his utter amorality and focus only on himself are all tied together in a neat package. He is a lifelife, common thug who happened to be born into money. He reminds me of Gotti, but even Gotti, as despicable as he was, had something like a sense of humor. Trump has none. He’s basically a scared, reactive, nasty little man. Right now, he’s scared to death of what happens to him, legally, if he loses this election, so scared that he is being driven even crazier. He’s cornered and capable of anything.
LikeLike
Stephen “Goebbels” Miller is not what most anyone would call stupid. After all, he writes the important speeches that Trump feebly stumbles over. But he is as despicable a creature as slithers across the earth. Goebbels had a PhD from the University of Heidelberg, with a specialization in Romantic literature.
LikeLike
cx: chastened
LikeLike
speduktr Some of us (people) are highly intelligent but willfully stupid, for many “reasons” that have little to do with our capacity to understand. (sigh . . . .) CBK
LikeLike
But you are right, speduktr. It is far worse to be cruel.
LikeLike
Bob It IS a total turnaround. No one sane can believe it–I thought Trump was a jerk from the get go, years ago and never watched his really-stupid programs; but can remember now wondering why ANYONE would watch that CXXP. . . . America was changing . . . .
But the red flags really went up when he got away with so much during the campaign, hmmmmm . . , and then big-time when we found out who his campaign chairman was, then shortly after that, the Republican platformed changed to favor the Russians. . . . downhill all the way since then. I guess it snuck up on us . . . .? CBK
LikeLike
LikeLike
I agree with Chomsky. The most important thing is to get rid of the malignancy in the White House. Everything else is secondary, even if we are not excited by Biden.
LikeLike
. . . I’m completely happy with “not excited” . . . CBK
LikeLike
Steven Singer posted a picture of an “open up the economy” protestor holding a sing that said, “arbeit mach Frei.” Take out the “neo.” These people are Fascist.
LikeLike
But,TOW, these are “good people!”
LikeLike
Please tell me that this isn’t so, Threatened!!!!
LikeLike
Scratch most “green” initiatives, and you will find feel good marketing and fossil fuels being burned. This is an extremely serious problem that we cannot escape through wishful thinking. Approaching it requires scientific understanding and in-depth analysis of the kind that our media and politicians typically do not do. Journalists must start taking seriously their duty to educate themselves and others, but this is difficult when their employers are a handful of oligarchs making obscene profits off things being as they are.
IF WE ARE TO SURVIVE, then Trump and McConnell and their ignorant, lowlife ilk need to be removed from office, and we need to start taking many matters a lot more seriously than we do: hypersonic nuclear missiles, the effects of agricultural operations on the ongoing sixth extinction, global warming, the breeding of pandemics in confined animal feeding operations, the spread of fascism across the globe, growing and extreme wealth and income inequality, pandemic preparedness, overpopulation, and the water crisis, to name a few. The clock is ticking, folks, and the most powerful and influential country in the world has an entire political party in power that is venal and clueless.
I’m as serious as bowel cancer about all this. This is not a drill. There will be no do-overs.
No election in U.S. history was more important than the one to come.
LikeLike
I agree completely. If this election goes the wrong way, I honestly believe it will be the last in our nation’s history. If the Idiot is “re-” elected, Gleichschaltung will go into overdrive. The best case scenario, in that event, is the fracturing of the nation into constituent regional governments, much like the state alliances that are responding to COVID.
LikeLike
What you said, GregB.
LikeLike
Trump is the enabler. McConnell is the instrument. What will put that “Gleichschaltung . . . into overdrive,” as you know, GregB, is the capturing of the judiciary and the “Justice” Department. What these people can accomplish, given those things, in a second Trump term is ghastly beyond the imaginations of decent people, but it’s time to start imagining that future, that plunge, again, into darkness.
LikeLike
The key issue for the emergence of fascism (I agree with you, Greg, no “neo” about it) is the removal of barriers to or limitations on the use of the state’s monopoly on violence. Since Marbury v. Madison (1803), the ultimate arbiter, here in the U.S., has been the courts. Trump’s politics (morals, interests, you name it) don’t extend beyond Trump. That’s ALL he cares about, and he simply isn’t smart enough to understand the long-term consequences of any action he takes, though he is certainly completely comfortable with one-person, authority rule. He’s a mobster; of course he is. But McConnell and Putin and Miller and Bill Barr ARE all smart enough. They know what they are doing. They are all fascists, and Trump is their useful fool. They understand that if they control the courts and enforcement, that’s all they need.
LikeLike
Bob and GregB: How do you see the place of the military in this , scenario, not generally, but THIS military? CBK
LikeLike
I have acquaintances in the military who are extremely uncomfortable with what’s happening, and so my read, which is not particularly well informed, is mixed. It would certainly take some pretty dramatic missteps on the part of the fascists for members of our military to turn against constituted authority, however constituted. Would we see something as astonishing as those soldiers in Russia climbing out of their tanks and going to stand with the protesters back during the fall of the Soviet Union? It doesn’t seem likely. And our own brownshirts–the MAGA guys with their automatic weapons who are in the streets and in state capital buildings–they may shout “freedom” and “molon labe,” but the fascists know that the moment those idiots stop doing the bidding of the new leaders of the new fascist states of America, they can be squashed like bugs. But with your usual insight, CBK, you raise what could well turn out to be THE key question.
LikeLike
Bob: Concerning the military, and living where I do I know many who are (mostly former students) and have been (retired), I have noticed that the younger and more short-term military tend to be more accepting of the modern conservative agenda. Older military folks who supported Bush II because they felt embarrassed by Clinton also want Trump to quit being an embarrassment, even if they agree with much of the right’s political stance.
LikeLike
CBK, you ask the question that has befuddled me my whole life. I was raised a military brat, but never served and I am married to a military brat whose father was in one of the most sensitive positions in government. One of my best friends has a son at a military academy and I ask him how his son would react to this and that and the answer is always the same: he’ll do as ordered. And I fear that’s the problem, people in the military are not asked to think beyond the bounds of duty. They are conditioned to do, no to question. So I believe martial law will be easier to implement in this nation than anyone realizes.
I recently finished rereading Zola’s Germinal, my favorite book from college. There is a scene when soldiers are summoned to protect the coal mines from striking miners, whose leader is bewildered by how these soldiers with working class roots don’t join the strikers. “How easily the revolution would have triumphed had the army suddenly come over to their side! All it needed was for the working man or peasant in his barracks to remember his origins.” Our military comes from the same origins. Remember what happened in Tiananmen Square. It can happen here.
LikeLike
Greg There is a conflict deep in our hearts between (a) being an American and (b) being associated with an authoritarian order, including the Church and the military, or both and others. IF it comes to it . . . and we know the plausibility of that IF in our present time . . . then the leadership in the military, and/or swelling in the ranks, will be Star 1. CBK
LikeLike
But if this happens, CBK, if Trump is reelected and this consolidation of power occurs, folks like Greg and me and others on this blog won’t long be around to find out. We already have a vast surveillance apparatus in this country. They will know who we are. And that’s another question–where do the career intelligence people stand in this? I suspect that there’s genuine hope there, but again, my knowledge about those matters is extremely limited.
LikeLike
Bob A little history of that “chill” we feel by speaking out . . . even here and on other sites like this one.
I am a long-time lurker on the National Literacy Association site where, when Bush Jr. came into office, those who were assigned to Bush’s office of religious concerns (or some such title) set policy that those sites (like the NLA’s) who were connected with governmental offices in any way could not discuss political matters. That mandate when down on open discussion like an iron hammer–there was nothing one person could do. It was the first time I have ever felt that chill. But I’ll never forget it. CBK
LikeLiked by 1 person
I would love to hear your answer, CBK, to your own question. What’s your take? Would our military leaders get behind a fascist turn in a Trump second term? This is the gravest of questions, and you are right that these people would be key. A James Mattis would never capitulate to such as this. But he is, however different one’s politics might be from his, a thoughtful fellow.
LikeLike
Bob My “take” is that, we know what has happened in the past, what (in a general sense) could happen, what might happen, and even what should happen, but we don’t know what will happen. My hope is that those who, in the moment have the important choices, know the historical import of what they are doing and choose to take the high road in their choosing.
I know some military people, but have seen in some an extreme self-imposed stupidity (Trump supporters, no matter what) and in others a qualified and reflective understanding of their place in history. There is no substitute for step-out good leadership, however, . . . now. CBK
LikeLiked by 1 person
know the historical import of what they are doing
Wow. Yes! In this time, really important history is being made.
LikeLike
Bob,there won’t be a fascist takeover of the US. I have been teaching students in the military for over quarter of a century and, based on conversations with them, it’s clear that they are supposed to follow orders not completely blindly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mate Isn’t the fundamental question whether their orders put them existentially in conflict with their oath to the Service and Constitution? CBK
LikeLike
Catherine, it certainly is the case that a regular soldier may get conflicting orders from their superior officers and the president, and they are supposed to obey both. On the other hand, Lloyd assured us that the officers’ oath doesn’t say that they have to obey the president.
LikeLike
I would hope so, Mate. This accords with my own personal experience of career military people. Very happy to read this.
LikeLike
“So, if you decide you want to vote for the destruction of organized human life on Earth. . . then do it openly. . . . But that’s the meaning of ‘Never Biden.’””
I doubt, Chomsky has ever sounded this passionate. Wow.
LikeLike
He’s clearly very, very worried. So am I.
LikeLike