Archives for category: Pearson

Ever since the debacle of Pineapplegate, it is widely recognized by everyone other than the publishing giant Pearson that its tentacles have grown too long and too aggressive. It is difficult to remember what part of American education has not been invaded by Pearson’s corporate grasp. It receives billions of dollars to test millions of students. Its scores will be used to calculate the value of teachers. It has a deal with the Gates Foundation to store all the student-level data collected at the behest of Race to the Top. It recently purchased Connections Academy, thus giving it a foothold in the online charter industry. And it recently added the GED to its portfolio.

With the U.S. Department of Education now pressing schools to test children in second grade, first grade, kindergarten–and possibly earlier–and with the same agency demanding that schools of education be evaluated by the test scores of the students of their graduates (whew!), the picture grows clear. Pearson will control every aspect of our education system.

Today, we learned from Michael Winerip in the New York Times that Pearson has made a deal with Stanford University to license teachers, no matter what state they are in. The deal is this: the school of education is supposed to send Pearson two 10-minute videos of the prospective teacher, plus the response to a written examination. Someone in the Pearson shop–possibly a retired teacher–will evaluate the prospect and decide after a brief review, whether they should get a license to teach. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/07/education/new-procedure-for-teaching-license-draws-protest.html?_r=2&src=rechp

It seems the teaching candidates at U.-Mass in Amherst say they won’t do it. They prefer to be evaluated by the people who see them teach every day. Their professors prefer to use their judgment about their students, rather than to outsource it to people who will never see their students face-to-face.

This is a hopeful sign. We should never forget that we always have the power to say no. It takes courage. But it can be done. Say no.

We can say no to testing. We can say no to anything that offends our basic values. We can stop the corporatization of public education. We can stop the outsourcing of responsibility from public institutions to Pearson and other providers.

Many years ago, I interviewed a famous at MIT about the role of standardized tests in education. He said something I never forgot. He said, “Let me write a nation’s tests, and I care not who writes its songs or laws.”

Are we prepared to hand over our children, our teachers, and our definition of knowledge to Pearson?

Teachers and principals discovered yet another error on one of New York state’s mandated tests. This one was on the fifth-grade math test and it required students to know mathematical processes that are not taught in fifth grade. See here:

http://www.nytimes.com/schoolbook/2012/05/02/state-officials-throw-out-another-pearson-test-question/

Merryl H. Tisch, the chancellor of the New York Board of Regents said that she takes “full responsibility,” and that she  hopes Pearson too will take responsibility. Commissioner John King apparently was not reached for a comment, but he earlier deflected any responsibility for errors on the state tests.

So if those at the top are indeed responsible, will heads roll? Will anyone at Pearson or SED be held accountable? Apparently not. After all, when the State Education Department made an even bigger error and lowered the passing mark on state tests for several years (which SED admitted in 2010), no one took responsibility and no one was held accountable.

To paraphrase the very wealthy Leona Helmsley, who once said that “Taxes are for the little people,” when it comes to state testing snafus, “Accountability is for the little people.” If the scores are flat, teachers may lose their jobs. But no one at SED or Pearson will lose his or her job for what they are doing to a generation of children.

Diane

A reader said it would be expensive to release all test items as the test publishers would have to spend lots more money creating new ones.

Actually there is another way to think about all this. Release all the items as a public bank of thousands of items. Each year’s tests can be reviewed and howlers would be omitted from future use. No student could possibly take or memorize every item. The bank of tens of thousands of items would make good fodder for test prep.

Let’s face it. The items are recycled now. It is a time-honored practice in NY state for teachers of Regents exams to use old versions of the Regents. Sometimes the old questions appear again–either in exactly the same form or so slightly modified that it doesn’t matter.

Why did Pearson charge NY $32 million for a lot of items that had been pulled out of its old testing bank, recycled from other states. The Pineapple story had been used and ridiculed in other states but Pearson didn’t retire it. Now they have pineapple juice on their corporate face. Why did Pearson charge Florida $250 million for a test that students took in two shifts, with no change in the items? Now Pearson will up their fee to pay themselves for test security.

At some point, the public will see all this as a great farce that takes money away from instruction and plows it into redundant and error-prone testing.

Diane