Heather Cox Richardson gives us some hopeful signs and auguries in her latest column. She is so very good at synthesizing the events that matter. No wonder she has 2.6 million subscribers. Wow!
She writes:
Today U.S. District Judge Steven Merryday threw out the $15 billion lawsuit President Donald J. Trump filed on September 15 against the New York Times for defamation. The judge, who was appointed by President George H.W. Bush, called the complaint “decidedly improper and impermissible” and took Trump’s lawyers to task for using a legal complaint as a public forum for abusive language.
Noting that the two defamation counts followed eighty pages of praise for Trump and allegations against the “hopelessly compromised and tarnished ‘Gray Lady,'”—an old nickname for the New York Times—he set a forty-page limit on any amended complaint.
The administration’s pressure on ABC to fire comedian Jimmy Kimmel is very unpopular, as G. Elliott Morris of Strength in Numbers notes, with people polled by YouGov on September 18 seeing it as an attack on free speech.
That unpopularity showed today when podcaster and senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) celebrated Kimmel’s firing but called the threat of Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr to retaliate against ABC “unbelievably dangerous.” Cruz called Carr’s threats “right out of a mafioso coming into a bar going, ‘nice bar you have here. It’d be a shame if something happened to it.’”
He explained: “I think it is unbelievably dangerous for government to put itself in the position of saying, ‘We’re going to decide what speech we like and what we don’t, and we’re going to threaten to take you off air if we don’t like what you’re saying.’”
Democratic political strategist Simon Rosenberg noted that three new polls out this week show Trump’s approval rating dropping and commented that voters don’t like “[t]his dictator sh*t.” AP-NORC observed that Republicans are growing pessimistic about the direction of the country. While the share of all American adults who say the country is off track has increased 13 percentage points since June, from 62% to 75%, the biggest change has been among Republicans. In June, 29% of Republicans were concerned about the direction of the country; now that number is 51%.
Most American adults think Trump has gone too far with his tariffs, his use of presidential power, and sending troops into U.S. cities.
Democratic lawmakers this week have reflected the growing opposition to Trump and his administration. Today in The Contrarian, Illinois governor J.B. Pritzker wrote that Trump’s attacks on Chicago aren’t really about stopping crime. Instead, Trump is creating chaos and destabilizing the country in order to erode our democratic institutions and cement his power.
Pritzker warned that Trump “has become increasingly brazen and deranged in his rhetoric and his actions” and that the things he “is doing and saying are un-American.” In contrast, Pritzker held up as a model “our collective Midwestern values of hard work, kindness, honesty and caring for our neighbors,” and urged people to “be loud—for America.”
Yesterday Senator Adam Schiff (D-CA) spoke at the Center for American Progress. He, too, outlined the administration’s attacks on the rule of law and blamed “billionaires padding their stock portfolios and buying up politicians,” “self-interested CEOs cynically dialing up the outrage and disinformation on their social media platforms,” and “politicians who saw more value in stoking grievance than solving problems” for creating the conditions that ushered Trump into the presidency.
Schiff called for restoring American democracy through legislation, litigation, and mobilization. He noted that Democrats have just introduced a package of reforms to put into law the norms Trump has violated. Democrats have also introduced a constitutional amendment to overturn the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission decision permitting unlimited corporate money to flow into elections. While this legislation almost certainly won’t pass in a Republican-dominated Congress, he noted, it would force a debate.
He also noted that Democrats are conducting oversight, demanding accountability for wrongdoing and attacks on the rule of law, and are creating a record. Their victories, he noted, have been “modest,” but they have, for example, managed to force the administration to rehire employees at the National Weather Service and succeeded in preserving U.S. Department of Agriculture field offices in California.
Litigation has been more successful, Schiff said. Since January, plaintiffs have brought more than 400 suits against the administration, and courts have halted the administration’s policies in more than 100 of them. Wrongly fired civil servants have been reinstated, funding has been restored to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, deportation flights have been grounded, Trump’s tariffs have been struck down.
“Ultimately, though,” Schiff said, “the most powerful check on Trump’s authoritarianism is not Congress. It is not the courts. It is the American people.”
And that was the rallying cry of Representative Jason Crow (D-CO) in Congress yesterday.
Crow, who entered Congress in 2019, is a former Army Ranger who completed three tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan. He was with the 82nd Airborne Division and the 75th Ranger Regiment.
In his speech, Crow warned that Trump is tearing down the walls of our democracy and called out “some of our most elite and powerful individuals and institutions” for “failing to defend our democracy.” He noted that “[s]ome of our nation’s most powerful law firms have bent the knee. Some of our finest universities are buckling. Some of the most powerful CEOs have capitulated. And some of the largest media companies are simply surrendering.”
“If those with power and influence want to sell off our rights and freedoms to enrich themselves, then Americans should make it clear that cowardice and greed will fail them,” he said.
“We will not shop at your stores. We will not tune into your TV and radio stations. We will not send our kids and our money to your universities, or use your services if you are going to enable our slide to authoritarianism.”
Crow contrasted those elite failures with “the courage we’ve seen from everyday citizens”:
Coach Youman Wilder, who stood up to ICE agents when they started interrogating kids on a baseball diamond in Harlem. A schoolteacher in Twisp, Washington, who joins protests against cuts to Medicaid and SNAP every Saturday because, she says, “Democracy only works if we work it.” Massive demonstrations across the nation in April. Parents in Washington, D.C., patrolling schoolyards to protect the rights of students and other parents as ICE agents are raiding and the National Guard is on the streets. Journalists around the country “reporting the truth, despite threats to them and their family.”
“There is courage everywhere we look,” Crow said. “We have not yet lost our power.
“He continued: “Now is the time…for us to stand with all those defending democracy.
“Defending free speech.
“Defending freedom of religion.
“Defending due process.
“Defending the rule of law.
“Defending the right of schoolchildren to learn without fear of being shot.
“Defending government of the people, by the people, and for the people.”
“As a young paratrooper, leading an infantry platoon in the invasion of Iraq,” he said, he was responsible for young men: “Black, White, Asian, Hispanic. From the North, from the South, East, and West. From farms and from cities. Rich and poor.
“When I think of America, I still think of those young paratroopers. How we came together, despite our differences, we served together, we fought together, we found great strength in one another.
“That is America.”
“There’s a tradition in the paratroopers,” he said, “that the leader of the unit jumps out of the plane first and then the others follow.”
He concluded: “I’m ready to jump.”
To read the footnotes, open the link. You may have to subscribe. Help her reach three million subscribers.
—

If nothing else, this corrupt administration has shined a light on the flaws in our democracy. I hope it also encourages government leadership to reconsider public-private partnerships that do little for the people except to hand the public the bill while the ultra-rich walked off with a boatload of public cash. The result of the collaboration generally results in the public paying more for a worse service. We the people have subsidized the super rich including Elon Musk, oil and gas, privatized education and the entire drug industry, but have no direct benefit to show for the alliance. Corporations tend to be “fair weather friends” that will always flock to whatever improves their bottom line regardless of ideology. Protecting The Constitution is not their priority.
LikeLiked by 2 people
*That’s* what I’ve been looking for — sufficient T voters to say, “Alright, that’s it. Enough!”
My suggestion: welcome them with open arms, not, “Hey, this is what you voted for.” Talk about what they don’t like about recent T policies & actions, points you agree on. Leave other issues for another day.
LikeLiked by 2 people
NOTHING, but the US Supreme Court standing up to Trump, might stop him. Even that isn’t a guarantee.
Trump does not care what other people think as long as they are paying attention to him. Still, he doesn’t like to be criticized, which is why Trump came out and publicly said critical coverage of him is “Really Illegal.”
Trump Says It’s ‘Illegal’ For TV Networks To Consistently Criticize Him. SOURCE: Agence France Presse
I only looked at the first page of the Google search on this issue.
The New York Times, ABC, and two major foreign news media sites were the only ones on that first search page reporting this. I don’t count Yahoo as a major news site.
LikeLike
Google!!? Try looking on Duck Duck Go.
LikeLike
Watching TV news, I saw several accounts of Trump saying that it should be illegal to have so much criticism of him on late night, that networks that criticize him should lose their license.
I saw one of the late night comics say that their shows always make fun of whoever is president. Really, he said, should I make fun of Chester A. Arthur?
LikeLike
I am of the opinion that we have reached the point at which the loyalty of much of law enforcement had decided to ignore their oath to the constitution. This situation will not pass without some strong action.
LikeLike
The loyalty of much of the police force in the country to the constitution has been compromised, I meant to say, by trump’s hiring of a multitude of ICE sgants who are obviously protecting themselves with anonymity. This is problematic in a big way.
LikeLike
I keep seeing videos of masked ICE agents beating up people, esp women. Throwing them to the ground. Like Gestapo.
LikeLike
Women and teenagers. Manhandling children and babies.
These are thugs. Trump’s brownshirts.
LikeLike
share & repost those videos everywhere
LikeLike
I share Heather Cox Richardson’s antipathy toward Donald Trump, but she lied about who killed Charlie Kirk. At first her mistake was a result of her extreme partisanship, the preconceived idea that the killer just had to be a right-wing type. She jumped the gun, as so many people do after violent crimes are committed, making speculations long before the facts are in.
If she had had the integrity to admit her mistake and publicly correct it, then she could have been shown some grace. But admitting that mistake would also have been to admit that her first posting was grounded in extreme partisanship, what her ideology led her to falsely believe – a grave sin for someone who purports to be a genuine historian. So she continued misleading her readers by saying – the day after strong evidence showed otherwise – that the killer’s motive “remains unclear.” At that point HCR’s original posting went from being a mistake to being a deliberate lie – she knew her claim was false.
The link below is behind a paywall, but it explains this topic in admirable depth. The two best quotes from that essay:
“But with the rise of Substack and Bluesky, Left-wing partisans have more tools than ever to isolate themselves in like-minded informational bubbles. This means that the same forces that have turned many Right-wing institutions into obsequious Trumpist organs over the last decade are now working their evil magic on the Left.”
“Richardson has seen the most success among the lot by combining her legitimate credentials and level-headed language with a post-truth appreciation for catharsis over factuality.”
In other words, she tells her left-wing readers exactly what they want to hear. No wonder she has 2.6 million subscribers.
https://unherd.com/2025/09/info-anarchy-comes-for-the-left/
LikeLike
Matt,
Heather can answer for herself. I can’t.
If you are a regular reader of this blog, you know that I did not speculate about who killed Charlie or what his motives were. I did tweet that it must been a professional hit because of the astounding accuracy of a single shot that hit the jugular. But Tyler Robinson was a 22-year-old with an old high-powered rifle, not a professional. I never speculated and still haven’t, about why he did it. I don’t know. What he did was a horrendous crime, and he will be held accountable.
This is what I wrote:
https://share.google/vr89wQp0rlIFFzV2w
LikeLike