Jeff Bezos may have neutered the editorial pages of The Washington Post but he has not silenced the news reporting. Here is a terrifying example. Their communications strategy is to focus relentlessly on Trump as a “king,” a man of supernatural power. This is a gift article so you should be able to open the link and see the illustrations.
Drew Harrell and Sarah Ellison wrote:
When actress Selena Gomez posted an Instagram video in January in which she cried about the Trump administration’s deportations of children, the viral clip threatened to stoke nationwide unease over the policy’s human impact.
But the White House digital strategy team had a plan. They dispatched videographers to interview the mothers of children killed by undocumented immigrants. They put President Donald Trump’s face on a Valentine’s Day card reading: “Roses are red, violets are blue, come here illegally and we’ll deport you.”
And they mimicked a style of video popular for its meditative soundscapes, known as ASMR, with a presentation that featured the rattling handcuff chains of a deportation flight. Gomez deleted her video shortly after posting, without specifying why. The Trump team’s video has been viewed more than 100 million times.
The effort was part of a new administration strategy to transform the traditional White House press shop into a rapid-response influencer operation, disseminating messages directly to Americans through the memes, TikToks and podcasts where millions now get their news.
After years of working to undermine mainstream outlets and neutralize critical reporting, Trump’s allies are now pushing a parallel information universe of social media feeds and right-wing firebrands to sell the country on his expansionist approach to presidential power.
For the Trump team, that has involved aggressively confronting critics like Gomez, not just to “reframe the narrative” but to drown them out, said Kaelan Dorr, a deputy assistant to the president who runs the digital team.
“We thought it was necessary to provide pushback in the harshest, most forceful way possible,” he said. “And through that, we had a viral hit on our hands.”
Stephen K. Bannon, a senior White House aide during Trump’s first term and the host of the “War Room” podcast, said the White House has reimagined itself as a “major information content provider.” What Trump does “is the action, and we just happen to be one of the distributors,” he said.
“Rapid-response communications are normally defensive,” he said. “They’re all offense, all the time.”
The White House’s rapid-response account posted 207 times to X on Tuesday, the day of Trump’s speech to a joint session of Congress, or nearly nine posts an hour, including Trump sound bites, supporter interviews and Democrat-slamming memes and attack lines. When a Fox News analyst called Trump “the political colossus of our time,” the team got the clip cut, captioned and posted online within 11 minutes.
In press rooms, the administration is welcoming friendly “new media” podcasters, X users and YouTubers to deliver what White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt calls “news-related content” to their millions of followers.
And on social media, the White House is firing off talking points across every platform in a bid to win online attention and reach viewers who have tuned out the traditional press. In an X post, communications director Steven Cheung described their goal: “FULL SPECTRUM DOMINANCE.”
The administration has produced news-style reports trumpeting Trump’s successes and put them in email newsletters and Leavitt-narrated “MAGA Minute” video segments; soon, they’ll be delivered via text.
The team has worked to humanize the president with picturesque postcards of a White House snowfall and behind-the-scenes videos from the Oval Office — where a New York Post showing the president’s mug shot hangs framed just outside the door. But the digital team has also gone for shock factor, posting a photo of chained men shuffling onto a transport jet (“Deportation Flights Have Begun”) and a portrait of Trump with a golden crown (“LONG LIVE THE KING”).
The president has appointed influential social media figures across the federal government — like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Kash Patel — who amplify his messages with their own marketing pushes. Trump has also fired off attention-getting posts of his own, including an AI-generated videotransforming the war-torn Gaza Strip into a gilded Trump beach resort, in line with his call to forcibly remove millions of people from Palestinian land.
The administration’s brash campaign-style tactics are designed to stand out on a crowded internet and speak to voters that officials believe are hungry for aggressive action.
“Even the tagline we’ve been using — ‘America is back’ — is very much saying: ‘We’re here. We’re in your face.’ It’s irreverent. It’s unapologetic,” Dorr, 32, said. (A veteran of both Trump campaigns, Dorr also worked as a “head of engagement” at Gettr, the right-wing social network run by Jason Miller.)
The posts have shocked and repulsed the left, leading Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats to say on X: “To find joy and entertainment in this is truly vile.” But the Trump team has been emboldened to go even further by the millions who have watched, shared and followed the accounts since Trump’s inauguration. Half of the White House’s Instagram views have come from non-followers, Dorr said, a sign that the team’s messages are gaining traction beyond Trump’s base.
White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said in a statement that the approach is built to reach audiences without the media’s help and to broadcast Trump’s “America First message far and wide.”
But this model of messaging could supercharge the presidential bully pulpit until it shifts Americans’ perception of events, according to experts who study propaganda and the press. Like Trump’s moves to shore up loyalty in Congress and remake the judiciary, the strategy is designed to weaken his opponents and dismantle checks against executive power.
Undermining the accountability mission of the Fourth Estate and building a viral pipeline of state media helps the administration — and future ones — stifle dissent, said Anya Schiffrin, a senior lecturer at Columbia University’s School for International and Public Affairs.
And by replacing dispassionate observers with partisan cheerleaders, political leaders are elevating a class of messengers incentivized to defend their decisions, no matter the seriousness or scale. Every policy maneuver could turn into a meme.
Said Renee Hobbs, a communications professor at the University of Rhode Island: “It’s an effort to replace the mainstream press with a partisan press” that will function as the new “purveyors of reality.”
‘Going to be great television’
Though members of the digital team serve on the front lines of what the White House calls the “most transparent administration” in history, Trump officials requested that their identities remain anonymous, citing personnel policy and concern over public backlash.
The team is made up of roughly a dozen employees — people mostly in their 20s and 30s from outside politics — who work out of the White House and are given wide leeway to craft content. By removing layers of bureaucracy before publishing, the team avoids the “analysis paralysis” of other messaging shops, Dorr said.
And members are expected to move at internet speed. When a federal judge declined to block the White House from banning the Associated Press from certain news events, the team raced to declare “VICTORY” in graphics that members slapped across White House TVs and social accounts.
They “have the buy-in from the [Trump] team to go out there and be unapologetic in our pursuit of advancing the administration’s goals,” Dorr said, “with the ferocity and the quickness and the pointedness” the White House demands.
For its rapid-response account, the White House employs video producers and editors, known as clippers, to create and post short videos on the fly. The role was first popularized by political activists looking to highlight opponents’ gaffes on the campaign trail, but Trump’s clippers often promote his moments, hoping to make them go viral in real time.
On Friday, within minutes of Trump and Vice President JD Vance’s fiery confrontation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, the White House accounts blasted out video of major punch lines, meme-ready photos and images of the American flag. “This is going to be great television,” Trump said as reporters filed out of the Oval Office.
The approach seems to be resonating online: Trump’s first Cabinet meeting, which was live-streamed and featured billionaire Trump ally Elon Musk, has more than 6 million views on X. “Trump is literally overwhelming them with information” in a way that is “changing the nature of the presidency,” Bannon said. “How many young men under 30 years old would ever watch two seconds of a Cabinet meeting?”
That fast-twitch model has spread beyond the White House, including to the Defense Department, which this month launched a rapid-response account to praise Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, grapple with senators and declare that “REAL journalism is dead.” But it has also helped seed major advertising campaigns to reach viewers beyond the web.
Kristi L. Noem, head of the Department of Homeland Security, has posted videos of herself in a flak jacket at the southern border and on immigration raids, including one on Tuesday at an apartment complex in Northern Virginia.
Footage from the raids is used in an international TV and digital ad blitz that warns undocumented immigrants to leave the country or be hunted down. At the Conservative Political Action Conference, Noem said the ads had a budget of up to $200 million and had been personally requested by Trump.
“We’re not going to let the media tell this story,” Noem recalled Trump saying, as was first reported by Rolling Stone. “We’re going to run a marketing campaign to make sure the American people know the truth.”
‘Desecrate their idols’
As the administration has expanded its marketing arm, it has also worked to uproot the classic structure of the White House press corps. In her first briefing, Leavitt called on “podcasters, social media influencers and content creators” to apply for credentialed access to a briefing room long filled by legacy news outlets. More than 12,000 have since applied, according to the White House, and several have been ushered to exclusive new-media seats near the podium.
Administration officials have said the change reflects a fundamental shift in American culture, as journalists compete for relevance with a new generation of influencers who speak to audiences of millions online.
But virtually all of the new-media creators have come from right-wing outlets friendly to the Trump cause. The Breitbart writer Matt Boyle asked whether the White House would continue its “breakneck” pace. (Yes, Leavitt said.) The pro-Trump podcaster John Ashbrook asked whether the media was “out of touch” about the border. (Yes, Leavitt said.) And John Stoll, the head of news at Musk’s X, asked about the White House’s “confidence” in going “toe-to-toe with Vladimir Putin.” (Very confident, national security adviser Michael Waltz said.)
“The Trump White House is loyal, and they are loyal to people who stood with them,” podcaster Dan Bongino said while toasting Rumble chief Chris Pavlovski’s moment in the new-media spotlight. (Days later, Bongino was named deputy director of the FBI.)
Some of the new-media figures have eagerly promoted Trump’s domestic agenda. A few hours after podcaster Sage Steele asked about the importance of passing a law to ban transgender women and girls from women’s sports, she stood behind Trump as he signed an executive order on the same issue.
Other Trump-boosting creators have joined the administration outright, like the “Dear America” podcast host Graham Allen, newly hired as the Defense Department’s digital media director. Brenden Dilley, a pro-Trump meme maker, said of the news, “There’s going to be nobody left doing podcasts soon because the top people are all going to work for the government.”
Friendliness between the White House and its messengers of choice is nothing new, including during the first Trump term, when right-wing provocateurs like Mike Cernovich and blogs like Gateway Pundit held credentials alongside the legacy press.
But back then, the traditional press corps set the tone, Bannon said. The softer questions during Trump’s recent Cabinet meeting, he said, made the first term’s briefings look like “hand-to-hand combat.”
Today “the powerful media is the ecosystem of the right,” Bannon said, “while the mainstream media [is] suffering layoffs.”
The right-wing media figures embraced by the Trump administration have often returned the favor. After the banning of the AP, Brian Glenn — a correspondent for the pro-Trump media network Real America’s Voice and the boyfriend of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia) — was given the rare opportunity to question Trump in the Oval Office. A few days later, he posted a selfie with Trump on X that read: “So much accomplished, and we’re still under a month in office.”
For those working closely with Trump’s public-relations infrastructure, the first weeks have marked a huge opportunity for exclusive content. Benny Johnson, a Tampa-based MAGA influencer who calls himself the “Front Seat to the Golden Era,” got to interview Vance last month, then headed to the Capitol, where he live-streamed a friendly chat with two Republican senators before they voted to confirm Patel as FBI director.
“First time in history we’ll have the stream going from the senator’s office. This is amazing,” Johnson said on stream.
The night before, Johnson had posted a video of himself stopping to rejoice outside the shuttered offices of the U.S. Agency for International Development, once the world’s largest provider of food aid. “Destroy the idols of the conquered church, right?” he said with a laugh. “Desecrate their idols. Look at this. There it is. Blacked out. It’s gone.”
Cat Zakrzewski and Michael Scherer contributed to this report.

Meet the new Goebels, same as the old Goebels.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We haven’t had to deal with an impotentate as demented as this since George III — and at least he really was a King so he had an excuse for delusions grandeur — but what the devil is #Felon47’s excuse?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Felon45 thinks he is a king and that’s enough for his enablers.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good to see Sarah’s name here, she is an old friend of mine and an excellent reporter. As is her husband.
LikeLike
Unlike the traditional media Trump’s army of social media posters have no fact checkers or editors to impose any limits of what is distributed to the public. They can embellish, distort and outright lie about anything and get the content widely distributed to the gullible public.
I wonder what Marshall McLuhan, author of “The Medium is the Message,” would make of how our easy access to technology can quickly spread disinformation and enhance brain washing. What is the democrats’ response to this potential propaganda machine, a video of Chuck Schumer saying,”Vote for us. At least we’re not Trump.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
This, quite obviously in my mind, is the “media” problem that we face.
LikeLiked by 1 person
retired teacher,
You are absolutely correct about Trump’s army of social media posters that can embellish, distort and outright lie and the content widely distributed to the gullible public.
The Republicans have always had that army. But that army wields very limited power if their false narratives don’t get a huge stamp of credibility from the so-called liberal media. That’s why Obama won twice and Biden won in 2020, despite just as large of an army posting negative content on right wing media. “His birth certificate”, Jeremiah Wright, “they cling to their guns and religion”, “Hunter Biden/Ukraine” were all one or two day stories and completely disappeared from the narrative in the NYT. The right wing mediasphere was still talking about them non-stop, but the mainstream media deemed them “not newsworthy” and they ceased to have any power to undermine the Democrat with the voters who decide elections. There is a direct correlation between how much credibility a right wing narrative is given in the NYT as a “very concerning issue that we will remind you about in every single news story about the candidate for the next 3 months” and whether voters believe it as “a very concerning issue that raises serious questions about how trustworthy the Democrat is”. None of that right wing propaganda works if the NYT doesn’t amplify and give credibility to the narrative that the Democrat isn’t trustworthy.
Trump needs Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan and the rest of the “see no evil when it comes to Trump but I will be delighted to write 500 stories about the untrustworthy Dems” NYT journalist/stenographers to give legitimacy to whatever right wing narrative helps empower them. I just watched a recent clip from a C-Span press conference where Karoline Leavitt gave Maggie a very special smile as she called on her. Trump and his minions adore her, notwithstanding the laughable professional wrestling-level mock fights they act out where Trump feigns anger at Maggie for some story that is mildly negative but still reinforces the false narrative that Trump’s (and Musk’s) motives are always purely about making government better and rooting out fraud and waste. That is why Maggie Haberman still gets a prime seat at press conferences while other reporters got thrown out. Trump needs her – and the NYT – to give credibility to the most absurd, non-credible narratives. As long as she does – and it’s going on 9 years now – she will be right there.
There has been a lot of excellent scholarly work by media critics who carefully track reporting instead of offering up their “feelings” (like “the NYT is just so anti-Trump”). Back in the Reagan era, Mark Hertsgaard wrote “On Bended Knee: The Press and the Reagan Presidency”. The description: “He shows how the press, both through government manipulation and through voluntary self-censorship, abdicated its responsibility to report what was really going on in the Reagan Administration.” Sound familiar?
It wasn’t the right wing media – it was the liberal media – that destroyed Dukakis and Gore and Kerry and “she who may not be named”. Amplifying over and over again in every single story about them the right wing narratives that all supported a single message — the Democrat can’t be trusted. When the liberal media refrained from amplifying right wing narratives – as they did with Bill Clinton and Obama and Biden in 2020- it didn’t matter that the right wing media was still repeating those lies every day. The voters who mattered — swing voters and those on the left — weren’t influenced the same way.
Not many people read the NYT. But the NYT sets the tone for other journalists, the way alpha kids at a middle school do, as to what is “important” and “acceptable”. For educators, think of it like bullying. If the alpha kid/kids in any given grade are kind, happy, and self-confident and they don’t condone bullying, the entire grade is affected, even if 90% of the students aren’t friends with the alpha kids. There will still be bullies, but they are marginalized and looked down upon by the other kids, and they have little power. But if the alpha kid/kids in a different grade in that very same school are mean kids, who enjoy tormenting certain other kids because they know they can and will get away with it, it sets a tone where that behavior is what the cool kids do. So other kids do it too. Mainstream media doesn’t care what some far right news site is reporting on. But if the NYT decides that a right wing narrative is of such vital importance to the voter that it deserves multiple daily stories for months, then the rest of the mainstream media goes along and presents that issue as being of very grave concern: her emails, her corruption, his pathological lying, his looking like a fool in a tank, the Afghanistan withdrawal a fiasco of incompetence never before seen in history, Iraq has nuclear weapons.
When the NYT deems an issue is NOT important to voters – Jeremiah Wright, cling to their guns and religion, fake birth certificate, he smoked marijuana and dodged the draft and cheated on his wife, he conned Americans into giving him money for a fake university, he fomented an insurrection, he lies to the American people and can’t be trusted – then the rest of the media goes along.
In 2024, the NYT made the narrative “Biden is far too cognitively impaired to be president” into an accepted truth, by flooding the zone where hundreds of stories have the same narrative – it seemed to be forbidden to write a story about Biden that did not refer to his severe cognitive impairment and the grave concerns that the public had about that. Peter Baker wrote a single story in September about Trump’s cognitive impairments and the issue was then pronounced “not newsworthy” and left out of the narrative. Intentionally. It was no accident that the NYT news story about Trump’s utterly bonkers appearance before Moms for Liberty presented Trump as a candidate with strong opinions that people may or may not agree with, and left out everything that would have supported the narrative the NYT deemed not newsworthy: the narrative that Trump is cognitive impaired. It’s not often that the extreme double standard of the NYT is so evident in the same campaign season!
If you read the NYT reporting of Trump’s appearance with the Irish Prime Minister that Jeff Tiedrich makes fun of in a later post of Diane’s, you will see there is no mention of any of Trump’s madness! The alpha kids have still declared that is not a newsworthy narrative and the mainstream media follows.
It’s sad because the NYT has so much power to influence public opinion even though most people don’t read it. They just have to cover Trump the way they covered Biden during the Afghanistan withdrawal and covered Biden’s failing” cognition. But they won’t, even when NOT doing so results in the ridiculously misleading reporting they did on Trump’s appearance with the Irish PM. Minimizing or simply ignoring anything that supports the narrative that Trump is cognitively unfit to be president and amplifying whatever fits the narrative that the NYT believes is proof of their very anti-Trump stance: “Trump is very uncouth and he has very strong opinions that some people disagree with but that’s because Trump means what he says and he will do what he promised the voters even when some people don’t like it.”
That is totally false. Trump is a con man who can’t be trusted but to the NYT, he is an uncouth guy who keeps his promises (because Trump says he does), and stories that undermine that narrative are rare, and if they do appear, it is one and done.
It would be better if the NYT just pulled a Jeff Bezos and declared their alliance with Trump and the Republicans. Because having the supposed liberal newspaper of record pushing the narrative that the Democrats are always untrustworthy and don’t care about anyone but elites, while the Republicans can be trusted to keep their word because they care about regular people, is very, very dangerous. Labeling anything that doesn’t fit with those two narratives as “opinion” – and including “opinions” that criticize Trump – is like getting a band aid from the guy who intentionally ran you over. And we live in a time when too many Democrats excuse the guy who intentionally ran you over by shouting that he is obviously on your side because he handed you a band aid.
The NYT has so much influence and if they wanted, could easily turn around to do a great service for democracy. But even after 50+ days of the most neofascist Trump actions, the NYT still covers Trump and the Irish PM by reinforcing the narratives that have infected our country – that Trump is uncouth but his actions that some Dems don’t like are always in service to making our country great. And the rest of the liberal media follows the cool kids.
Luckily, there are still folks like Marcy Wheeler, Jeff Tiedrich, and many others who report the reality. But their influence is limited when the liberal newspaper of record is amplifying the opposite narrative. The best hope for this country is for the NYT to be perceived as the WSJ is perceived – a newspaper that sometimes writes good stories but that is mostly a voice for the right wing narrative.
LikeLike
Trump is the king of lies, misinformation, chaos, confusion, Putinism, plain old-fashioned stupidity and alienating our allies which is dumb and stupid.
LikeLike
“After years of working to undermine mainstream outlets and neutralize critical reporting, Trump’s allies are now pushing a parallel information universe of social media feeds and right-wing firebrands to sell the country on his expansionist approach to presidential power.”
They are covering all the bases, guys–in his DOJ speech, Trump called out by name one of the writers from “The Contrarian” (the writers who left the Post) and the guy who was center-front in the court last week for getting all those government workers’ jobs back (I won’t name him here on purpose, or maybe it wouldn’t hurt.)
It looks to me like what has been the REAL Deep State all along is coming out of its rabbit hole and dragging everything Alice-in-Wonderland along with it. Hey look! It’s an endless train of dumpster fires!
I guess the real question is: Will the bulk of the American people, and mostly those who claim MAGA, continue to let themselves be scammed by a bunch of starry-eyed misguided young folks who know how to write code.
I guess Make American Great Again, really means Make American Fascist Again? Oh, wait–it wasn’t fascist in the first place. Boing! Boing! Boing! CBK
LikeLike
Correction, rewrite: I guess the real question is: Will the bulk of the American people, and mostly those who claim MAGA, continue to let themselves be scammed by a bunch of starry-eyed misguided young folks who know how to write code . . . and who have dropped their moral pants in the gutter they are playing in, you know, the one’s that their parents and teachers left to them awhile back.
My advice to them–you have a wonderful tool, now try to do something good with it instead of following the nasty whims of a bunch of lost-to-humanity psychopaths. CBK
LikeLike
BTW, I didn’t open the Post article because they collect data from readers. CBK
LikeLike
They wanted an email address to be able to read. No go for me.
LikeLike
I can’t help but believe there wll be a backlash. Trumpism will fall of its own hubris.
LikeLike
Agree. We have never experienced such wanton destruction of our govt
LikeLike
Never underestimate the ability of the resistance to form a circular firing squad, though. Chuck Schumer is now being called a Nazi collaborator.
LikeLike
They wanted an email address to read. I don’t do that!
LikeLike