The speed with which Trump embraced the Russian view of its war on Ukraine is head-spinning. Trump said that Ukraine started the war, even though the world saw that Russia invaded Ukraine and that Russia has destroyed Ukrainian hospitals, schools, apartment houses, cultural sites, its power grid, and other non-military targets for three years. Even now, American and Russian delegations are meeting in Saudi Arabia to discuss how the war should end. Neither Ukraine nor Europe was invited.
Meanwhile, Trump lobs insults at Zelensky, calling him “grossly incompetent” and insisting that Ukraine must hold an election before peace can be reached. Zelensky was elected in 2019 with 73% of the vote while Putin had another fraudulent “election” after disposing of any other candidates. Yet today, Trump lashed out at Zelensky and called him “a dictator without elections.” Trump’s insults mirrored Russian propaganda.
After three years of international isolation, Putin has been rehabilitated by Trump and treated as the leader of a major power.
What has become clear is that Trump is hostile to our European allies and is excited to move the United States into an alliance with Putin, with Putin as the senior partner. It’s a shocking turn of events.
Heather Cox Richardson wrote about recent events:
The sixty-first Munich Security Conference, the world’s leading forum for talking about international security policy, took place from February 14 to February 16 this year. Begun in 1963, it was designed to be an independent venue for experts and policymakers to discuss the most pressing security issues around the globe.
At the conference on Friday, February 14, Vice President J.D. Vance launched what The Guardian’s Patrick Wintour called “a brutal ideological assault” against Europe, attacking the values the United States used to share with Europe but which Vance and the other members of the Trump administration are now working to destroy.
Vance and MAGA Christian nationalists reject the principles of secular democracy and instead align with leaders like Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orbán. They claim that the equal rights central to democracy undermine nations by treating women and racial, religious, and gender minorities as equal to white Christian men. They want to see an end to the immigration that they believe weakens a nation’s people, and for government to reinforce traditional religious and patriarchal values.
Vance attacked current European values and warned that the crisis for the region was not external actors like Russia or China, but rather “the threat from within.” He accused Europe of censoring free speech, but it was clear—especially coming from the representative of a regime that has erased great swaths of public knowledge because it objects to words like “gender”—that what he really objected to was restrictions on the speech of far-right ideologues.
After the rise and fall of German dictator Adolf Hitler, Germany banned Nazi propaganda and set limits on hate speech, banning attacks on people based on racial, national, religious, or ethnic background, as these forms of speech are central to fascism and similar ideologies. That hampers the ability of Germany’s far-right party Alternative for Germany, or AfD, to recruit before upcoming elections on February 23.
After calling for Europe to “change course and take our shared civilization in a new direction,” Vance threw his weight behind AfD. He broke protocol to refuse a meeting with current German chancellor, Olaf Scholz, and instead broke a taboo in German politics by meeting with the leader of AfD Trump called Vance’s speech “very brilliant.”
Bill Kristol of The Bulwark posted: “It’s heartening that today the leaders of the two major parties in Germany are unequivocally anti-Nazi and anti-fascist. It’s horrifying that today the president and vice-president of the United States of America are not.” German defense minister Boris Pistorius called Vance’s speech “unacceptable,” and on Saturday, Scholz said: “Never again fascism, never again, racism, never again aggressive war…. [T]oday’s democracies in Germany and Europe are founded on the historic awareness and realization that democracies can be destroyed by radical anti-democrats.”
Vance and the Trump administration have the support of billionaire Elon Musk in their attempt to shift the globe toward the rejection of democracy in favor of far-right authoritarianism. David Ingram and Bruna Horvath of NBC News reported today that Musk has “encouraged right-wing political movements, policies and administrations in at least 18 countries in a global push to slash immigration and curtail regulation of business.”
Musk, who cast apparent Nazi salutes before crowds on the day of President Donald Trump’s inauguration, wrote an op-ed in favor of AfD and recently spoke by video at an AfD rally, calling it “the best hope for Germany.” In addition to his support for Germany’s AfD, Ingram and Horvath identified Musk’s support for far-right movements in Brazil, Ireland, Argentina, Italy, New Zealand, South Africa, the Netherlands, and other countries. Last month, before Trump took office, French president Emmanuel Macron accused Musk of backing a global reactionary movement and of intervening directly in elections, including Germany’s.
Musk’s involvement in international politics appears to have coincided with his purchase of Twitter in 2022. And indeed, social media has been key to the project of undermining democracy. Russian operatives are now pushing the rise of the far-right in Europe through social media as they did in the United States. Russian president Vladimir Putin has long sought to weaken the democratic alliances of the United States and Europe to enable Russia to take at least parts of Ukraine and possibly other neighboring countries without the formidable resistance that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) would present.
Russian state television praised Vance’s speech. One headline read: “Humiliated Europe out for the count. Its American master flogged its old vassals.” Russian pundits recognized that Vance’s turn away from Europe meant a victory for Russia.
Vance’s speech came after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told other countries’ defense ministers on Wednesday, February 12, that he wanted to “directly and unambiguously express that stark strategic realities prevent the United States of America from being primarily focused on the security of Europe.” Since 1949, the United States has stood firmly behind the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) that said any attack on one of the signatories to that agreement would be an attack on all. Now, it appears, the U.S. is backing away.
In that speech, Hegseth seemed to move the U.S. toward the ideology of Russian president Vladimir Putin that larger countries can scoop up their smaller neighbors. He echoed Putin’s demands for ending its war against Ukraine, saying that “returning to Ukraine’s pre-2014 borders is an unrealistic objective” and that the U.S. will not support NATO membership for Ukraine, thus conceding to Russia two key issues without apparently getting anything in return. He also said that Europe must take over assistance for Ukraine as the U.S. focuses on its own borders.
On Wednesday, Trump spoke to Putin for nearly an hour and a half and came out echoing Putin’s rationale for his attack on Ukraine. Trump’s social media account posted that the call had been “highly productive,” and said the two leaders would visit each other’s countries, offering a White House visit to Putin, who has been isolated from other nations since his attacks on Ukraine.
Also on Wednesday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent met with Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky and offered U.S. support for Ukraine in exchange for half the country’s mineral resources, although it was unclear if the deal the U.S. offered meant future support or only payment for past support. The offer did not, apparently, contain guarantees for future support, and Zelensky rejected it.
On Saturday, while the Munich conference was still underway, the Trump administration announced it was sending a delegation to Saudi Arabia to begin peace talks with Russia. Ukrainian officials said they had not been informed and had no plans to attend. European negotiators have not been invited either. While the talks are being billed as “early-stage,” the United States is sending Secretary of State Marco Rubio and national security advisor Michael Waltz, suggesting haste.
After Rubio and Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov spoke on Saturday, the Russian readout of the call suggested that Russia urgently needs relief from the economic sanctions that are crushing the Russian economy. It said the call had focused on “removing unilateral barriers inherited from the previous U.S. administration, aiming to restore mutually beneficial trade, economic, and investment cooperation.” On Friday, Russia’s central bank warned that the economy is faltering, while Orbán, an ally of both Putin and Trump, assured Hungarian state radio on Friday that Russia will be “reintegrated” into the world economy and the European energy system as soon as “the U.S. president comes and creates peace.”
But the U.S. is not speaking with one voice. Republican leaders who support Ukraine are trying to smooth over Trump’s apparent coziness with Russia. Senate Armed Services Chair Roger Wicker (R-MS) called out Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s “rookie mistake” when he offered that the U.S. would not support Ukraine’s membership in NATO and that it was “unrealistic” for Ukraine to demand a return to its borders before Russia invaded in 2014, essentially offering to let Russia keep Crimea. Wicker said he was “puzzled” and “disturbed” by Hegseth’s comments and added: “I don’t know who wrote the speech—it is the kind of thing Tucker Carlson could have written, and Carlson is a fool.” Carlson, a former Fox News Channel personality, has expressed admiration for Orbán and Putin.
“There are good guys and bad guys in this war, and the Russians are the bad guys,” Wicker said. “They invaded, contrary to almost every international law, and they should be defeated. And Ukraine is entitled to the promises that the world made to it.”
Today on Face the Nation, Representative Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) said: “There is absolutely no way that Donald Trump will be seen—he will not let himself go down in history as having sold out to Putin. He will not let that happen.” Sarah Longwell of The Bulwark said: “I guess Republicans think this is how they manipulate Trump into doing the right thing. But Trump’s been selling out to Putin since Helsinki when he publicly sided with Putin over America’s intelligence community. And he hasn’t stopped selling out since. And the [Republican Party] lets him.”
European leaders reported being blindsided by Trump’s announcement. German leader Scholz on Friday asked Germany’s parliament to declare a state of emergency to support Ukraine, and on Sunday, European leaders met for an impromptu breakfast to discuss European security and Ukraine. Macron invited leaders to Paris on Monday to continue discussions. Representatives of Germany, Britain, Italy, Poland, Spain, the Netherlands, and Denmark will attend, as will the secretary-general of NATO and the presidents of the European Council and the European Commission.
After the Munich conference, in Writing from London, British journalist Nick Cohen wrote that those Americans trying to find an excuse for the betrayal of Ukraine are deluding themselves. He wrote: “[t]he radical right in the US is not engaged in a grand geopolitical strategy. It is pursuing an ideological campaign against its true enemy, which is not China or Russia but liberalism. The US culture war has gone global. The Trump administration hates liberals at home and liberal democracies abroad.”
Proving his point, on Saturday after Vance’s speech, Trump’s social media account posted: “He who saves his Country does not violate any Law.” This message, attributed to French dictator Napoleon Bonaparte, not only claims that the president is above all laws, but also signals to supporters that they should support Trump with violence. And that is how they took it. Right-wing activist Jack Posobiec responded, “America will be saved[.] What must be done will be done,” to which Elon Musk responded: “Yes[.]”
Political scientist Stathis Kalyvas posted: “There is now total clarity, no matter how unimaginable things might seem. And they amount to this: The U.S. government has been taken over by a clique of extremists who have embarked on a process of regime change in the world’s oldest democracy…. The arrogance on display is staggering. They think their actions will increase U.S. power, but they are in fact wrecking their own country and, in the process everyone else.”
He continued: “The only hope lies in the sheer enormity of the threat: it might awake us out of our slumber before it is too late.”

Immigrants are not stealing jobs all across our nation, The Orange Turd and his boss Musk are. as they weaken us for Putin’s benefit.
LikeLike
Trump’s treatment of Zelinsky is despicable. What will it take for the GOP Congress to grow up and get some courage? I wonder if they think that, after two more years of this political dystopia, anyone will vote for those Congresspeople who support it now?
But Zelinsky was being generous is saying that Trump is in a disinformation bubble and Putin is lying; when, in fact, Trump is the liar–he knows that well. The real news is that, if Zelinsky called an election today and won, Trump would say it was corrupted. My bet is Zelinsky is no fool. He knows what’s going on. And Trump is really getting his cards out on the table now.
Also, either someone from MAGA got to that judge who wouldn’t stop Musk and the Balls Brigade from getting into the Social Security Administration, OR there is a terrible hole in our justice system where they have to wait until a crime occurs before putting a stop to its movement. The advent of technology and the easy capture and exchange of information call for laws that can prevent such criminal behaviors before they occur. CBK
LikeLike
All you say is true. What it ignores is that Trump is not leading the Troglodytes and their elected officials they are leading him to deliver the pain… “MAGA Takes PLEASURE In Making People Feel PAIN.” Bill KristolAll of the issues that they profess to care about are not important to them. Therefore when Trump reverses or fails to deliver on a given policy there is no backlash. The price of eggs which was only important to the media when Biden was President could go higher than the price of Gold per ounce and he would not lose a single MAGAT (maggot)…. This is about stroking their egos. “Tell the poorest White man he is better than the best-est Black man and he will empty his pockets for you. ” LBJ and Dylan with the same theme in the same year.1963….”A South politician preaches to the poor white man
“You got more than the blacks, don’t complain
You’re better than them, you been born with white skin,” they explain.
And the Negro’s name
Is used it is plain
For the politician’s gain
As he rises to fame
And the poor white remains
On the caboose of the train
But it ain’t him to blame
He’s only a pawn in their game”… Except at this point the base is so conditioned to the fix that the politician can only deliver or get booted.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Joel: I have no doubt that racism against “the black man” is at the center of much of what’s going on in the U.S. today, and that it has existential roots that go way back over centuries where it joins hands in its psychic ground with every other bias that views the “other” as an existential threat.
Combine that with so called “Christian Nationalism,” and we have the toxic situation that says “I have God’s endorsement,” where, in fact, they have confused their God idea with their own fear and resultant totalitarianism that enables them to accept, as you say, their own hate and acceptance of finding pleasure in someone else’s pain.
I didn’t “ignore” it . . . I just didn’t say it. And that’s only part of it . . . . Trump needs to go–his “sell-by” date has long passed. CBK
LikeLike
THE SUPREME COURT MADE THIS MESS WHEN THEY HUNG UP THE “FOR SALE” SIGN ON AMERICA’S GOVERNMENT
THE PROBLEM WITH SUPREME COURT JUSTICES is that no matter how well-versed the Justices are in civil and constitutional law, no matter how fervent their idealism or ideology, their court-cloistered lives leave them simply naive about human nature.
For example, when the Roberts Court issued its Citizens United decision, the Court majority made a purely ideological ruling that revealed no understanding at all that they were putting democracy up for sale and opening the door for every self-serving megabillionaire like Elon Musk to simply buy Congress and the Presidency.
The Justices’ naivety has brought about an end to our Founding Fathers’ Great Experiment, and the Roberts Court will be remembered in history books around the world as the Court which put a For Sale sign on America’s government and ended our republic.
So, today, MUSK RULES AMERICA — and the Math shows how he is able to do that:
Musk has warned Congress that if anyone opposes or criticizes him, he will spend $100,000,000 to defeat that congress member in the next election.
Musk can easily do that. Very easily. Check out the money Math:
Key Factor to remember is that Musk has a fortune of $400 BILLION.
There are approximately 300 Republicans in Congress. If Musk spent $100 million against each of those 300 Republicans, that would cost him only $30 billion, leaving Musk with $370 billion. He’d hardly miss the $30 billion spent on electing his own Congress.
Let’s say that Musk decided to spend $100,000,000 EACH to defeat EVERY member of Congress, Republican and Democrat, and elect his own entire Congress. Well, there are 535 members of Congress in total, House and Senate combined: 535 times $100,000,000 to elect Musk’s own toadies is only $53.5 billion, leaving Musk with $347 billion to also elect all the state governments that he wants.
No politician dares to oppose Musk, not even Trump.
The Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision put our republic up for sale, and megabillionaire Musk is buying it, will own it, and will operate it anyway he wants because he doesn’t have to listen to anything the Supreme Court says.
All thanks to the Roberts Court and the For Sale sign it hung out on American government.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Merrick Garland and the January 6th Committee helped hang the sale sign by failing to complete its investigation in a timely manner and prosecute the convicted felon who likely would be behind bars now instead of sitting in the oval office and kissing up to Russia.
LikeLike
You are missing the very important fact that the right wing Supreme Court played a huge role in preventing Merrick Garland from completing his investigation. Marcy Wheeler at Emptywheel.net has no qualms about calling out problems with Democrats, but she carefully shows with facts how impossible it was because the Dems were (I guess stupid enough) to actually follow the law and the right wing justices and federal judges put up every roadblock possible and honored every single delay that the Trump lawyers asked for. Including deciding that the Constitution said Trump had immunity anyway.
I also don’t get why you blame the January 6 committee, which actually brought to light important information and forced to the media to temporary cover it (and then treat it like old news that was not important).
The right wing is empowered because the voters who don’t pay much attention hear the media amplifying the message that “even the Dems” know that if you don’t like what’s going on, blame the
Democrats. While the Republicans always amplify the message that any problem is the Democrats fault and things will be better if they keep voting for the Republicans.
This is the fault of the right wing Judiciary that voters had a chance to stop in 2016 and did not.
And there is nothing we can do. I’d bet quite a lot of money that Trump will suspend elections, and any chance of saving democracy. That’s a bet I’d love to lose, but I know the odds are in favor of my winning.
Especially when I see comments like this which blame the victims instead of the people doing harm!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree, but this was OBVIOUS in 2016 and we had an election with an open Supreme Court seat and the court tied 4-4. Voters had a choice. Did they want to preserve the right wing Supreme Court with new Trump-dominated appointees, or did they want a Supreme Court that would repeal Citizens’ United? The Supreme Court was tied 4-4 with an open seat. I repeat, they Supreme Court was tied 4-4 with an open seat and NO ONE knew who would die and who would live in the next 4 years. But EVERYONE knew with absolutely certainty that the election with a 4-4 Supreme Court with a vacant seat would immediately change the Supreme Court to a liberal body or preserve the right wing majority.
Every single voter had a chance to decide if they thought it was important to finally get the Supreme Court out of right wing hands, or whether what was more important to them was keeping the Democrats from having power, knowing that keeping the Democrats from having power meant that the court would remain in the hands of the far right.
Those on the far right joined with just enough Putin-lovers who claimed to be on the left and celebrated their “victory” in keeping the Supreme Court in right wing hands as an enabler of authoritarianism.
So bye-bye democracy and congratulations to those on the far left who joined with Republicans in 2016 and got exactly what they wanted. They have no one to blame but themselves when their own families are hurt as much as the rest of ours.
If you thought there was no difference between Republicans and Democrats, and you STILL think there is no difference between the Republicans and Democrats, I have a Supreme Court to sell ya, cheap, along with a great education at Trump University, a lovely charitable foundation that makes political donations so Attorney General Pam Biondi will ignore crimes by Trump, and a country run by your beloved Putin who you believe is always right, and the Dems always wrong.
The “winners” are the far right wing white supremacists who hate everyone who doesn’t embrace their version of right wing Christianity, AND those who believe that destroying democracy and installing white supremacy authoritarianism into power is a very small price to achieve their goal of destroying Democrats. Of course, when it is progressives and leftists who get rounded up with the Democrats, and LGBTQ and especially trans people who get rounded up along with Democrats, they will have no one to blame but themselves. But they won’t. These folks would rather have trans people suffer whatever evil is going to happen to them than admit that they were wrong about the Republicans being no worse than the Dems. Just like they will never admit they were wrong about Putin’s goals for Ukraine. Authoritarianism doesn’t bother them – having authoritarian government is just the price they are more than willing to pay to prevent those “evil Dems” like AOC from having any power. So congratulations to those on the left who are celebrating their pyrrhic “victory”. They can brag to their children that they knew this was coming and they were good with it because it achieved their goal of keeping the evil Democrats from doing evil things like preserving trans rights. Those on the right who played them for fools will surely give them a special salute as they strip rights from their families along with ours.
LikeLike
Wow. Your keyboard must’ve caught fire when you were typing this.
Just curious….can you envision any surprises, and scenarios that might upend this picture that you describe? (Call them what you will..”white swans”, “black swans”, the known unknowns” etc…)
BTW I’m not asking this question to make any particular point. Just thinking, what’s the way out of this epic tragedy??
P.S. and, YES, it’s absolutely stunning what’s happening right now with U.S. and our longtime allies, Deeply, deeply disturbing…
LikeLike
John,
I just happened upon this quote (attributed to Thomas Aquinas) on a Facebook feed:
“He who is not angry when there is just cause for anger is immoral. Why? Because anger looks to the good of justice. And if you can live amid injustice without anger, you are immoral as well as injustice.”
(I have been google-researching to check if this quote is accurate and found this: “Aquinas is citing the work Opus Imperfectum or Incomplete Commentary on Matthew, which, according to the translator of the modern edition, “was wrongly ascribed for centuries to John Chrysostom”.
“He who is not angry, whereas he has cause to be, sins. For unreasonable patience is the hotbed of many vices, it fosters negligence, and incites not only the wicked but even the good to do wrong.”)
My own opinion: Diane Ravitch was among many who warned us about this in 2016 and many times since, and anyone who is at this blog who ignored those warnings because they didn’t trust her – or trust what their own eyes told them – should be ashamed. The way out of this epic tragedy passed a while back, when we all got snookered by folks who spent their efforts normalizing whatever fascist signals Republicans gave, belittling and attacking everyone who called out the obvious danger, and then blaming “the dems” whenever it all went to s**t for not taking some action that these complicit Trump-enablers now claim would have magically stopped this Republican march to fascism that these very same people kept saying was totally normal and no worse than what “the evil Dems” do.
And by this I mean the so-called liberal “both sides equal” media and the useful idiots on the left – both of whom carried water for the Republican march to fascism by normalizing Trump, demonizing the Dems, and constantly telling us that the Americans drawn to a man who spewed racist, xenophobic, homophobic, pro-fascist LIES were “very good people” who should absolutely never feel any shame about their choice to empower the guy spewing the ugliness he was spewing. And anyway, it was the Dems fault that these “very good people” wanted a racist authoritarian insurrectionist spewing lies to win.
To this day I have no idea why anyone who isn’t secretly a neo-fascist or a useful idiot decided that it was a good idea in 2016 to spurn the only opportunity in decades to change the Supreme Court into a court that protected democracy instead of a court that enshrined right wing power. Their whining excuse that they aren’t right wing fascists themselves, they just didn’t think there was any difference between a pro-Citizens United right wing Supreme Court and liberal Supreme Court and judiciary just doesn’t fly. Even if they hated the Dems as much as they pretend to dislike the Republicans that they were complicit in empowering, they knew that if the Supreme Court enabled an authoritarian leader in Putin’s mold, the chances of getting progressive politicians elected to fight authoritarianism in the future would be as unlikely as in Putin’s Russia. But then again, maybe that was the point, since they were also defending Putin.
I am old enough to remember a time when neo-nazis wore hoods to hide their identity and the one thing every decent American agreed upon, regardless of their politics, was that anyone who supported right wing racist neo-fascists was not – by definition – a “good person”.
Today, the NYT runs articles about the fabulous and admirable young people making it cool to love the racist, xenophobic, lying neo-fascist president! Of course, “they like Trump” is the allowable euphemism the NYT uses, since the last thing the NYT wants to do is to shame these nicely dressed affluent young people by making them directly own what they are supporting. Until that changes, what is becoming a very fast march to fascism will be almost impossible to stop.
Look how fast even “liberals” on here made excuses for the Supreme Court deciding that Nixon was right, and if the President does it, it’s legal.
Anyone really believe there is going to be a future election that isn’t in the mold of elections in Russia? Look at how the “new” Justice Department’s mandate seems to be to silence and criminalize any opposition to Republican authoritarian rule. Trump takes over the FEC to do what he did to other agencies and “weed out fraud” – with the media again giving credibility to the most ridiculous absurdities. And we know what happens when even the liberal media is complicit in getting the public to believe absurdities. Maybe what Trump says is true, says the NYT, although someone who hates Trump disagrees.
Maybe it’s possible a few big Democratically controlled states could have some measure of independence, but even that is a toss-up.
When the Republicans are already trying to criminalize AOC’s legal actions (and I put even money on them eventually succeeding and charging her), while the left blames the Dems instead of the Republicans, then what is to be done?
Democrats aren’t running bad candidates against good Republican candidates. They are running excellent candidates against some of the worst, unappealing Republicans, and getting defeated because the so called liberal media normalizes the worst Republicans while nitpicking any negative (“too socialist”, “too corporate”, “too xxx”) that makes the Dem look like the “untrustworthy”, “unprepared”, “dangerous”, “cognitively unsound” candidate and too many enablers, even here, have been propagandized to believe that means that the liberal media is being “fair and balanced” and cheer them on.
NYT Feb. 13, 2025:
“For These 20-Somethings, Trump ‘Is Making It Sexy’ to Be Republican
A “MAGA Youth” dinner in Manhattan gave young Trump supporters a place to socialize and celebrate the new administration.”
Isn’t nice when you can celebrate authoritarian racists and xenophobes doing so much harm to so many vulnerable people and feel no shame?
LikeLike
Thanks for the reply.
And, great quote from Aquinas.
A Pew poll recently had 45% of the surveyed Republicans fine with the pardon of violent January 6 criminals. That’s incredible. I mean, I’m not sure how we get around that fact..
And, here we are five years after the pandemic hit the world and another poll has 8 in 10 Republicans saying that the news media exaggerated the risks of COVID-19. My God, a million+ Americans died from the pandemic. Even if it was half that, we’re talking World War II type casualties in the U.S. (3 in 10 Democrats in comparison had that view.)
But still, with the Congress so closely divided, couldn’t a handful of Republicans step up and side with the Democrats on at least some issues -for the good of the country…really the world?
What a tragedy.
Hang in there. And, thanks for giving a damn.
https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2025/02/12/5-years-later-america-looks-back-at-the-impact-of-covid-19/?utm_source=firefox-newtab-en-us
LikeLike
SCOTUS justices aren’t naive. Thomas, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch and Barrett were all bought and paid for by Leo and the Federalist Society to advance the antidemocratic agenda of that group.
LikeLike
The SCOTUS may be right wingers but not all of them hate the government.
LikeLike
quikwrit–all of my life I have harbored a genuine respect for and confidence in the Supreme Court. . . . . GONE. CBK
LikeLike
“rookie mistake?” No, Hegseth was just parroting his marching orders from Trump/Musk.
LikeLike
Even before his wonderful interview with Putin and tour of Russia, Tucker Carlson, on camera, questioned why we were providing aid to Ukraine. He literally suggested that we should be forming alliances with Russia and China, instead.
Which is one of the many reasons that I’m not surprised at this abhorrent turn of events in the “negotiations”. They might not like each other…but there’s an element of cooperation at play, here. One which extends beyond Trump and Carlson.
Painful and sickening to watch these spineless Republicans in Congress as the sit back and allow all of these things to happen. They’re abdicating both their power as a co-equal branch of government and their responsibilities to their constituents.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is all true but I’m afraid we may be losing sight of the most important topic: the New York Times.
LikeLike