Governor Bill Lee was determined to get a universal voucher bill, regardless of which families get the money or what it costs the state. Since Republicans control the legislature, he got what he wanted. The plan will be phased in.
The legislature knows that most vouchers will subsidize private school tuition. They probably know that vouchers don’t raise academic achievement. They surely know that Tennessee students did well on the national test, NAEP, compared to most other states. And they know that paying the tuition of all the students who attend religious schools and private schools will be a heavy financial burden.
The only thing that is not clear is which billionaire or billionaires was behind the state Republicans’ readiness to sabotage their public schools.
None of that matters.
Marta A. Aldrich reported for Chalkbeat:
Tennessee lawmakers on Thursday approved Gov. Bill Lee’s universal private school voucher bill, creating a new track for educating K-12 students statewide.
The 54-44 vote in the House, where Democrats and some rural Republicans joined to oppose the program, came after four hours of debate, including dozens of failed attempts to add amendments aimed at strengthening accountability and protections for students with disabilities, among other things.
The Senate later voted 20-13 to pass Lee’s Education Freedom Act.
The Republican governor called the bill’s passage “a milestone in advancing education in Tennessee.” He is expected to quickly sign his signature education bill.
“I’ve long believed we can have the best public schools & give parents a choice in their child’s education, regardless of income or zip code,” he said on social media.
Tennessee joins a dozen states that have adopted similar programs allowing families, regardless of their income, to use public tax dollars to pay for alternatives to public education for their children.
President Donald Trump this week signed an executive order that frees up federal funding and prioritizes spending on school choice programs.
Lee’s office did not immediately respond when asked if the federal order has implications, financial or otherwise, on Tennessee’s Education Freedom Act.
Also this week, results of a major national test show that Tennessee students held their ground in math and reading, in a year when average student test scores declined nationwide.
The new voucher program is scheduled to launch in the upcoming school year with 20,000 “scholarships” of $7,075 each to aid families toward the cost of a private education. Half of them will be for students whose family income is below a certain threshold — $173,000 for a family of four. Those income restrictions will be lifted during the program’s second year. The number of available vouchers can grow by 5,000 each year thereafter.
About 65% of the vouchers are expected to be awarded to students who already attend private schools, with 35% going to students switching out of public schools, according to the legislature’s own analysis of the proposal….
The packages will cost almost $1 billion this year in a state that has seen its revenues drop because of tax breaks for corporations and businesses enacted in 2024 under another initiative from the governor.
The Education Freedom Act itself will cost taxpayers at least $1.1 billion during its first five years, state analysts say, under a provision that allows the program to grow by 5,000 students annually.
In addition to providing some families with vouchers, the legislation will give one-time bonuses of $2,000 each to the state’s public school teachers; establish a public school infrastructure fund using tax revenues from the sports betting industry that currently contribute to college scholarships; and reimburse public school systems for any state funding lost if a student dis-enrolls to accept the new voucher.

Sounds like Tennessee will be one of the first states to go bankrupt and to save themselves they will raise taxes on everyone except the corporations and billionaires.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, universal vouchers come with a high price tag
LikeLike
Thanks to the Law of Unintended Consequences, the people of Tennessee will be getting what their politicians just adopted . . . screwed.
LikeLike
Tennessee has gone stupid and “stupid”will get worse.
LikeLike
I couldn’t be more disgusted by this. When the bill failed a few years ago, the rural Republicans who voted against the bill were replaced with those who would vote for it.
Frankly, it’s nothing more than a tuition rebate for those who can already afford it. There’s no way it’s going to help the poor kid to afford any of these private schools in my area:
Ensworth School
$30,310 (K-5)
$36,880 (6-8)
$40,240 (9-12)
Harding Academy
$18,000 (Pre-K)
$25,330 (K-5)
$28,270 (6-8)
Harpeth Hall (all girls)
$36,240 (5-8)
$36,750 (9-12)
Montgomery Bell Academy (all boys)
$37,250 (7-12)
Nashville Christian School
$13,216 – $15,315 (K-12)
Overbook Catholic School:
17,315 (K-6)
St. Anne Catholic School:
$13,750 (K-8)
$11,000 if active member of the school’s church parish
St. Cecilia Academy (Catholic – all girls):
$19,900 Jr. High
$22,800 High School
St. Henry Catholic School:
$8,589 (K-8)
St. Matthew Catholic School:
$11,790 (K-8)
$9,430 if active member of the school’s church parish
Father Ryan High School
$25,415 (9-12)
Pope John Paul II Preparatory School
$14,550 (Middle School)
$19,850 (High School)
LikeLike
Joe,
You are right. This voucher in TN will be a subsidy for kids already in private schools. The elite schools don’t have space and don’t want kids who can’t pay the tuition. Vouchers will be subsidies for the affluent.
LikeLike
OMG, Joe Nashville. Thanks for this update on private school prices in your area. I last investigated the topic a few yrs ago, researching Florida private school prices. At that point it was clear FL’s then-proposed expanded voucher would not cover all of Catholic primary school tuition, and fall about $3+k short of Catholic hischool. For innovative schools such as Montessori, would be significant only for PreK-2nd grade. For selective private schools, merely a (not-insignificant) discount. There were however on the FL list a large number of little, what I call “small-c christian schools,” whose tuition would be covered PreK-8thgr. I suspect Nashville area has such schools too– or if not, they will now be cropping up to take advantage of the voucher. A voucher-paid little school with zero reqts re: stds/ certified teachers et al state reqts can do a lot for propping up church costs.
LikeLike
Hi bethree5,
So far, I don’t know of any such small schools in my area, but I wouldn’t doubt there are entrepreneurial vultures salivating to create their own private schools with tuition rates at the amount of the voucher.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bethree,
Please read Josh Cowen’s new book THE PRIVATEERS
LikeLike
These politicians are so disingenuous when they say that finally the parents are free to attend the school that best fits their needs, however, it’s the private, religious or charters that choose the students not the parents. They have the choice to apply to the school of their choice! Can the public schools choose too? Not likely.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“In addition to providing some families with vouchers, the legislation will… reimburse public school systems for any state funding lost if a student dis-enrolls to accept the new voucher.”
Now there’s an unusual feature. I remember Abbott offered this to the rural nay-sayer legislators in his 2nd attempt to get vouchers approved. They demurred, & following year Abbott’s scorched-earth tactics got them primaried out. Remains to be seen whether his “assured” 2025 bill carries the same feature. Haven’t heard of this feature in any of these recent state-approved universal voucher systems (other than TN’s). Regardless, if used, it ramps the cost of these programs even higher. What voters are willing to pay for “school choice” boggles the mind!
…Or could it be they don’t even get it will cost them extra in school/ state taxes. Unless there’s a state referendum, they’re not even likely to see an estimate of how much extra. Most of this activity seems to be a game played at a higher level. Govrs/ state legislatures competing among each other in a game of “how conservative are YOU?” that doesn’t involve voters at all. Gov’rs/ state legislatures that have way more power than the municipal govts whose constituents have to pay at least half of the cost.
LikeLike
Bethree,
Voters in TN didn’t ask for this.
Had there been a referendum, I’m willing to bet that it would have been overwhelmingly defeated
LikeLiked by 1 person
I probably don’t need to say it, but this issue reveals a serious flaw in balance of power [state vs local] in these states rushing to adopt measures whose costs are only partially borne by state funding. You can see the same thing in cultural arena, i.e., states imposing curricular and book bans on the locals. These states at the very most bear 1/2 the per-pupil costs [of the 90+% not covered by fed funding]—locals the other half. Yet their state laws allow state actors to override local decisions. Even in VA, state law allows govr to override decisions of school boards representing the largest school districts in the nation.
I will once again parade my state’s IMHO superior set-up, at risk of repeating myself. NJ is a state of fiercely independent towns—and each town/ city has its own school board. No county-wide districts as in VA, where in northern part of state the school districts are largest in nation, with up to 180k K12 enrollment.
Example in point: in summer ’22, Murphy admin/ state BofEd floated a new state ed std for sex ed, which included instructing even K-3 in gender orientation & gender identity fluidity. Here, new stds have to be approved by local school boards & approval signed off by supt. You can’t just wholesale ignore them, but there is flexibility. Toms River was one of the first districts to review & provide input. School bd/ supt simply highlighted the offending section (re: K-3) and noted: “parent(s)/ guardian to implement standard at home as age-appropriate.” Trenton eventually received so much similar feedback that they sent the standard back to DofEd for a re-write.
LikeLike