Mary Trump, daughter of Donald’s older brother, thinks that the nation might be suffering cognitive decline. How, she wonders, could anyone think longingly of the days when her uncle Donald was President, when chaos was a daily phenomenon?
She writes on her blog:
Since so many people are acting as if they’re certified neurologists, I’d thought I’d join in and discuss the one patient I actually am VERY worried about.
The United States of America appears to be experiencing cognitive decline. That’s the only way I can explain the short memories that have erased the horrors of my uncle’s catastrophic four years in the Oval Office. It’s the only way I can explain a poll that shows Donald with a 51 percent approval rating in Wisconsin. It’s the only way I can explain why this race is so close and Donald—the convicted felon and adjudicated rapist and fraud—remains a significant threat to our democracy.
On Monday, the Huffington Post published a story about how next week’s Republican convention will cash in on the nation’s “collective amnesia” with a program that seeks to remind us about all of the “good times” we had during the Trump administration. Since those good times are purely fictional—unless, of course, you’re like Stephen Miller and enjoy kidnapping and incarcerating small children—it’s going to be fascinating to see how they go about it, and whether or not the corporate media fall for it.
As writer S.V. Date noted, “Donald Trump left the White House with violent crime spiking, thousands of Americans dying each day from a disease he claimed was no worse than the common cold and having attempted a coup to remain in office despite having lost reelection.”
“The former and would-be future president and the Republican National Committee on Monday released a schedule of convention themes that counts on Americans forgetting all that and instead waxing nostalgic for his years in office.”
Waxing nostalgic? For a time when over 5,000 Americans were dying every day; basic supplies, like toilet paper and hand sanitizer, were impossible to find; and Donald showed his concern for the American people by playing golf every day?
Yes, I’m worried about us.
Don’t get me wrong—I wish I could forget, too. I wish I could forget the refrigerated morgue vans that idled in the streets of New York City while Donald threatened to withhold vital PPE from our frontline medical workers unless Gov. Cuomo kissed his ass.
I wish I could forget the way Donald ordered peaceful protesters in Lafayette Square to be tear-gassed so he could go do a photo-op in front of a church.
I wish I could forget the way he talked about the ratings of his COVID briefings while people were on lockdown and hospital emergency rooms were overflowing.
I wish I could forget the way he tormented non-MAGA Americans with his incessant tweeting.
I wish I could forget his telling the Proud Boys to “stand back and stand by.”
I wish I could forget the anguished screams of police officers as they were beaten and tortured by Donald’s followers on Jan. 6, 2021.
And I wish I could forget how he stacked the Supreme Court with Christian Nationalists who just stole basic human rights from tens of millions of women and then rewarded him by making him—him—king.
But I can’t forget any of that. And I’m determined not to let the rest of the country forget it either. One of our goals has to be to remind this as many people as possible just how bad things were and warn them that things will be so much worse—if we keep forgetting.
Americans have short memories. And after the massive traumas we’ve experienced over the last eight years, it’s completely understandable that people are inclined to forget. That’s how trauma works. The reason things in this country continue to seem bad now despite much evidence to the contrary is because we’ve never recovered from the horrors of the Trump administration. Ironically, forgetting how bad things were is leading to nostalgia for the worst four years of my lifetime.
The fact that it’s explicable doesn’t make it any less horrifying.
At next week’s Republican convention, the opening night’s theme is “Make America Wealthy Once Again.”
Really?
Donald left office with the economy cratering and the worst jobs record since Herbert Hoover. Under Joe Biden, the stock market is breaking records daily, unemployment has been at impressive lows, wages are up, and manufacturing is back. America is much wealthier than it was when my uncle was in the White House.
On Tuesday, the theme is “Make America Safe Once Again.”
Really?
We would ask Officer Brian Sicknick if Donald made America safer, but we can’t because he died after being brutally beaten during Donald’s attack on the Capitol. We could ask former Vice President Pence, but Donald tried to get him hanged.
And on Wednesday, they’re going with “Make America Strong Once Again.”
That is just beyond the pale.
Donald is the weakest man I’ve ever known. He kisses up to dictators like Putin and Kim Jong Un and Saudi Arabia’s MBS and Hungary’s Orban because he craves their power and hopes his groveling will convince them to lend him some of theirs. He thinks he can tell our allies to go to hell because, with a huge assist from the Republican Party, he’s banking on American’s forgetting who our enemies really are.
Either way, we have just a few short months to remind Americans what it was really like when Donald was in office and help them see—by talking about the Republican platform and the fascist agenda laid out in Project 2025—what the future will look like if Donald and his brown shirts get back into office.
He’s betting that we’ve forgotten a lot of things. And maybe we have. Maybe we aren’t just democracy in decline—maybe we’re a nation experiencing cognitive decline.
If we fail, I fear he will do things to this country and its people that we will never be able to forget.
Or forgive.

It began of course, like so much decline in the American way of life , with Ronald Wilson Reagan, the viral vector zero of Democracy’s Auto Immune Disease (DAID), the 2‑bit, 3rd rate, ham‑fisted actor who turned the People against the whole idea of a People’s Government. He was only the Talent, of course, he was only selling what he was bought and paid for to sell.
LikeLiked by 1 person
He was quite good, at first, at reading prepared statements from a teleprompter in a grandfatherly way.
LikeLike
I would say that the only ones in cognitive decline are the ones who support Trump and who will vote for Trump. He is so obviously a charlatan and demagogue without any scruples who spews lie infused word salads at the drop of a hat, 24/7.
LikeLike
We often subjected to exhortations to be kinder in our appraisals of the folks across the aisle, but I’m sorry, anyone who thinks that Trump is an acceptable candidate for president is utterly lacking in discernment, a moron.
LikeLike
I have nothing but respect for Mary Trump. She is a truth teller despite the threats of extremists. She is also a good writer. Are we suffering from collective amnesia? How was it possible that a conman, liar, convicted rapist and felon was ahead of a decent man led us out of the horrible Covid pandemic with minimal damage to our economy? Are we suffering from short term memory loss?
The sad reality is that a second Trump term shepherded by The Heritage Foundation and a rogue Supreme Court would be so much worse than the first! Trump and company will step all over individual rights and freedoms. Sixteen Nobel Prize winning economists have warned that Trump’s policies would supercharge inflation. Haven’t we faced enough greedflation? Tax cuts for the wealthy would explode our national debt and choke working families, the elderly and the poor. After fifty years of trickle down economics and an explosive wealth gap, still so many in this country believe in a man that only cares about power and wealth and are willing to to perpetuate this myth and give this fraud the reins of power. We would be the laughing stock of the western world. Pathetic! Vote Harris-Blue and give democracy and the historical reputation of our great nation a chance.
LikeLike
For those that suffer from “Trumpnesia” about his chaotic first term, read through this compilation from the Economic Institute of some of what Trump didn’t do for working families, and a second term would be worse.https://www.epi.org/publication/50-reasons/
LikeLike
A elected Trump in collaboration with his band of pirates: billionaires, The Heritage Foundation and a rogue Supreme Court would effectively be “a slow moving coup.”
LikeLike
cx: An elected Trump
LikeLike
“Donald left office with the economy cratering and the worst jobs record since Herbert Hoover.“
There is a lot of the negative economic stuff from Covid that was not the fault of either Biden or Trump, but there is plenty of stuff Trump did that undermined our world allies, eroded democratic norms, and destroyed general civil liberties that make him odious enough. Trump supporters comfort themselves in the idea that the economic downturn caused by Covid was the fault of Fauci, so the above argument has no effect on them. To be fair, no logical argument penetrates the wall erected by Trump supporters to ward off reason.
LikeLike
Trump increased the deficit by 7.8 TRILLION dollars and did nothing for the middle class.
LikeLike
How, could anyone think, the nation MIGHT be “suffering”cognitive decline? The sale of Electoral College saviors requires “collective amnesia”. “This will be the first US presidential election since 1976 without a Biden, Bush, or Clinton on the ticket. But we’re not an oligarchy, honest!” Pitching another round of hopium and changium, WON’T end the dominant clique of corporate/military/money masters. Rump ‘Splainin, has yet to transform the merchandise for sale in the political market place, into public servants. Sure, the rump believers are (fill-in). How about the E.C. savior believers???
LikeLike
hopium and changium
OMG. That’s hilarious. LOVE IT!!!
LikeLike
This is also a media issue. NYT reporters have actually defended their reporting by implying that there is no need whatsoever to mention Trump’s historically horrible presidency because they believe everyone already knows. (Their “truth” that “everyone already knows” all about Trump so they shouldn’t mention anything negative in articles about Trump is belied by the amnesia of the American public and it seems that it is the so-called liberal media suffering cognitive decline)
So all of their daily news reporting about Trump is exclusively about “what Trump plans to do” and “what Trump says” and “what happened to Trump today” but they can’t write a single story about Biden or Kamala without prominently featuring the narrative that they will have to answer for all the failures of the Biden economy and they will have to answer for all their failures with border policy, and they will have to answer for all the Biden administrations many, many failures.
Oddly, the media never mentions that Trump would have to answer for anything in his past. They never mention that Trump would have address the serious doubts and concerns voters have about him. They don’t even mention Trump’s felony conviction. But they don’t write any story about the Dems without a gratuitously negative “truth” that Kamala will have to answer for all the many failures of the Biden Administration.
The NYT wrote one of their typical “fair and balanced” news stories that came out within minutes of Biden announcing he wasn’t running for re-election about how KAMALA (and not Trump) would be faced with serious questions:
“Ms. Harris would have LITTLE CHOICE but to run on the Biden-Harris administration’s record over the past four years, which Mr. Trump has attacked relentlessly. As the party’s nominee, she would be able to take some credit for the president’s legislative successes, like new laws boosting infrastructure spending, but would also be vulnerable to attack for his FAILURES, like the BOTCHED withdrawal from Afghanistan, a surge in inflation and the difficulty of CONTROLLING THE STREAM OF MIGRANTS across the Southern border.
After a first two years in office in which Ms. Harris was OFTEN DERIDED as OUT OF HER DEPTH…”
Amplify the negatives, and the ONLY Biden success that the NYT reporter referred to was “new laws to boost infrastructure spending”.
Not one positive about the economy mentioned in the article. Not low unemployment, not all the strong economic indicators, not a mention of inflation going down and being a worldwide problem that Biden’s White House has addressed more competently than any other country. Nope, just a litany of “Biden problems”, a gratuitous reference to infrastructure spending as the only positive, and AMNESIA about Trump.
Not only has the so-called media encouraged amnesia about Trump, they encourage voters to believe that any negative information about Trump they hear is just Democrats’ partisan opinions that should not be trusted. In the same NYT article pre-written to come out as soon as Biden stepped aside, the so-called journalist described Trump this way:
“Mr. Trump, whom DEMOCRATS HAVE BRANDED as an existential threat to democracy and a supporter of dangerous positions on guns, abortion, immigration, taxes, education and trade.”
Kamala having to answer for all of Biden’s FAILURES is a fact. Any negatives about Trump are simply DEMOCRAT BRANDING.
It’s not surprising that the public has forgotten how terrible Trump’s first term was, since the so-called liberal media will not talk about it because it would be “too biased” to mention it.
LikeLike
The New York Times!
LikeLike
https://danieldrezner.substack.com/p/an-open-letter-to-the-editors-of
LikeLike
I’m not the only one. Not sure why you are so defensive, but your knee jerk defense of the NYT reminds me of your knee jerk defense of Eva Moskowitz back when I would post critical comments about her.
Do you have some personal reason to try to belittle and discredit critics of the NYT and Eva Moskowitz? Because it seems that you can’t just let me post something critical of the NYT and ignore it, and you did the same thing – belittle me – every time I posted something critical of Eva Moskowitz or Success Academy.
LikeLike
You’re definitely not the only one. There is a sizable group of people who think complaining about the NY Times is an election strategy.
Your ability to hold many years-long grudges is really weird. Please give me a link to where I defended Eva Moskowitz so I can see what the circumstances were. Because unlike you I truly cannot remember this event.
I offered you a deal whereby neither of us would interact with the other, and you rejected it. So I guess you have to deal with the horror of someone providing an alternative perspective to yours.
LikeLike
“The New York Times!” is not an alternate perspective. It’s a snarky remark instead of an explanation of your views.
When you do back up your replies to me with something other than snark, I LIKE it. I always look at the links and consider your point of view.
That’s what you don’t get.
LikeLike
If this helps, it’s shorthand for “and here we go for the tenth time today with the story about how this is all the fault of the New York Times.”
LikeLike
Why do you always do that? Re-frame my comments in order to discredit them? I did not say “it’s all the fault of the NYT”. Stop putting words in my mouth, please.
I said that the short memories of the American public is also a MEDIA issue, and I used an example from the “liberal” NYT because I believe it is important to support my comments with examples. And NYT coverage influences how the rest of the media covers the news. And it’s news coverage has been problematic.
You also posted a link to a NEW article in the NYT which actually does remind folks about Trump’s history. That kind of article is rare. And I hope it means that the NYT is starting to realize that their excuse that “people already know all the bad things about Trump so we can’t mention them anymore” is not working anymore. It’s just making them look foolish.
LikeLike
It certainly seems like you think it’s all the fault of the New York Times, based on your comments.
LikeLike
I don’t know why I even bother to write a reply, when I know you will just ignore what I am saying and repeat “you do too.” Hope springs eternal.
I was happy you posted a link to the new NYT story. It is the kind of reporting I hope to see more of – reporting that reminds readers of what Trump has done in the past, at a time when there seems to be a shocking amnesia about Trump. That’s the subject of this blogpost by Diane Ravitch.
LikeLike
Trump spoke to a fanatical Christian group yesterday. He urged them to vote for him, and, “You won’t have to do it anymore.” Let’s see what the press does with this foreboding comment. https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/27/politics/video/trump-christian-vote-vinjamuri-nr-digvid
LikeLike
At most, I expect it to be reported once and forgotten.
The question is whether the public is constantly reminded of it in every news story about Trump. I doubt it. That’s why this will be forgotten, along with all the negative things about Trump’s presidency, while Biden’s “failures” in managing the economy, in the withdrawal from Afghanistan, in the border, must be mentioned ALL THE TIME.
The US economy is the envy of other western nations right now, but the so-called liberal media presents it as if it is a failure and then asks “why don’t people think the economy is good?”
LikeLike
The horrible NY Times has already run with it.
Although when you look at a longer clip from around that same time in the speech, it seems clear (to me at least) that what Trump is saying is, “you people don’t vote reliably, but you really need to vote for me this time. Just this once, vote, and I promise you we’ll fix everything so you don’t need to vote again.” He goes on to say “well, the democrats will probably screw things up so badly again that you might need to vote again and do it all over.”
Nonetheless, the Times jumped on the story, although they will later be accused of doing something bad relating to the story.
LikeLike
I spoke too soon, I see they’re already being proactively criticized for their future failure to continue covering the thing Trump said.
LikeLike
Thank you for the link to today’s story! Michael Gold wrote an excellent article, one that actually mentioned Trump’s long history instead of assuming “everyone already knows”
I would say that the media criticism is working! This kind of news story was not the norm for Trump (although it was for Biden). It reminds readers of Trump’s past instead of making it irrelevant or mischaracterizing negative facts as “Democrat branding”.
“The former president — who continues to falsely insist the 2020 election was rigged, a claim that inspired some of his supporters to storm the Capitol in a bid to keep him in power in 2021 — has raised alarm from Democrats and some Republicans. He has compared his political opponents to “vermin,” said he would have a prosecutor investigate President Biden and his family and framed his campaign as one of retribution.
James Singer, a Harris campaign spokesman, criticized Mr. Trump in a statement for lying about the 2020 election, among other things, during his Friday remarks. Mr. Trump “went on and on and on, and generally sounded like someone you wouldn’t want to sit near at a restaurant — let alone be president of the United States,” Mr. Singer said.
Since his 2020 loss, Mr. Trump, who often praises strongmen leaders on the trail, has further embraced a brand of conservatism that experts on autocracy have said veers toward totalitarian.”
Reminding readers of Trump’s past has been missing from NYT news stories. I hope this story is a sign that the media criticism is working. If it another one-off, which another few weeks of media coverage that excludes Trump’s past and adds to the amnesia about how the public feels, then more media criticism is required.
LikeLike
I wrote a long reply to this link earlier which is being held up. But I thanked you for this link, and gave my take on it. Hopefully it will eventually appear.
LikeLike
But was it long enough? I like it when you make them really, really, really long. So do Bernie and AOC.
LikeLike
yay my longer reply posted! I stand by it! flerp! posted an excellent NYT article, and I hope it signals an ongoing change in how the NYT covers Trump. If the so-called liberal media keeps reminding the public of the truth, instead of leaving it out of the narrative, we might actually keep our democracy for a while longer!
LikeLike
Scam scam every where but don’t worry , every one is not a cheater, very reliable and profitable site. Thousands peoples are making good earning from it. For further detail visit the link no instant money required free signup and information…….__ https://cli.re/rpkaj5
LikeLike
Suckinzeeggs!
LikeLike
America, and Americans, are indeed in cognitive decline. About 3/4 of Americans use social media. Social media use is only increasing and increasingly it is the primary way Americans access “news.” The algorithms of social media sort us into silos. We see mainly news and opinion that confirms our own prior opinions. People do not read, they scroll.
These trends are not only increasing, but they are accelerating. What this looks like in 30 years is scary to contemplate. I don’t think it’s an accident that the general “weirdness” of our politics has shot skyward since 2012, around when social media and smart phone use became semi-ubiquitous. Personalization and silo-ization is ever-increasing. Shared reality is ever scarcer.
LikeLike
You’re definitely not the only one. There is a sizable group of people who think complaining about the NY Times is an election strategy.
Your ability to hold many years-long grudges is really weird. Please give me a link to where I defended Eva Moskowitz so I can see what the circumstances were. Because unlike you I truly cannot remember this event.
LikeLike
Oops wrong spot.
LikeLike
Daniel Denzer was a DEFENDER of the NYT coverage until even he noticed how problematic it was getting.
As I said in a reply that is being held up for moderation, the Michael Gold story you posted was excellent. The NYT got better. Media criticism keeps them honest. It isn’t an “election strategy”. It is noticing that the so-called liberal media’s coverage has made it easy for the far right message that things were great under Trump to be believed.
I am not going to get into an argument about Eva Moskowitz with you. I posted many critical things about her because I truly believed that her disingenuous comparisons of her charter schools that counseled out (or repeatedly failed) students with public schools was harmful and was used by politicians to support harmful public policy. Gary Rubinstein has reported on this practice after carefully documenting the large numbers of disappearing students. Moskowitz could have told the truth – that her schools simply counseled out the students who didn’t thrive in her schools! – but instead she attacked her critics even when her critics were a young child where she illegal released her own inexperienced teachers and administrators nasty comments painting him as violent to cover up what her schools were doing and continue the myth (lie) that her schools worked miracles with all the students that public schools were “failing to teach”. She attacked John Merrow for reporting the truth.
I wish you would have ignored my criticism of Success Academy just like you could have ignored my criticisms of the NYT coverage. Instead you would often post similarly belittling comments as you did here. I hope your view of Eva Moskowitz have changed since then.
LikeLike
Bully for Daniel Denzer, whoever he is! You’re free to keep “noticing” what you want to notice about the evil New York Times. I’m free to keep noticing that the idea that the Times is the reason past elections haven’t gone how you wanted, or why polls don’t look how you want them to look, is wrongheaded and perverse.
Again, if you have a point to make about my failure to condemn Eva Moskowitz to your satisfaction, then post a link. It’s not hard to do if you know how to use the internet.
LikeLike
I don’t know if this reply will be held up in moderation.
But you are AGAIN mischaracterizing my views.
Public opinion where people believe things that are false or exaggerated about one candidate or have amnesia about another candidate’s very serious issues influences elections. And the media influences public opinion. Most people here probably would be critical about how the NYT reports on public education and especially when it cheerleads for some charter schools.
How in the world would I even know that you don’t agree with my criticism of Eva Moskowitz if it wasn’t from your reactions to my comments on this blog?
If you want to prove me wrong, just tell us how you feel about Eva Moskowitz! In the past you have professed not to know enough about her or her charter network to say anything negative about it. You just didn’t seem to like it when I did.
LikeLike
Huh. I thought you—the person who weirdly brought up Eva Moskowitz—were “not going to get into an argument about Eva Moskowitz” with me. Go figure.
Agree to disagree about your views. To an outside observer, your view essentially appears to be that there is no reality outside “the narrative,” which is controlled largely by media, and essentially by one media organization, the New York Times. Which is why the 80% of your comments these days are about the New York Times.
LikeLike
Is it true, what they say, that Flerp once wore a white suit after Labor Day? That guy. Geez. And I haven’t seen a single denunciation by Flerp of Ed Gein. What’s with that? Suspicious, huh?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Flerp and Gaetz. Meanwhile, why would BOTH Bernie and AOC say that grass is green unless it was, in fact, green, despite what Bob says, and why would Flerp and Gaetz deny this because that’s what they clearly implied in paragraph 5, sentence 2, of their post on the 33rd of January just before they put words in my mouth knowing full well that I did not say that Biden’s first name is Joe and that Atticus is a White Savior, as you know and as anyone here can check for themselves by simply looking up what I actually said in an alternative universe that I am making up as I post this. Why? Well, clearly, Flerp and Gaetz are in league with the New York Times and the shape-shifting aliens from Alpha Draconis. As Flerp once himself said on this very blog back in 1776, “around” and “nice.” See what I mean? Pure snark, unlike real engagement, which I am willing to carry out anytime because I’m so outstanding in that way. Diane, Flerp has bubble gum. Please him to the principal’s office right now. Thank you.
LikeLike
This juvenile humor seems sad to me, but maybe other people are enjoying it. If so, that’s fine by me, as I have a thick skin. Carry on!
LikeLike
Oh, and please go on for a gazillion more paragraphs of not engaging about something Flerp supposedly said about Eva Moscowitz five years ago.
LikeLike
America is definitely in cognitive decline. We don’t reads; we scroll. We don’t inhabit shared reality; we scroll within our silos, seeing and interacting with content chosen by algorithms to conform with our prior beliefs and worldviews. These aren’t absolute facts, but they are the core trends, and the trends are accelerating. It’s no accident that the weirdness of our politics and political discourse have gone skyward in the age of the smart phone and social media.
LikeLike
I love my typo in the second sentence. It’s fitting.
LikeLike
It’s perfect, that typo!
LikeLike
Typo? I don’t see no stinkin typo!
LikeLike
It’s true. For most, the US is a fast-food nation and too many consume too much sugar or additives that contribute.
AI Overview
Learn more…Opens in new tab
Some studies have linked diets high in ultra-processed foods, like soft drinks, to cognitive decline, but the studies do not prove that these foods cause cognitive decline. For example, a 2022 study of Brazilian adults found that people who consumed more than 20% of their calories from ultra-processed foods experienced a 28% faster decline in cognitive function than those who ate less. Another study found that middle-aged people who ate the most junk food experienced a faster rate of cognitive decline than those who ate the least
LikeLike
It’s not cognitive decline — it’s just effective propaganda that’s delivered via The Faux News Network and social media. Relentlessly.
Humans not only have short memories of politics, but because most Americans actually don’t pay attention to politics on a day-to-day basis, the memories don’t even form and can be created retroactively by propaganda.
Moreover, the human brain is constantly reworking memory, adjusting it to fit with current perception and subconscious desire.
So, no, it’s not cognitive decline: It’s propaganda war…and Democrats need to become much better at conducting such war for “memory”.
Unfortunately, Democrats aren’t even very adept at conveying their actual current accomplishments to voters, let alone past accomplishments.
LikeLike
I would agree that successful propaganda does not indicate cognitive decline, but the image seems appropriate.
LikeLike
I think my tomatoes need watering.
Oh, wait. Am I allowed to say that? I don’t have a PhD in Botany.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bob Gaetz….oops….I mean Shepherd, would watering tomatoes be considered “Field work” or is it considered working in the field? Inquiring minds need to know! Please don’t let your implicit bias show.
LikeLiked by 1 person
For fear of further revealing the truth about my turn to the Dark Side, I am going to field that question and any suggestion that I am writing for the New York Times. As Roy Cohn taught me and Trump, keep ’em guessing. But alas, I guess that some of you are onto me and my ilk.
LikeLike
Yikes. The tomatoes are looking kinda dry, but I guess I will leave them. After all, I am not a specialist in vascular dynamics in angiosperms.
LikeLike
Of course, we are all IMPLICITLY Freddie Kruger and the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man and but just refuse to admit it, unlike those who have undergone Satori and have so become perfect progressives like Bernie and AOC and Barney.
LikeLike
Implicit bias:
Having an immediate negative reaction when anyone who isn’t a white heterosexual male requests a change that white heterosexual males believe is uncalled for and deserving of constant ridicule and derision. See Rush Limbaugh.
Examples:
“Those fem-Nazis making us call them Ms. — what a nasty bunch of ladies”.
“Why can’t I still call them f*gg*ts or “h*mos, that’s what they always were called?”
“What’s wrong with Billy Crystal doing his Sammy Davis Jr. impression? My friends and I always thought it was hilarious, what’s wrong with these overly sensitive people who are making it so hard for us – we’re the victims here!”
There is a respectful way to discuss matters when cultural norms begin to change. And there is the knee jerk, Rush Limbaugh reaction whenever the slow change begins. It’s true that not all changes take. But it is ALSO true that even people like me, who once thought it was weird to use the pronoun “they” to refer to an individual, can change our view. Because sometimes, even if it doesn’t matter to you, you can realize that since it does matter to someone else and since it does take almost no effort on your part, you can call them by the pronoun they prefer. Or you can belittle and deride them for asking you to make the effort to do something you have decided deserves derision.
Kindness. It goes a long way. If your first reaction is to deride and belittle someone instead of thinking about why your own reaction is so negative, then maybe you should consider your own implicit biases.
I admit it. My first reaction to hearing Ms. as a teenager was that it was silly. My first reaction to hearing “they” used for an individual was to think it didn’t make sense. But instead of deriding it, I thought about it some more. It’s not that hard. Our first reactions aren’t necessarily the only ones we will ever have. If we are open-minded and have empathy.
I’m prepared for all the derisive responses.
LikeLike
Well, that’s not what implicit bias means, but whatever.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Implicit bias. n. A supposed bias or prejudice that is not consciously held or recognized by the person having it.
LikeLike
Are you saying that the people who had an immediate negative reaction to using new terms like “Ms” and “they” instead of the terms that they had been using all of their lives and always believed were fine did not have some implicit bias? What do you call it when folks choose to deride and belittle people asking that they change certain language terms that they use instead of treating their request with thoughtfulness and courtesy? What do you call it if they grudgingly accommodate the request because they feel forced to do so while all the time thinking to themselves how burdensome it is that they have to accommodate this request?
Many people did not consciously recognize their bias. I know I didn’t. It’s human to have some biases you don’t recognize. I know some people seem to believe they could not possibly have any unconscious biases, but most of them do. If a small number don’t, that makes them quite rare, and I wonder if anyone who is over 50 can really say they have gone through their entire life having no unconscious biases. We all grew up in a culture that made it almost impossible not to have had some biases that we have hopefully changed when we realized we had them.
LikeLike
I am saying what implicit bias means. No more. No less.
LikeLike
With all respect to a person whose prose mirrors great learning, you cannot expect to grow a good tomato in Florida. Please come to Tennessee (OK, I will admit my cousin in LaJunta, CO served us some good ones from that area) and you will understand tomatoes.
LikeLike
I think you’re right. I have terrible luck with tomatoes because Floruhduh is home not only to grifters and tort lawyers and insane presidential candidates but also to lots and lots of nasty bugs, like leaf borers, that love tomatoes as much as did Bobby Baccalieri!
However, my peppers are another story. They can’t get enough of this increasingly tropical climate. I have a garden full of superhots–ghost peppers (bhut jolokia), Thor’s hammer, dragon’s breath, 7-pod primo, thai chilis, Vietnamese devil pepper, moringa scorpion, Carolina reapers, chocolate bhutlah. I’ve yet to get my hands on the X pepper, but I’m on the lookout! One has to wear gloves to handle any of those! LOL. I LOVE the hot ones. I am also growing some less challenging peppers–poblanos, jalapeños, habaneros, Cubanelles. I really enjoy making my own salsas, and I have a great seed collection.
Breathtakingly good habanero salsa, which I have named Haba-dabuhl-doya: 5 habaneros, with or without seeds and pith (if you keep them, the salsa is much hotter), 1 large yellow sweet pepper, 1 teaspoon chicken bouillon (regular or vegan/imitation), 1 1/2 teaspoons light brown sugar, 3/4 teaspoon each of ground cumin and whole coriander seed, 1/4 cup lime juice, splash of vinegar, 1/4 cup water, 1/4 cup matzo meal (or panko or toast), 1/4 teaspoon Xanthan gum (optional, to keep the salsa from separating). Put all into a blender and stir it up, little darlin’, stir it up.
This basic recipe can be used with lots of different peppers to produce differing salas. You can add tomatillo or tomato, if you like.
LikeLike
My son has taken to calling me “The Germinator.”
LikeLike
Oops. I left this essential ingredient out of the Habanero salsa: 6 sultanas (white grapes)
LikeLike
I wonder if there is a gene involved in tasting habanero peppers. While I find the heat in them a bit much, I find the flavor they give is accompanied by a lingering aftertaste I find hideous.
some find cilantro tastes like soap. Some find greens bitter, likewise for beer with a lot of hops.
LikeLike
How odd! I love Habaneros for their sweetness and flavor! You can make the same recipe, Roy, with many different peppers.
LikeLike
The tomatoes off my grandfather’s vines in southern Kentucky are of cherished memory. Oh my lord. Those were so good.
And the stuff in a store is nothing like a pepper freshly plucked.
Oh, and for those of you who are wondering about Roy and his pickled peppers, here’s how easy it is to make those.
Cut to stems off. Cover the peppers with a solution of 3/4 water, 1/4 white vinegar. Boil until soft. Place in jar. Keep in fridge for weeks. If you want, you can add typical pickling spices such as whole coriander, whole allspice, bay leaf, cinnamon stick, yellow or brown mustard seeds, whole cumin, red pepper flakes.
There are other methods, ofc, but this is very simple and easy. I constantly keep a jar of quick pickled jalapeños in the fridge for use in my Latin American cooking.
Fun fact of the day: The turgor pressure on the outside skin of a growing potato is three times that of the pressure of a car tire! Other veggies have similarly high pressures on their outside skins. If you pluck one of my peppers freshly and cut into it, you will see and feel the difference from one that you buy from a supermarket.
LikeLike
correction: six Sultanas, or white raisins
LikeLike
I really like Walz from Minnesota. He has great instincts and an authentic bearing. I’ve never seen anyone else zero in so smartly on the “weirdness” of MAGA. I think this is so much more effective than abstract talk about threats to democracy. It captures something essential in a way that the vast majority of people get instinctively. They are just weird.
Minnesota’s governor, a possible Harris vice-presidential pick, calls Trump and Vance ‘weird people.’
LikeLike
Here’s Tim Waltz riding the slingshot with his daughter.
https://x.com/GovTimWalz/status/1698761196730540472
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s. So. Awesome.
LikeLike
Today, I went to work in my garden, and I looked for my favorite garden trowel, and I couldn’t find it. I remembered that recently I decided to keep it in a different place. I remembered actually thinking about doing that. But I could not remember WHERE I decided to put it. Wherever it was, it was not with the rest of my gardening stuff. I have no idea why I moved it or where it now is. LOL. The same thing happened to me about a year ago with a rechargeable flashlight. I decided on the perfect place to keep it. Then I promptly forgot where that was. I have looked in vain for it ever since.
Now, here’s the thing: I wouldn’t have done that when I was 49 and running a publishing house. That forgetfulness has come with age, and I am only 69. I have noticed other changes. I know more than I ever did. I have been an assiduous lifelong learner. But when I do math or logic problems now, it takes me longer. I am not as quick as I was. And I make more typos. And I have more tip-of-the-tongue recall experiences.
Given all this, I do not think that I have the cognitive sharpness that I had 20 years ago, and I would not hire me to do the job that I had 20 years ago, which involved keeping in my head the intricacies, complexities, details of a large number of complex projects with lots of components and tight schedules and budgets. My ability to do that–to be on top of things–was critical to my success.
How much more so for the President of the United States. That is no country for old men, the saying goes. Precisely.
LikeLike
I recall reading that Nolan Ryan threw a no-hitter at age 44. He continued pitching until age 46.
Ryan’s talents and skills certainly declined from his peak. He was not as good as often as he was when he was at his peak athletically.
However, Ryan was still a very good pitcher, because while he didn’t have the same pure athletic ability, he had experience and wisdom. Was he “the best in the country” pitcher at 44? Is any president “the best in the country” cognitively? What matters is whether they can do the job competently.
Bob, I think your cognitive abilities, regardless of their decline, are still better than a number of presidents I can think of (George W. Bush, looking at you!) Despite your strong dislike of me and our differences, I still believe your experience has given you wisdom.
Not being at your cognitive prime does not mean you are cognitively unfit. Wisdom provides knowledge to most of us about how to compensate for things we may have less of, like energy. What good is being super smart if you don’t have wisdom? What good is being smart if you don’t know how to deal with setbacks, or don’t know how to deal with PEOPLE? What good is being super smart if you can’t get the best out of the people who work for you? What good is being super smart if you lack integrity?
I believe Biden got the best out of the people who worked for him. He chose people who he trusted and his judgement proved to do be quite sound. Other presidents, including cognitively fit Jimmy Carter, were not nearly as good at that part of the job.
I agree that the ideal president is young enough to have the stamina needed for a 24/7 job, smart enough to be able to weigh the different facts they will be presented with, and old enough to have the wisdom to make the right decisions. The ideal president must have that and also have the right values and unquestionable integrity. But I’ve never seen that president. Maybe Kamala will prove to be that elusive one, but I am fine if she is not. It’s not necessary to have all of those to have a successful presidency. They are human and will have strengths and weaknesses. But some of those are more important than others. I’d rather have a president with wisdom and integrity than one at his peak cognitively. I’d rather have a president who can get things done because he understands Congress and hires good people than a president who is at his peak cognitively. I am glad Kamala is proving to be smart, funny, wise, and appealing. I think she will make an excellent president. But I am okay if she has some human weaknesses, too.
LikeLike
Well said.
LikeLike
Nolan Ryan could still throw in the mid to high 90s at age 44 and was one of the best pitchers in baseball. It wasn’t wisdom and experience that kept him at that level for so long. It was his freakish physical longevity.
LikeLike
NYC: Using your baseball analogy reminds me of the great knuckleball pitcher, Hoyt Wilhelm. He pitched forever, and his edge was a pitch no one could consistently hit. He was not great, but was part of a successful team. So should we all be.
LikeLike
I am glad to know I am not the only person who has developed the ability to lose things. I do not, however, attribute this to cognitive decline. Rather, it has been the hallmark of my long and under-productive life.
LikeLike
The frustrating thing–and the reason I think it’s a sign of cognitive decline–is that I remember clearly thinking about putting these things away in a particular place, but I don’t remember WHAT PLACE I decided on in each case. ROFL. [Face palms.]
From what I have heard of your brilliantly talented kid, Roy, and based on how much generations of students must have learned from you, I would hardly say that you have been unproductive.
LikeLike
Donald Trump. To know is him to, well, here’s an example:
Klepper & Bolton on Trump, Russia & NATO – Jordan Klepper Fingers the Pulse: Moscow Tools (msn.com)
LikeLike
Oops. Here is a link that works:
Klepper & Bolton on Trump, Russia & NATO – Jordan Klepper Fingers the Pulse: Moscow Tools (youtube.com)
LikeLike
At least, SOMEONE from the Trump family has a, SOUND mind, instead of, following the leader, she would be,a WAY better, candidate to run from the, Trump family, but, she isn’t, running…and, if he win the Nov. election, whichis, MPRE than, likely, U.S. would have, officialy, tripped and, falen down, and, can’t, E-V-E-R, get back up, again!
LikeLike