Michigan, under Republican control for years, has given free rein to charter schools and has long been overrun with unaccountable for-profit schools. But the Governor, Gretchen Whitney, is now a Democrat, and the elected State Board of Education is no longer controlled by Republicans. The State Board took a shocking step this week. It resolved that charter schools should be held to the same rules as public schools.
The State Board of Education approved a resolution during its meeting today calling for legislation to open charter schools to be treated more like public schools in the state of Michigan.
Mitchell ROBINSON’s resolution made the agenda and asked the state Legislature to create and pass laws that would put charter schools under the approval of the Michigan Department of Education and make them more transparent by opening them up to the Freedom of Information Act and Open Meetings Act.
The resolution also asked for legislation that would require charter schools to follow many of the same requirements as public schools, such as bidding for vendors, requirements that no child be excluded from enrolling, not refusing transfer students if space is open, require teachers and administrators to hold certificates, and mandate contracts for management organizations be published online.
“So charter schools are technically public schools, so they should be expected to follow regulations regarding transparency, as all publicly funded schools are,” Robinson said.
However, he said many charter schools are dominated by politically-motivated special interest groups, those looking to be education reformers, and “predatory for-profit organizations.”
He said he’s looked at the charter school system in Michigan and found that they make up one-third of all the local education agencies in the state and are not accountable to the communities.
“I see no evidence of innovation in this service sector,” he said.
He said the public school system struggles to adequately fund itself, not even adding the charter system that also pulls funding for the 363 schools across 285 districts.
“This is financially irresponsible,” he said.
The sole no vote against the resolution came from Tom McMILLIN, a Republican board member.
He argued that charter schools fill in gaps in education and were already fully transparent with the public funding they received.
“These charter schools give parents choices. They fill up for a reason,” McMillin said.
He said the teachers and administrators were already required to be certified.
“What this would do is simply force charter schools to not open, which is what some people want,” McMillin said.
Marshall BULLOCK II pointed to troubles with charter schools in the Detroit area closing without warning or opening in a struggling district that could have the “unintended consequence” of splitting a neighborhood.
“That is how you destroy a neighborhood,” Bullock said.
McMillin called it “perverse” to not give parents a choice and “force them, based on their zip code, to a failing school.” He placed the problem at the feet of the state superintendent.
Tiffany TILLEY asked that the board hear a presentation to look at what other states are doing in terms of charter schools.
“Michigan has become kind of like the Wild Wild West when it comes to charter schools,” Tilley said.
She said you can’t have “thousands” of charter schools with no transparency and continue to maintain a well-funded system, but putting a limit on the number of charters schools could help.
“We do need to change the laws and this has gone on for a very long time,” she said.
Now if only the Michigan legislature would ban for-profit charters! No public school operates for profit. The “profit” is inevitably taken from students and teachers. It’s wrong.

Wow, your hard work and perseverance and passion have paid off. You have worked tirelessly on behalf of public education and informing the public. Thank you. 😊
LikeLike
thank goodness for Governor Whitmer! She’s been a rock star for Michigan!
LikeLike
Governor Whitmer demonstrates she understands how unscrupulous the charter sector is. There is nothing that the charter sector does than could not be done as well or better in the public sector. Whitmer is being generous by simply requiring some level of accountability from charter school operators. The state should intervene in the profiteering , embezzling and the gaming of the system that occurs in the charter sector. No group should have access to public funds without accountability.
LikeLike
Now, if only the legislature would approve a resolution, calling for legislation, to END, putting children under the ABUSE, of the test-score cabal. What part of, continuing the greatest waste of minds and resources (testing), is FOR THE CHILDREN??? What part of “Make me stop doing wrong (testing)” is for the children? What part of testing, demonstrates accountability to the communities?
LikeLike
If charter operators really have to obey all the rules of public schools then charters will cease being windfall cash cows for the corporate-church charterbaggers and they will be forced to move on to greener fields of grift.
LikeLike
The sole no vote against the resolution came from Tom McMILLIN (R-ALEC)
LikeLike
I wonder if that also means, if real public schools cannot spend money and bus students to promotional events (losing instructional learning time) that support, advertise and promote our schools (meaning all of us not just charter school CEOs and stock holders), if publicly funded private sector, secretive charter schools will also be banned from spending the public’s money that way.
https://dianeravitch.net/2013/09/25/a-parent-at-success-academy-says-no-we-wont-march/
LikeLike
This is by far one of the best non-educationese non-legalistic explanations for the public to read about charter schools. Evidence-based research and all are necessary – but simple reality-checks, fairness-checks, and common sense go a long way at the dinner table and coffee shop.
The blog is a list of one-liners in terms everyone “gets” – (and now many have received)
LikeLike
It’s so refreshing to see a democratic acting like democrat and standing up for public education.
LikeLike
It makes common sense to taxpayers to require charter schools to file the same exact public domain budget forms that genuine public schools are required to file — and to file them under penalty of perjury, just like public schools.
That common sense requirement can be easily “sold” to taxpayers by politicians and public school proponents, because the natural instinct of every taxpayer is to make certain that there is accountability for how their tax dollars are spent. Every state in our nation should have that same common sense accountability requirement for charter schools. Time for NEA to launch a national campaign.
LikeLike
Don’t hold your breath waiting for the unions to freaking do something. They could end the federal standardized testing mandate by calling for a national action. Until they do, they are COMPLICIT in child abuse.
LikeLike
Mitchell Robinson is likely known to readers of this blog; he’s an Associate Professor of Music at Michigan State University and has been an educator for some 40 years.. His blog is titled Electablog, and he was endorsed by our own NPE Action for his current office.
LikeLike
Mitchell Robinson is a champion of public schools.
LikeLike
This is wonderful to see, for those of us who fondly remember great Michigan public schools! Many of the practices, programs, and ideas I experienced growing up in a prosperous Flint, (1940’s-’50’s) with well-funded, innovative public schools, I was able to use as a teacher leader in Central Ohio and as a public-school teacher in three different Ohio school districts.
One of the first differences I saw between the Michigan schools and the Southern Ohio ones was the lunch period: An hour in Flint, with a cafeteria, but also students free to go outdoors, home, or wherever if they wanted; Half-an-hour in Ohio schools. Libraries: Every school had one; not so in all Ohio elementaries. Activities: Flint Central had a pool and a swim team; not so for most Ohio schools. Music: Every Friday in a Flint Jr. High there was a morning assembly with music–sing a long’s or presentations by students or the Flint Symphony. Participatory democracy: In Flint a whole jr. high was turned into a political convention, with every student a delegate. I never saw anything like that in Ohio, but I was inspired by that and such practices (including mock trials I experienced attending OSU law school) to have mock trials and other team or group projects in teaching both English and Social Studies in Ohio.
After I moved away, I saw once liberal Michigan become more and more Republican and poison the people of Flint with water from the polluted river. (And it was not a problem unique to Flint).
Michigan began as a state which ruled out capital punishment, as its first official act. It also gave us the auto industry and strong unionism–when the birthing UAW occupied the factory in Flint, 1936. Over time, with increasing “conservative” governments, it became the state that gave us Timothy McVeigh’s plot to blow up Federal government buildings, and the attempts on Gov. Wittmer’s life.
Hail, hail to MIchigan, coming out of its dark ages and back to the light it once was for America!
LikeLike
Hello Jack: Wow, what a wonderful recollection. You should send this as is to every person in Congress and SCOTUS. It “says it all.” CBK
LikeLike
Diane: The charter/voucher idea, especially with the demand for having no accountability, has proved to be a huge moral hazard, just in terms of applying capitalist principles to what, in a democracy, is about providing basic public service for “the people.”
Also, the Education for All idea is bedrock for any democracy because, without a basic education for all, and across generations, democracy itself cannot last long . . . which seems to be the idea anyway for many whose motivations are less about thieving from the public coffers than about making way, AGAIN, for racism and every other kind of -ism on the books, including snobbery, aka: keeping their children away from “those people” and themselves away from “those parents” who can only remind them of their building of and misuse of power as well as their “gated” ignorance.
Also, I see complaints here and elsewhere in the literature about greed, fraud and, more generally, the false need to slip a profit-making business in between children’s right to a public education and the people’s governmental institutions that are mandated to pay for it . . .
. . . but what about the across-the-board assault on the curriculum? Is anyone thinking about systematically guarding these schools from the rampant replacing of a qualified education with various forms of social, political, and religious propaganda, not to mention the normalization of book banning? (next step: burning?) CBK
LikeLike