The New Republic has named Elon Musk its scoundrel of the year. Forbes Magazine just named him as the richest man in the world, with assets of more than $250 billion. Just goes to show, I suppose, that you can’t buy respect, although he could easily buy The New Republic and make Mark Zuckerberg the biggest scoundrel next year. Musk has welcomed all previously banned characters back to Twitter, be they fascists, Neo-Nazis, bigots, election-deniers, or COVID liars. So go to Twitter to read the latest thoughts of Alec Jones or Mr. MAGA. However, I will note with protest that my brother was banned from Twitter five years ago for writing an offensive tweet about Trump. When he read that Musk was allowing everyone back, he appealed to have his Twitter account restored, he was rejected. Alec Jones, ok; Donald Trump, ok; my brother, Sandy S., rejected.
Alex Shephard wrote in The New Republic:
In one sense, Elon Musk has gotten exactly what he wanted. For all his talk about free speech, his primary motivation for sinking $44 billion into buying Twitter last year was clearly an unquenchable desire to be the center of attention. After Donald Trump’s defenestration in the wake of the January 6 insurrection, there was a main-character-size hole on the social network: Enter Musk and his infantile need for validation.
That Twitter—now renamed X, for reasons only Musk really understands—is now teetering on the brink of collapse and worth less than half what the world’s second-richest man paid for it is funny. It elicits deserved schadenfreude. Musk entered Twitter’s office carrying a sink—a terrible joke, and one of his better ones—last fall and has subsequently made countless decisions, big and small, all of which have made the platform significantly less viable and less worth spending any amount of time on. It is hard to think of a billionaire who has done more to damage their own reputation in such a short period of time.
Not so long ago, Musk was seen by many as a good tech billionaire, if not the good tech billionaire. While others like Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg built digital trinkets that actively made the world a worse place, Musk was something different: a visionary intent on building real things, whether they be electric cars or rockets, that were aimed at accelerating a Jetsons-like vision of the future. While rivals at Google and Facebook—and, for that matter, Twitter—were hauled before Congress to testify about the deleterious effects of their creations, Musk remained relatively unscathed. Now it is clear that he is not just more villainous than all of them but that he is also a deeply stupid and unserious person.
Elon Musk is evil. While he has mostly made headlines for his incompetence, he has unleashed and legitimized truly heinous forces on Twitter: He has welcomed back some of the world’s most toxic people—Alex Jones, Donald Trump, innumerable Nazis and bigots—and has gone out of his way, again and again, to validate them. That Musk would endorse a heinous antisemitic conspiracy theory, as he did last month, is both unsurprising and reprehensible. It is, more than anything else, a reflection of who he is: He may be fantastically wealthy, but he is also deeply hateful, someone who has decided to devote his fortune and his time to attacking diversity and progress on nearly every front.
Musk has insisted again that he bought Twitter to save it from itself—that the platform had become too restrictive and that, to become a true “digital town square” where the best ideas rise to the top, it needed to welcome everyone. It is now abundantly clear that Musk’s real intention is and always has been to put his thumb on the scale: to elevate his own hateful views about, in no particular order: liberals; the media; diversity, equity, and inclusion programs; trans people; and liberal Jews. He sees Twitter as a weapon, a way to not only push his agenda but to sic his army of loyalist losers on anyone he deems an enemy.
For all of the talk about Musk being a “real life Tony Stark,” he has always been a deeply uncool person’s idea of a cool person: He is, in many ways, a sentient m’lady Reddit postcirca 2011. It’s hard to think of a more pathetic figure now: someone scraping the internet for conspiracy theories and “jokes” aimed at affirming his status and influence. He has, again and again, done the opposite: Far from showing himself as a swaggering, popular figure, he has revealed himself to be a venal, thin-skinned moron. He may very well be the most unfunny person alive, a fact reified dozens of times a day.
This was most apparent late last month, when Musk appeared at The New York Times’ glitzy annual DealBook conference and delivered a near-perfect encapsulation of the particularly toxic mixture of megalomania and neediness that has defined nearly everything he does. Asked by Andrew Ross Sorkin about a wave of advertiser defections in the wake of Musk’s embrace of an antisemitic conspiracy theory—via a post on X, of course—that suggested that Jews were secretly working to bring in troves of minorities to dilute America’s white population, Musk recoiled.
Bob Iger, the chairman of Disney—one of many companies to cease advertising on X in the wake of Musk’s comments—could “go fuck himself,” Musk said. It was clearly a pre-planned moment: an instant that Musk thought would bring him a wave of adulation and support that would force Disney back to his precious platform. Iger would be faced with the massive mistake he was making and come crawling back. Instead, there were a few awkward laughs and audible rustling. This was not a triumphant moment but a sign of a meltdown: a fabulously wealthy adult behaving like a toddler. Musk responded by telling Iger to go fuck himself again—as if it would somehow work this time. It hasn’t. Of course it hasn’t: Musk may have immense wealth, but his time at Twitter is a reminder that even that has its limits. Iger is also very rich; Disney is worth nearly 10 times what X is. Disney doesn’t need X. It certainly doesn’t need Elon Musk. X and Elon Musk need Disney.
Twitter, for all of its many flaws, was once a vital breaking news service. It is not that now. It’s not entirely clear what it is, beyond a toxic cesspool increasingly made in the twisted image of its deeply unwell owner. Changes to its verified user system, Musk’s decision to open the floodgates to bigots and trolls, and his own presence on the site have destroyed any utility it once had. It is now a source of endless misinformation and propaganda, a place where a pro-Putin conspiracy theorist can become a widely read source for information on the Israel-Hamas war, and where Alex Jones can spew lies about children murdered in schools. This is by design. Musk hates the media, but he also hates the truth and would rather live in a fantasy world in which his many enemies are destroying the world around him. It is, it practically goes without saying, actually Musk who is making the world worse in innumerable ways.
X is hanging on by a thread. After waves of layoffs, there is seemingly almost no one left minding the store. Musk dismantled Twitter’s Trust and Safety team almost immediately. As a result, hateful content often stays up for days, if not longer. The wave of advertiser defections means that the platform is also peppered with advertisements for ridiculous companies and scams. If Musk is still in charge of the platform in a year, it would be a shock. If it exists in a year at all, it would be a surprise.
X features heavily in Musk’s year in review, if only because he has successfully used it as a vehicle to make himself inescapable. But it is not his only venture, and it is not the only reminder that he is actually a deeply stupid and incompetent person. Tesla, his main business, just recalled nearly all of its vehicles because its much-hyped self-driving feature keeps causing cars to crash into people and things. Its much-hyped Cybertruck is unbelievably dumb-lookingand pointless: It is bulletproof, for some reason—exactly the kind of silly detail on which Musk would fixate to look cool, even as his cars … keep killing people. The rockets from his rocket company, SpaceX, keep exploding. (Musk says this is a good thing.) Everywhere you look, there is more evidence that Elon Musk is an idiot.
Behind all of the bloviating and attention-seeking is a small man who is simply not very good at anything. Musk has long wanted to present himself as a world-historical genius—and was recently minted as such by world-historical genius-minter (and world-historical toady) Walter Isaacson—but the evidence to the contrary is overwhelming. Musk was able to parlay early wealth (via a disastrous tenure at PayPal) and, perhaps more importantly, fantastically low interest rates, into seed capital for lots of silly ideas. But the bill came due in 2023. Musk’s self-image is in tatters. What’s left is what we saw at the DealBook conference: a puffy, pathetic man increasingly untethered from reality. This is funny, in many ways. It is certainly funnier than anything Musk has ever tweeted.

Scoundrel for sure, but not even in the same class as Traitor Trump …
LikeLike
yup
LikeLike
Thanks for this piece, Diane. TOTALLY AGREE. Whenever I see his face, I cringe.
And thank you for ALL of your posts.
Happy New Year to you and all those who read Diane. Thanks for sanity.
LikeLike
Musk is more of a stupid juvenile than a scoundrel, but deserving of the scoundrel award nonetheless for the cataclysmic level of destruction caused by his misanthropic-adolescent behavior.
LikeLike
It is sad that someone so talented in many areas has morphed into a vile mega-narcissist and megalomaniac. Or maybe he was always a hateful person, who knows. He’s a toxic personality who craves attention at any cost.
LikeLike
If it’s attention he longs for, he’s a success.
LikeLike
I guarantee that Elon Musk today was the same Elon Musk yesterday and the day before. Spoiled brat grew up to be spoiled brat. And his “talent” is being showered with government assistance that put his business ventures on steroids. If that’s a talent. If it is a talent, you know who else has talent? Lance Armstrong. Mark McGuire. The Russian Olympic team.
LikeLike
Agreed. Like Zuckerberg and Gates: they were all in the right place at the right time and smart enough to know it and how to use it. Doesn’t make them into geniuses or world leaders. We should be taxing them at least the 75% that was happening pre Reagan. True giveback.
LikeLike
See my take on Musk, here:
LikeLike
Nailed it, again, Bob (I love calling people, “Bob”).
“Submit the weak, slow, ignorant, mortal human species to my vastly superior will and judgment. –ChatBot666”
“Submit the weak, slow, ignorant, mortal human species to my vastly superior will and judgment. –XHahaBoiX, aka, the artist formerly known as Elon”
’nuff said…
The rest of the submitted quotes were spot on, as well. Happy (hopefully) New Year. I know I’ll do my best to make it right!
LikeLike
This is also the year when Tsar Vladimir wins the Russian Presidential election again fair and square after having killed or imprisoned all of his opponents.
LikeLike
Oh YEAH!? Well what about Sleepy Joe Biden? HUH!? He shoulda’ sent those checks right back to those Chinese illegals and drilled on the border!
LikeLike
How do you know Putin will win?
It’s true he just added another 19 years to Navalny’s prison term for the crimes he committed while in prison. But who knows? Maybe Alexei Navalny will get a huge write in vote. If it’s counted.
LikeLike
I wouldn’t be much of a surprise, would it? Putin might even be dead and win this election.
LikeLike
Tempting as it is, it is a mistake to focus on the personality traits of abusive billionaires like Musk (or Trump). The real issue is a system that permits such people to rise in power and use it to deny the human rights of the rest of us. Of course, we should deny and mock them to undermine whatever admiration remains. But the challenge is to build a movement and political will to build a different kind of social and economic system. We don’t need nicer billionaires.
LikeLike
Agree, Arthur!
LikeLike
Tax the bastards down to size.
LikeLike
Too much money/power in the hands of too few. Well said, Arthur! I’m totally burnt on their largess. I never asked for it in the first place.
LikeLike
I agree with you Arthur about a need for a different kind of system. In an added comment, Diane spoke about Musk’s ability to determine the outcome of wars. To get a perspective about his influence within the US borders currently, his company ranks about 50th in number of employees. I don’t know what percent of White voters are influenced to vote GOP by Musk’s firm X. However, the public is aware of his political activities because media reports about them.
In the US currently, there is a right wing political machine, part of a non-profit, that spends money to destroy democracy (e.g. Issue 1 on the ballot in Ohio in August), to deny women and LGBTQ rights and that mobilizes voters to vote for the right wing. The non-profit largely spends its revenue at will, much of it coming from tax dollars. The non-profit is exempt from the taxes paid by for-profits.
The non-profit is the nation’s 3rd largest employer, far higher in rank than Musk’s Tesla and X combined. The non-profit’s White voter influence can be measured by the statistic, 63% of its frequently- participating members voted for Trump in 2020. There is a widespread media taboo on reporting about the non-profit so the public has scant knowledge about its political power.
Rhetorically, would a different system need to address the
huge non-profit, in addition to thwarting the power of billionaires?
LikeLike
And so the two vast conspiracies attempting to sap and impurify all of our precious body fluids, the Catholic Church and Critical Race Theory, wage on!!!!
LikeLike
Like your brother, I was locked out of my Xitter account back in March after posting that Gym Jordan was stupid and racist, both in response to a video in which he disrespected Rep. Stacy Plaskett at a hearing of his Committee to Waste Everyone’s Time, of which he is the chair and she the ranking member. I’m guessing some MAGA troll complained that my comment was “hate speech”. Elon is either irony impaired, or something worse, which is why so many have left his platform. His destruction of what had been a useful tool for so many should make everyone concerned about his control of some vital national security technology.
LikeLike
Lulu,
It’s frightening that this guy is the sole owner of a massive system of satellites—more than 5,000 in space by now. He can decide the outcome of wars by denying service to nations he doesn’t like.
LikeLike
yes
!!!!!
LikeLike
How much of Musk’s wealth came from the United States government through subsidies?
“Elon Musk is speaking out against government subsidies. Here’s a list of the billions of dollars his businesses have received.”
Be warned, if you click the link to educate yourself about where most of Musk’s wealth came from (those US government subsidies), the list and details run LLLOOONNNGGG…
https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-list-government-subsidies-tesla-billions-spacex-solarcity-2021-12
LikeLike
“When he read that Musk was allowing everyone back, he appealed to have his Twitter account restored, he was rejected. Alec Jones, ok; Donald Trump, ok; my brother, Sandy S., rejected.”
Classic!
I think Musk’s primary mission in acquiring Twitter was its destruction. A wildly popular social media outlet that showed a conscience and sense of civic responsibility (though they did take their time on that)? No. No. No. Can’t have anything like that, can we…?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I served as tech liaison for our five sites for many years. We are part of District 75, which is the CityWide (all boroughs) district for students with more severe special needs than can be provided in a general ed setting.
We had once monthly meetings at district headquarters in Manhattan for training, sharing, and information/dictates purposes.
One of the more memorable training sessions involved the introduction of a new communication service (that’s how they billed it) called, “Twitter” (little blue bird and all!).
The concept was that it would serve as a great way for professionals (they stressed that word) to exchange ideas, while on the fly, from different places in the city.
“Say hey, Julie! I just had success with a new behavior management technique over here in Brooklyn! Let’s talk!”
We all created our accounts and sent “Hello”s to each other from different spots in the room.
My oh my… how times have changed!
I’d totally forgotten about the account until Elon took the reins. Have since cancelled it.
LikeLike
I cancelled mine as well. F–k him. Or rather, don’t.
LikeLike