Leonie Haimson, executive director of Class Size Matters, is outraged that Mayor DeBlasio is handing schools over to Laurene Powell Jobs and the charter-promoting Robin Hood Foundation.
Powell Jobs has handed out $100 million to jumpstart “innovative” schools. Four of the 10 schools to which she gave $10 million each have already failed. Her closest associate is Arne Duncan, whose Race to the Top was a disaster.
Over the last decade or so, the Robin Hood Foundation has primarily supported charter schools in its education portfolio, as might be predicted considering it was founded by hedge funders and its board is still composed largely of corporate executives and financiers. According to Wikipedia, its board chair, Larry Robbins, is also the board chair of KIPP NY charter schools, and board chair of the Relay Graduate School, that trains teachers in the charter school “no excuses” regimented style of instruction. Robbins is also a member of the NY Board of Teach for America.
DeBlasio, who claimed to be a charter critic, has invited Robin Hood to open 18 new charter schools. Astonishing!
Haimson writes:
Given that these two private funders will help select the winners, or as Robin Hood put it, “will partner with the Department of Education on a rigorous selection process”, that means DOE will be sacrificing control for the design of these public schools to these two organizations for a relative pittance, compared to what it will cost to operate them.
But an even greater concern, as I expressed it to the Daily News, is that every new school will likely take space and funding away from our existing public schools, which are already underfunded and in many cases squeezed for space. Every new school makes overcrowding worse by eating up classroom space with the need to carve out new, replicated administrative and cluster rooms.
We already have seen how worse inequities have resulted from the expansion of co-located charter schools in our public school buildings, as well as how the Gates-funded small schools initiative led to many of the remaining large high schools becoming even more overcrowded with the high-needs students that the small schools refused to enroll. Many of these disadvantaged students at the large schools ended up more likely to be discharged, enrolled in low-quality credit recovery programs, or graduating without a Regents diploma — all of which served the purposes of the organizations running the show as their small schools graduation data appeared better in comparison. Another piece of evidence that DOE is caught in an infinite feedback loop: the Senior adviserto the XQ Institute is Michele Cahill, who ran the small schools initiative when she was at DOE.
It feels as though we are seeing a rerun of the Bloomberg-Klein regime.

“That means DOE will be sacrificing control for the design of these public schools to these two organizations for a relative pittance, compared to what it will cost to operate them.”
Happens all the time in ed reform. The billionaire funders do it but ed reformers in government do it too. They dangle a tiny portion of what the thing actually costs and then with that they buy the policy. Once the policy is in they transfer the costs to the public.
They’ve done it over and over and over. Race to the Top did it. The ed reform mandated policy cost much, much than the sweepsstake winner states got. It was a bad deal. The Ohio public schools who took the grants ended with a net loss and policy they didn’t develop and didn’t support.
I’m only surprised NYC bought it. They usually dangle it in front of more desperate places.
Anyway, you’l know soon enough. If the “winners” are determined by the same set of echo chamber members who judge all these things then the contest is already over. No dissenters will get past the first round. It’s skewed at the outset, right? Twice as many charter schools as public schools is a decision, and that decision has already been made.
LikeLike
yikes
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 7:03 AM Diane Ravitch’s blog wrote:
> dianeravitch posted: “Leonie Haimson, executive director of Class Size > Matters, is outraged that Mayor DeBlasio is handing schools over to Laurene > Powell Jobs and the charter-promoting Robin Hood Foundation. Powell Jobs > has handed out $100 million to jumpstart “innovative” ” >
LikeLike
How? I thought NYC had already reached the cap on charter schools. How could the Mayor “invite” them to open 18 new ones?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Leonie Haimson asked the same question.
LikeLike
FLERP!,
This is how the NY Times reported this: (The all caps are mine)
“In New York City, XQ will spend about $10 million to help create 10 new and restructured district high schools across the five boroughs.
Robin Hood is planning to spend about $5 million to support the opening of another 10 new traditional public schools in low-income neighborhoods, likely including a mix of elementary, middle and high schools. Robin Hood is also set to spend about $1 million to train educators in district and charter schools.”
In a SEPARATE initiative planned for the same time frame, Robin Hood has also committed to spend about $10 million to help create 18 new charter schools. These charter schools will be IN ADDITION to the 40 new and reconfigured schools that are envisioned as part of the newly announced program.”
I could be wrong, but my reading of this is the initiative de Blasio announced is different from Robin Hood Foundation’s plan to create 18 new charter schools. And Robin Hood would have to have their billionaire funders buy more politicians in Albany to raise the cap if they want to do that.
LikeLike
Sigh. I’ve said it before in these fora, so I regret belaboring the point, but: Mayor DeBlasio has been an enormous disappointment.
LikeLike
The mayor becomes even more disappointing as time goes by. I regret my 2013 support for him.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Likewise, Diane–and I appreciate your saying so.
LikeLike
I am not a New Yorker but I have been looking at Robin Hood Metrics for some time and I have just checked to see if these have been updated. The answer is no.
The website says: “Our system of metrics supports a powerful ambition: spend donor dollars smartly. Without waste. Metrics help determine the relative impact of different kinds of poverty-fighting initiatives. See the 163 Metrics formulas we have developed to evaluate poverty interventions.”
The first metric says: As outlined below, we estimate the total benefit of pre-K programs on poor New Yorkers from all enumerated impacts to be $50,650 per student.”
If you look closely at the reasoning for each metric you will see that Robin Hood is relying on estimates from “experts” who are cited in references. Most of these citations pre-date the economic disaster of 2008 and the current version of all metrics is dated 2014. Robin Hood is not nimble with metrics and does not care about their validity.
As one example, the first metrics for calculating the economic worth of pre-school refer to outcomes from three “high quality” preschool programs created 30 years ago with estimates of the current benefit of similar (hypothetical) programs on a long chain of other estimates–rates of high school graduation, college attendance and graduation, estimated earnings from an associate versus bachelor degree, also inferential leaps to health benefits, reduction of juvenile delinquency, and parents free from the cost of child care while kids are pre-school.
The assumptions made about the economic value of a “high quality pre-school program” are dubious at best. They reflect the values and tactics of billionaires smitten with the belief that they have superior judgment because they are devoted to return on investment calculations, even if these are based on outdated studies and dubious inferences. These calculations extend to a “quality of life years” metric (QUALY) now in use by medical insurance companies.
You can bet that these self-anointed experts and money changers are not investing $50,650 per child in pre-school programming in NYC.
Click to access Metrics-Equations-for-Website_Sept-2014.pdf
LikeLike
Why does Leonie only focus on the hypocrisy of de Blasio?
Clearly there are lots of other hypocrites she didn’t mention but who are helping push this evil and corrupt policy.
The other “hypocrites” are teachers’ union leader Mike Mulgrew. And City Council Member Mark Treyger, Chair of the Committee on Education. And NeQuan C. McLean, President CEC 16. I’m shocked that Mark Treyger is actively helping de Blasio turn over public schools to corporate interests, but I’m certainly glad to know what a lying hypocrite Treyger is.
de Blasio is term limited, but Mark Treyger clearly has aspirations and we should all make sure he is defeated in the next election. If I believe that Leonie is correct, then Treyger only pretends to support public schools while he is clearly only interested in pushing de Blasio’s pro-corporate takeover of public schools because he wants money from those rich billionaires for his next race.
de Blasio is gone, but let’s get rid of Treyger who – thanks to Leonie – I now know is a corporate shill who would destroy public schools to get in good with those corrupt foundations whose agenda he is pushing.
LikeLike
DeBlasio runs the New York City Department of Education. He has total control. He made the decision to partner with Mrs. Jobs and the hedge funders Robin Hood Foundation.
LikeLike
And Mark Traygar made the decision to cheerlead it and endorse it. He had total control of that decision and chose to embrace the hedge funders. I can only surmise Traygar wants their money for his next campaign.
LikeLike
Is Traygar lying?
“It is always a good day when there’s investments made in public schools. Imagine Schools NYC is a community driven initiative addressing many, many needs and is a game changer for students. Educators, students, parents and community stakeholders will be able to develop innovative school models that will provide real-world educational experiences for our students,” said Council Member Mark Treyger, Chair of the Committee on Education. “It’s time to build curricula around the diverse strengths of students and in alignment with 21st century opportunities and needs. I look forward to touring an Imagine School in the near future.”
LikeLike
Whew! Robin Hood, known to us already as a big [KIPP-connected] charter funder, has—how special!—a trio of co-founders/board members that really smells bad: Weinstein supporter, Epstein supporter, & perp. Eww.
And contrary to the rosy press coverage of a unique “community-driven” concept, Imagine gives 1 month application deadline complete w/concept design & trimmings—and so far nobody’s seen any community meetings. The real deal looks unmistakably like small schools then co-located charters that squeeze out the hoi polloi in favor of potential high test-scorers.
The usual crap. DiBlasio thinks this will improve his image on his way out? With whom?
LikeLike
Robbin the Hood
Robbin the hood
Of public schools
Fillin with flood
Of charter tools
Out of the wood*
With his Merry Men
Robbin the Hood
Has struck again
(*hedge, to be more precise)
LikeLike
Push Pols
Over the hedge
And under the bridge
Trolls have the edge
And pols in the fridge
LikeLike
Trolls refers to Wall Street hedge fund school privatizers
LikeLike
“Trolling for Dollars”
The trolls are waiting under bridge
To pounce upon the passing kids
Disguised as Broads and billy Goats
With candy and with diet Kochs
“Inflammatory Trolls”
Inflammatory trolls
With pants and hair on fire
Have sold their very souls
To get what they desire
….
And still of a winter’s night, they say,
when the VAMmers roam like trolls
When the school is a ghostly galleon
tossed upon rocky shoals,
When the Test is a ribbon of Pearson
tying the Common Core,
A Mywayman comes riding—
Riding—riding—
A Mywayman comes riding, up to the
school-house door.
— from The Mywayman
LikeLike