Bob Shepherd is an amazingly accomplished writer, assessment developer, wordsmith, textbook author, and many more things. But after climbing many professional mountains, he decided to become a classroom teacher. He has a low tolerance for nonsense. He teaches in Florida.
Evaluation Session Stream of Consciousness Rant
OK, you are sitting in your year-end evaluation session, the freaking EIGHTH such session you’ve had this year, as though you had nothing better to do, and you’ve heard from every other teacher in your school that his or her scores were a full level lower this year than last, and so you know that the district office has leaned on the principal to give fewer exemplary ratings even though your school actually doesn’t have a problem with its test scores and people are doing what they did last year but a bit better, of course, because one grows each year as a teacher–one refines what one did before, and one never stops learning.
But you know that this ritual doesn’t have anything, really, to do with improvement. It has to do with everyone, all along the line, covering his or her tushy and playing the game and doing exactly what he or she is told, going all the way back to Bill Gates, who, being a God, evaluates but is not evaluated, who did stack ranking at Microsoft because, admit it, he was probably on the spectrum and didn’t know better and, since behaving in this appalling way made him incredibly wealthy, it must be right, huh? And, at any rate, everyone except the politicians and those paid to think otherwise knows that the tests in ELA are not actually valid or reliable and that’s not really the issue at your school because, the scores are pretty good because this is a suburban school with affluent parents, and the kids always, year after year, do quite well.
So whether the kids are learning isn’t really the issue. The issue is that by means of the latest magic formula pushed by the district and some InstaEduPundit, each cohort of kids is supposed to perform better than the last–significantly better–on the tests, though they come into your classes in exactly the same shape they’ve always come into them in because, you know, they are kids and they are just learning and teaching ISN’T magic. It’s a lot of hard work. It’s magical, sometimes, but its’ not magic.
So, the stuff you’ve been told to do in your “trainings” (“Bark. Roll over. Sit. Good Boy”) is pretty transparently teaching-to-the-test because some people, astonishingly, continue to believe, after years of evidence to the contrary, that that’s a way that one might actually meet the insane demand that each cohort will be magically superior to the last, but you feel in your heart of hearts that caving to this idiocy, this crowd madness, would be JUST WRONG, that it would short-change your students to start teaching InstaWriting-for-the Test, Grade 5, instead of, say, teaching writing. And despite all the demeaning crap you are subjected to, you still give a damn.
And you sit there and you actually feel sorry for this principal because she, too, is squirming like a fly in treacle in the muck that is Education Deform, and she knows she has fantastic teachers who knock it out of the park year after year, but her life has become a living hell of accountability reports and data chats to the point that she doesn’t have time for anything else anymore (she has said this many times), and now she has to sit there and tell her amazing veteran teachers who have worked so hard all these years and who care so much and give so much and know so freaking much that they are just satisfactory, and she feels like hell doing this and is wondering when she can retire.
And the fact that you BOTH know this hangs there in the room–the big, ugly, unspoken thing. And the politicians and the plutocrats and the mendacious twits at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute and that smarmy know-nothing David Coleman and the Secretary of the Department for the Privatization of Education, formerly the USDE, and the Vichy education guru collaborators with these people barrel ahead, like so many drunks in a car plowing through a crowd of pedestrians.

“And you sit there and you actually feel sorry for this principal because she, too, is squirming like a fly in treacle in the muck that is Education Deform, and she knows she has fantastic teachers who knock it out of the park year after year, but her life has become a living hell of accountability reports and data chats to the point that she doesn’t have time for anything else anymore (she has said this many times), and now she has to sit there and tell her amazing veteran teachers who have worked so hard all these years and who care so much and give so much and know so freaking much that they are just satisfactory, and she feels like hell doing this and is wondering when she can retire.”
I’m sorry, perhaps you’ll forgive me that I’m not crying buckets for this poor principal. She knows she has great teachers but she’s willing to stab them in the back to save her own backside? Boo hoo for her. I feel as sorry for her as I do for the poor guy running the concentration camp who’s sorry for what he has to do to the inmates.
LikeLiked by 1 person
YEARS of “admin” level principals, vice principals, assistant principals, coaches, supervisors, facilitators, test bosses, consultants: all taking good-sized paychecks to play the BLAME TEACHERS game.
LikeLike
I do know one administrator who left after a short while when he couldn’t stomach having to rate good teachers poorly. He left quietly since he still needed to work. I wonder what he is doing now.
LikeLike
Powerful, and unfortunately, a dead-on account of the condition of many teachers. Smarmy, mendacious, know-nothings who thinks that continuous improvement, cohort to cohort, is possible because kids in a cohort are just widgets and the teachers are producers of these and on the take unless they “meet or exceed expectations.” Thank you Diane for bringing Bob Shepard’s writing froward and to Bob for capturing this dread time of year for teachers.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am so glad I got to teach in a better time…when we teachers could put the kids first, use their and our creativity to make our subjects real and fun. Wow! I am so lucky to have been able to retire before all this crazy corporate nonsense began this destruction. Oh, please, younger ones, continue the fight for humane public schools!
LikeLike
Great piece, Bob!. Painful to read. Several years ago when my state was rolling out a new evaluation system, the principals in my district were instructed to give everyone “proficient” no matter what. I assume this was so that teachers would get comfortable with the system and not complain. Previously “exemplary teachers” and all veteran teachers with 30+ years of experience rendered “proficient.” What’s the point?
LikeLike
They’re setting a median.
It is literally what you do when measuring widgets.
LikeLike
Because if they were exemplary, than some others would be incompetent, but this never happens, does not it? All the teachers are great, loving, caring and knowledgeable. All 100% of them. There are no bad seeds.
LikeLike
I meant to say I left after that year so I don’t know what happened next…
LikeLike
A Bill Gates/Eli Broad Stream of Consciousness Mash-Up:
“$$$… aah, power/control…$$$… yes, power/control… Mine Mine Mine !!!… $$$… Power… Mine… Control… Mine… $$$… MIne !… Mine !!! … Mine !!!”
Apologies to Mr. Shepherd, but the lizard brain of these two is rather primitive…
LikeLike
No time to comment, it’s river time!
LikeLike
Have fun, Duane! (Oh, heck, you’re probably down river already & will never read this.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep, was, but now back. Thanks!
LikeLike
Reminds me of the early days of NCLB (circa 2002) when schools had to show test score increases in each of several different sub-groups of students. Now I still teach in this relatively small district of about 2,000 students, K to 12. Any way, we were sitting in the auditorium listening to a women from NYSED describing this unreasonable demand; she came off as rather terse and rigid – very authoritarian. When she was done I raised my hand and mentioned that some of our subgroups had fewer than 20 students and that it was not possible to draw statistical conclusions from such small sample sizes. Her answer: “I don’t give a shit.” True story.
LikeLike
This has migrated into health care. Health care people hate it too 🙂
It sometimes leads to ridiculous results. For a while, they were ranking providers on “patient satisfaction”.
Apparently, patients want a lot of antibiotics and opiates, so it really wasn’t a good competition to launch. To get a higher ranking you would give the people what they want, with disastrous results.
LikeLike
Last year I was chatting with my accountant while getting my taxes done, and we spoke about our children. He said that his daughter was graduating from college and was considering going into education. In mock horror I raised my hands and in a panicky voice said, “Don’t let her do it!”
That’s when he said that his MD wife had already warned their child away from going into medicine…
LikeLike
posted at https://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Evaluation-Session-Stream-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Diane-Ravitch_Evaluation_Learning_School-Reform-180605-716.html#comment702456
with this comment, taken from this site.
From the Ravitch Blog: ReStandardized Testing
CHris Churchill: For better schools, ditch the standardized tests
It’s easy to think of things our kids would be better off doing. Playing in the spring sunshine. Planting a garden. Burying their heads in books. Practicing jump shots. Catching frogs. Learning reading, writing and arithmetic. Learning Urdu. Learning anything.
The tests are a time suck for teachers, too. They’ll be watching over spiritless and possibly anxious classrooms of test-taking students when they should be, crazy thought here, teaching. We should want our schools alive — with passion and joy, with laughter and curiosity, with play and learning.
Maybe that sounds too romantic for this grim, hard-headed age. Shouldn’t we insist that our children line up for the rat race and defeat their rivals from around the globalized economy?
Even if we swallow that baloney, there’s remarkably little evidence that the national rise of high-stakes standardized testing has done anything to improve schools and learning. As far as I can tell, the only beneficiaries are the big bureaucracies that want more control over classrooms and the big corporations that provide the tests.
The tests certainly haven’t benefited our kids, who, in many districts, are getting shorter recesses so teachers can spend more time in service to the looming tests. Or who, as many parents can attest, view testing days with anxiety and dread.
If the tests were just tests, they might be relatively harmless. But they epitomize something bigger: The madness that applies a production mentality to education. Everything can be neatly quantified, yes siree, not to mention automated, regulated and homogenized!
But children aren’t widgets and schools aren’t factories. You can’t measure the success of a classroom with data points. Standardized testing tells us nothing important about how children experience school.
Tests can’t tell us if Mr. Jones is a much-needed role model for fatherless boys. They can’t tell us how much Mrs. Riley cares for her fourth-graders. They can’t tell us if Ms. Hughes’ eighth-graders feel supported or inspired. They can’t tell us if Mr. Hernandez is changing lives.
All of which illustrates why tying teacher evaluations (and salaries) to test scores is so hideously ludicrous. Such a system rewards an uninspired teacher who devotes every depressing classroom minute to dreary test prep, and it punishes the impassioned teacher who refuses to teach for the test but instead imbues children with a love of learning.
There are other problems. Tests designed by upper-middle-class professionals will, surprise surprise, inherently reward the children of upper-middle-class professionals. Schools attended by poor kids get labeled underperforming or even failing. But lower test scores often result from that very poverty. A child who knows violence, hunger or fear at home won’t do as well on a standardized test, and it’s unfair to expect even a great teacher to overcome that.
Let’s pause here to give the opt-out movement a sincere and robust round of applause. Clap, clap, clap, clap.
The parents who hold their children out of testing — about 20 percent of the statewide total in recent years — are expressing healthy rebellion against the production approach to education. They’re standing up to the consultants and “experts” who claim to know what’s best for kids but prove again and again they don’t. They are saying no to an impersonal education bureaucracy with a vested interest in getting bigger and silencing parental voices.
Clearly, the opt-out movement has been a tremendous success. It has forced New York to back off its testing regime, at least a little. The time devoted to testing students in grades 3 through 8, for example, has been reduced from six days annually to four, including the two days of math testing that begin Tuesday.
Meanwhile, Gov. Andrew Cuomo has seemingly shelved his proposal that test scores account for 50 percent of teacher evaluations; the opt-out rebellion put that bad idea on ice. Now, the state Assembly is even considering a bill that would end test-based teacher evaluations altogether.
New York should go further. It should altogether eliminate standardized testing in elementary and middle schools.
Doing so would be a step toward rejecting the insidious idea that education should be evermore standardized. It would bring more local control of schools. It would help recognize what should be obvious: Real teaching can’t be homogenized, because every child learns differently. It’s an inherently individualized process.
As most every parent and teacher knows, learning is about small moments and quiet victories. It’s about relationships built on trust and even love. My God, is there anything more personal or magical or maybe even divine than teaching a small child to read?
There are things that can be measured. Teaching and caring for children are not among them.
cchurchill@timesunion.com ” 518-454-5442 ” @chris_churchill
LikeLike
We all know this is BS, but if you are gong to make comparisons, at least track the individual child to see if they have improved from the previous year, not a completely different set of children. John did great last year, but Tom didn’t do as well this year – so you must have done a crappy job. It’s as if you told a doctor, John’s healthy, but because Tom has adult onset diabetes you’re getting a bad rating and might lose your license.
Make about as much sense.
As an aside, one year a friend of mine taught in a “challenging” school, the test scores were low and her evaluation reflected this outcome. She transferred to City Honors the following year, one of the best high schools in the country, and low and behold, all her students did exceptionally well. Almost overnight she became an exemplary teacher. From the lowest rating to the highest in only one year – A miracle!
LikeLike
Yeah…that’s it. Bob hits it out of the park. It’s not just the content of this piece, it’s the flat out speed of the thing that replicates the hell-bent pace of life in school today. (Pity the kids who have to find time to learn in this frenetic culture.)
Funny thing is, I’ve had this crazy busy end of the school year day that isn’t even near over. I’ve been running behind since, like, 6:15 a.m. when I walked into my classroom. But Bob’s “Stream of Consciousness Rant” is one of the few things that’s actually helped me SLOW DOWN for a moment. Wow. Now, that IS something, Bob. To read something…and reread it…..and actually….slow….down….for…a……moment……
LikeLike
Oh my, my, my heart and head are hurting! So get this. So much BS to make exemplary teachers squirm to get a “proficient” rating using that one size fits all who-the-heck-is-Danielson and WHY are we using that rubric? I cannot even… so understood. Don’t take the at risk kids. They might not teach themselves well enough and you are dinged on your eval. OR maybe they have a bad day, with their awful lives, and the only place they feel safe venting is your class but… well, you get it.
And don’t start me on Valued Added, a concept from AGRICULTURE.
Thanks for posting this. I am beyond relief that I semi-retired to never have to go through this truly ABUSIVE “evaluation” process again! I even had one a few weeks before I RETIRED forever from K-12 teaching!
Sincerely,
There are not enough rants in the world for this! Laura
LikeLike
VAM Slammed!
The test-based “Value-Added Method” (VAM) of evaluating teachers has been “slammed” — quoting The Washington Post — by the very people who know the most about data measurement: The American Statistical Association (ASA). The ASA’s authoritative, detailed, VAM-slam analysis, titled “Statement on Using Value-Added Models for Educational Assessment” and has become the basis for teachers across the nation successfully challenging VAM-based evaluations.
Even though it’s anti-public school and anti-union, the Washington Post said the following about the ASA Statement: “You can be certain that members of the American Statistical Association, the largest organization in the United States representing statisticians and related professionals, know a thing or two about data and measurement. The ASA just slammed the high-stakes ‘value-added method’ (VAM) of evaluating teachers that has been increasingly embraced in states as part of school-reform efforts. VAM purports to be able to take student standardized test scores and measure the ‘value’ a teacher adds to student learning through complicated formulas that can supposedly factor out all of the other influences and emerge with a valid assessment of how effective a particular teacher has been. THESE FORMULAS CAN’T ACTUALLY DO THIS (emphasis added) with sufficient reliability and validity, but school reformers have pushed this approach and now most states use VAM as part of teacher evaluations.”
The ASA Statement points out the following and many other failings of testing-based VAM:
“System-level conditions” include everything from overcrowded and underfunded classrooms to district-and site-level management of the schools and to student poverty.
A copy of the VAM-slamming ASA Statement should be posted on the union bulletin board at every school site throughout our nation and should be explained to every teacher by their union at individual site faculty meetings so that teachers are aware of what it says about how invalid it is to use standardized test results to evaluate teachers or principals — and teachers’ and principals’ unions should fight all evaluations based on student test scores with the ASA statement as a good foundation for their fight.
Fight back! Never, never, never give up!
LikeLike
This captures perfectly the feeling of impotence we have at the site-level nowadays. It always puzzles me how the Reformers’ imposition of rigid mandates on public schools squares with their celebration of charters’ freedom from mandates. If freedom is good for charters, why is it bad for public schools?
LikeLike
Good point.
LikeLike
Taught back in the day, when there were good principals who evaluated teachers insofar as helping them to teach better & smarter. They gave great suggestions.
Then, they were people who had taught for more than five years, & usually had served as an A.P. first. They weren’t wet-behind-the-ears products of TFA, nor were they fighting tooth-&-nail to become superintendent. Their jobs & future of their schools weren’t bound to test results or test preps. Teachers could teach & principals had principles.
But–I DID have some REALLY bad special ed. adminimals. The worst! (& THOSE are, unfortunately, still around &, even worse, working to reduce the very population they’d been hired to serve; their job is to perpetrate Response to Intervention {in which the kids NEVER “qualify” for services, remaining in an educational vortex} while saving the school district $$$$$ that would otherwise {& best} be spent on oh, I don’t know, teachers, social workers, therapists & programs.) Someday, soon, there will be no special ed. programs, but the adminimals will somehow retain their positions.
LikeLike
Bob Shepherd described with perfect accuracy what I went through this year. I only had to meet with my adminimal six times instead of eight, though. Big whoop for me.
Thank you, Mr. Shepherd. There’s solace in our misery’s company.
LikeLike