Released today:
AFT Report Calls for Investor Action to Hold Gun Manufacturers Accountable
for Risks to Society
WASHINGTON—To help confront the United States’ gun violence epidemic, the AFT today released a special edition of its “Ranking Asset Managers” report, which creates a watch list of investment managers that invest millions of dollars in companies that make assault weapons. Since the shootings at Columbine High School in Colorado, 200 students have been killed in school and 187,000 students have been affected by school shootings. The report offers information for pension fund trustees, and it calls on asset managers to evaluate risks associated with investing in gun manufacturers and to engage in meaningful action, such as adopting policies that mitigate the safety risks assault weapons pose.
“We have a gun violence epidemic in our country, and our children and their teachers are caught in the crosshairs of this public health emergency,” said AFT President Randi Weingarten. “Educators, parents and students need safe and welcoming schools, and educators have a right to assume their deferred wages are not being invested in the companies that make the military-style assault weapons used to injure and kill them and their students in countless school shootings.”
Weingarten added, “When companies produce a dangerous product that creates a national public health and safety crisis, that company becomes a high-risk investment and people have the right to know. This report is about exposing that risk and providing pension trustees and investment managers with the tools they need to demand meaningful action.”
The report highlights actions several pension funds have taken to reduce their risk exposure. It also calls on all investors to “use their power to compel those gun manufacturers to take meaningful action to address these risks.” Most importantly, it creates a list of specific steps pension funds and financial institutions can take to mitigate their risks, including signing a gun safety code of conduct and limiting—or putting stricter stipulations on—their relationships with gun manufacturers. The report identifies Amalgamated Bank, Citigroup, Bank of America and several states’ public pension systems as institutions that have all taken steps toward this goal, and it names other financial institutions and public pension systems that have not yet acted in response to the gun violence epidemic.
One of those states identified as having failed to act is Florida, where the public employee retirement system invests in all three publicly traded gun-makers, including American Outdoor Brands, which made the weapon used at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School to take the lives of 17 Floridians. Yet Florida teachers and other public employees have no seat at the table to help assess the risk presented by investing in gun manufacturers. Their only option is to appeal directly to Gov. Rick Scott. On the other hand, in many states, notably California and New York, pension fund trustees representing teachers and school staff have pushed their pension funds to engage with gun manufacturers on meaningful change, evaluate risk or divest from them entirely. The report urges trustees to continue to consider those options.
As Jay C. Rehak, president of the Chicago Teachers’ Pension Fund Board of Trustees and chair of the AFT Pension Trustees Council, explained, “Teacher trustees face a painful dichotomy between the classroom and the boardroom. We’re on the front line in schools and face the daily reality that gun-related deaths are the third-leading cause of death for the kids in our classrooms. It would be tempting to base investment strategy on that emotional connection, but we don’t have that luxury. We’re fiduciaries, and we have to speak to our investment managers in language they understand. As cold or difficult as that sounds, that’s what we do. A pension fund weighs and balances investment risk, and the bottom line is that investing in weapons manufacturers involves intolerable reputational, regulatory and statutory risks. That’s why we divested from assault weapons manufacturers in 2013, and it’s why we continue to ask our managers tough questions and hold our fund managers accountable for following this policy.”
After outreach from the AFT, four investment managers with more than $8.3 trillion in assets under management informed us of their intent to engage with gun manufacturers regarding their concerns, including Fidelity, Vanguard, Dimensional Fund Advisors, and Voya.
“Whether investors welcome it or not, society’s expectations are shifting,” Weingarten said. “The action we’ve seen from investors in public and private pension funds, as well as large institutional investors, is a start, because we all have a role to play in protecting our country from gun violence. We can no longer allow the NRA to prevent us from taking the same actions we take with cars, food, medication and other products to ensure safety. If the car industry were allowed to behave the same way we allow the NRA to behave, we’d be driving around without seatbelts, airbags or speed limits. And while we respect the Second Amendment, rights come with responsibility. I doubt the founders, in an era of muskets, could fathom the kind of assault weapons being produced and sold on the streets today.”
The AFT has a long history of demanding transparency from the investment community, as the vast majority of its 1.7 million members participate in defined benefit pension plans, whose assets exceed $3 trillion.
The full report is available here and is being sent to trustees today.

Glad to hear this.
I was stunned (naive me) to discover the NYS teacher pension is invested in gun companies. I called shortly after February 14th to ask. I was told they had not yet made a decision whether or not to divest.
BTW, I also wondered to the person on the phone if it was possible the fund was also invested in charter school companies. I was directed to their website where they list the 150+ companies from the fund. You need to be a detective to discover how your retirement is funded.
The endless web of connections.
OY
LikeLike
I would also like to see AFT and NEA disinvest in private prisons. Who knows what else we are investing in…
LikeLike
Alice is right, if the AFT has this much clout, why not get out of other things? How about fossil fuels, predatory debt, factory food or tobacco? And for gods sakes, divest from charter school investors who want to destroy teacher unions! I would say that posed a major fiduciary risk….
LikeLike
This is a very good thing. Be reminded that the initiative for such action was created by students, not their teachers, not their principals, not by their counselors or any other school functionaries or the teachers’ unions. That students sometimes, oftentimes I think, know better what is good for them than many adults do (e.i. the gun lobby and those who stand with it, legislators who will not do what the students now are demanding them to do). So, maybe we can take this as an important teaching moment. Activist students engaged in doing what is necessary to make the world a better place for themselves and, in turn, all. I have watched my nephew, David Hogg, his sister Lauren, and a host of other fired up young people cause a riot of change, from challenging adults like Laura Ingram and that stupidest of of asses who runs the Infowars travesty, the president of the United States and, too, teachers and administrators who wanted to get in the way of their protests. Watching David, Lauren, Emma and so many others work on the project I have to say that they are learning more out of school than they were learning in their classrooms. Indeed, they need the “basics” that enable one to read, speak, write, calculate all teachable in the context of real world projects with goal THEY covet that they can further by application of the basics.
We do not need school shootings or other kinds of disaster to initiate missions of discovery and action. Everywhere around every school are instances, irritants, events, and ideas that can stir up a student enough to want to do what is necessary to understand and do something about whatever it is. And it is not so hard to run the curriculum around student interests that are influenced by engagement with adults who actually use what they teach to bring about meaningful and important ends. To those who have been telling me that we cannot do without direct instruction, I say it does little good to teach things that students are not motivated to learn. How many of my college students have told me that they did what they did to get through but hardly enjoyed or found relevant the bulk of what they were being taught!
Adults need to listen to students and in listening will discover in what they are interest. Once their interests are understood–sometimes cultivated by teachers engaged with the world–they will want to learn because they need to learn to be successful in endeavors meaningful to them. This is a simple principle but not easy to apply if those leading lead lives apart from the events of the society in which they live, are engaged with what is going one in the world or, at least, informed of such and interested in understanding and becoming somehow–maybe through writing, involvement in politics, involvement in the formation of school policy, perhaps–in what is going on. And they have to be smart in how they approach coming to understand. They have to be adept and gleeful for the ability to think, to grow their own intellects. And this is critical for teachers from pre-school through graduate school.
Maybe the Never Again movement will be understood for all it is worth, a part of that worth tied to better understanding of issues such as motivation and engagement, lack of motivation, disengagement, all important to a healthy educational environment.
LikeLike
At least, in NYC, the TRS (Teachers Retirement Service) has divested from gun manufacturers. Now they need to keep their word and move on divestment from fossil fuels.
From the UFT website:
TRS has divested from gun manufacturers
published March 2, 2018
On March 2, 2018, the Teachers’ Retirement Board issued the following notice:
Starting in February 2013, the Teachers’ Retirement Board divested from gun manufacturers (companies receiving material revenue from the manufacture of civilian firearms and ammunition). The Board modified its policy in December 2017, when it resolved to further divest from companies that receive at least 5 percent of their revenues from the manufacture of civilian firearms and ammunition. This divestment is now complete.
Each year, TRS publishes a listing of investment holdings in its Investment Portfolios publication. The latest version shows holdings as of June 30, 2017, so it does not reflect the most recent divestment actions.
LikeLike
As long as we have pro-firearms rights people in government, firearms sales will decline. When Obama was elected, firearms sales skyrocketed. Remington is in bankruptcy. see
http://time.com/5215326/remington-gun-company-bankruptcy/
All of the firearms manufacturers are experiencing a “Trump Slump”.
If you want the firearms industry to decline, the best way is to elect pro-firearms rights politicians.
I once knew a man in Huntsville, ALA, who ran a gun store. He kept a 4×8 color poster of his biggest salesman, on the wall of his store. The poster was of Barack Obama!
LikeLike
Charles,
I expect that poster of Obama was intended for target practice
LikeLike
Obama was his best salesman. When Obama was elected the first time in 2008, He kept the store open 12 hours a day. Ammunition was on back-order for weeks at a time.
Here in Virginia, after the Sandy Hook school shooting, firearms sales went through the roof. People literally camped out on the gun store steps, waiting for the stores to open, so that they could buy weapons and ammunition prior to any firearms ban.
LikeLike
That is because so many gun owners in the South are white racists and hate black people.
Nothing to boast about. Shameful.
LikeLike
I do not get the racial connection. The alleged Sandy Hook shooter was white, and the victims were mostly white. Ditto for Columbine, and Parkland. White shooters, mostly white victims.
In the past, whenever there is a school shooting, some politicians start hollering for “gun control”, whatever that is. Firearms-rights supporters and firearms owners run down to the local gun store and stock up on firearms and ammunition, in anticipation of the government trying to infringe on their firearms rights. When the panic stops, firearms sales return to normal.
Interestingly, when the recent St. Valentines day massacre occurred in Florida, there was no massive spike in weapons/ammunition sales. Firearms rights supporters are confident, with the current occupants in Washington, that no serious effort to curtail firearms rights would result. Events are proving their assessment, to be exactly right.
LikeLike
When you use President Obama’s face on a poster for target practice, that’s racist. When the very thought of a black president increase gun sales, that’s racist.
LikeLike
I am getting your point. You are mistaken. The gun shop owner posted the picture of Obama in his gun store, not for target practice. You cannot fire a weapon in a store. He posted the photo, because candidate/president Obama was on record, as being opposed to firearms rights. By reminding customers of this fact, he hoped to increase firearms sales, to customers who were afraid of losing their rights. He told me, that Obama was the best thing that ever happened to his business.
LikeLike
Charles,
Do you know what a dog whistle is? Putting up a huge poster of the first black President in a gun shop is a subtle or not subtle appeal to racism.
I won’t argue with you. You don’t get it.
LikeLike
“That is because so many gun owners in the South are white racists and hate black people.”
Certainly not “so many”. Are there some? No doubt. But my knowledge of gun owners here in the Show Me State, which many consider to be part of the South (I don’t) that description certainly does not hold for them (or me).
LikeLike