Dahlia Lithwick writes in Slate about the broad, comprehensive education that prepared students at Marjory Stoneman Douglas gave them the remarkable poise, knowledge, and rationality to meet the historic moment into which they have been thrust.
“The effectiveness of these poised, articulate, well-informed, and seemingly preternaturally mature student leaders of Stoneman Douglas has been vaguely attributed to very specific personalities and talents. Indeed, their words and actions have been so staggeringly powerful, they ended up fueling laughable claims about crisis actors, coaching, and fat checks from George Soros. But there is a more fundamental lesson to be learned in the events of this tragedy: These kids aren’t freaks of nature. Their eloquence and poise also represent the absolute vindication of the extracurricular education they receive at Marjory Stoneman Douglas.
“The students of Stoneman Douglas have been the beneficiaries of the kind of 1950s-style public education that has all but vanished in America.
”Despite the gradual erosion of the arts and physical education in America’s public schools, the students of Stoneman Douglas have been the beneficiaries of the kind of 1950s-style public education that has all but vanished in America and that is being dismantled with great deliberation as funding for things like the arts, civics, and enrichment are zeroed out. In no small part because the school is more affluent than its counterparts across the country (fewer than 23 percent of its students received free or reduced-price lunches in 2015–16, compared to about 64 percent across Broward County Public Schools) these kids have managed to score the kind of extracurricular education we’ve been eviscerating for decades in the United States. These kids aren’t prodigiously gifted. They’ve just had the gift of the kind of education we no longer value.”

HOW ODD THAT YOU SHOULD POST THIS.
I was taken by the erudition and passion of the kids, by the way they could express themselves. They reminded me of my students from the past, educated in schools that did it right… taught kids to read write THINK and thus to express themselves when they speak…literacy… chichis what we taught. Now they teach to a test in too many schools.
I Was so impressed with these kids, whenever I heard them speak.. and I am so sad for them, and this trauma they will never escape.
LikeLike
They sound like the teens/young adults from the late 60’s early 70’s protesting Viet Nam, racial discrimination, speaking out about the energy crisis, Watergate etc. It’s true that we really got a great education back then. I think the politicians got grilled and made to do what was right back then. The Clinton era seems to be when politics changed and found a way to” work around” those pesky teens/young adults and teachers who had a way of riling up the country for the good of the common man.
LikeLike
I had the same impression of these young people that you did. These students are articulate, and they know how to think and express themselves. In the 19th century an educated person was literate with a foundation in the classics including the study of Latin or Greek. If you ever read letters from Civil War soldiers, you would be impressed by their coherence, word choice and allusions to poetry or literature. Today being “educated” is knowing how to CODE, and they are even trying to teach it in preschool! It is so, so, so ridiculous as the technology will most likely change before they ever get to use it.
LikeLike
Yes, it’s frightening how far we’ve drifted from traditional ideas of good schooling. Acknowledging that there was never truly a Golden Age of American public education, E.D. Hirsch calls the Fifties its Silver Age. NAEP reading scores for 17 year olds (adjusted for poverty, etc.) peaked in 1972, when the Fifties kids reached 17, and have been declining since. Since reading comprehension is function of background knowledge, this implies that the typical curriculum is less knowledge-rich than it was in the Fifties. The Common Core era is the apotheosis of this deviance –skills drills all day every day in many K-8 schools. It’s abominable.
LikeLike
Ponderosa,
Please don’t cite NAEP scores for 1972. NAEP first offered tests, not to the nation, but to states that volunteered, in the early 1970s. The tests have been revised many times since then, the reading frameworks have been rewritten. If Hirsch cited that date, it is utterly bogus.
After NCLB passed, every state was required to participate. Before 2003, many states did not participate in NAEP.
LikeLike
Diane, Hirsch accounts for the shifts in NAEP testing format on pp. 15-19 of Why Knowledge Matters. I’ll try to reread it soon to see exactly what he says.
LikeLike
Lithwick rightly cites debate, journalism, public speaking and theater as enriching components of the Stoneman Douglas curriculum that all kids should have. But I think there’s more to the picture: content-rich core classes. On one of his CNN appearances, David Hogg alluded to his AP Environmental Science class.
So glad Lithwick recognizes the old school Fifties as the Golden (or Silver) Age of American education. After the Sixties, teachers thought they could reinvent schools for the better. I was one of the guinea pigs, sent to a special program for GATE students run by hippie teachers. There was no structure. We were just supposed to explore and express our innate brilliance and creativity. I found it very boring. I wanted to be taught.
LikeLike
Quit blaming teachers. Most of us would REALLY prefer to teach in the old-school style, but we’re not allowed to. We know how important content, and quality extracurriculars, and the arts, debate, theater, civics, etc. are, but there’s no funding to teach them, or the classes are overloaded.
LikeLike
I’m glad YOU do, TOW, but I think you’re an exception to the rule. I just attended a huge teacher conference put on by our union –every workshop offered the same dismal orthodox modern approach –skills, skills, skills. Not a word of dissent that I could detect. Most of the teachers were from the elementary level; perhaps there’s more dissenting among high school teachers. Most teachers I know are uncritical of the fashionable pedagogy coming out of our ed schools. They don’t read widely. But I blame the ed school professors –and the creators of Common Core –more than the teachers.
LikeLike
There are MANY public schools like Stoneman Douglas across our country. I could name MANY in Kansas, where I have spent my life as a passionate educator. Likewise, there are many students who are both articulate and compassionate. Come visit Kansas and visit our great students, parents, educators, schools and communities. Of course, we can get better and we are!! #KansansCan
LikeLike
“They’ve just had the gift of the kind of education WE no longer value”
Why do we keep seeing this ubiquitous “WE” pop up repeatedly about the United States?
Who belongs to this WE?
There is no WE, because WE are not among the 2,000 some members of ALEC.
We are not David or Charles Koch.
We are not Bill Gates.
We are not Donald Trump.
We are not a member of the Walton family.
In fact, the FEW, not the WE, that has decided the U.S. doesn’t value this kind of education is the WHO that is not a WE.
LikeLike
I did not find a link to the Slate article, but please note that the savvy of these students is NOT alone from extracurricular activities.
This is partial list of curricular offerings at the Margery Stoneman Douglas High School, focus on the arts.
Two-Dimensional Studio Art 1; Two-Dimensional Studio Art 2; Two-Dimensional Studio Art 3 Honors; Ceramics/Pottery 1; Ceramics/Pottery 2; Ceramics/Pottery 3 Honors; Introduction to Drama; Theatre 1; Theatre 2; Theatre 4 Honors; Acting 1; Acting 2; Acting 3; Acting 4 Honors; Technical Theatre: Design & Production 1; Technical Theatre: Design & Production 3; Technical Theatre: Design & Production 4 Honors; Journalism 1; Journalism 2; Guitar 1; Guitar 2; Band 1; Band 2; Band 3; Band 4; Band 5 Honors; Band 6 Honors; Orchestra 1; Orchestra 2; Jazz Ensemble 1; Jazz Ensemble 2; Jazz Ensemble 3; Chorus 1; Digital Design 1/Level 2; Digital Design 2/Level 3; Television Production 1/Level 2; Television Production 2/Level 2; Television Production 3/Level 3; Television Production 4/Level 3; Technical Theatre: Design & Production 3; Technical Theatre: Design & Production 4 Honors.
That list is incomplete. add Journalism, Languages, “Contemporary History” (with a new date: Valentines Day 2018) and many others. A large comprehensive high school has advantages and disadvantages.
This is list of the extracurricular clubs and activities from the school’s website. Notice how many of these are service and issue oriented. Some are clearly to cultivate leadership
A Cappella Club; Astronomy; Best Buddies; Book Club; Brain Brawl; Bus. Prof Of America; Chess Club; Chorus; Coding Club; Universal Geek Club; Culinary Club; Debate; Deca-S; English Honor Society; First Priority; Forensics; French Club; Freshman Class; Gay Straight Alliance-;; Health & Fitness Club; Hope Club; Hosa (Health Occup Students); Icc (Inter-Club Council); Int Thespian Society (Drama); Interact; Jewish Student Union; Jrotc – Guard/Drill/; Junior Class; Key Club; Literary Magazine; Makers Space Club; Mentoring Tomorrow’s Leaders; Model Un; Msd Stands Up To Cancer; Mu Alpha Theta; National Honor Society; Natl Art Honors Soc; Newspaper; Orchestra; Paws-L.; Politics Club; Psychology Club; Quill & Scroll; Rho Kappa;- Robotics; Rowdy Eagles; Sadd; Save What’s Left; Science National Honor Society; Secme Club; Senior Class; Service Hour Coordinator; Sga-D. ; Sophomore Class; Spanish Club; Spanish Honor Society; Spoken Word; Ss Competition; Step Team; Technology Club; Teen Trendsetters; Tri-M Music Honors Soc; Tutoring, Math Club; Tutoring, Nhs; Tutoring, Science; Tutoring, World Languages; Tv/Film Club; Women Of Tomorrow; Yearbook.
LikeLike
There is no charter school that can duplicate these types of options or “choices” that this school can, but it takes money to fund these types of opportunities for young people. Privatization is like a tape worm to public school budgets.
LikeLike
Imagine that: they don’t wear uniforms, they don’t stand in line like Soviet apparatchiks, they aren’t forced to do their work with grit, and they can go to to the bathroom when they need to. Poor kids.
LikeLike
Would this kind of critical thinking that challenges authority exemplified by these traditional public schools students in Parkland have emerged from students educated in the charter school sector?
No, folks, and that’s just as these unaccountable and privately-managed schools were designed.
Per their corporate funders’/masters’ marching orders, charter school honchos are tasked to — and indeed want to — turn their low-income minority students into compliant, obedient drones who wouldn’t dare speak out as the Parkland students have. This is to prepare them for the subservient place even educated low-income minority students will take in the society once they reach adulthood. (channeling Jim Horn on this one 😉 ).
Indeed, where are the accounts of charter school students in Florida, or in the southern states, or anywhere in the U.S. speaking out on the gun issue as the Parkland students have? Have any, will any participate in any of the upcoming marches or walkouts?\
Not bloody likely, if historic patterns hold.
It’s just crickets from those students, and again, that’s just as it was designed.
One harrowing first-person account from a KIPP student illustrates my point on this.
An African-American female was once punished severely at Mike fondles-middle-schoolers** Feinberg’s Houston KIPP school, and punished by Feinberg himself, and *why? you may ask.
She was slapped down hard for her mere attempt to question authority.
She didn’t post anything on-line.
She didn’t have her fellow students sign a petition.
She didn’t do any kind of rabble-rousing whatsoever.
She didn’t stage a walkout, or go to the media, or even threaten to do so.
She merely asked … one … simple … freakin’ … question.
She was an African-American student who was befuddled as to why KIPP leaders — including her school’s principal-equivalent-at-the-time, KIPP Houston’s Executive Director Mike Feinberg — made ZERO mention of African-American history during African-American History month (February).
She further pointed out how they and the rest of the student body had been fed copious acknowledgment of Jewish history and the Holocaust (nothing wrong with that, mind you), but when it came to .. say … the 400-plus-years of slavery inflicted on African-Americans … she has, to date, heard nothing — NADA, ZIP, BUP-KISS.
Ditto for historical black figures.
Mind you, this occurred in Houston, a city in a former slave state.
All she asked, was that in addition to all the Holocaust stuff, that during Black History Month, for gosh sakes, some mention be made of Black history and Black historical figures. As it stood, Black History month was totally ignored by her school’s leaders.
How dare you?!!! was Feinberg’s idiotic and racist responsebefor punishing her severely for even deigning to think and speak out for herself and for the other African-American students at Feinberg’s school.
Here’s the link to this harrowing first-person account from that student of how she was put through this sh– — and put through it by Feinberg himself
(MInd you, this is a story which, in its own way, is just as bad, or almost as bad as the sexual fondling perpertrated by Feinberg … because just as with the fondling, years later, this student still remains deeply traumatized by what Feinberg did to her):
thedailycougar.com/2012/03/27/kipp-has-room-for-improvement/
x x x x x x x x x x x x
Regarding Feinberg, I was going to say *allegedly-fondles-middle-schoolers, but I figured that if the KIPP organization itself publicly claimed that its investigators, after a year-long investigation, found the accusation, testimony and evidence that Feinberg did indeed fondle middle schoolers (ages 9-14, btw) to be so “credible” — so credible in fact that they all chose to fire Feinberg — I’m going to take the word of the KIPP leaders and its investigators themselves on the matter Feinberg’s guilt.
Re-read (or read for the first time) KIPP’s letter announcing Feinberg’s firing here, in which they make this claim:
http://blog.kipp.org/updates/letter-to-kipp-team-and-family/
LikeLike
The above referenced opinion piece is from an official University of Houston website.
Since KIPP has huge clout with the University of Houston, I don’t trust that it will remain there for long once its presence on this blog is discovered.
Therefore, I’m reposting the entire piece BELOW, to preserve it.
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
LINDSAY GARY:
With more than 50 schools nationwide, the program has successfully educated hundreds of underprivileged and minority youth since its founding. As a former student of the original KIPP School in Houston from 2000 to 2004, I am a living testimony to the rigorous yet rewarding educational system. But I am also a witness to an area in which KIPP fell short.
Knowing one of the co-founders and many of the teachers and administrators personally, I am sure the intention wasn’t to alienate the black students. In fact, Fienberg believes that “all instruction must be relevant to the learner, culturally and emotionally.”
However, with its progressive ideas in education, during my years of attendance, KIPP reverted to arguably backwards practices in terms of cultural relevance in relation to the students with darker skin.
Of my graduating class at KIPP, I was one of about 20 black students in a mostly Hispanic population. Being the minority wasn’t easy, and some of the teachers at KIPP didn’t make it any easier. There are a few incidents that vividly stand out to me.
I can still remember “judgment day” as I once called it. It was the day that students would learn their fate in attendance at the end-of-year trip. As an extremely well-behaved and straight-A student, I had no worries about my fate. But something was different in the teachers’ eyes when I met them at the judgment table. They told me that I was not on the list to go on the trip. I was shocked and embarrassed. It was heartbreaking news for a former “Student of the Year.”
They explained that I had made an improper comment.
As I searched my memory bank for any recollection of anything improper, one of my teachers explained my wrong-doing. The improper comment:
“I understand and love learning about Jewish history, and I understand our founders are of Jewish heritage. I was just wondering if we could ever learn about black history or more about Hispanic history, since most of us are black and Hispanic.”
I fought back tears as my fate was unveiled. I couldn’t understand what was so wrong about that statement. Did the opinion of a little black girl matter in such a school?
There were many other instances when I felt this intolerance, such as the time we were told our black hair products were a joke, the favoritism Hispanic students received, the lack of information we learned about black history, the fact that we were often targeted for misconduct, and the fact that at least one of the school’s plays was about Hispanic culture and none were about my own.
But Judgement Day was by far the most hurtful of all my culturally negative experiences at KIPP.
Some may wonder if this experience was unique to me. I guarantee it wasn’t. Quotes on this topic from fellow black KIPPsters include: “We were always asked why we didn’t mingle with the Hispanic children but the Hispanic children were never asked why they didn’t mingle with us,” and “There were special programs that catered to the Latino students and parents, but we never had that.”
After such negative experiences, I vowed to never express my opinion at KIPP again. In fact, my teachers eventually allowed me to go on the trip. But they threatened that if I ever made remarks like that again, I’d be put on a plane, alone, from California to Houston. It wasn’t until Harriett Ball passed, that I decided to openly voice my opinion again.
In February, I received the monthly newsletter from a KIPP Alumni Association representative and was extremely disappointed with what the newsletter mentioned, or should I say failed to mention. The newsletter highlighted Valentine’s Day and internships among other things, but made absolutely no mention of Black History Month, which as its name states, spans the course of the entire month. I was already disappointed with my recent discovery that the woman who had inspired and mentored the KIPP co-founders, was in fact a black woman. It wasn’t until Ball’s passing, seven years after I had completed my KIPP education, that I would learn anything about her.
Don’t you think knowing this would have made a world of difference, created a pool of inspiration, for a little black girl at KIPP? Was it merely an accident or pure neglect that the newsletter failed to mention something so important to black people?
I am not sure if KIPP is culturally the same now as it was then, but the 2012 February newsletter suggests that not much has changed at the original KIPP School. I am happy to say that KIPP schools like Liberation and Voyage have been created in predominantly black areas such as the Third Ward and are orchestrated by those who are familiar with black culture and history.
But what about black students who don’t live in these areas? Should they be at risk to have their culture suppressed or even have their opinions taken away like I did? Should they have to feel less-than, blamed or alienated? Although KIPP is widely-recognized as successful, I urge administrators to survey the cultural satisfaction of minority students in a majority setting.
Although primarily progressive, KIPP can learn something from the positive cultural trends unique to the era of segregation.
Lindsay Gary is a senior history major and may be reached at opinion@thedailycougar.com.
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
Once again, here’s the link to that piece:
LikeLike
Another thing.
You want further proof of KIPP students being brainwashed enough so that, years after attending, their programmed response to Lindsay’s article is — just as Feinberg’s was at the time of the original atrocity — to attack, belittle, and attempt to shame Lindsay back into silence?
Look no further than the Comments section below Lindsay’s opinion piece. A six year old comment to that effect (from one of Lindsay’s classmates) is followed by a 5 year old comment from me countering this tripe.
(Did Feinberg convince this blogger to write this hit piece attacking Lindsay? Is this Feinberg himself impersonating a student? I have my suspicions… SEE the next post/story)
Here’s the comment from “Unbelievable”:
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
UNBELIEVABLE:
Can’t believe someone in our class wrote something so ignorant.
I don’t even see where she is coming from, even from some one young in middle school. I felt we were all treated equally and always given the same opportunities. Like the person above states, the families of student of African Decent were all better off financially than the Hispanic students in school but only difference in programs that were offered was helping parents of students of Hispanic decent to learn English. I don’t see how you state African Culture was not represented, Black History Month was always celebrated in school and if you walk in the original KIPP Middle School you see several quotes by Martin Luther King and other people of African Decent.
The reason it seemed that students of color were separated from others was because of the same reason it happens in any other school; popularity and interests. The people of African decent were better off financially, their parents were pharmacists, and educated white collar workers. They had different interest than say the group of people who intensely focused on school, those who liked to play video games, those who thought were popular, those who skated and the list goes on. Lindsay also states she was 1 of 20 students of African Decent so she felt like a minority in the classroom but she fails to mention that there were only 50 students in our class…
Having 40% of the students being culturally related to you may still be a minority but even with in the Hispanic students there were differences and ”minorities”. . There was Hispanics from Mexican decent, Salvadorian Decent, Cuban decent, Guatemalan Decent, and the list goes on. You were young, we were young. One tends to hang out with the group of people you click with whether white, black or Hispanic. It was interests that set us apart, not our skin color.
I am disappointed with a former classmate of mine writing something like this about the school that helped her be the successful person she is today and helped her get to where she is. Even she had a better opportunity than 30-40% of the students in her class, she got the opportunity to leave KIPP and go on to a private High School.
I truly believe that if it wasn’t for KIPP I would not be the position I am right now, and I believe the author of this article should feel the same way. I was part of Lindsay Gary’s class of 08. I am current student at UH, and soon to be part of their Graduate School and it is all thanks to the teachers at KIPP never giving up on me. The teachers at KIPP were never favorable to any students of a particular race, they helped everyone equally. They pushed us all the same.
I welcome anyone to visit any KIPP school and see the difference they are making in their student’s life.
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
JACK COVEY:
Unbelievable:
I don’t know what grad school that you are attending, but I’m sure it requires such attributes as critical thinking and empathy, which you are are surely lacking. You ignore Lindsay’s valid criticisms, then instead respond with shaming language and thought-stopping cliches attacking Lindsay for being ungrateful and “ignorant.” The cultic, pro-KIPP mindset you display in your comment to Lindsay’s article is creepy.
I mean, let me get this straight: you believe that it is okay for the KIPP school leaders to punish Lindsay merely for asking for some exposure to black culture and history? That, as a result of her questioning, she should be barred from attending the out-of-town field trip? And that later, she she should be threatened into silence, that if she ever dared say such a thing again, she would be sent home, and presumably expelled.
Since you refused to address these criticisms in Lindsay’s article, one can only presume you believe the KIPP school leaders acted properly in this instance.
As represented in the above comment, if you represent the lasting effects KIPP has on students, KIPP is a miserable failure.
LikeLike
I just mentioned my suspicions that Mike “too-handsy-with-kids” Feinberg might have been behind this hit piece in the Comments section of Lindsay’s article — either directing a former classmate of LIndsay’s to write it, or writing it himself while pretending to be one of Lindsay’s classmates.
Well, I want to back that suspicion with another anecdote, one from one of the journalist / guest volunteer teacher at the original KIPP school — the one jointly founded and run by Feinberg and his partner Dave Levin — who left disillusioned at what went on in the school, and her experiences with Feinberg in particular.
She wrote a critical piece with such experiences — stating that the original KIPP Houston school was just “classroom after classroom full of creepy Stepford children” — then was disgusted that Feinberg then tasked KIPP students to bombard her with letters attacking her for what she wrote.
Receipt of these Machiavlliean epistles confirmed for her, and removed any doubt about her low opinion of the KIPP model for education low-income minority children.
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
“When I actually criticized KIPP at an Education Writers Association meeting, Feinberg had a class of eighth-grade students write me letters about how wonderful KIPP was. Co-opting kids to do your PR campaign? I just was repulsed on so many levels, and it just reminded me why I was so opposed to KIPP in the first place.”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
The whole piece is here:
http://www.schoolsmatter.info/2007/01/kipp-and-stepford-children.html
In the process, she mentions Jay Mathews — the de facto KIPP Information Minister posing as an objective Washington Post reporter and author … “What Kool-Aid did Jay Mathews drink?” — and his pro-KIPP articles and non-fiction book.
She also references Feinberg’s “temper tantrums that would never be acceptable at a public high school” and how “everything at KIPP was about Feinberg and his ego.” (Yeah, I’ll BET it was!):
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
EXCERPT:
“You wouldn’t call (the original KIPP Houston school) a place where children were encouraged to think. It was classroom after classroom of creepy Stepford children.
“I’m a high school journalism teacher who values children who know how to think. That is not what is valued at KIPP. Conformity is what is valued at all cost. I think rigid controlled instruction is fine at the 4th grade, but if you’re still controlling children that way at the 8th grade, you have problems.
“I think that is why KIPPsters have such a problem going on to high school and why Feinberg has a problem pulling the KIPP experience into the high school grades.
“This is a school that instills the discipline that most children could and should learn at 8 or 10. They just like to hammer it home at 10, 12, and even 14.
“My own thought?
“At some point in the middle school years, kids need to move into their own, think on their own, learn how to be creative. I’m sure others would argue with me, but that just didn’t happen at KIPP, in my mind.
“KIPP and I parted ways after I wanted to take the kids to a junior high journalism conference in San Antonio, and Feinberg wouldn’t agree because the kids hadn’t “earned” the trip. It occurred to me — and I probably am not as artful I could be when I say this — that when a rigid discipline code trumps valuable student learning, then the ones who lose are the kids. Period.
“To me, that was profound. No system of discipline, no method of teaching, should ever get in the way of learning.
“You’ll hear a lot about the Myth of KIPP. The fact is that KIPP is a fine charter school, but it is no better or worse than many other charter schools. It will work for some kids and not for others. I would have been miserable at KIPP!
“I don’t care how selfless it may be — the great noble story of two Teach for America grads pioneering a new way for education — but the whole “Harriet Ball was our inspiration” (blah blah blah) is, I suspect, some part truth and then just a whole lot of spin.
“I imagine KIPP has evolved — they have learned to order the buses, take the grant money, hire better teachers, whatever — but I never saw any incredible magic at KIPP that couldn’t be replicated at a public school with a good principal and concerned parents.
“And all these interviews about how selfless these guys are… I mean, what Kool Aid did Jay Mathews drink?
“When I was there, everything at KIPP was about Feinberg and his ego. His approval meant everything to the kids. I won’t go into his particular temper tantrums, but they would never be acceptable at a public school.
“His point system for rewarding the kids was above everything else.
“And don’t think every teacher agreed with his methods. I think Feinberg likes to paint teachers who disagreed with him as simply not being “with the program” or unwilling to do the work. But there were plenty of teachers on the campus who simply got there and just didn’t agree with the way that Feinberg ran his school. A number of us wondered aloud whether this brave experiment could be replicated anywhere at all.
“When I actually criticized KIPP at an Education Writers Association meeting, Feinberg had a class of eighth-grade students write me letters about how wonderful KIPP was. Co-opting kids to do your PR campaign? I just was repulsed on so many levels, and it just reminded me why I was so opposed to KIPP in the first place.
“So… my fair assessment… I don’t know what makes me madder… Feinberg so self-satisfied with his great KIPP experiment or the media that is so willing to make KIPP a great school simply because it’s a great story to tell.
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
As the saying goes, “Pride goeth before the fall.”
Indeed, this kind of dictatorial cult-like environment described above is a highly fertile breeding ground for a cultic leader to perpetrate misconduct — sexual or otherwise. It happened at The Weinstein Company & Miramax, and apparently that’s exactly what happened at KIPP as well.
Just read KIPP leaders’ letter to the parents to read about that in detail:
http://blog.kipp.org/updates/letter-to-kipp-team-and-family/
LikeLike
Here’s a better link to Lindsay’s opinion piece:
LikeLike
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/fl-florida-school-shooting-cruz-mental-health-20180302-story.html
The people quoted in the article don’t realize that they are blaming “personalized learning” for the actions or lack thereof that led to this shooting. The reformers’ desire is for most students to go to “school” in this kind of way.
LikeLike
Every school board in the country needs to read this article. I am taking it to mine. (Its latest accomplishment is to run up a $12 million deficit while getting rid of school librarians.) Of course those students had a solid academic grounding that included respect for the humanities–and science, as someone mentioned earlier.
LikeLike
Instead of throwing money at “hardening” schools maybe we should throw money at extracurriculars… or better yet, encourage schools to pay the same stipend to student government facilitators as they pay for their athletic coaches…
LikeLike
Not true what is written here about the students at Stoneman Douglas receiving an education typical of the 1950’s and not today. Those students have certainly received an excellent education, both from the curriculum of their school and the school extracurricular activities in which they are involved.
But so too do students today in appropriately funded Connecticut public schools. Curricula in Connecticut high schools offer government courses, theatre courses, art courses, speech courses, history courses, and English courses, and extracurricular activities are widespread and address all kind of student interests.
The students of Stoneman Douglas demonstrate daily how well they think, how articulate they are, and how they know how to conduct themselves so that they are persuasive and effective. They are wonderful!
And legions of other public school students are also. Students like the students of Stoneman Douglas are what our well-funded public schools produce. Don’t sell our public schools short.
LikeLike