Wiith survivors of the Parkland massacre watching, the Florida House voted down a bill to ban the kind of gun that Nikolas Cruz to murder 17 students and teachers only days ago.
This is from the Sun-Sentinel of Florida:
With Stoneman Douglas students watching, Florida House declines to take up assault weapons ban
Less than a week after 17 people were fatally shot at a Florida high school, the state House has voted down a motion to take up a bill that would ban assault rifles, effectively killing the measure for this session.
The motion failed by a 36-71 vote.
Students from Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School were in the gallery to watch the vote. An Associated Press photo showed Stoneman Douglas junior Sheryl Acquarola, 16, overcome with emotion, alongside several other students.
As the Florida House opened its session Tuesday, Democratic Rep. Kionne McGhee asked for a procedural move that would have allowed it to consider a bill to ban assault rifles and large capacity magazines.
He said the move stemmed from the massacre last week that has refueled a national debate about gun control.
The bill had been assigned to three committees but was not scheduled for a hearing. The committees won’t meet again before the legislative session ends March 9.
McGhee said that means the bill would be dead unless the House voted to remove it from the committees and let it be considered by the full House.
Republican leaders in the House and Senate say they will consider proposals including raising age restrictions for gun purchases and the red-flag bill regarding temporarily taking away someone’s guns if they are deemed a threat to others.
The House did not debate the merits of the bill because McGhee’s motion involved a procedural issue. But the House voted 71-36 to reject taking up the measure on the floor.
Nikolas Cruz is accused of using an AR-15 rifle, a type of weapon that would be covered under the bill.
A Senate version of the bill (SB 196), filed by Sen. Linda Stewart, D-Orlando, also has not been heard in committees.
Meanwhile, a Florida Senate committee endorsed a proposal to put law enforcement officers in every school in the state.
Only slightly more than half of Florida’s more than 4,000 public schools have the resource officers. They are sworn law-enforcement officers and allowed to carry a weapon on a school campus.
The Senate Education Committee voted Tuesday to include the requirement in a sweeping education bill that is now moving through the legislature.
Information from the News Service of Florida and the Associated Press was used in this report.

These people do not deserve to be in public office. I hope they are removed as soon as possible.
LikeLike
This is not surprising. The NRA backs most of the Republicans in the legislature.
LikeLike
Florida Gov Scott and Senator Rubio are big NRA supporters.
LikeLike
They would rather pay for a person to defend every school every day, I’m sure in lieu of some educational priorities, rather than preventing anyone from buying these guns in the first place. Crazy.
LikeLike
I is a very, very sad note when the Florida Legislators put procedural issues before the safety of Students, Teachers, and Administrators. It is a very, very sad note when the only way Florida Legislators can think of to protect individuals in the schools is to have police carrying firearms on campus. More guns on a school campus does not solve the problem. Clearly these very same Legislators are willing to put the wishes of the NRA ahead of the safety of Students. Shame on them. Shame!!!!!!
LikeLike
Lord, forgive them they know not what they do
LikeLike
President John F. Kennedy told us: “Those who make reform impossible, make revolution inevitable.”
A thoroughly corrupt, uncaring political class, in thrall and in service to the Ruling Parasite Class and its corporations, like the one we suffer under now, will eventually cause rebellion.
LikeLike
I have been more than ready since the 70’s! You think it will happen soon?
LikeLike
The students just received an education on the inner workings of our government. They have learned that what is taught in the classroom is not what actually happens in our government. They have learned that we no longer live in a democratic country. They youth of today are watching and listening…. and they will make change for the future.
LikeLike
Soon these same HS students will vote. Watch them. They are smart and brave. The see BS.
LikeLike
It is just despicable. So owning a shiny killer toy is more important than the lives of school children?
LikeLike
Hey, Floridians:
STOP voting for these jerks lest you suffer the consequences of crazy gun laws.
LikeLike
Amen.
LikeLike
NF,
Floridians wanted crazy gun laws–they voted for Trump, who’d begun worshipping 2nd amendment, and as Emma Gonzalez noted, got $30 million from NRA.
LikeLike
I address only those Floridians who have not learned any lessons. I am sure there are many who oppose the current gun laws and want dramatic and acute reform.
LikeLike
It is a very sad day for not only Florida but for the whole US. These legislators are perpetuating something that should be illegal and that is responsible for the continuing killing of innocent children and adults.
Shame on their weaknesses and shame on their inabilities to care beyond the $$ they get from the NRA. Just how powerful is this corrupt corporation and what is the stranglehold that it has on our government?
I’m sure the survivor teenagers are learning the hard way that government doesn’t do justice way too often but is bought out by money. It’s a sorry day for Florida and the whole US.
LikeLike
What’s even crazier are the current federal restrictions against using federal money to even research the effects of guns, gun policies, and exploring the efficacy of alternatives to current policy.
Our government for decades has politically decided to turn a deaf ear to even asking a research based question in case they don’t like the answer. They’d rather spend money cleaning up after carnage than understanding in a profound scientific way why the carnage happens if it has anything to do with guns.
LikeLike
As I understand it, there is nothing to prevent data-gathering/ research, CDC head Azar said as much a few days ago. The ’98 Dickey amendment proscribes political advocacy only, doing nothing is about ‘chilling effect’/ lack of leadership – e.g., agency admin afraid to spend $ on something that could be shut down midstream w/o support up the chain. Presumably CDC doesn’t need a congressional appropriation for every study. Trump would be wise to blink & allow CDC to proceed w/o comment, picking up wider popular support at little political risk.
LikeLike
Then why is congress barely considering removing the amendment or amending it to more clearly allow non-partisan research, or pursue another avenue of not allowing political advocacy with federal money (which is already illegal)
They aren’t even sending a wink that they’ll look the other way – the message they continue to send to this day by continually including it in budget appropriations is they still endorse the effect , and if they hear something they don’t like they’ll be empowered to consider it advocacy and yank funding.
Even Obama couldn’t get research done under this amendment and he WANTED it because of the Republican Congress.
Dickey himself acknowledged before his death this was a bad amendment and never intended for it to have these effects.
It’s a little bit more than a cowardly administrator – especially stretching over 22 years.
LikeLike
Of course the amendment is deplorable, but as you point out it’s redundant; it’s symbolic. It certainly doesn’t prevent research into gun violence, mass shooter psychology, etc. What prevents that is bad faith by legislators sworn to represent their constituents but in fact representing their campaign donors, lack of political leadership and will to protect and preserve the public good – always getting back to bad law/ dereg around big money dictating policy: 501(c)3&4, PACS & superPACS, Cit United, & the bad law/dereg/tax breaks& loopholes creating big corp/ fin/ Wall St influence that outstrips the will/ vote of citizens.
LikeLike
Guns are not the answer. Taking them into anywhere you want and using them to defend or resolve issues is pure insanity and atrocity. The NRA is little more than a home-grown domestic terrorist organization. The USA will become the kind of society where you always will have to wonder if someone is carrying and concealing a gun and if they are sane enough not to use it for selfish, impulsive motivations. Then you will have to wonder if you will get caught in any cross fire from people trying to “defend” themselves or if you – should you decide to use your own gun – will be downed but the attacker’s bullets.
I say take away the guns, the entities that are the actually the dangerous instrumentality, and get rid of them, save for hunting and marksmanship. Eliminate ALL civilian ownership of semi-automatics and silencers. Anyone who uses a semi-automatic to hunt animals is a cheater, has poor sportsmanship, and is not thinking straight.
What a horrible and vile culture to step into if you always have to think about if someone at any given moment can pull a gun simply because it becomes legal to do so.
If Congress wants to make conceal and carry borderless and homogenize all the state gun laws to mirror image that of Florida’s, then all I can say is that people will up and rebel and it would be utter and unacceptable chaos if those bullets reached politicians and their loved ones on a local, state, and federal level. I see that as one inevitability, alas. Imagine . . . .
I for one, aside from potential film projects, will NEVER step foot in Florida. Never! I would think there should be a national and international coalition of people who tour in Florida (lots of Canadians vacation there, for example) yearly who will want to stop patronizing the state for its beauty and attractions and start understanding the ugliness reared upon its underbelly.
LikeLike
If “Mental health” is the problem… how is more police in schools is the answer?
LikeLike
And one more question: did the Florida Senate committee proposal to put law enforcement officers in every school in the state include the funds to do so…or would they expect the local budgets to absorb the cost? I think I know the answer, but either way the children lose out. If the state can offer more $$$ for armed guards why can’t they offer more $$$ for counseling services or to underwrite the costs of public schools? And if they DODN’T provide the money, what will the local school districts have to cut to make room for “good guys with guns”?
LikeLike
To make this even more ridiculous, see what the legislature did later in the day: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/florida-house-porn-assault-weapons-ban_us_5a8d37d4e4b03414379bac85
LikeLike
C’mon y’all, shouting doesn’t change anything. KEEP SUPPORTING STUDENTS TO BE PRESENT IN CONGRESS AND LOCALLY TO HELP THIS ISSUE GAIN THEIR FAVOR. IT’S A SLOW PROCESS BUT IT IS A PROCESS. AND THE FLORIDA STUDENTS HAVE MADE A “START”. UNITED WE STAND!
LikeLike