In 1996, Australia experienced a horrendous mass murder known as the Port Arthur Massacre. A man named Martin Bryant went to a popular tourist site and methodically murdered 35 people, including a few that he murdered on his way to Port Arthur and after his departure. Among his victims was a young mother and her two daughters, ages 6 and 3.
This event shocked the nation, which proceeded to enact strict laws about access to guns, registration of guns, and restrictions on private ownership of semi-automatic guns. In addition, the government initiated a massive gun buy-back program.
There has not been a mass murder in Australia since 1996 and the national adoption of meaningful gun controls.
In the U.S., there are a significant number of people who love their guns more than human life.
Will the latest school massacre in Florida turn Americans against the National Rifle Association and its adherents in Congress and state legislatures? Will it be the equivalent of the Port Arthur Massacre?
The New York Times explains the obstacles to any significant change in gun laws in Florida, which is one of the most gun-friendly states in the nation.
“In the wake of Florida’s latest shooting massacre, and calls to tighten its relaxed gun laws, Gov. Rick Scott declared that now, everything was on the table.
“Yet the governor sidestepped whether he would explicitly support new gun restrictions. And he emphasized he would never “trample” on anyone’s constitutional rights.”
Scott is the keynote speaker at the NRA annual convention in Dallas, May 3-6.
“Florida’s gun lobby continues to instill fear in lawmakers. It is led by Marion Hammer, 78, who grew up shooting rabbits, reportedly packs a pistol in her purse and seeks political vengeance on legislators who disappoint her.
“Though Florida is a purple state, Mr. Scott, a favorite of gun lobbyists, and other Republicans control state government, and they have steadfastly opposed new restrictions. For gun-control advocates, victories of late have included steps like defeating legislation to allow some people to carry guns into airport terminals.
Gun owners are now a major constituency, too: Nearly two million residents have permits to carry concealed weapons, far more than any other state…
”Florida’s pro-gun approach came under scrutiny after mass shootings in Orlando in 2016 and in Fort Lauderdale last year. But, little changed in the Statehouse; bills to limit assault weapons, for example, did not get a hearing.
Even after the massacre in Parkland last week, the only movement on gun bills dealt with proposals to expand where guns could be carried, not to restrict them.
”State Senator Dennis Baxley, a Republican who wrote the Stand Your Ground law in 2005 and is a major gun-rights backer, doubts gun-control proposals will gain traction.”
“I don’t see any interest here on that,” said Mr. Baxley, who represents parts of Sumter, Marion and Lake Counties. “We’re pretty comfortable that freedom works.”
”Mr. Baxley likens gun restrictions to imposing limits on forks and spoons to reduce obesity. He argued the focus needs to be on school safety…
”Changing Florida’s gun laws could come down to two things: Whether Ms. Hammer can keep legislators from breaking ranks. And, the ambitions of Mr. Scott, who is increasingly expected to challenge Bill Nelson, the state’s incumbent Democratic senator this year.
”Ms. Hammer, who stands barely 5 feet tall, has been the state’s chief gun lobbyist for decades and was the first woman to serve as national N.R.A. president. The state’s Stand Your Ground and concealed-carry laws were largely her initiatives.
”Legislators, especially Republicans, fear her ability to marshal angry emails from thousands of gun owners in every pocket of the state, destroying ambitions of even onetime allies.
“She can be pretty hard on people who aren’t coming around,” Mr. Baxley said. “She has a long memory when you cross her.”
Will members of the legislature listen to Ms. Hammer and the NRA, or will they listen to the teenagers of the state?
Ms. Hammer, the NRA, AND Governor Scott have blood on their hands. The blood of victims of the Pulse nightclub and the blood of students and staff at the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. How many more children and adults will die until they open their eyes and hearts?

The Australians didn’t have to deal with the 2nd amendment (a distorted interpretation of the 2nd amendment, in my opinion) and the NRA. It will take a massive people’s revolt to change things in this country as well as voting in more Democrats this year.
LikeLike
The PM at the time who enacted the laws, John Howard, did have to face off against angry mobs and was seen to be wearing a bullet proof vest when addressing at least one such rally:
https://www.theage.com.au/news/national/anger-lingers-among-those-who-lost-their-firearms/2006/04/27/1145861489398.html
Incidentally, John Bloody Howard is also an arch-conservative who changed the law in 2004 so that any marriage celebrant – religious or otherwise – had to say in the ceremony “Marriage is between a man and a woman”. Thankfully we finally (and famously) overturned that last year with our new marriage equality legislation. Howard still thought he was right.
But my point is – this is not a left / right issue. If John Howard can do it, anyone more progressive than him (which, quite frankly, is just about everyone) should have no problem!
LikeLike
Here we are in America, slaughter, after slaughter after slaughter and we are no closer to regulating these weapons of mass destruction than after the last bloodbath. There may be a difference this time, only time will tell. Maybe at long last we have had enough. Please point me to the GOP John Howard who is ready to ban these semi-automatic rifles? (John Kasich?) Nobody is even talking about banning the semi-automatic pistols. In the US, it is most definitely a right/left issue.
Did John Howard push to eliminate the Australian universal health care system? No. Australia still has its version of universal health care.
The US? NYET! No universal health care for you!
However, yes, it is a hopeful sign that it could be done in Australia by a very conservative leader. The UK also acted after a huge school massacre, it even banned hand guns.
LikeLike
We are trying to solve the wrong problem.
davidrtayloreducation.wordpress.com/2018/02/19/school-safety-or-gun-control/
LikeLike
Can’t agree with your total surveillance solution, David.
Why not?
As it is schools are one of the safest places a child can be, safer than their home, the car they ride in, the parks in which they play, safer than while shopping, and in most every place in society.
What is the unwritten message that is being sent?
I imagine that the former Stasi, KGB and other notorious surveillance state apparatus would be drooling over your suggestion.
What is the Franklin quote?
“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”
LikeLike
It might not be a perfect plan but I know we can’t do anything about the guns, however we do have control over the safety level of our buildings.
LikeLike
Americans love of “security” is mind-boggling to me. As if we can prevent any and all mishaps, accidents, and bad things from happening. Our surveillance state has far surpassed anything the Stasi, Savak, or KGB could imagine. All for our own supposed good. I don’t buy it.
LikeLike
I’m waiting on a better suggestion. Because we both know that the gun owners are not going to change their stance.
LikeLike
You can’t secure your building unless your firepower is greater than the shooter. At all entrances, before and after school.
LikeLike
That’s true, but we can only control what we can control. We haven’t been able to control the guns, so we should do the best we can to make the buildings as safe as possible.
LikeLiked by 1 person
David,
I get your point but a school cannot be a prison or an armed camp. The goal must be to change the gun laws. If we don’t do that, we will never end the plague of mass murders, not only in schools, but in movie theaters, malls, and anywhere that people peaceably gather.
LikeLike
In reality, with my plan I don’t want guns in school. I just want to minimize and make it difficult for people that should not be there to get in the doors.
LikeLike
All the schools I’ve ever visited had unlocked main doors without any surveillance. Couldn’t there be at least a camera at the door that would show someone in the main school office who was there and if he/she appeared to be carrying a gun?
LikeLike
Can’t we do both? Work on school safety and gun safety simultaneously? I live in NJ with sensible gun laws and with a new governor who is on board for strengthening gun laws. In any case, parents will at the least be demanding more safety measures at schools. The idea that a school massacre can’t happen to you has gone out the window with this latest slaughter. We have troubled students and deranged young men all over the map.
LikeLike
No, “The idea that a school massacre can’t happen to you HASN’T gone out the window.” Is the shooting a horrific fact? No doubt!
Why do we have so many “troubled students”? Cannot the blame be laid on the capitalist economic system that rewards the few and screws the vast majority all the while proclaiming that the only valid mode of being is the inhuman consumption of resources? That one isn’t right and good without a shitpot full of “toys”???
At the same time what can one expect from a society and country that leads the world in death and destruction. How many tears have been shed for each of the countless child and elderly deaths from the slaughter caused by our bombings all around the world?
It’s blowback, a means, which the vast majority of Americans cannot see, refuse to see, to show us just how terrible our accepted policies of the death and destruction machine which the vast majority cheer on-god bless america!
LikeLike
Guns are not the answer. Taking them into anywhere you want and using them to defend or resolve issues is pure insanity and atrocity. The NRA is little more than a home-grown domestic terrorist organization. The USA will become the kind of society where you always will have to wonder if someone is carrying and concealing a gun and if they are sane enough not to use it for selfish, impulsive motivations. Then you will have to wonder if you will get caught in any cross fire from people trying to “defend” themselves or if you – should you decide to use your own gun – will be downed but the attacker’s bullets.
I say take away the guns, the entities that are the actually the dangerous instrumentality, and get rid of them, save for hunting and marksmanship. Eliminate all civilian ownership of semi-automatics and silencers.
What a horrible and vile culture to step into if you always have to think about if someone at any given moment can pull a gun simply because it becomes legal to do so.
If Congress wants to make conceal and carry borderless and homogenize all the state gun laws to mirror image that of Florida’s, then all I can say is that people will up and rebel and it would be utter and unacceptable chaos if those bullets reached politicians and their loved ones on a local, state, and federal level. I see that as one inevitability, alas. Imagine . . . .
I for one, aside from potential film projects, will NEVER vacation in Florida. Never!
LikeLike
And one more thing:
Perfect recipe for a societal inferno:
2 cups of heavily weakened or eliminated social safety nets
1 cup of poor healthcare system
5 cups of income inequality
3 cups of voter suppression
4 cups of inequitable taxation
3 cups of privatized public schools
2 cups of deregulated, gutted gun laws
1 cup of crumbling public infrastructure
Combine all ingreidinets and mix thoroughly. Pour into a cookie sheet and bake at 450 for 20 munutes.
Let cool and cut into equal squares. Serve to guests at room temperature and watch each and every one of them die of political, plutocratic poisoning.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If only we could learn from examples, evidence or fact, we would be on the right track. We are not using any of these to create policy. We know that trickle down fails; yet our tax “reform” is full of it. We know we can repair and rebuild our infrastructure if we had higher tax rates on the wealthy as we did in the ’50s; yet our tax rate has been lowered. We know we cannot win in Afghanistan, but there we remain. We know that climate change is real, but we cannot formulate policy to reduce our carbon load and invest in alternative forms of energy. We know that privatization of our public schools is wasteful and ineffective, but we keep pouring money down the drain. Our policies do not reflect logic, wisdom or in some cases basic human dignity. They represent the agenda of wealthy, special interest groups that control many our puppet representatives.
LikeLike
Your last two sentences, retired teacher, are, unfortunately, too very much true.
LikeLike
USA Today had article today on the June 20 protest.
LikeLike
The headline is not true.
For a list of mass murders in Australia see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_in_Australia
There have been quite a few mass killings since 1996.
LikeLike
Duane,
Most of the listings refer to family killing family, domestic violence. Others involve stabbings, arson, vehicular attacks. Few with guns.
Australia couldn’t ban murder, but they seem to be doing a far better job reducing mass murders by gun than we do. We do nothing.
LikeLike
Oh, I understand what you are saying. It’s just that the headline of the post is not true. Nothing more or less.
LikeLike
The total number of deaths on the post you cite is 79 in 13 incidents, 3 of which of ten or more deaths accounted for 36 of those 79. During that same period, 348 Americans died in 16 incidents in which 10 or more persons died: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_shootings_in_the_United_States
I’m too lazy to get the numbers of shooting deaths beyond what is accurately posted in the article links above. So I would argue with your characterization of “quite a few”, especially when put in context. The comparison actually supports the claims made above.
LikeLike
Diane is correct in her assessment. I remember the Bourke St attacks here in Melbourne a couple of years ago by the deranged young man who was seen doing “burnouts” in the car he then used to mow down pedestrians. With a gun, this same man could have inflicted a lot more carnage.
My take on it after it occurred was: “Why aren’t cars considered to be weapons as well?”
LikeLike
I have no problem with Diane’s assessment. I have a problem with the false and misleading headline. That’s all.
LikeLike
“In the U.S., there are a significant number of people who love their guns more than human life”
and these are the people that voted for Trump and still support him and Trump doesn’t care about any life – human or any other life form — except his.
Trump doesn’t even care about his hardcore supporters. To Trump, they are his ignorant, deplorable fools that would continue to stand by him even if he started shooting and killing people standing on Fifth Avenue in New York City.
Trump even said it:
LikeLike
One of the reddest of herrings gun fetishists cite is that the NRA does not represent the will of gun manufacturers, but millions of responsible individuals. A perfect example of this is the argument that more guns will make us safer. Part of this is to arm teachers (with proper training, of course!). According to the DoE, in the 2009-2010 school year, there were 98,817 public schools in the U.S. If we assume that each school will have three guns plus ammunition and that the cost of those alone would be $1,500 (you can get cheaper guns at Cabela’s and unregistered gun shows, but I’m assuming high quality here, which is still substantially cheaper than arming them all with AR-15s), that means the gross costs of those guns and ammunition would be $148,225,500. That would lead to a nice profit to make blood money even bloodier!
LikeLike
If teachers were armed (a terrible idea), they would need AR 15s.
LikeLike
Additional thought: There’s probably a lobbyist at the NRA working on legislative language on the “Smart Firearms for Teachers” bill to authorize DoE funds to train teachers in the use of firearms and authorization to appropriate funds for firearms for teachers who successfully pass the course. That way taxpayers can pay gun manufacturers directly!
LikeLike
Lots of money to be made arming every teacher in America. Of course, they must have at least an AR 15, or they will be overpowered.
LikeLike
Arming teachers is one of the most insane, if not most insane ideas out there as a response to these occurrences.
LikeLike
Here ya go: http://www.newsweek.com/columbine-florida-school-shooting-gun-control-812173?utm_source=yahoo&utm_medium=yahoo_news&utm_campaign=rss&utm_content=/rss/yahoous/news
Too much pathetic irony in this story.
LikeLike
The brave survivor young adults in Florida may be the change. Perhaps they CAN change the world for the better. Here is hoping so.
LikeLike
Each of the last three times I have been in Australia there has been a mass shooting covered on the news during my stay. If you look up the data, there actually have been quite a number of massacres – most of which did not involve a firearm- I found this quite surprising given the narative- when I brought this up to Aussie’s I know they were also schocked- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_in_Australia
LikeLike
“New South Wales, a state in southeast Australia, was founded by the British as a penal colony in 1788. Over the next 80 years, more than 160,000 convicts were transported to Australia from England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales, in lieu of being given the death penalty.”
https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20120126-travelwise-australias-penal-colony-roots#:~:text=New%20South%20Wales%2C%20a%20state,being%20given%20the%20death%20penalty.
Is it possible that some of the killings after the British Empire stopped using Australia as a prison colony are in some related to some of those former convicts?
After all, I think it is debatable that the often violent and extreme right Christians in the US might be that way because many who came to the North American colonies in the beginning belonged to persecutor fundamentalist Christian religions.
And now there may be evidence there is an inherited genetic link.
“Religion and the Founding of the American Republic”
https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/religion/rel01.html
“Genetic background of extreme violent behavior”
https://www.nature.com/articles/mp2014130
Of course that doesn’t excuse mass murderers. But why do we wait until they go on a killing rampage before we get rid of them?
LikeLike