Rafe Esquith, a teacher of fifth-grade students at the Hobart Elementary School in Los Angeles who gained national attention for his Hobart Shakespeareans, won the right to sue the Los Angeles Unified School District for firing him in 2015. Esquith was accused of sexual improprieties, which he denied.
A state appellate court panel Thursday upheld a trial judge’s ruling that a former Los Angeles Unified School District teacher can move forward with his lawsuit alleging he was removed from his classroom for criticizing many of the school district’s policies and initiatives.
The three-justice panel of the 2nd District Court of Appeal found that Rafe Esquith’s causes of action did not arise out of an employment investigation conducted against him and that therefore the district was not engaged in “protected activity,” which would have been grounds for dismissing the case.
“We agree that Esquith’s claims do not arise from a protected employment investigation,” Justice Audrey Collins wrote. “Rather, Esquith has alleged that defendants harassed him, discriminated against him, and retaliated against him, and to accomplish these ends they engaged in a baseless investigation and took adverse employment actions against Esquith.”
Zack Muljat, one of Esquith’s attorneys, issued a statement on the ruling.
“We agreed with the ruling in the trial court and we agree with the opinion of the Court of Appeal,” Muljat said. “We look forward to the opportunity to forge ahead and bring justice to Mr. Esquith.”
In his July 2016 ruling, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Mark Mooney said he could not grant the district’s motion to dismiss Esquith’s entire complaint because some of his claims did not fall under what is considered protected speech and the right of the LAUSD to conduct an investigation of the teacher.
Mooney’s ruling meant that Esquith’s claims of defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, the taking of items from his classroom, retaliation, age discrimination and unfair business practices remained in the case. He also is seeking reinstatement to his teaching position.
“Esquith alleged that he was an outspoken critic of certain LAUSD policies and he was nearing retirement, and as a result (the district) retaliated and discriminated against him by removing him from his teaching position and conducting a baseless, meandering investigation designed to damage Esquith’s career and reputation,” Collins wrote.
Esquith, 63, was removed from his Hobart Elementary School classroom in April 2015. The district began investigating him when another teacher came forward to allege that Esquith was using inappropriate sexual language with his students….
Esquith says he never received a complaint from a parent or teacher during his 30 years as an educator.

Outstanding!
LikeLike
It is about time.
But if the union had defended him aghast the false accusations, ad is their JOB, HE would not have had to spend great amounts of times and money to go to court.
The plot to privatize public schools began with the removal the PROFESSIONAL PRACTITIONER so the schools would fail, just the hospital would fail they cookout the surgeons and replaced them with trained EMPs.
The ploy only works when the union looks the other way , as it did in LAUSD.
http://www.perdaily.com/2014/07/former-ctc-attorney-kathleen-carroll-lays-out-unholy-alliance-between-union-and-public-education-pri.html and when the union and colludes to end collective bargaining rights: http://www.perdaily.com/2014/03/lausd-and-utla-collude-to-end-collective-bargaining-and-civil-rights-for-teachers-part-2.html
It is ALL about money, and the metaphor for the process around the nation. Take out the tenured professional and save 40k and more in benefits.
LAUSD’S TREACHEROUS ROAD FROM REED TO VERGARA- IT’S NEVER BEEN ABOUT STUDENTS, JUST MONEYhttp://www.perdaily.com/2014/06/lausds-treacherous-road-from-reed-to-vergara–its-never-been-about-students-just-money.html
It happened to me in NYC: http://www.perdaily.com/2011/01/lausd-et-al-a-national-scandal-of-enormous-proportions-by-susan-lee-schwartz-part-1.html
LikeLike
No judgment has been made as to whether the allegations against him are false or not. That’s why the case is moving forward. I will remind everyone (and I know this is a very unpopular stance around here), emails were found on his school computer – which he does not claim are forgeries – with incriminating sexual and harassing content. Again, I will say now as I did when this matter came up before, yes, it probably was retaliation that LAUSD investigated him when and how they did, but that doesn’t change the fact that I wouldn’t want my daughters in his class. The provenance of those emails is far less of a concern to me than their content.
LikeLike
I too will reserve judgment. Chapter five of “There Are No Shortcuts” did not sit well with me. I hope that he is innocent but I am not placing any bets.
LikeLike
Regardless of guilt or innocence, the Broad Unaccredited Academy Superintendent Deasy creation of a team of district officials whose only job is to hunt down and publicly destroy teachers, working in conjunction with the local media, is the real crime here. That we, the public, even know what the (purposely selected parts of his) emails said is the Real. Crime. Here. He may or may not be the best teacher ever. Or he may be the worst teacher ever. Don’t know him. Not my call. I will just say this, being a male teacher in Los Angeles nowadays is unreasonably dangerous because the culture has been made to be paranoid. Broad. Beutner. Deasy. The LA Times. I walk on eggshells instead of being as warm and supportive as I can, and it shouldn’t be that way.
LikeLike
Dienne,
Do you have a link for those emails with the alleged “incriminating sexual and harassing content”? Please share.
Gracias,
Duane
LikeLike
The corrupt LA Unified district administrators and/or board members behind what happened will not pay a penny. Their punishment should be a life sentence in a maximum security prison without parole.
LikeLike
I hope that his conduct as a teacher is proven to be above reproach and that he has a very good lawyer.
LikeLike
He has a very good lawyer, and apparently, a decently strong case.
LikeLike
There remains some justice in this chaos!!!
LikeLike
The injustice in this whole era of lausd and its board is that this type of illegal practice, that of blaming the teacher by discrediting him or her on some bogus charges, is and was widespread. It happened to thousands of innocent older, veteran teachers nearing retirement age where their pensions were stolen or denied to save money for the district. It was/is cowardly, illegal, unfair. I hope lausd pays, pays a lot for destroying those lives for their own financial gain. And the teacher union? You mean lausd’ stooges? It still is taking it up the yazoo.
LikeLike
The teachers union? You mean the Twitter Storm? Ha!
LikeLike
AAAAAAH! Some good news for a change.
LikeLike
One thing we know for sure, teachers, targeted by pseudo-elected school boards owned by tech tyrants and Wall Street, don’t get a cut from software and tablet sales, don’t work to destroy the structure of democratic governance, and don’t pave the way for greater concentration of wealth. The enemy of my enemy….
LikeLike
For 30 + years, Teacher Rafe Esquith has dedicated his precious time, knowledge, money and effort for a common good, PLUS he and his wife live modestly and sell their own car to buy supplies and to support his poor students, where is any free time for him to take advantage or to sexually harass young children? Most of all, he writes well known educational book.
I hope that justice will well serve teacher Rafe Esquith in compensating him, and his wife for their emotional sufferance from defamation and income loss sooner. Back2basic
LikeLike
Was the class action part of this suit still happening or not?
LikeLike