The American edition of The Guardian, a British newspaper, has https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jun/05/public-lands-project-description?utm_source=eml&utm_medium=&utm_campaign=&CMP_TU=&CMP_BUNIT=&att5=tarted a series to cover any efforts to sell off our national lands or lease them to oil and gas interests or for mining.
“At a moment of deep political division, few issues draw as much bipartisan support from the American public as the sanctity of our national lands. Yet conservative lawmakers have quietly laid the foundation to give away Americans’ birthright: 640m acres of national land. The move would give private developers and oil, gas and mining interests unprecedented control of our shared resources.
“Today, the Guardian US launches This Land is Your Land, a new series to raise awareness about the threat to our public lands and hold politicians and corporate interests accountable for their environmental policies. The series kicks off with an editorial, The Guardian view on America’s public lands: Stop the Republican threat, and a story about risks to the Grand Canyon, as Arizona officials ask the Trump administration to end a ban on uranium mining. While the urgency of climate change is rightly taking up many of our newsroom resources at the moment, we also want to keep the spotlight on the other environmental crisis facing America.
The inspiration for This Land is Your Land came directly from you, our readers and supporters. When the Guardian US published its first story on public lands earlier this year, after the Republican congressman Jason Chaffetz of Utah introduced a bill to sell off 3.3m acres of national land, the piece became a social media phenomenon, attracting close to a million readers, and generating 61,000 comments on Facebook. We received countless emails asking that we stay on top of the subject.
We heard you, and we are excited to launch the series today on this critical issue that desperately needs more national news coverage. When your read the stories in This Land is Your Land, you might notice the project has an unique $50,000 fundraising campaign built into it. As a supporter of the Guardian, your generosity already helps fund environmental series like this, so we’re not asking for additional contributions from you for this campaign. But since we are constantly exploring new and innovative ways to encourage readers to pay for our journalism, we thought you might be interested to know about the fundraising approaches we’re trialing.
The vast majority of Americans support efforts to preserve our national lands—and the public can influence the debate. Not long after our story on Chaffetz’s bill to sell 3.3m acres ran, the negative backlash had a meaningful impact: Chaffetz was forced to pull support for his own legislation.
You can follow This Land is Your Land here.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/series/this-land-is-your-land
Sincerely,
Jane Spencer
Deputy Editor/Strategy
Guardian US
Keep Watch

It’s imperative everyone voices their opinion. 6 of the lands up for review are in California alone and one is the Giant Sequoias
This gives you the website and code through which to comment. Only three weeks left.
Thanks!
https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/interior-department-releases-list-monuments-under-review-announces-first-ever-formal
LikeLike
The issues are much broader. This is not the whole thing that is going on. Trump and friends want massive rollbacks on protections of national lands, monuments, and large areas of the oceans. This rollback is only partly about getting access to energy. It is about putting a thumb in Obama’s eye and taking park lands for development. See this https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/25/us/politics/national-monuments-energy-drilling.html?_r=0
In addition ALEC has 14 examples of model legislation for exploiting federal lands in addition to model legislation for states, counties, and municipalities to “shrink” their holdings of public lands (with the help of some GPS calculations).
In other words, do not let this one bill from Chaffetz or the fundraising tied to the Guardian US publication and staff effort DISTRACT your attention from larger moves, including local moves that ALEC has had its sights on recently and also for years. ALEC is where lazy legislators go to find ready to use corporate friendly and/or ultraconservative legislation.
alec_search_term=lands&alec_post_type%5B%5D=model-policy&alec_year=&alec_p2p%5B%5D=eyJjb25uZWN0aW9uX3R5cGUiOiJpc3N1ZXNfdG9fY29udGVudCIsImlkIjoxMTQzOX0%3D&alec_meta%5B%5D=&alec_meta%5B%5D=&alec_term%5B%5D=&in_page_search=1
LikeLike
That DUMP HATES this country and is totally jealous of Obama. The Dump is one sick and totally disgusting person. plus he’s illiterate in all areas. He should move to Russia permanently.
LikeLike
In Utah the issue is also about school funding. Our schools are funded through property taxes. The federal government doesn’t pay any. We have a very large portion of our lands under federal control which seriously hampers the funding of our schools. We had two very large monuments declared in recent years. Both interrupted the communities with in and around them. It caused disruption in the cattle industry which curtailed the grazing of cattle which had at one time been private property. It disrupts water rights and contracts as well. The Grand Staiircase was designated with no public input or discussion. The Bears Ears monument actually super ceded the public discussions and compromises in process. It was very controversial and effected Native American lands as well. Both of these monuments were extremely large and left large tracks of land without proper oversight. The last time the government shut down Utah’s public parks also shut down costing the state millions in the travel industry. The state opened and paid for Zion’s operating costs during this time. Many in the state felt that the stat government did a better job managing the park than the forest service. In Utah this is a very hot topic with one group worried about preservation and the other about personal and state rights. I do not claim to know much as I have not really studied this out. But I do know that at this time we do not have a plan that most of the residents feel supports he needs of all.
LikeLike
The federal government pays localities “payment in lieu of taxes” instead of property taxes, so that argument doesn’t hold water. “These payments to local governments help offset losses in property taxes due to nontaxable federal lands within their boundaries” -Chapter 69, Title 31 of the United States Code. You can find the actual payments by state and county. The federal government has paid more than 7 BILLION dollars since 1977. Look it up at http://www.nbc.gov/pilt/counties.cfm
When were the Monuments ever private property? They have always been federal land, which the federal government leased to cattle grazers for far less than market price. That federal land belongs to you and me.
The overwhelming majority of Native American nations in the Bear Ears area supported the designation of Bears Ears National Monument. They welcomed the chance for the first time ever to help administer a monument which preserves their sacred sites. The area has not had proper oversight before this, and so many of those sites have long since been looted. With the Monument, local Native Americans have gained more control.
I have a big problem with the Trump administration now wanting to get rid of land that belongs to all Americans in order to turn it over to the state. The state of Utah does not have a right to federal land, so this is not an issue of states’ rights. Wherever you heard that argument, it is bogus.
LikeLike
Absolutely true . 200,000 acres did belong to the state but it is hard to see how that generated revenue . From what I can tell grazing will still be allowed . The arguments were and are bogus.
LikeLike
I lived in Utah for nearly two decades and during that entire time, most State officials and most Congressional reps and Senators and county officials in Southern Utah were continually trying to come up with ways to take over Federal lands.
They don’t like the Federal government telling them how they can use land that does not even belong to them (the state of Utah) but benefit greatly from the tourist dollars generated by national parks and other public lands AND from very low cattle grazing fees.
In other words they want “hands off handouts” from the Federal government.
The hypocrisy is stunning.
LikeLike
By the way, I heard so many outright lies from Utah officials about this issue over the years that it made my head spin.
The bottom line is that Federal lands belong to ALL of us, not just a few officials in Utah and their cronies who would despoil them for profit (eg, through coal mining tar sands mining)
LikeLike
And the worst one is Senator Orrin Hatch.
LikeLike
It is worth noting that the Utah Enabling Act which led to Utah’s becoming a state required that the people of the state “forever disclaim all right and title to the unappropriated public lands lying within the boundaries”.
So any claim that Utah has a right to these lands is just a LIE that has no basis in fact or law.
It’s another case of Utah officials wanting to have their cake and eat it to.
LikeLike
According to this pew research study the people of Utah favor the Grand Staircase Monument designation by a margin of better than 2/1
The polling on Bears Ears a much larger swath of Federal land is all over the place . But the designation does not prevent grazing . Of the 1.35 million acres of land in the proposed monument only 12,600 acres are privately owned . It would be hard to see that those 12,600 acres of mostly undeveloped range land contributed much to public schools. In NY Farm land is taxed at a small fraction of residential or commercial land. When it is sold for other purposes several years of taxes are retroactively collected at a higher rate . Further most Tribes support the proposal . I suspect there would be little support for repealing it had had it been designated by Bush or Reagan . Obama doing it on the way out the door, seems to have inflamed the Republican Tribe. A particularly odious group of mostly elderly intolerant individuals. (sorry could not help myself)
Click to access 3935-pew-utah-grand-staircaseescalante-topline-final.pdf
http://www.standard.net/Environment/2016/12/29/why-is-bears-ears-national-monument-controversy-obama-big-deal
LikeLike
Like, Joel, like enthusiastically.
LikeLike
The people Utah have always supported public lands by a wide margin. Most Utah residents understand that the vast, undeveloped open spaces are what makes Utah such a special place.
But, unfortunately, politics in Utah are not controlled by the people. Their “representatives” (and the Mormon Church) are incessantly subverting the popular will on land and other issues.
LikeLike
I guess the good news here is that there actually is a point of consensus in the American polity.
Thanks to The Guardian for their excellent work on this.
LikeLike
It is curious that we need to get information about what is happening in the US from a UK news source.
The Guardian is actually FAR superior to most of the news outlets in the US. they make the NYTimes and Washington Post look like tabloids.
LikeLike
I definitely agree, SomeDAM, and your comment, obviously, doesn’t speak well of other papers in our culture (I’m thinking of you, New York Post).
And thanks.
LikeLike
markstextterminal
The Murdock rag is not fit to cover road kill with.
LikeLike
Please watch:
LikeLike
Wrong link, that was from a prior comment:
LikeLike
Something isn’t working, ay ay ay!
Diane, please remove my comments. TIA, Duane
LikeLike
Let’s try again. Please watch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGKU8awk7Vg
LikeLike