When she was questioned by Congress, Betsy DeVos let the cat out of the bag about vouchers.
The U.S. Department of Education will hand out money for vouchers and will not enforce civil rights laws.
“She lifted the curtain on school vouchers and made clear exactly what this system of using taxpayer funds to pay for private and religious schools is.
“It’s a way for some parents, particularly bigots, to get taxpayers to subsidize their attempts to evade or break the law.
“The revelation came during DeVos’s testimony before Congress about President Donald Trump’s proposed new federal budget and that budget’s effect on education.
“DeVos found herself questioned by U.S. Rep. Katharine Clark, D-Massachusetts. Clark inquired about Lighthouse Christian Academy, a voucher school here in Indiana — Bloomington, in fact — that boasts that it will deny admission to students who might be lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender. The school also will deny admission to students who come from homes in which homosexuality or bisexuality is practiced.
“(An aside: Don’t schools and people like this — who go out of their way to demean vulnerable children — really make you proud to be a Hoosier?)
“Clark asked if DeVos would prevent federal funds from going to schools that violate federal law by discriminating against people based on sexual orientation. DeVos tried to duck the question, but, after considerable hemming, hawing and throat-clearing, finally said this was really a parent’s decision, not hers.
“Clark corrected her.
“This really isn’t about parents’ choices, the congresswoman said. It was about whether federal tax money would be used to subsidize policies that violate federal — and, in some cases, basic constitutional — law.
DeVos stood by her answer.
“Clark then asked her if there was any form of discrimination against which DeVos would take a stand. Would the education secretary, for instance, funnel federal tax dollars to a voucher school that discriminated against African-American students?
“DeVos again tried to evade the question.
“Clark pressed.
“DeVos finally uttered a series of non-sequiturs about parents caring about their children and states honoring that as her final answer.
“But she refused to answer the question.
“She couldn’t name a single instance in which she would oppose allowing voucher schools to discriminate against law-abiding American citizens.
“Not one.
“Not. One.”
It’s tempting to write this off as another instance of Betsy DeVos being Betsy DeVos, a billionaire lightweight dilettante trying to pass herself off as a heavyweight expert on education, law and public policy. She certainly isn’t the first person to think wealth is a substitute for study or knowledge.

I suspect that an eventual replacement will be worse.
LikeLike
Good grief, I’m a Hoosier!!!
Money sure doesn’t prevent ignorance. Here’s to tRump and is minions who can out-ignorance them all.
LikeLike
Nothing matters to DeVos other than getting federal dollars flowing to states or to profiteers and keeping watch on the loyalty of her staff. The whole Trump administration is ethically challenged They hope to get away with ignoring laws against discrimination. Same for Republicans and Democrats who support this corruption.
LikeLike
I think religion plays a bigger role than money. She wants to starve the public schools to death so that more kids end up in Christianist indoctrination academies. Her dream: America as the Christian version of Pakistan.
LikeLike
@ponderosa: Do you have any documentation, to this effect? Have you got her on record, as stating this? see
https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/negotiating-surrender
LikeLike
Estoy completemente de acuerdo.
LikeLike
Completamente, ay ay ay.
LikeLike
@Charles –there’s a secretly recorded video of one of the guys who ran one of her foundations saying that they viewed vouchers as a way to expand “God’s dominion”. I’ll see if I can find it.
LikeLike
Here’s the story. I got part of it wrong: De Vos herself wants to expand God’s kingdom and laments the absence of God from public schools. http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/betsy-devos-education-trump-religion-232150
LikeLike
Dewey’s Pedagogic Creed statement of 1897
…
“Every teacher should realize he is a social servant set apart for the maintenance of the proper
social order and the securing of the right social growth. In this way the teacher is always the
prophet of the true God and the usherer in of the true kingdom of heaven.”
Heavens to Betsy…
LikeLike
Thanks, ponderosa, the link to the Politico article. All should read and listen to what the DeVos’ have been trying to institute in this country for the last 20 years at least.
They are xtian fundie dominionist groupies with too much money.
LikeLike
Ponderosa: excellent cite on the DeVos agenda.
I found this particularly enlightening: “The two [Betsy and Dick DeVos] also lament that public schools have “displaced” the Church as the center of communities, and they cite school choice as a way to reverse that troubling trend.”
This gives us a clue as to what era the DeVos agenda is trying to turn the clock back to. When, in the US, was “the Church” (as opposed to the public school) the center of the American community?
As a 60-something American from a rural upstate-NY town, church was community-central during primary grades in the 1950’s. Such tiny towns typically had just one or two Protestant ‘community’ churches, whose denominations shifted regularly depending on the pastor you could attract. The “community center” — which hosted all local activities including vol-fire-dept fairs, was an annex to the community church.
My urban, Catholic husband would agree: during primary grades– during the 1950’s, in a typical extra-Manhattan NYC borough– all nbhd social activity revolved around the local Catholic church, whose nbhd kids went to the associated Catholic primary school.
But even in the 1950’s (60-+ yrs ago!), that all changed as soon as students hit jr &/or sr hisch. From that point forward, social activities shifted to whatever pulled those multi-church folk together– sports, music, the arts.
In ’50’s upstate-NYS towns like mine, there were also tight-knit Jewish, Greek Orthodox, & Eastern Orthodox [Syrian/ Lebanese] communities. It must be said that those community ties outlasted the primary grades. But they were not precisely church/ temple-centered: they were ethnically/ extended-family-centered, & their communities extended well past the local church/temple.
The only communities where “the Church” was still the central community hub past primary grades– even 60+ yrs ago– were those communities [like BDeVos’s W MI Dutch community] where “the Church” ran K-12 schools, & sponsored nearby religiouscolleges.
Do such communities still exist today in any number? Did they ever exist in any number since the 19thC? Or is BDeVos– as Secy of fed DOEd– in charge of the entire nation’s ed system, 90% of whose families w/school-age children attend public schools– simply committed to turning the clock back to some pre-industrial era when “the Church” was the center of ed/ community activities?
LikeLike
School choice should be available to everyone, even those parents who want their kids to attend a school with a bias! Freedoms guaranteed by our constitution have a cost. It’s tolerance.
LikeLike
Parents have the right to enroll their children, in schools which teach various things, which are not in the mainstream, and not politically correct. The Supreme Court ruled this in 1925, in Pierce v. Little Sisters of the poor. see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierce_v._Society_of_Sisters
LikeLike
The Pierce decision of 1925 responded to an effort in Oregon to require all children to attend public schools.The KKK and other bigoted groups sponsored a referendum that would to impose this mandate. The referendum passed. The Society of Sisters and others sued, saying that the referendum would violate freedom of religion and deny parents the right to decide how to educate their children. The Supreme Court agreed with them.
This is the key paragraph in the decision:
“Under the doctrine of Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 , 43 S. Ct. 625, 29 A. L. R. 1146, we think it entirely plain that the Act of 1922 unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents and guardians to direct the upbringing and education of children [268 U.S. 510, 535] under their control. As often heretofore pointed out, rights guaranteed by the Constitution may not be abridged by legislation which has no reasonable relation to some purpose within the competency of the state. The fundamental theory of liberty upon which all governments in this Union repose excludes any general power of the state to standardize its children by forcing them to accept instruction from public teachers only. The child is not the mere creature of the state; those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare him for additional obligations.”
The Supreme Court ruled that the state could not force all children to go to public schools. It supported parents rights to send them to private or religious schools.
The decision did not say or imply that the state was obliged to pay for parents’ choices to leave the public schools and choose a religious or nonpublic education.
In other words, Charles, the Pierce decision does not support your fanatical belief that the state should pay for parents who choose to send their children to nonpublic schools.
LikeLike
I never said, that the Pierce decision requires the state to pay the costs of non-public schools. The Pierce decision is self-explanatory. If parents wish to enroll their children in non-public schools AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE, then they may do so. No more, no less.
LikeLike
Charles, we agree. Exercise choice but if you leave the public system, pay for it yourself.
LikeLike
Don’t jump to this conclusion. Of course, we agree with the Pierce decision. I am willing to compromise. The state does not have “dibs” on our children’s education, nor on their minds. Parents have been sending children to schools, which teach various religious concepts, that are at variance with science. Some (not all) non-public schools teach racial concepts which are out of the mainstream. This is the price of freedom.
LikeLike
“Freedoms guaranteed by our constitution have a cost”?? Tolerance is a “cost of freedom”. Really?? You’ve got that twisted. Tolerance is a hallmark of freedom.
Those discriminatory schools?? They are available, Kent. And yes, “even [to] those parents who want their kids to attend a school with bias!”
No, problem, the parents can pay for that “school with bias”, i.e., constitutionally out of line discriminatory school, out of their own pocket. No one should be forced to pay for the religious and/or discriminatory based education of other’s children.
Go ahead and opinionate that “it’s intolerance”. Remember, everyone has an opinion, just like everyone has an excretory orifice.
Yeah, that’s rude and crude but not as rude and crude as expecting everyone else to pay for Kent’s beloved religious and/or discriminatory schools.
LikeLike
Curmudgucation doesn’t have to be rude or crude — the message is very clear when he comment son Devos’ : “betsy: “It is school choice–directly empowering parents to choose the best educational environment for their child–that is the most democratic of ideas.”
Response from Curmudgucation:
Nope. Nope nope nopity nope. There are arguments to be made for parent choice, but “it’s the essence of democracy” is not one of them.
Democracy, even the sort-of-democracy practiced by the USA, is not about saying, “I want to make this personal choice, and I want everyone else to pay for it.”
Democracy is not saying you want a six-lane highway to run back the lane where only your house sits, so you get the rest of the taxpayers in your state to pay for it.
Democracy is not saying that since I want to have a police force that patrols my own house 24/7, I should have that police coverage and all local taxpayers should foot the bill.
Democracy is not “My fellow taxpayers have to pay for whatever I decide on my own that I want.”
Choice fans often like to talk about the money following the child because “that money doesn’t belong to the school system.” And they have a point– it is not the school’s money. It is also not the family’s money. It is the taxpayers’ money, and the taxpayers have given it to support a system that will educate all students in the community through an institution managed by elected representatives of those taxpayers (when was the last time you saw a school board requirement that only parents can be elected).
Democracy is about coming together as a group to discuss, debate, (hopefully) compromise, and elect folks who will decide how best to manage our resources. Our version of democracy has some built-in protections so that the minority can be protected from a the majority.
But the “most democratic of ideas” is not that each individual gets to live in the Land of Do As You Please at public expense. Vouchers may be many things, but they are not remotely democratic.” CURMUDGUCATION
LikeLike
Peter’s still teaching, I’m not.
Not that I gave a damn about being rude and crude on an internet forum coming back to haunt me when I taught.
I say it as I see it and, if some don’t like the stridency with which I say it, I say tough . . . ! (is that better?)
LikeLike
yes, I also say I am retired so they can’t fire me. Teachers in my city are very leary of what they do or say. They can get “written up” by being vocal.
My friend’s daughter had a lawsuit that she won and her dad said ” well if you file another grievance you will never work in public education again.
Another friend won her grievance and she is good — visible, vocal, but many of the staff I met through door to door canvassing are quite intimidated by their local administrator/superintendent.
j
it as I see it and, if some don’t like the stridency with which I say it, I say tough . . . ! (is that better?)
jeanhaverhill@aol.com
LikeLike
You see Jean, I can’t stand it when people twist the meanings of words and ideas in an attempt to support their argument and/or nefarious desires. Using language in such a fashion lacks a fidelity to truth attitude and is the hallmark of purveyors of equine excrement who try to extract something of value from those whom he/she deceives. You know, Jean, I just ain’t buying that sack of. . . !
LikeLike
Rude and crude may be the answer. PC certainly didn’t work .
LikeLike
DeVos is evasive by design. Her only loyalty is to forward her twisted voucher agenda. Rights be damned. What bothers me is how the federal government can allow federal funds to go to private entities that will not abide by federal civil rights laws. I remember when building contractors that had contracts with the federal government, there was a court case that stated they had to abide by federal civil rights laws if they received federal funds. Minority groups may need to challenge any discriminatory practices at these private schools, and take the cases to court.
LikeLike
“The Trump administration is planning to disband the Labor Dept div that has policed discrimination among federal contractors for four decades”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-administration-plans-to-minimize-civil-rights-efforts-in-agencies/2017/05/29/922fc1b2-39a7-11e7-a058-ddbb23c75d82_story.html?utm_term=.a8f5cd147001
LikeLike
A lot more than the one division will be disbanded.
LikeLike
They are probably figuring that court cases in red states would result in a “freedom of religion” verdict like the bakery that refused to bake a cake for a gay wedding.
Trump and company are trying to neutralize every agency that protects the common good. Trump also has a ton of appointments in the lower courts.
LikeLike
yes, you are right about trump and our republican governors are doing it also. At least we have 3 who will be taking on our republican governor in the next election.. and we have current school board and city council elections to pay attention to in the interim.
Governor Baker signed on yesterday with Climate Change alliance (CA , NY, VT) etc because there are 3 candidates willing to take him on.
Baker loves to tell everyone the state is first in testing and I have to remind the politicians we are only about #28 in equity .
Baker loves his sports reputation and nomination for “most popular governor.” But the candidates we have are discussing his poor management (Jay Gonzales has experience with budgets having worked in the Patrick administration) and he has experience in health care.
Baker I accuse of wanting to be a character in the Huckleberry Finn novels because of his “aw shucks” attitude to build his popularity — and he gets other people to build the fence while he withholds the resources (on cable/tv he says we have to change our attitudes and not stigmatize someone on drugs but then he cuts the budget for rehab, city programs for the opioid crisis etc.) He does the same things with schools; he made a commercial about how he wants “everyone to choose a quality school” but you can’t find them in MA (all the time we have still not passed the Foundation Budget study requirements.
Please see Maggie’s corrections of Betsy on these issues.
LikeLike
She can’t even be a decent political hack. Hell, she should have just lied through her teeth and stated that “The U.S. Dept of Ed will enforce the laws as we believe is necessary”, and moved on. No one would have ever challenged her down the road about the statement. And even if they did she could just say “Well, we determined that X action wasn’t needed” and then move on again.
She needs to bring her political game up to snuff.
LikeLike
Sounds like Obama
LikeLike
I don’t worry about the Obomber anymore.
LikeLike
Should have added to that statement ,that NYCPSP thought I was tough on Hillary and not Obama.
LikeLike
Betsy Devos presents school choice as though the parents are enabled to choose the school they believe will best serve their children. Until the time that all schools must accept every child who applies, the choice will ultimately belong to the school and not to the parent.
LikeLike
You have that right LH!
LikeLike
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2017/05/24/katherine-clark-betsy-devos-get-into-heated-discussion-discrimination/ZXjQVDWB6AKdyHghCNDxOM/story.html
We were pretty proud of Maggie Hassan (NH Senator) during the confirmation hearings when she also held Devos to accountability.
p.s. Kent you need to see Curmudgucation’s explanation and the “Soundbite of the week” “Nope, Nope, nope, nopity nope. (it is NOT democracy).
I wish that people would see the Orwellian nature of the words. When charters were voted down in MA (60 – 40% in my County) the republican governor has switched to not calling it a “charter” — he has “hybrid” schools, “innovation” schools, empowerment schools but his use of “empowering does not represent the way i/we (many of us) have used the term in a more appropriate sense …. “free market” is probably the euphemism for all of these but in order to sell to parents, the bureaucrats at DESE tell them how they will be “empowered by their choices” but many others have defined this and I don’t need to any more so I am donating the book “Deconstructing Development Discourse: Buzzwords and Fuzzwords” to the library book sale and in my conversations with local colleagues i call them “futzwords”….
LikeLike
I know this is older but we were very proud of newly elected Senator Maggie Hassan.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2017/01/18/devos-unfamiliarity-with-civil-rights-law-for-students-with-disabilities-concerns-hassan/eaRGm1bAzUy9PG2RCl5Q8M/story.html
My City is on the NH border but , although I didn’t drive the busses of voters over the state line on election day as trump has accused, we were very active in the NH campaigns with literature, information, driving people to ring the door bells for canvassing, and the NH people came across the state line to help especially with the Bernie Sanders campaign because he had early name recognition in Vermont, NH etc.
I was pleased that Maggie Hassan was elected (Kelly Ayotte removed) — K. Ayotte was the only New England senator who did not support the bipartisan legislation prepared by Manchin/Toomey/Biden . But we won even more by getting Maggie Hassan elected (Kelly was escorting Gorsuch around on behalf of the NRA after she lost that seat).
LikeLike
Like
LikeLike
So if I am understanding this correctly a school could deny openly entrance because a person is black or gay or Asian or Hispanic or Jewish etc and they will still get federal funds? As a taxpayer my rights are being violated when my money goes to violators of Civil Rights! Are there not legal grounds to fight this for taxpayers??
LikeLike
There are two types of segregation, de jure and de facto, as far as I know. Civil rights laws are firm of de jure (by law), the old Jim Crow laws, but civil rights laws are squishy on de facto cases. They are harder to prove, and open to interpretation. Who is rendering the decision is very important, which is why a judge in a blue state may render a different decision from that in a red state. It is also why cases make their way up to the Supreme Court.
LikeLike
“They are harder to prove, and open to interpretation.”
They have purposely been made hard if not impossible to prove by the “conservative” legislators, guided by ALEC and The Kochsoaker Bros in passing legislation demanding that a plaintiff prove that the discriminator, in his/her mind was really, I mean really intending to discriminate. Results of nefarious actions don’t count (except in the wrong way against public school teachers for student test scores.)
Those laws basically place a 30 ft high bar to pole vault over. In other words, it ain’t gonna happen.
LikeLike
intended, not intending. ay ay ay
LikeLike
Duane E Swacker
First no need to apologize for the typo (especially to me ) was on Juan Cole’s web site what a pleasure to have that 2minute edit button for this guy who can’t see inside the box. But I will live with the embarrassments.
Second do you still think there wasn’t a lesser evil. Because outside some Black Swan event it could take decades to reverse the damage to be done .
LikeLike
Joel,
I don’t understand what you are asking with the “Second do you still think. . . .”
Please explain more.
Gracias,
Duane
LikeLike
Sadly, one of the many problems, with assigning children to schools based on their zip codes, is that schools follow the housing demographics. In a white neighborhood, the neighborhood school will be primarily white. In a black neighborhood, the neighborhood school will be primarily black.
Giving the parents of minority children, more options in how to obtain educations for their children, will break down the artificial racial barriers.
Even some African-American leaders endorse “magnet schools”, and giving more options to parents.
Last week was the anniversary of the Brown v. Board of Education decision in 1954. We have come a long way in this nation, but we still have more road to travel.
LikeLike
Charles
Schools are not the problem
Poverty and segregation are
LikeLike
Charles,
You have posted too many comments today.
Please limit your comments to no more than five a day.
LikeLike
Sadly, one of the many problems, with assigning children to schools based on their zip codes, is that schools follow the housing demographics.
A lot of this is due to federally mandated housing policies that is described in Richard Rothstein’s recent book, The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America
Another factor is standardized testing. An unintended consequence of standardized testing is valuing neighborhoods based on those aggregated standardized test scores. Standardized test scores are a proxy for socio-economic class. When a family says that they moved into a community because it has good schools, and then points to standardized test scores (or a related formula that uses standardized test scores), then that is a euphemism for saying, “we moved into that community because the residents are of a higher socio-economic class.” There is a lot of self-segregation that is taking place based on this phenomenon.
Vouchers and school choice will not solve this, because families with means will always make sure that they get into the desired schools. Those without means will not get the choice schools.
LikeLike
Not all wealthy people are highly educated.
-Henry Ford barely finished 7th grade
-Thomas Edison got through 5th grade, barely
-Steve Jobs dropped out of college.
I used to say, that school is where you go to learn about people who dropped out of school and became rich.
Education alone, will not make you wealthy, either.
“The world is full of educated derelicts” – Calvin Coolidge
LikeLike
The world is full of non-educated greedy SOBs also!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Charles– not sure how this relates to the post. There will always be a micropercentage of wildly creative and intelligent folk who will succeed materially consequent to inventions and innovations mostly as a result of self-initiated study and experiment, regardless of their degree of formal education. You could have added Bill Gates to your list.
The discussion is about basic public K-12 education for the masses– in today’s world, needed by ordinary folk in order to compete for even the most menial of jobs– and our Secy of Ed’s plan to allow folks to use their portion of public school taxes for tuition at schools which discriminate (racially or otherwise).
But perhaps you were responding to Diane’s comment characterizing BDeVos as “a billionaire lightweight dilettante trying to pass herself off as a heavyweight expert on education, law and public policy. She certainly isn’t the first person to think wealth is a substitute for study or knowledge.”
This is not a comment on whether formal ed is nec’y to become rich. It is an observation that DeVos’ wealth [read campaign-coffer-stuffing influence] elevated her to head of the federal education agency despite her utter lack of study or knowledge in that sphere.
LikeLike
What is the difference between the first two on Chas’s list and Jobs and Gates?
Not only about a 75-100 years between childhoods but Jobs and Gates dropped out of college whereas Ford and Edison didn’t finish grade school. Quite a bit different. The lumping of Jobs (and Gates by you) together with Ford and Edison is a false equivalence that serves only to muddle Chas’s thought/statement
LikeLike
I’m not so sure it’s that far off, Duane. There are lesser, more ordinary folk who also fit this mold. In mid-1930’s my dad finished only 8th-gr & squeaked into a mill job ahead of 16-y.o.’s & hs grads w/lesser mechanical skills/ crazy work ethic/ambition (& continued to succeed from there). One of my brothers was similar, couldn’t finish hs (early ’70’s) but high trades/ social/ entrepreneurial skills gave him a huge leg up on ordinary peers w/hs & college, made good living in own biz. Gates & Jobs are on a different plane, but similar as phenom ’70’s college drop-outs whose tech & entrepreneurial skills enabled them to race ahead in tech fields, employing highly-degreed peers as subordinates.
Charles uses such folk to illustrate that material success does not correlate to degree of formal education. It’s a nothingburger: degree of material success has been shown many times over to correlate– in the main– to degree of formal education. Those who leap ahead of more-[formally]-qualified peers to grab a comparatively bigger share are outliers, who possess compensating attributes that make it possible. Meanwhile, the great middle majority needs society to provide them with the best formal ed we can afford them, so they can compete in a challenging marketplace and find employment sufficient to support themselves.
LikeLike
Yup, Charles, your advice really simplifies this whole education business: those whose purpose in life is to become rich should drop out of school, and the rest of the population should go to school and watch reruns of all 100 seasons of “The lifestyles of the rich and famous”.
These are truly words to live by, and I think this should be carved onto the walls of every school.
LikeLike
My comment was partly humorous, partly instructive. There are wealthy people who are not highly educated. There are highly educated people who are not wealthy. The two attributes, are not mutually exclusive. There are wealthy PHds.
LikeLike
Charles,
The psychologist G. Stanley Hall wrote over a hundred years ago that there are many successful people who are illiterate. He pointed to the Blessed Mother as an illiterate who had made good.
LikeLike
How will privatization not trample the rights of Americans? Covfefe and grizzlies.
LikeLike
Rights the issue of our time . Billionaires for the right to pilfer and pillage.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They are indeed citizens and in fact united.
LikeLike
Except for billionaire privatizer Gulen. He’s not a citizen. Oh, and the billionaire President of the United States, Vladimir Putin, he’s not a citizen either.
What a mess.
LikeLiked by 1 person
One aspect of Chavous’s op-ed that so far no one one else — Dr. Ravitch, Peter “Curmudgucation” Greene, Mercedes Schneider, Jennifer Berkshire et al — has mentioned is .. well … I’m just going to say it:
Chavous, the head of Devos’ American Federation of Children and tireless promoter of “choice, is African American.
Check out his picture and bio.
http://www.kevinpchavous.com/meet-kevin.html
I’m bringing that up because in her Senate testimony a couple weeks ago, Secretary Devos — who also funds American Federation of Children, and thus, currently pays Chavous’ salary at the AFC — unashamedly said that that she approves of “whites only” private schools funded by government money (via vouchers). Such “no-blacks-allowed” institutions, according to Secretary Devos, should be allowed to exist, and the U.S. Dept. of Ed under Devos’ watch will, in the future, not lift a finger to assist any blacks who were denied entry into one of those voucher-funded schools.
More on that here:
And here’s the video of now legendary “Devos vs. Clarke” tete-a-tete:
Sweet Jesus!
Did you ever think that you’d see the day that a prominent, veteran African American politician like Chavous (former leader of the Washington, D.C. City Council) would be throwing his weight behind the existence of segregated schools that openly turn away black students, and that he would put his back into promoting the notion that the U.S. government must fund, promote, and protect those schools, and defend those schools’ operators’ right to blatantly discriminate against those members of Chavous’ own race?
Would you ever have imagined that such an African American politician as Chavous would echo the argument that this dubious so-called idea of “school choice” should take precedence over the hard-fought civil rights of his fellow African Americans?
Jesus Christ! Wasn’t there a friggin’ civil war fought a century-and-a-half ago to end all this? Wasn’t there a court case called Brown vs. the Board of Education sixty-odd years ago that supposedly put a stop to this?
We’re going backwards in time, thanks to folks like Chavous.
Chavous is what people in the African American community would call a “sell out”, or an “Uncle Tom.”
Did anyone ever see the movie DJANGO UNCHAINED? Chavous is basically Samuel L. Jackson’s character, with Betsy Devos the equivalent of Leonardo DiCaprio’s character. Remember (SPOILER ALERT WARNING) when Jackson’s character burst into tears when DiCaprio got blown away? That’s Chavous, baby.
Here’s that scene from DJANGO UNCHAINED where house n-word Samuel L. Jackson starts bawling like a baby at his slave master DiCaprio’s demise. This moment essentially sums up Chavous’s relationship with his slave master Betsy Devos:
(at around 0:55)
(at around 0:55)
Kevin, if you’re reading this, here’s what you SHOULD HAVE done in the wake of your boss’s confrontation (top video in this post) with Congresswoman Clarke. That very same day, or the very next day at the latest, you should have called a conference and released a statement announcing your resignation from the American Federation of Children, and citing the abomination detailed in this post as a reason for doing so.
But you didn’t do that, did you, Kevin?
Instead, just as with other sell-out blacks — such fellow Washingtonian and ex-D.C. teachers union leader George Parker, or “Dr.” Steve Perry, or Derrel Bradford, and countless other African Americans —- you keep selling your soul to the highest bidder… over and and over and over ….
Instead of standing up for the principles of legacy of Martin Luther King, you “take them dives for the short-end money,” (a mid-six-figure salary at Devos’ AFC, I understand)
btw, I’m quoting Marlon Brando’s Terry Malloy (from the movie ON THE WATERFRONT):
( 0:33 – 0:38 )
( 0:33 – 0:38 )
TERRY MALLOY: “You shoulda looked for me out just a little bit so I wouldn’t have to take them dives the short end money.“:
It’s sell-outs such as you Kevin whom the racists and the school privatizers use to put on a phony facade that such so-called “corporate education reform” policies and practices are in the best interests of African Americans when, in fact, those policies and practices most surely ain’t.
What a disgrace to the African American community you truly are, Kevin!
LikeLike
I agree that Chavous sucks. But at least, a significant portion of civil-rights groups put the ed-reform crowd on notice in early 2015 that “school-choice” policies & annual testing were getting black kids nowhere fast, & NAACP finally came on board within the year, demanding a moratorium on charter school expansion.
LikeLike
Oh, and to that list of African American sell-outs, you can add John King, and Rishawn Biddle.
Although Biddle did have one bright moment when he refused to back Success Academy after the “Got-to-Go List” and rip-‘n-redo video scandals — and Eva’s mistreatment of African American students… boys especially.
LikeLike
Oh, and Corey Booker.
LikeLike
Trump’s Rollback of Civil Rights
By Robert Reich, Robert Reich’s Blog
04 June 17
Trump’s budget isn’t just about massive tax cuts for rich and major cuts in assistance for the poor. He also wants to roll back civil rights. Under his proposed budget:
The Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice – which has long investigated hate crimes, voter suppression, and other forms of discrimination – would lose at least 121 positions.
The Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Program – in charge of policing against discrimination by companies with federal contracts – would be eliminated altogether. That’s 600 positions. (Just last September, the office reached a $1.7 million settlement with tech giant Palantir for discriminatory hiring practices.)
The Environmental Protection Agency’s environmental justice program – which combats higher-rates of pollution in communities of color – would be eliminated.
The Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights – charged with investigating discrimination in America’s schools – would be drastically cut. The Trump administration itself has admitted these cuts will hamper its ability to conduct investigations.
Trump has made clear his priorities: Benefit the most comfortable Americans and stick it to the most vulnerable.
LikeLike
This was my comment on the thread to WaPo’s The Answer Sheet “How Betsy DeVos Has Mastered the Art of the Non-Answer”:
Ms DeVos does not need answers, nor even educational or managerial acumen. All that is irrelevant to those who believe there is no governmental role in education. She was put there as a wrecking ball. She has made it crystal-clear from her evasive half-answers that she is committed only to “choice”, and will enforce civil-rights measures only to the extent required by law– an open invitation to Congress to cut the funding legs out from under the OCR. Her testimony before the Senate indicated indifference to the educational outcomes of choice policy, suggesting that there will be no accountability strings for fed monies pumped into states to support vouchers (1bill for starters) and charters (1/4bill this year).
Why ask DeVos questions about climate change or even dicrimination? Why not zero in: how do you plan to support and improve the public schools that 90% of our children attend?
LikeLike
So then these kinds of chats have no consequences for DeVos? There are no rules against a secretary dodging questions? Shouldn’t there be a so called “Congressional Judge” appointed who’d say
Defendant, answer the question or you’ll be stripped of your secretary of education title, your fortune will given to the defenders of public education, plus you have to write “Betsy answers questions.” 5 million times on this Congressional blackboard while kneeling on an architect’s ruler provided by Duane Swacker and supervised by General Lloyd Lofthouse.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Mark's Text Terminal.
LikeLike
I get regular email updates from the White House, telling about the wondrous things Trump has been doing.
This is on his agenda for TODAY, June 5, 2017
TODAY’S EVENTS
12:30 PM: President Trump has lunch with Vice President Pence and Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos
LikeLike