“Cashing in On Kids” reports that ALEC education legislation is quietly spreading across the nation. ALEC is the American Legislative Exchange Council, a secretive far-right organization that is funded by major corporations and whose members are state legislators. Its goal is privatization and deregulation. It writes model laws, then its members introduce them into their state legislature as their own. To learn all about ALEC, go to Alec Exposed.
Despite widespread public opposition to the corporate-driven education privatization agenda, at least 172 measures reflecting American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) model bills were introduced in 42 states in 2015, according to an analysis by the Center for Media and Democracy, publishers of ALECexposed.org and PRWatch.org. (A PDF version of this report may be downloaded here.)
One of ALEC’s biggest funders is Koch Industries and the Koch brothers’ fortune. The Kochs have had a seat at the table – where the private sector votes as equals with legislators – on ALEC’s education task force via their “grassroots” group Americans for Prosperity and their Freedom Partners group, which was described as the Kochs’ “secret bank.”
The Kochs also have a voice on ALEC’s Education Task Force through multiple state-based think tanks of the State Policy Network, ALEC’s sister organization, which is funded by many of the same corporations and foundations and donor entities.
ALEC’s Education Task Force is also funded by the billionaire DeVos family, which bankrolls a privatization operation called “American Federation of Children,” and by for-profit corporations like K12 Inc., which was founded by junk-bond king Michael Milliken.
ALEC’s education task force has pushed legislation for decades to privatize public schools, weaken teacher’s unions, and lower teaching standards.
ALEC’s agenda would transform public education from a public and accountable institution that serves the public into one that serves private, for-profit interests. ALEC model bills divert taxpayer money from public to private schools through a variety of “voucher” and “tuition tax credit” programs. They promote unaccountable charter schools and shift power away from democratically elected local school boards….
Although ALEC and other school privatizers today frame “vouchers” – taxpayer-funded tuition for private, and often religious, schools – in terms of “opportunity” for low-income students and giving parents the “choice” to send their children to public or private schools, the group was less judicious in its earlier years.
The commentary to ALEC’s original 1984 voucher bill states that its purpose is “to introduce normal market forces” into education, and to “dismantle the control and power of” teachers’ unions by directing money from public institutions to private ones that were less likely to be unionized.
Friedman was more explicit when addressing ALEC’s 2006 meeting. He explained that vouchers are really a step towards “abolishing the public school system.”
“How do we get from where we are to where we want to be?” Friedman asked the ALEC crowd.
“Of course, the ideal way would be to abolish the public school system and eliminate all the taxes that pay for it. Then parents would have enough money to pay for private schools, but you’re not gonna do that.”
Of course, in order to believe in the idea of “opportunity scholarships” to “save poor kids from failing schools,” you have to believe that the big corporations and the billionaires are civil rights crusaders for the poor and needy. My imagination is not big enough to do that.

“We’re Crazy ALEC and Our Educational Policies are Insane!” A school board talk by Andy Goldstein.
https://youtu.be/WheNIUTddT0
LikeLike
Wow! That was excellent. Thank you for posting.
LikeLike
Thanks for the links, Diane!
LikeLike
Agree. The article in the link is a must-read for every legislator.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just remember when you go to vote- the Democratic Party supports all of this. From charters to vouchers to for-profit companies cashing in on canned computer instruction, the two “sides” are identical. Only the rhetoric is different. President Obama’s ed agenda in my state is identical to that of John Kasich.
Voters should make an “informed” choice and part of that is recognizing that there is no choice on public school policy and practice. None. It’s market-based ed reform or nothing. Arguably Republicans are better because at least they have the courage to run on it, although that’s an ideological distinction that makes not one bit of difference as a practical matter. Pick the zealots or the “agnostics” and the end result is the same. You’re getting Milton Friedman and Barry Goldwater.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am very less sure than you that both parties are so similar, even in education.
Too, I have stated many times that any group which is a single issue group creates less than admiration on my part.
Education encompasses a GREAT deal more than just charters. Yes, indeed, we do not believe in charters or other anathema which desecrates the public schools
but
again, look at the totality of the people for whom you vote. If you like the kinds of things that Trump et al are saying, vote for him or one of the others that spout “lies” and worse at each other.
For me, I cannot go along with that.
This is an education blog and I will not go into politics that much but for me it is appalling that educators have become so, in my opinion, so myopic that they focus JUST on one issue,
That is not education in its best sense to me.
Disagree if you like but that is my opinion.
I
LikeLike
Chiara I disagree that all of the Democrats supports the political ideology of the Kochs and ALEC. Anyone voting must make an informed decision on who to support both at the national level and your state. But here in Indiana and many other states the Democrats have always been the party protecting our public schools. And across the nation I have seen many Democrats come to the realization that market based reforms are destroying our public schools. I could never support any current GOP candidate or current office holder and would encourage anyone I know
LikeLike
Sorry about my post. I was trying to say that I could not support any GOP candidate or office holder right now and would encourage everyone else to do the same. The current GOP roster for president is worse than horrible with Kasich leading the pack in public ed enemies. At least the Democrat candidates will listen to educators and our concerns.
LikeLike
Or at least we have every right to push them toward supporting what we need?
LikeLike
Teresa Kendall, You had ZERO influence on President Obama’s education policy. The only rational thing to do is get the feds OUT OF EDUCATION. No Democrat will do that.
LikeLike
It’s to the point where it’s insulting to me because it’s a game to them. They magnify tiny differences to get their supporters all fired up and behind the scenes they all agree on everything. It’s a huge group of marketing and PR people selling this “difference” on public schools that comes down to Coke v Pepsi. How many vouchers and charters and how quickly should they “scale up”? How much can they cut from existing public schools without total collapse? Should computer instruction be 100% of the day for lower and middle class children or 50% of the day?
LikeLike
Gordon Wilder
March 13, 2016 at 11:02 am
I am very less sure than you that both parties are so similar, even in education.”
Gordon, I’ll vote for the Democrat in Ohio but I won’t be voting “on public schools” because I am sick and tired of being lied to. I can’t have a “choice” on public schools but I can know what I’m getting, and what I’m getting is Milton Friedman and Barry Goldwater dressed up as something new with “progressive” language. I am sick and tired of being sold a bill of goods by professional marketers and PR people. It is important to me personally that I not be fooled again.
I know education encompasses much more than charter schools, but I was talking about Democrats and public schools. Show me the difference there. It’s not “accountability” and it’s not funding and it’s not “support” of public schools- neither Party “supports” public schools. They barely mention public schools, other than to deliver another scolding lecture or set of unfunded mandates or the latest gimmick. So what is it? On existing public schools, the schools 93% of kids attend in my state including my own, what is the difference? Can you point to a single benefit or improvement Democrats are offering public schools over Republicans? My son attends public school. All of my kids did and they attended during the entire period of ed reform dominance in government. Our public schools aren’t “better” as a result. In many ways they’re worse.
LikeLike
“again, look at the totality of the people for whom you vote. If you like the kinds of things that Trump et al are saying, vote for him or one of the others that spout “lies” and worse at each other.”
I find Donald Trump appalling. Not only would I never vote for him, I think he’s a terrible role model for anyone, child or adult. I wouldn’t even look to him if I were real estate developer or looking to sell over-priced bottled water because I think it’s wrong to rip people off. I think he’s a lousy private sector role model too. He’ll manage to discredit both the public AND private sectors and I don’t know what we do then 🙂
LikeLike
John Kasich is a founding member of ALEC. He is every bit as extreme a the three other candidates. His handles have done a great job fooling the American public into thinking he is the moderate candidate in the group. Do your homework. John Kasich is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Beware!
LikeLiked by 1 person
‘ “Of course, the ideal way would be to abolish the public school system and eliminate all the taxes that pay for it. Then parents would have enough money to pay for private schools,…’
In what world are poor and even middle income parents going to have enough money to send their kids to private schools? Given that so many even now make too little to pay much if anything in income taxes, I am interested in where this tuition money is supposed to come from. I seriously doubt “opportunity scholarships” are going to be funding the education of all of the children whose parents cannot afford to send only some or none of their children to school.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Can you see that world coming where, like other non-inclusive countries, our poorest children will soon end up begging in the streets? (And our wealthier citizens will be whining and complaining to the government that it must “do something about those unsightly children!”)
LikeLike
Aren’t they already?
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Crazy Normal – the Classroom Exposé.
LikeLike
From one of the articles:
“”How do we get from where we are to where we want to be?” Friedman asked the ALEC crowd. ‘Of course, the ideal way would be to abolish the public school system and eliminate all the taxes that pay for it. Then parents would have enough money to pay for private schools, but you’re not gonna do that.'”
And that right there is a huge lie to start with, that what the parents pay in taxes for public schools would be enough for private school tuition. Pure bovine excrement coming from Friedman who, as an economist, had to know the actual figures.
Continuing from that article
Instead, Friedman said, the politically feasible way of moving towards an entirely private educational system is through vouchers:
“So you have to ask, what are politically feasible ways of solving the problem. The answer, in my opinion, is choice, that you have to change the way government money is directed. Instead of it being used to finance schools and buildings, you should decide how much money you are willing to spend on each child and give that money, provide that money in the form of a voucher to the parents of the children so the parents can choose a school that they regard as best for their child.”
A key phrase/question “. . . how much money are you willing to spend on each child. . . “. I believe it has been historically documented that as a country we aren’t willing to spend enough for each child, especially African Americans, Hispanics, the special needs students and other ELL’s. So “provid(ing) that money. . . to the parents. . . so the parents can choose a school. . . ” Again any true, honest economist should have known that the amount given would not even begin to cover the costs. Economists’ pie in the sky thinking.
And that folks is the basis of destroying public education lies and distortions from a supposedly “great” economic thinker. Falsehoods abound out of the mouth of such men (and women).
LikeLike
Koch Brothers Exposed documentary
LikeLike
I just can’t get my head around the fact that when I began teaching in 1959 we had a system much like Finland has now. In fact I have read that she says that she got it from us.in the 70’s. It was the Dewey philosophy of education. We had to have a BS Degree to begin with and after that I had to get a Masters with-in four years ,which I did. I won’t go into all the details but I was master of my room and teachers were respected. There were no standardized tests in primary. No tests in kindergarten. Any tests were make up by the teacher in elementary. Standardized tests were being dropped all over the country in the 60,s because they only measured memorization. There were few ever used. We used play, .music ,games, books, art materials, recess, and telling time to help them to be better listeners ,lengthen their attention span, learn how to get along with others etc. My kids did very in 1st grade and the rest of their schooling. Many did go to college. students are being pushed and dominated now. Too bad, They love to learn, but if they don’t have the necessary physical and mental development for what they are given to learn they will have problems Margaret Burns
LikeLike
Very important commentary, but you don’t identify who “Friedman” is. Milton, just before he died in Nov, 2006?
Are you familiar with the Sudbury Schools, where kids -not governments, Alec, corporations or parents- are the “deciders”? Fantastic results, like this: http://sudburyschool.com/content/free-last. I took my Congressman, Jared Polis, to see one, and we were both very impressed, but he’s done nothing about it.
LikeLike
Jared Polis prefers charter schools to any other.
LikeLike