Despite declining enrollments, despite the closing of 50 public schools, the Chicago Public Schools board (hand-picked by Mayor Rahm Emanuel) is seeking to expand the number of charter schools. The great advantage of charters, from the Mayor’s point of view, is that they are mostly non-union. So think of it as payback to the Chicago Teachers Union for its insistence on adequate resources for the public schools.
Despite declining student enrollment and dozens of dramatically under-enrolled schools, Chicago is seeking potential new charter schools for the city.
In a Request for Proposals issued Wednesday, CPS says it’s looking for dual language schools, “Next Generation” schools that would blend technology and traditional teaching, and—in a first—it wants a “trauma-informed school,” where staff would get training to support students with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder or exposure to trauma.
The district is prepared to give charters that already run schools approval for up to four additional campuses. And it’s poised to grant approvals now for campuses that wouldn’t open for several years, to allow more time for planning a school’s opening, the district says in a press release.
In recent years, the district had named Neighborhood Advisory Councils where community members could give input into charter proposals. Those are now scrapped, saving roughly $170,000, CPS says. Instead, charter schools themselves will “directly engage residents in obtaining the support of their desired school community,” according to the release.
“It looks like they’re making it even less democratic,” said Wendy Katten, director of the parent group Raise Your Hand, which has had members serve on the advisory councils.
Katten says many considered the NACs “flawed” because CPS seemed frequently to ignore the advice of the councils, but “at least it was an opportunity to look at the proposal, to really scrutinize it as a community. To take (that) away—and to have the charter operators do the community engagement—that’s even more of a sham than what currently has existed. The real question is, our city needs a massive debate about opening any kind of new schools in a city that has just hemorrhaged students,” said Katten.

Hi Diane, Please see the link attached regarding charter schools in Nebraska! Please help us continue to get the word out about how this will cripple the education system in Nebraska. Sincerely, Dawn Mathis http://m.ketv.com/news/new-initiative-vows-to-bring-charter-schools-to-nebraska/37246994
LikeLike
I feel like I’ve heard this exact same story before, repeatedly for the last several years. Chicago, New York, Los Angeles: the most populous cities in the U.S. Profiteering paradise. A mess for the 99.9% rest of us.
LikeLike
Meanwhile, his constituents want to recall/impeach him. This will focus on police brutality and murder coverups; not school closures and charters, however.
LikeLike
I suppose we can all admit now that it was never about “improving public schools”.
It was about replacing public schools. Always.
LikeLike
Are people starting to notice that the public schools never seem to “improve” under ed reform? Instead they’re just slowly replaced. If this were actually about “improving public schools” wouldn’t there be some evidence of that, after 20 years?
LikeLike
The Chicago Public schools must be seeking to open a “trauma-informed school” as a result of the attacks on the Chicago public schools over the past generation, intensified under the Emanuel administration.
It’s a perpetual motion machine, whereby cronies gorge on the opportunities created by the looting by other sets of cronies.
What banana republic could ever hope to compete in this race to the bottom?
LikeLike
I love the fake “public hearing” governance mechanism ed reform has invented:
“A CPS spokesperson providing written responses “on background” said CPS will host public hearings on any charters that make it through the application process. The applications will be viewable online, and a “feedback portal” is being set up for community members to share their views. A Board of Education “questions and comments” page already solicits public opinion, the spokesperson noted.”
I’d actually have more respect for them if they just were straight with people and told them “these are the contractors we hired”.
These bogus “hearings” are insulting. It denigrates the whole concept of a “hearing” when the determination is made ahead of time.
LikeLike
I’d actually have more respect for them if they just were straight with people and told them “these are the contractors we hired”.
——————————
Or more if Eli Broad, would just tell the public,
“We really don’t give a sh— that the public has voted over and over to support traditional public schools and opposed charter school expansions.
“We’re still going to spend a half-billion dollars to shove 300 unneeded charters down your throats whether you want them or not, even though… or rather because … it will destroy the existing public school system in Los Angeles.”
Meanwhile the L.A. / Eli TIMES will back this and write editorials like:
“Stop Whining About Charters” (actual title)
and
“The War on Charters” (actual title)
while endorsing Ref Rodriguez, a non-educator who made millions running a charter chain, for one of LAUSD seven school board seats.
In Chicago, the Tribune even had its own version of this editorial:
“Unchain the Charters”
Don’t you see? Those billionaires with their privately-managed charters are the good guys, victims that the forces of a failed status quo are waging “war” on, and who are keeping them “chained” up.
It’s truly Orwellian.
LikeLike
Don’t let a crisis go to waste!
LikeLike