The editorial board of the Albany Times-Union explains the economics behind Governor Cuomo’s proposal for “Education Tax Credits.”
It is a voucher plan with a different name, usually offered by rightwing Republicans, not Democrats who claim to be progressive.
The rhetoric is about “parental choice,” but the big beneficiaries would be wealthy donors to private and religious schools.
For those who support private and parochial education systems, with a true spirit of generosity, we say good for them. But tax revenue shouldn’t be diverted away from state coffers – which is what tax credits end up doing – so more money makes its way to private schools.
One controversial part of the bill includes access to tax credits –75 percent of any gift up to $1 million – for donors. The pool of money for the tax credits is limited; the dollars would be doled out on a first-come, first-served basis. Large corporations with fancy accounting firms can quickly grab the tax credits, and mom-and-pop donors would likely be left wanting.
Especially for high-income corporations, a tax credit is exponentially more valuable than the current tax deductions available for charitable giving to nonprofit institutions, including private or parochial schools.
There’s a big difference between a tax deduction and a tax credit: A tax deduction reduces your taxable income, so your taxes are based on a lower amount; a tax credit comes off your tax liability, so it’s cut off the bottom line of what you owe in taxes….
A similar education tax credit bill failed to pass last year, and the year before, for good reason. It’s a thinly disguised voucher system that’s being touted as “fair” even as the state continues to use out-of-whack funding formulas to provide constitutionally mandated support for public schools, and to squelch on past funding owed to districts across New York.
Regardless of Cuomo’s best efforts to push “options” to public education and weaken his newest political nemesis, public-school teachers, the state’s Constitutional mandate continues to be the financial support of a public school system, with state funding of specific services provided to private schools. Not the other way around.

Amazing students protest in TX to keep their principal! http://educationblog.dallasnews.com/2015/06/frisco-high-students-planning-walkout-to-support-principal.html/
LikeLike
Speaking of the education privatizers (Anschutz), business journals reported today on a Justice Dept. probe of anti-trust violations by the big theater chains. Regardless of the Justice Dept. findings, can citizens expect similar business practices, from privatized schools, in local communities?
LikeLike
Cuomo is another example of someone that never attended public schools so he does not understand their value. One of the reasons that our country has been able to make the kind of progress it has made in the late 19th and 20th centuries is due to a system of strong public education. While not perfect, public schools have given so many Americans a path to change their lives for the better. Public education has enabled us to nurture talent from all social classes, and we would not been able to make the advances we have made without it.
LikeLike
Meanwhile, the pro-public education governor in Pennsylvania is finally, finally looking at cybercharter funding. Apparently no one in the ed reform “movement” could get it done.
Too busy opening new charter schools and handing out vouchers to private schools to perform the basic minimum duties of their publicly-paid employment, like asking why a cybercharter that has no facilities receives the same funding as brick and mortar schools.
http://crossroads.newsworks.org/index.php/local/keystone-crossroads/81326-pa-cyber-charters-not-happy-with-gov-wolfs-proposed-steep-cuts
LikeLike
It is refreshing to see a governor that hasn’t been bought by corporate funds trying to do what is best for his state. I would love to see Pennsylvania recover from its previous bad choices.
As for the funding disparities in charters, the states keep throwing money at charters without much accountability. Taxpayers need to vote for people that are better stewards of public funds. Charters school funding is like the “wild west” with few rules and little enforcement.
LikeLike
The tax credit to private schools actually saves taxpayers money: that’s because private schools educate kids for less and if those schools fail and those kids go to public school, it adds to the tax burden. In the same way that we give tax credits to movie companies to make movies in NYS, a tax credit for private schools is good for the economy.
LikeLike
It also means that the billionaires will contribute less to the “general good” tax base. Regular taxpayers will have to make up the difference by paying more. https://www.facebook.com/nysutTRO/photos/a.564351617017298.1073741828.563835887068871/751787811607010/?type=1&theater
LikeLike
Nope, the tax credit REMOVES money from the public school tax base and directs it to private schools instead. So what you are saying is that private school parents have resented paying taxes for public schools, so now they don’t have to pay them anymore! They can spend them on Yeshivas like the ones in East Ramapo instead!
LikeLike
Private schools like Montclair Kimberly Academy, Dwight-Englewood (and the Christie sons’ Delbarton) in NJ charge more for tuition than public per-pupil expenditures, plus they have endowments. Which private schools “that educate kids for less” are you referencing?
LikeLike
The following is a great analogy I read that was written by another person….Don’t use the public tax supported pool and parks that is fine and well within your rights and choice BUT…go pay for a country club AND don’t expect my taxes to support your dues to the country club.
LikeLike