Steve Cohen, superintendent of the Shoreham-Wading River School District, published an editorial in the local newspaper blasting the New York Board of Regents.
Many educators are afraid to speak out against what they know is wrong because they fear for their jobs. Teachers may be fired. Principals may be fired. Superintendents may be fired. When anyone expresses their professional judgment without fear and says what’s right for children, it takes courage. For teachers, it is best to do it en masse. The same for principals. Superintendents are leaders of their community and are in a position to make a new path. They can lead opinion. More should do so.
I am happy to add Steve Cohen to our honor roll.
High schools have always prepared students for college and careers, he writes. But the Regents have a new idea.
He writes:
First, consider exactly how the Board of Regents defines “College and Career Ready.”
If a student passes an algebra test in 8th or 9th grade at a level that correlates to a C in freshman mathematics in college, and if that same student passes an English test in 11th grade at a level correlated with a C in freshman English in college, along with earning 22 credits in high school and passing three other Regents exams, then she or he is set and ready to go to college and into the world of work.
No music, art, advanced study in much of anything; no community service, no sports, no occupational training; no independent work in any academic or other creative field is required. In addition, to do well on these tests, it is not necessary to read entire novels or histories or write papers of any length or complexity. It is not necessary to develop a love of anything or demonstrate an ability to think on one’s own feet.
Second, note that 16 of the 17 Board of Regents members, in addition to the commissioner of education himself, send their children to private schools — ones that have not embraced the reforms the Board of Regents and the commissioner claim are needed to make students “College and Career Ready.” I mention this fact because its relevance becomes obvious once one understands what “College and Career Ready” means for the children of our educational leaders. You see, the colleges that the children of Regents and commissioners of education are expected to attend, places like Harvard University, define “College and Career Ready” differently.
But this is not what is expected by elite universities, who want so much more for their students.
And he adds:
So it turns out that “College and Career Ready” means two different things depending on whether you are a public school student in New York or a student at an expensive private school. “College and Career Ready” for public school kids means achieving at a decidedly mediocre level when compared to the expectations the Regents have for their own children. Perhaps that’s one reason they would never send them to schools that are benefiting from their wonderful reforms.
For “College and Career Ready,” once one digs a bit below the surface, suggests readying public school students for work that does not demand advanced learning in anything and is not oriented toward preparing students to “take advantage of future learning opportunities of all kinds.” No, these loftier expectations, and the courses and other resources needed to achieve them, are to be reserved for students not subject to the glories of the Regents Reform Agenda, students whose parents have the money and connections to keep them out of the public school system.
Most new jobs created in our economy are low-paying service jobs. We should be concerned that “College and Career Ready” actually refers to a curriculum that guides public school students to these jobs, leaving the few good jobs to students who receive a private high school education that prepares them to “take advantage of future learning opportunities of all kinds.”
Make no mistake about it, “College and Career Ready” is code for education apartheid. Do not let your children breathe the stale air of low expectations, reduced exposure to the arts and music, limited engagement with sophisticated science and little, if any, prolonged, deep and thoughtful contact with great literature.
“College and Career Ready” is a trap. Don’t fall for it. Your kids deserve better. Just like theirs.

Thank you to Superintendent Cohen for showing us that the emperor has no clothes. A look at how the ELA modules are being used in elementary schools to the exclusion of reading authentic literature illustrates Cohen’s point.
LikeLike
” College and Career Ready is code for education apartheid”-Cohen
Superintendent Cohen nailed it.
LikeLike
“education apartheid”.
Nah, just fulfilling the wishes of their God who has already chosen them to reap the vast majority of the benefits society produces because they are obviously better (if you don’t know why then the public schools must not have done a very good job on you) and their children deserve the very best (cough cough) because they are the best and brightest.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on nytechprepper and commented:
Steve Cohen, superintendent, is an educational leader who “gets” it!
LikeLike
If I may edit your comment: “Steve Cohen, superintendent, is an educational leader who “HAS FINALLY GOTTEN” it!-(AFTER THE DEFORMS NEGATIVELY IMPACTED HIS DISTRICT, NOT BEFORE.)
LikeLike
@DuaneSwacker.. I for one am glad this man has “gotten it” and frankly if he gets it and shares the message this is a good thing. Why harp about “when” he got it. Do you harp about Diane Ravitch and her realizations and when they came? I for one am glad that she changed her views and would begrudge nobody who reflects and learns.
LikeLike
Unnecessarily snide edit. We don’t know that his opinion is based solely, or even at all, on personal experience in his school. Why the need to demean our thinkers?
LikeLike
Contrary to what the Common Core supporters believe, we all learn at different rates. Most Superintendents will either never get it or they will be more interested in being politically correct than in what is the best path for the future of our public schools and the children who attend them. I would hope my next Superintendent would be as open and honest as this Superintendent.
LikeLike
Read the district’s site and information on CCSS. They’re going all in for it. Yes, I’m glad Mr. Cohen has finally seen some of the light but he needs to do a lot more rethinking yet on these nefarious educational malpractices that are CCSS and the attendant tests.
LikeLike
“Why the need to demean our thinkers?”
I have no need to “demean our thinkers”. Just pointing out some very obvious facts. It’s just that the vast majority of sups, other administrators and teachers have been GAGAer all the way until these egregious malpractices start to make them, their district and their schools look bad that they start to get upset. We should never have gotten to this point if those who are now being affected had been doing any “thinking” and taking the appropriate action up to this point.
What’s the saying? “First they came for. . . . “
LikeLike
Thanks for clarifying that, Duane. I guess it’s better to be late to the party than not getting it at all like many NYS school leaders who are still drinking the Common Core/High-stakes Testing Kool Aid.
LikeLike
Yes, unfortunately are still way too many cool-ade drinking (probably spiked) GAGAers.
LikeLike
“. . . 16 of the 17 Board of Regents members, in addition to the commissioner of education himself, send their children to private schools. . . ”
I always thought it was “bad form” to say one thing and do the opposite.
Hubris thou art 94% of the NY BoR
LikeLike
“. . . earning 22 credits in high school. . . ”
I guess those Missouri public high school grads would almost be ready for grad school in NY-ha ha. A Show Me State high schooler has to earn 26 credits to graduate. And most graduate with more!
LikeLike
In NYC, College and Career ready means scoring a 3+ on an AP exam, completing a CTE sequence, passing a centrally approved, qualifying course (my school has three; I have no idea what the criteria are, but I know syllabi were submitted and it had to have been taught three years already), or passing the Trig, Chem, or Physics Regents. Schools also get graded on how many students pass the English Regents with a 75 and any math Regents (usually Algebra) with an 80, those being CUNY’s cutoffs for remedial coursework. Obviously, these different indicators are very different in terms of difficulty, but they all count the same (and there may be others, but it’s easy to confuse the “college prep” and “college readiness” standards). Among other oddities of these criteria, a child who can score highly on a native-to-them AP language exam can be judged “college ready” without being able to add and subtract.
LikeLike
While I share your concerns about the issue of College and Career…I would like to know where did you get your information regarding our children? Please provide the evidence!!!!!
LikeLike
The idea has always been create two classes, the worker or drone and the queen or king. The rich will get richer and, well you know the rest
LikeLike
I don’t know if I’d use the word “apartheid” to describe the differences between elite $50,000/year private schools and public schools.
But a school district located in the multilingual, multiethnic, multicultural New York City metropolitan area that is only 5% black and Hispanic, 3% free lunch eligible, and 1% ELL? That seems more like apartheid. And that’s the demographic makeup of Shoreham-Wading River.
What had this district been doing to help parents who don’t have the money, connections, or the right color of skin to live in the leafy suburbs? What would it do if Common Core, APPR, and all the rest of it were overturned? Which of these hypersegregated districts is doing something–anything!–to improve outcomes for kids warehoused in a small handful of districts?
LikeLike
Tim:
You are quite right. Since 1973, when the Supreme Court ruled that super-metropolitan school districts were unconstitutional, suburbs have become ever more racially segregated, and Long Island may be among the worst in the nation.
What is changing now is that the Plutocracy in charge of the country feels powerful enough to lump suburban white kids in with previously disadvantaged kids of other races. For the first time in ages, the grim job and education prospects of whites as well as blacks and Hispanics are beginning to converge. This change provides an opening for interracial coalition building.
As you know, race has trumped class in the US for as long as anyone can remember. Perhaps that barrier might begin to crumble as this crisis deepens. “Suburban White Moms” was a telling slip of the racial tongue.
But, as you suggest, this change will not come easily.
LikeLike
The tenor and substance of the suburban backlash doesn’t give me much hope that it will lead to an alliance with the cities. As the supposedly progressive Regent Harry Phillips put it, why should the suburbs suffer for the failings of our urban schools?
I’d be happy to be proven wrong, but I haven’t seen much evidence of sentiment to the contrary: establishing a voluntary inter district scholarship plan, e.g., offering free PD or mentoring to city teachers, etc. I think most suburban residents are quite pleased to have few “at-risk” kids in their children’s schools, and for their children’s schools to have a vast competitive advantage when it comes to hiring.
LikeLike
I found this episode of This American Life very interesting: http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/512/house-rules
The mother of the student in the prologue was jailed for sending her students to school in the neighboring school district in Ohio.
LikeLike
I am so pleased to see another Long Island superintendent standing up for children. Having the courage to stand by one’s convictions is true leadership. Thank you for all your efforts, Steve Cohen.
LikeLike
Does anyone know how many of the private elite schools in NYC are using Common Core?
LikeLike
I ask this frequently.
I also want to know how mant of the schools that educate the children of those that push the “reform” agenda…( endless testing, teacher elvaluations, etc.) are subjecting their students to same.
So far the answer seems to be none.
Humm, can’t quite put my finger on it….
LikeLike
Rhetorical question…
LikeLike
One of your best posts, thank you.
LikeLike
Brave and excellent words.
I’m the chair of my local school board this year, and I’ve been fighting for over three months to get our superintendent to engage in a review of our curriculum. Even though our state (Maine) has constitutionally-protected local control, even though the state’s own Dept. of Ed. Web site states clearly that the boards control curriculum, and even though the boards are required by law to sign-off on their districts’ curriculums, I’ve gotten nothing by a run-around from the superintendent and apathy from my colleagues.
Frankly, Diane, I wish you would add a new topic to your discussions: How administrators, teachers, and board members are cutting their own throats by either carrying water for the reformers, acting like useful idiots by foolishly believing that their “professional” status aligns them with reformers (and vice versa), and sticking their heads in the sand with “it won’t happen here” rationalizations for doing nothing while Rome burns.
All of these programs—CC Standards, testing, and the “college-and-carrier-ready” propaganda campaign—are all tentacles on the same octopus. This is meant to transform our democracy into an oligarchy by turning our higher education back into the finishing schools for the élites they were before the 1930s. Of course, when that happen, merit will mean nothing; since all of the wealth will be controlled by inheritance. No matter how smart your kids are—and how dumb theirs’—nothing much will ever change.
Just think: The poster child for our brave new world will be George W. Bush.
LikeLike
“I wish you would add a new topic to your discussions: How administrators, teachers, and board members are cutting their own throats by either carrying water for the reformers, acting like useful idiots by foolishly believing that their “professional” status aligns them with reformers (and vice versa), and sticking their heads in the sand with “it won’t happen here” rationalizations for doing nothing while Rome burns. ”
Thank you M&S for stating the truth about the GAGAers.
Be careful though as you will be accused of “demeaning” the good GAGAers who have finally been negatively affected by the edudeformers’ malpractices.
LikeLike
Thanks, Duane! But what exactly does “GAGA” mean?
LikeLike
Go along to get along.
From my ongoing devil’s dictionary of educational jargon:
Going Along to Get Along (GAGA): Nefarious practice of most educators who implement the edudeformers agenda even though the educators know that those educational malpractices will cause harm to the students and defile the teaching and learning process. The members of the GAGA gang are destined to be greeted by the Karmic Gods of Retribution upon their passing from this realm.
Karmic Gods of Retribution: Those ethereal beings specifically evolved to construct the 21st level in Dante’s Hell. The 21st level signifies the combination of the 4th (greed), 8th (fraud) and 9th (treachery) levels into one mega level reserved especially for the edudeformers and those, who, knowing the negative consequences of the edudeformers agenda, willing implemented it so as to go along to get along. The Karmic Gods of Retribution also personally escort these poor souls, upon their physical death, to the 21st level unless they enlighten themselves, a la one D. Ravitch, to the evil and harm they have caused so many innocent children, and repent and fight against their former fellow deformers. There the edudeformers and GAGAers will lie down on a floor of smashed and broken ipads and ebooks curled in a fetal position alternately sucking their thumbs to the bones while listening to two words-Educational Excellence-repeated without pause for eternity.
LikeLike
November 30, 2013 at 7:34 am
” College and Career Ready is code for education apartheid”- I might not use that strong a term but it does appear to be the new code word. When everyone can be everything in a one size fits all cooperate reform world, then College and Career Ready becomes the catch word…. And we all know that their catchy phases generally do not bode well for children, schools or teachers. Interesting piece. Spot on. Thank you Superintendent.
LikeLike
The apartheid will be exacerbated by the fact that the schools which will teach TO THE TEST will be the urban schools. Administrators and teachers in those schools seek to validate their programs and their students by producing high test scores. In reality, though, they will be producing an underclass of workers because the language arts standards of the a Common Core do not provide students with the reading, writing, speaking, and thinking skills necessary for success in higher education or the professions. David Coleman, the chief writer of the language arts standards, assertively and proudly states over and over again that the Common Core is preparing students for a post high school world in which no one cares at all about what they think and feel. Exactly.
LikeLike
Thank you, Mr. Cohen. It is refreshing to hear from a superintendent that does not quietly take his marching orders from the business community. One thing that I might add is that while the economy may be adding mostly low wage jobs, we must not accept that it is OK that these are dead end jobs. Nobody’s access to adequate housing, food, or healthcare should be predicated on their educational attainment.
We need the government to step in to create jobs and we need living wages.
We need students to be question- the- system ready if we are ever to see change. Our child poverty rate is a national (actually international )disgrace.
LikeLike
the unknown future of life on earth demands citizens who are creative problem solvers.
Please investigate the TED talks by Ken Robinson…..How to educate in Death Valley.
LikeLike
Thank you, Superintendent Cohen, for speaking up. I ask, again, where are our NJ Superintendents and Principals? The silence is deafening.
LikeLike
Lowering the bar closes the achievement gap – for public school students, of course.
LikeLike
In Houston today you can come out of college with a degree in petroleum engineering and no experience whatsoever and get a job earning $80,000 a year. The people in the oil industry who will hire you don’t care what if anything you know about music or art, what if any community service you have done, what if any novels or histories you have read, or what if any sports you play.
LikeLike
Jim:
1. Are you suggesting that Houston oilmen could hire all college grads if only these grads chose to become oil engineers? I don’t think so. In fact, as is already happening in China, if we just educate everyone in a technical skill, there will soon be a glut of such workers, and their salaries and benefits will decline, if they can find work at all.
2. Perhaps we’d all be better off if our oil kings were more broadly educated, since their business model denies a good deal of modern science, and their politics are to the right of the Sheriff of Nottingham.
LikeLike
Excellent!
LikeLike
Working for the oil industry is one of many employment opportunities that are and will continue to be available to people.
The needs of the oil industry don’t necessarily coincide with those of other professions. To say that Sally, with her philosophy degree from SUNY Binghamton, is deluding herself because somebody in petroleum engineering with no experience is starting at $80,000 is shortsighted, imo.
LikeLike
I want to know where all these Democrats for Education Reform from a few years back, who were boasting that ed reform would be the “civil rights battle” of their era. Is this what they meant?
LikeLike
It has always been this way. The difference is that teachers are being made technocrats for computerized teaching in the school. Bad education will breed more violence for the private prisons.
LikeLike
Steve – the things you mentioned – music, art, history, etc. will give very few graduates a job that will repay their student loans and justify the time and expense of college. They are not a preparation for the world of work.
LikeLike
Jim:
True enough. To me, however, this fact is just one more obstacle we face in this situation. We’ve had at least 30 years of plutocratic leadership in the US, and that reality puts us way behind the curve. What other choice do we have but to gather up our political, moral, cultural resources and resist? These resources may prove to be insufficient. But we know that doing nothing, or believing that our plutocrats are democrats, will just bring us more of what we have. If parents care about their kids’ futures, they must step up, and soon.
In the 1934 gubernatorial election in California, a Methodist minister was asked why he intended to vote for Upton Sinclair, who was then running far behind the Dem and Rep candidates. Wasn’t a vote for Sinclair a “wasted” vote? The minister’s response was, “I’d rather vote for something I want and not get it, than to vote for something I don’t want and get plenty of it.”
We’re at such a point. We need a third party. Now.
LikeLike
My apologies. Sinclair was the 1934 Democratic candidate in CA….I guess I had forgotten that in the 1930s, Democrats were actually Democrats, not Eisenhower Republicans. Sinclair ran way behind the Republican, Frank Merriam.
LikeLike
Creativity is always the preparation for the world of “work”. What jobs are you considering?
LikeLike
Steve – Throughout history “class consciousness” has invariably proved an extremely weak basis of identity compared with racial/ethnic/religious affiliation. Class rivalry for example had nothing to do with Yugoslavia coming apart whereas religious/ethnic identity had everything to do with it.
In the Middle East for example divisions are ethnic between Jews and Arab and religious between Moslem, Christians and Jews. What is the probability that for example poor Jews and poor Arabs would form a coalition against rich Jews and Arabs? Answer – zero.
LikeLike
What was the probability that the Catholic Church would accede to Galileo Galilei? ZERO
You’re thinking does not compute Will Robinson.
LikeLike
Please! All politics is local. We need creative entrepreneurs. What does the Middle East have to do with it?
LikeLike
Mike:
I am all in favor of serious discussion of the compensation people earn for the work they do. Are you? Do you really expect people to believe your comment is meant to advance our understanding of the problem we face? Do you really expect sane people to believe that educators are “the problem”?
LikeLike
Using the term “apartheid” is an interesting choice.
As a superintendent of a public school district, do you take efforts to throw students out of your school if they do not live in the district? I know some districts in New York put a bounty of $300 a head for every student that does not “belong” in the school while others just have district employees investigate suspicious children and demand tuition or through them out of the district. In Ohio they occasionally jail the parent to set an example for anyone who would send their children to school outside of the bantustan.
LikeLike
I agree with you, but I believe you should just ignore any individual who tries to distract you from the major issue and then focus only on making your points. When you respond to the endless questioning, then you are reinforcing this behavior and it distracts from your own message and the intended audience. By ignoring the individuals, you are using the same strategy the reformers are using. This strategy works because your message is all that matters and all else is a form of distraction from your message. If you continue with your message and ignore all else then it is much more likely that others will understand your point of view since you are not spending time off the point responding to some tangential question possibly leading you off your intended point. Please keep up the fight for our students.
LikeLike
Steve,
“Do you really expect sane people to believe that educators are “the problem”?”
It’s not that all educators are the problem. Unfortunately, the vast majority are GAGEers who when spoken to in private know that what they are instituting is not for the betterment of the teaching and learning process, who can articulate reasons to be against these educational malpractices but who, nevertheless, go along to get along (GAGA) and harm the most innocent in society, the children. And yes, CCSS and the accompanying tests cause much harm to the innocents.
If you haven’t read, understood and put into practice safeguards against these educational malpractices, Noel Wilson’s “Educational Standards and the Problem of Error” found at: http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/577/700 then you haven’t done all you could be doing to prevent those in your charge from harming the innocents.
Brief outline of Wilson’s “Educational Standards and the Problem of Error” and some comments of mine. (updated 6/24/13 per Wilson email)
1. A quality cannot be quantified. Quantity is a sub-category of quality. It is illogical to judge/assess a whole category by only a part (sub-category) of the whole. The assessment is, by definition, lacking in the sense that “assessments are always of multidimensional qualities. To quantify them as one dimensional quantities (numbers or grades) is to perpetuate a fundamental logical error” (per Wilson). The teaching and learning process falls in the logical realm of aesthetics/qualities of human interactions. In attempting to quantify educational standards and standardized testing we are lacking much information about said interactions.
2. A major epistemological mistake is that we attach, with great importance, the “score” of the student, not only onto the student but also, by extension, the teacher, school and district. Any description of a testing event is only a description of an interaction, that of the student and the testing device at a given time and place. The only correct logical thing that we can attempt to do is to describe that interaction (how accurately or not is a whole other story). That description cannot, by logical thought, be “assigned/attached” to the student as it cannot be a description of the student but the interaction. And this error is probably one of the most egregious “errors” that occur with standardized testing (and even the “grading” of students by a teacher).
3. Wilson identifies four “frames of reference” each with distinct assumptions (epistemological basis) about the assessment process from which the “assessor” views the interactions of the teaching and learning process: the Judge (think college professor who “knows” the students capabilities and grades them accordingly), the General Frame-think standardized testing that claims to have a “scientific” basis, the Specific Frame-think of learning by objective like computer based learning, getting a correct answer before moving on to the next screen, and the Responsive Frame-think of an apprenticeship in a trade or a medical residency program where the learner interacts with the “teacher” with constant feedback. Each category has its own sources of error and more error in the process is caused when the assessor confuses and conflates the categories.
4. Wilson elucidates the notion of “error”: “Error is predicated on a notion of perfection; to allocate error is to imply what is without error; to know error it is necessary to determine what is true. And what is true is determined by what we define as true, theoretically by the assumptions of our epistemology, practically by the events and non-events, the discourses and silences, the world of surfaces and their interactions and interpretations; in short, the practices that permeate the field. . . Error is the uncertainty dimension of the statement; error is the band within which chaos reigns, in which anything can happen. Error comprises all of those eventful circumstances which make the assessment statement less than perfectly precise, the measure less than perfectly accurate, the rank order less than perfectly stable, the standard and its measurement less than absolute, and the communication of its truth less than impeccable.”
In other word all the logical errors involved in the process render any conclusions invalid.
5. The test makers/psychometricians, through all sorts of mathematical machinations attempt to “prove” that these tests (based on standards) are valid-errorless or supposedly at least with minimal error [they aren’t]. Wilson turns the concept of validity on its head and focuses on just how invalid the machinations and the test and results are. He is an advocate for the test taker not the test maker. In doing so he identifies thirteen sources of “error”, any one of which renders the test making/giving/disseminating of results invalid. As a basic logical premise is that once something is shown to be invalid it is just that, invalid, and no amount of “fudging” by the psychometricians/test makers can alleviate that invalidity.
6. Having shown the invalidity, and therefore the unreliability, of the whole process Wilson concludes, rightly so, that any result/information gleaned from the process is “vain and illusory”. In other words start with an invalidity, end with an invalidity (except by sheer chance every once in a while, like a blind and anosmic squirrel who finds the occasional acorn, a result may be “true”) or to put in more mundane terms crap in-crap out.
7. And so what does this all mean? I’ll let Wilson have the second to last word: “So what does a test measure in our world? It measures what the person with the power to pay for the test says it measures. And the person who sets the test will name the test what the person who pays for the test wants the test to be named.”
In other words it measures “’something’ and we can specify some of the ‘errors’ in that ‘something’ but still don’t know [precisely] what the ‘something’ is.” The whole process harms many students as the social rewards for some are not available to others who “don’t make the grade (sic)” Should American public education have the function of sorting and separating students so that some may receive greater benefits than others, especially considering that the sorting and separating devices, educational standards and standardized testing, are so flawed not only in concept but in execution?
My answer is NO!!!!!
One final note with Wilson channeling Foucault and his concept of subjectivization:
“So the mark [grade/test score] becomes part of the story about yourself and with sufficient repetitions becomes true: true because those who know, those in authority, say it is true; true because the society in which you live legitimates this authority; true because your cultural habitus makes it difficult for you to perceive, conceive and integrate those aspects of your experience that contradict the story; true because in acting out your story, which now includes the mark and its meaning, the social truth that created it is confirmed; true because if your mark is high you are consistently rewarded, so that your voice becomes a voice of authority in the power-knowledge discourses that reproduce the structure that helped to produce you; true because if your mark is low your voice becomes muted and confirms your lower position in the social hierarchy; true finally because that success or failure confirms that mark that implicitly predicted the now self evident consequences. And so the circle is complete.”
In other words students “internalize” what those “marks” (grades/test scores) mean, and since the vast majority of the students have not developed the mental skills to counteract what the “authorities” say, they accept as “natural and normal” that “story/description” of them. Although paradoxical in a sense, the “I’m an “A” student” is almost as harmful as “I’m an ‘F’ student” in hindering students becoming independent, critical and free thinkers. And having independent, critical and free thinkers is a threat to the current socio-economic structure of society.
LikeLike
Day after day I come here to see what progress is being made on driving a stake through the heart of CCSS. I am gladdened to hear that the groundswell of parents, students, teachers, and, thank you Mr. Cohen, the odd administrator is growing by the day, but it is news on CCSS in my home state that I yearn to find. You see, I teach in the merry land of Connecticut where CCSS has yet to show it’s true colors, thus I am hoping it can be killed before it does to us what it has done to NY. The testing is just beginning. Smarter Balanced tests haven’t wasted too too much instructional time. Yet. And SEED, our new accountability focused evaluation system, while it is stressing everyone out and wasting huge amounts of our planning time, has yet to push anyone over the edge. Soon enough though. A friend who is a psychiatrist asked me not long ago, “What are they doing to you teachers this year? My office is full of teachers all of a sudden!” Mr. Cohen, my colleagues, my administrators, my board of education, and scariest of all, the parents of my district have absolutely no idea what Bill Gates and President Obama have planned for their children. PLEASE SEND YOUR LETTER TO MAJOR NEWS PAPERS IN CONNECTICUT AND ACROSS THE LAND SO THAT WORD CAN GO OUT AND THE BEAST BE SLAIN BEFORE IT DOES MORE DAMAGE.
An observation on a Smarter Balanced Performance Pre- Assessment my students just took in their ELA class. The task was to read 3 articles and respond to the prompt- “Would robots make better teachers than humans?”, citing facts gleaned from the 3 articles in support of their opinion. The odd student who wrote that robots would be better teachers than humans received high scores, so long as they provided facts as support. However, the vast majority of children felt humans are better teachers because they care about students, make learning fun, and encourage them to always do their best. Sadly, these children all received terrible scores. You see, all 3 of the articles they had to draw supporting information from were about the wonders of robots. None contained a single word of praise for human teachers, thus the many empathic pieces could only be supported with personal feelings and beliefs. THE TEST SET THEM UP TO FAIL!
Common Core, it’s high stakes testing, and teacher evaluations tied to standardized test scores must be stopped before it serves its purpose of further stratifying American society.
LikeLike
CCSS/PARCC/SBAC is snake oil salesmanship on the grandest of scales. They diagnose an illness that doesn’t exist (failing schools)
and sell us the snake oil cure (CCSS) that can’t possibly work.
Then they take the money and run.
I’m afraid that by the time the stake is finally driven through the heart of this bogus reform movement, the village will have been plundered and left in smoldering ruins.
LikeLike
Mikefromlongisland: how do you feel about e ery member of the Walton family being a billionaire yet paying their employees so little that some qualify for public assistance?
LikeLike
Duane
Please no more dissertations on the site. We are obliged to read all of this? The best writers get to the point.
LikeLike
Joseph,
If you have read it, skip it.
The reason I post Wilson’s work so often is that I assume many new people read this blog on a daily basis and therefore I can reach more and more people everyday with what I consider as the most important bit of educational writing of the last half century.
“The best writers get to the point.”
At least in American English that may be desirable, not necessarily in other languages. But to do Wilson’s work justice one necessarily has to write more to get his many epistemological and ontological points across.
I hope you take the time to read the whole work as every time that I’ve read it (and I’ve read it over a dozen times) I find more and more that is pertinent, propitious and poignant, not to mention getting to the heart (and ripping it out) of the educational standards and standardized testing schemes, regime, and/or discourse.
His arguments have never been refuted nor rebutted that I know of. I’ll allow Wilson the last word:
“It requires an enormous suspension of rational thinking to believe that the best way to describe the complexity of any human achievement, any person’s skill in a complex field of human endeavour, is with a number that is determined by the number of test items they got correct. Yet so conditioned are we that it takes a few moments of strict logical reflection to appreciate the absurdity of this.”
LikeLike
Joseph,
See reply below!
Thanks!
LikeLike
Diane has been upfront about her past and her philosophical transformation that became this blog. To a large degree it is this personal evolution that gives her the credibility we all admire.
LikeLike
I agree Jon. We all have our opinions about the “standards”, but the scary part of this story is really the tests that are being created to go with them. I suggest that everyone take a close look at them. Here in Louisiana “practice” tests have been released to help teachers prepare students for the real deal in the spring. In our school district the curriculum supervisors have decided to each take one of these practice tests to analyze and report back to the team. Our students will be tested on items for which they have not received a foundation, due to the CCSS not having had time for transition from the lower grades. They are developmentally inappropriate on many levels. How have we allowed public education to be controlled by people who are not educators? These so called tests amount to a form of child abuse being inflicted on children in their formative years that will have lasting and devastating effects. And yet we are mandated by law to inflict this on our children. I blame our legislators and elected officials. The agenda they push is slowly creating an opportunity gap that will be the downfall of our nation. It is not the standards that we should worry about, but the assessments by which our students will be judged. Take a close look at those test items.
LikeLike
Au contraire, tests aren’t created for the standards, standards are created for the tests. This is how education is controlled and the “resources” and “staff development” are the delivery system.
It’s like what happened with the tobacco industry. They stopped selling cigarettes, but nicotine delivery systems.
LikeLike