Katie Lapham teaches ESL classes in Brooklyn. What is really rotten in the schools, she writes, are the terrible tests that her first-graders must take. Their purpose is solely to evaluate the teachers. The tests were largely developmentally inappropriate. No teacher, she writes, would create such absurd tests.
She writes:
“Last month, it took me two and a half days to administer the 2014-2015 Grade 1 Math Inventory Baseline Performance Tasks to my students because the assessment had to be administered as individual interviews (NYCDOE words, not mine). The math inventory included 12 tasks, many of which were developmentally inappropriate. For example, in demonstrating their understanding of place value, first graders were asked to compare two 3-digit numbers using and =. Students were also asked to solve addition and subtraction word problems within 100.
“While I do not believe my students were emotionally scarred by this experience, they did lose two and a half days of instructional time and were tested on skills that they had not yet learned. It is no secret that NYC teachers and administrators view these MOSL tasks as a joke. Remember, they are for teacher rating purposes ONLY. “You want them to score low in the fall so that they’ll show growth in the spring,” is a common utterance in elementary school hallways. Also, there will be even more teaching-to-the-test as educators will want to ensure that their students are proficient in these skills before the administration of the spring assessment. Some of the first grade skills might be valid, but others are, arguably, not grade-level appropriate.
“The Grade 1 ELA (English-language Arts) Informational Reading and Writing Baseline Performance Task took less time to administer (four periods only) but was equally senseless, and the texts we were given had us shaking our heads because they resembled third grade reading material. In theory, not necessarily practice, students were required to engage in a non-fiction read aloud and then independently read an informational text on the same topic. Afterwards, they had to sort through a barrage of text-based facts in order to select information that correctly answered the questions. On day one, the students had to complete a graphic organizer and on day two they were asked to write a paragraph on the topic. Drawing pictures to convey their understanding of the topic was also included in the assessment.”
Lapham was surprised to learn that there is an alternative assessment that progressive schools use. She wonders why her school, in a poor neighborhood, was never informed about the option.

“You want them to score low in the fall so that they’ll show growth in the spring,” is a common utterance in elementary school hallways. Also, there will be even more teaching-to-the-test as educators will want to ensure that their students are proficient in these skills before the administration of the spring assessment.”
This is pretty much gospel in our school. Sad, but true.
LikeLike
Who decides what is a “progressive” school? Is this alternative only available to a select few? Maybe I am being cynical, but is this part of larger agenda to bash many while a chosen few can save face?
LikeLike
Here’s a description “Formative assessments are Assessments for Learning. Strategies are wide in variety, happen regularly and shift the emphasis from focusing what the teacher is doing to what understanding the student is demonstrating. The instructional inquiry cycle offers a strategic approach to employing regular assessments, making sense of the information and adjusting based on the results.” These exams were rigorously vetted and aren’t developmentally inappropriate given their purpose, that’s just Lapham’s opinion.
Alternative assessments were made available to every school, rich and poor, and in fact the schools that selected them were demographically the same as the ones that didn’t. If Lapham has evidence to the contrary she should present it here.
LikeLike
From what is the description “Formative assessments. . .results” taken?
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Texas Education.
LikeLike
To Socrates of NY:
Who are you to tell teacher Lapham to provide evidence? You cannot even identify yourself and why do you know in details about “The instructional inquiry cycle”?
Please re-read what you wrote: “These exams were rigorously vetted and aren’t developmentally inappropriate given their purpose, that’s just Lapham’s opinion.”
So that is your opinion about GRADE ONE who should take RIGOROUS EXAMS.
Please be honest to yourself. Would you want to be trained in athletes group at the level regional. provincial, and national up to Olympic Games while you are just step into track and field at GRADE ONE level???
It would be very RIGOROUS for your body for sure!
The brain of grade one is not for exam, your body at the entry level is not ready for training at the competition level.
God needs to bless people like you and all people who involve with the creation of Common Core with some temporary disable illnesses that make all of you to realize and to understand the plight of the unfortunates. The powerful should not impose whatever on the powerless (children) that the powerful cannot even do for themselves, like rigorous exam on GRADE ONE, and rigorous body training program on all of people who participate in creation of Common Core.
If the powerful are so smart, why don’t they teach their own children with their own invention. Yes the powerful send their children to SCHOOL where their children can learn from teaching professional and without their invention. This is the ultimate punch line for the powerful.
Hands and feet cannot be replaced to function for stomach and intestine. Likewise, lung and heart cannot be replaced to function for brain. However, all these organs need to work together simultaneously to sustain the survival of our body.
Our nation will only be survived with strong labour force and strong teaching force. The brain will guide and nurture hand and feet to feed stomach and intestine. As a result, thanks to the harmonious digestion, the lung (political force) and the heart (spirit of nation) can breathe and speak out humanity to the world. Back2basic.
LikeLike
Socrates is obviously on Pearson’s payroll or an administrator who never spent 15 mins. in a primary setting.
LikeLike
“developmentally inappropriate” This is the key reason why the Common Core must be revised or eliminated. We need to repeat these words over and over again!!!
As a mother with good gut instincts , it feels to me like a form of child abuse
LikeLike
We parents need to demand from our legislators an investigation into the development of The Common Core!!! Lots of money has been made and we need to find out who profited the most. Transparency is key and for the future we need to insure this by drawing up new legislation which requires any changes to our educations system to be made using a democratic process with several checks and balances. Our democracy and the well being of children depends on this. The Common Core is developmentally inappropriate and turns the bell curve into a Rhino Spike!!
LikeLike
The saddest thing is that moments of precious childhood are muddled with such misguided practices. As a teacher, a lot of this borders on the equivalent of educational malpractice and breaches of ethics about developmentally appropriate practice. I mourn this…I mourn that they are being assessed to populate a database instead of playing and exploring to learn, harnessing their strongest innate young capacities. Most of humanity grew into adulthood without this ridiculous imposed testing regime.
LikeLike