Archives for category: Honor Roll

Amy Frogge, public school parent, ran for school board in Nashville.

She ran against a heavily funded candidate, who raised and spent $113,000, more than was ever spent for a school board race in Nashville. Frogge’s opponent was endorsed by “Mayor Karl Dean along with a host of special interest groups, ranging from the Nashville Area Chamber of Commerce to the local teachers’ union to the education advocacy group Stand for Children. She enjoyed the support of a number of affluent charter school enthusiasts who funneled her $7,100 through a PAC called Great Public Schools. She even aired a series of television ads, virtually unheard of to land a seat on the school board.”

As the Nashville newspaper said, “It was a clear takedown of power brokers.”

Frogge was outspent 5-1.

But she was elected by a 2-1 landslide.

What was her secret? Hard work.

On the other hand, a TFA executive beat the chairwoman of the school board with a war chest of $84,000 and the fervent support of charter school advocates.

State Representative Marci Maxwell is a hero who joins our honor roll for bravely standing up for public education.

She  wrote an article in which she urged voters to reject an initiative to authorize charter schools in Washington State.

She pointed out that the state’s voters have turned down charters three times previously.

Bill Gates and other billionaires and entrepreneurs are funding this effort topet voters to approve charters.

In other states, legislatures have approved charter legislation without going to the voters. Some have used ALEC model legislation, others have been influenced by campaign contributions. But it’s rare that voters have a chance to express their views about creating a dual system of schools dividing a limited amount of public funds.

Thank you, Rep. Maxwell, for helping to educate the public.

Steve Zimmer, a board member of the Los Angeles Unified School District, is a hero for public education. He joins the honor roll.

He has stood up to the powerful privatization lobby, which wants to hand more and more public schools over to private management.

Zimmer has the temerity to ask where the charter movement is going in Los Angeles. What is the end game? Who is looking out for the 86% of students who are not in charters? What are the consequences of “co-location” (i.e., giving charters free space in a public school, taking classrooms, facilities and resources away from the public school students)?

Zimmer has offered a resolution calling for greater oversight of charter schools in the city and requiring that the charters present the same data as public schools.

Zimmer points out that the 232 charters in the city of Los Angeles enroll 14.5% of the district’s students, yet the board approves charters without more than five minutes of deliberations.

Only 7 of the city’s 232 charters participate in the LAUSD data system, making it hard to know who they are serving and what they are doing.

He notes that charters are supposed to be incubators of innovation, yet they share nothing with public schools, and the board has no process by which to evaluate and share any best practices incubated in charters.

He notes that charters serve only 1/3 of the proportion of students with moderate-to-severe disabilities as compared to the public schools in the districts.

He wants the LAUSD superintendent to “issue a comprehensive report to the Board about the benefits, challenges andresponsibilities of being the largest charter authorizer in the world.”

He recommends a commission to “provide detailed recommendations to the Board about charter authorizations, renewals, amendments, Proposition 39 allocations, authorizing guidelines and issues of governance and oversight.”

Two charter chains object to his proposal. They want no constraints on their ability to continue expanding and drawing down public funding away from public schools without any oversight. It works for them. They claim Zimmerman wants to hamstring their growth. But in fact he is calling for responsible  oversight of public-funded institutions.

The public schools in several poor communities have been under state control for more than a decade, proving that state education departments don’t know how to run schools while obliterating democracy.

State Senator Ron Rice has called for a restoration of democratic control in Newark, Jersey City, and Patterson.

The state has been in control of Newark since 1995, Patterson since 1991, and Jersey City since 1989.

He has joined a coalition of local groups and clergy to call for an investigation of the state education department.

Meanwhile, the state education departmentauthority take over scores of other districts, no doubt to advance Governor Christie’s privatization agenda.

Senator Ron Rice is a champion for democratic control of the people’s schools.

State Representative Reggie Fullwood is a hero for public education in Florida. He is encouraging the state board of education to select a state commissioner who will advocate for the state’s beleaguered public schools, not vouchers and rapacious charter entrepreneurs. He also wants a sane testing system that is not high stakes.

 

Florida’s Next Education Commissioner, Statement by Rep. Reggie Fullwood
by FLHOUSEDEMS on Friday, September 7, 2012 at 10:58am ·

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

September 7, 2012

CONTACT:  Mark Hollis

(850) 488-9622

Rep. Reggie Fullwood Statement Regarding

Characteristics of Florida’s Next Education Commissioner

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — State Representative Reggie Fullwood (D-Jacksonville) issued the following statement regarding the State Board of Education’s approval today of the “desired characteristics” it wants in Florida’s next education commissioner.

Representative Fullwood sent a letter to former State Board Chair Kathleen Shanahan on Thursday asking that the next commissioner be a strong advocate for public schools, reduce the state’s reliance on standardized high-stakes testing for accountability purposes, and consider all education stakeholders’ thoughts and concerns as Florida contemplates new education reforms.

The following is a statement from Representative Fullwood about today’s Board action:

“It is gratifying that the State Board of Education appears to be making it a priority to hire a commissioner who is committed to obtaining the input of parents and education stakeholders as future education reforms are contemplated. However, it is disappointing that the Board, by its actions today, remains anxious to hire yet another advocate for private-schools vouchers or a proponent of private virtual school operators. I believe Floridians expect our next state education commissioner to be committed – first and foremost — to Florida’s public schools and public school students.”

Below is the text of a letter submitted Thursday by Representative Fullwood:

September 6, 2012

Ms. Kathleen Shanahan

Chair, State Board of Education

325 W. Gaines Street

Suite 1520

Tallahassee, Florida 32399

Dear Chair Shanahan and members of the State Board of Education:

I have read with interest the criteria you are considering in the search for a new commissioner of education. As a legislator who is significantly concerned about the future of our state’s system of education, I urge you to amend your search criteria to ensure that Florida hires a commissioner who will bring a more collaborative approach as we strive to create the best school system in the United States. This means that our next commissioner should be willing to work with parents, educators, local school boards, and all legislators regardless of party affiliation.

In advance of your scheduled Friday telephone conference call on the topic, I urge you to give consideration to the following:

Specifically, among desired characteristics the State Board of Education may want to add to its list of criteria are: a Commissioner of Education who: (1) will aggressively advocate on behalf of Florida’s public schools; (2) is committed to working in a bipartisan fashion and engage in cooperative dialogue with all legislators, local officials and others regardless of political affiliation; (3) is committed developing a broadly based public school assessment system that relies more heavily on tests and measures designed for assessment purposes instead of using high stakes standardized tests for punishing and rewarding students, teachers and schools; and (4) will work cooperatively with all key stakeholders in the education community, including but not limited to representatives of teacher organizations, superintendents and parent groups.

In addition, I would encourage the Board to give serious consideration to additional recommendations that have been offered today in a letter to Governor Rick Scott from a coalition of parent and teacher groups. In their letter, the coalition group states that Florida needs a commissioner who (1) will collaborate with parents, educators, community organizations, and local elected officials to restructure the flawed accountability system into a credible system that informs and improves learning, rather than punishes; (2) is committed to ensuring that districts eliminate zero tolerance and implement fair, supportive and non-exclusionary disciplinary practices, in keeping with Florida’s groundbreaking 2009 state law (3) will promote the wise use of limited public dollars to support teaching and learning practices that prepare all students for college and career success, rather than an excessive focus on narrow definitions of achievement through testing (4) will maintain the Task Force on Accountability for Exceptional Education, Special Needs, and English Language Learners as an advisory board; and (5) is free of any real or perceived conflicts of interest with regard to privatization, test publishing, or lobbying.

Thank you for taking my concerns and recommendations seriously.

Sincerely,

Reggie Fullwood, State Representative

Florida House District 15

cc:        Florida Governor Rick Scott

            Democratic Speaker-designate Perry Thurston

            Republican Speaker-designate Will Weatherford

Rep. REGGIE FULLWOOD (D-Jacksonville)

 

 · Comment · Share

Rick Roach is a school board member in Orange County, Florida. He took the state test, the FCAT, and concluded that it is a very poor measure of student learning and is consuming far too much instructional time.

Rick Roach joins the honor roll of champions of public education. The honor roll consists of people who fight for good education for all children; who oppose privatization and high-stakes testing; and who break ranks and take risks to speak out. They may be state board members, local school board members, superintendents, principals, teachers, parents, and concerned citizens.

A reader sent this story about him.

Last winter, when he took the FCAT, he failed both sections. He said he knew none of the answers to the math questions, but managed to get 62% on the reading section. His story was written up by Marion Brady for Valerie Strauss’s Answer Sheet column in the Washington Post.

Roach said this to Brady:

“A test that can determine a student’s future life chances should surely relate in some practical way to the requirements of life. I can’t see how that could possibly be true of the test I took.”

Then he added, “It makes no sense to me that a test with the potential for shaping a student’s entire future has so little apparent relevance to adult, real-world functioning. Who decided the kind of questions and their level of difficulty? Using what criteria? To whom did they have to defend their decisions? As subject-matter specialists, how qualified were they to make general judgments about the needs of this state’s children in a future they can’t possibly predict? Who set the pass-fail “cut score”? How?”

“I can’t escape the conclusion that decisions about the [state test] in particular and standardized tests in general are being made by individuals who lack perspective and aren’t really accountable.”

When a superintendent has integrity and community support, he can stand up to the Governor, to Washington, and to the winds of fashion.

That’s Michael McGill, the superintendent of the Scarsdale, New York, public schools.

Scarsdale is one of the most affluent communities in the nation. But there are plenty of other superintendents in affluent communities who are going along with absurd mandates.

McGill is not going along. He has spoken out eloquently against high stakes testing. Imagine a superintendent who write a “declaration of intellectual independence.”

He has spoken out against the state’s half-baked evaluation plan for teachers.

When I visited Scarsdale schools a year ago, Mr. McGill gave a speech to the faculty denouncing federal policies that undermined the pedagogical freedom of his teachers.

Michael McGill is a hero superintendent.

A  reader of this blog wrote thiis letter of support:

Dr. Michael McGill, Superintendent of Scarsdale Schools is a hero superintendent guiding  a hero school district with a long history of thoughtful school policy and innovation, sometimes in the face of powerful and regressive political forces (including successful resistance to attempts to limit access in the schools to information and ideas by advocates for McCarthyism in the 1950s).  Continuing that long tradition, Mr. McGill is a vocal opponent of high stakes testing and tying teacher evaluation to tests.

But, he’s not only a hero because of what he opposes; he’s a hero because of what he advocates. Under McGill’s leadership, Scarsdale is providing a thoughtful road map for school improvement that others might well emulate.  He consults with this teachers and community.  Programs and changes are considered thoughtfully and evaluated for their merit before being launched.  His expertise and thoughtful approach to the training and retaining of high quality teachers, his vision for the authentic education of children and his leadership style in the building of his community make him the kind of superintendent any school district would hope to have.

Admittedly, he’s in a district that supports education over measurement. In that way, Scarsdale is already at odds with the testing über alles approach.  In 2001, his parents stood up to the obsessive testing culture created by NCLB and refused to allow their children to take the test.  In 2005, in concert with his faculty, and after two years of researching the value and consequences of the changes under consideration, McGill led the Scarsdale community as it became the first high school in America to drop out of the AP program.  Some might question that policy. Doesn’t that mean that Scarsdale is foregoing a challenging curriculum?  No, it doesn’t. It means the exact opposite.  As he wrote in an article for the AASA, McGill realized that the imperative of test preparation determined both what and often how teachers taught. Although AP courses undeniably met a high standard, teachers wanted their pupils’ experience to be even better and not a cynical process of strategizing to amass the right number of points. Instead of continuing to pursue a test of excellence, he decided to build a course of excellence.  He brought in experts to work with his faculty to build advanced topics that would be superior to the AP and no longer beholden to the AP exams.  Students were still free to take AP exams, but he understood what those in the forefront of the reform movement do not, that learning is compromised when driven by a high stakes testing culture. Scarsdale set their standard higher than the state.

Under the leadership of Dr. McGill, Scarsdale continues a long tradition of educational excellence and innovation.  He surrounds himself with thoughtful, experienced educators and a  School Board dedicated to building better learning environments.  who work with him to continues to innovate and point the way for other school systems that want to set their sights higher as well.  This year, Scarsdale opened its Center for Innovation, the first innovation center to be hosted and supported by a K-12 school district… [b]ased on successful models of university and corporate technology R&D programs, such as the MIT Media Lab and Apple Advanced Technology Group, the Center… provide[s] opportunities for Scarsdale to continue its leadership role in demonstrating innovative instructional practices. The Center plans to partner with concerned others, fostering conversation and collaboration with teachers, students, community members, university researchers, corporate and university R&D departments and other school districts.

Scarsdale provides a principled and meaningful response to the misguided policies of the non-educator driven reform movement.   They are blazing a trail for public educators: a sustainable, well considered approach to practice and innovative, built on experience, expertise and an understanding of the challenges and opportunities ahead in public education.  What better reason for excitement? Informed reform you can believe in.

A few days ago, I started honoring people who defend public education and teachers against reckless assaults on them. One of the first of those on the honor roll was Lottie Beebe, an elected member of the Louisiana Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.

Here is her response.

***************

Diane, you are my hero.  Thank you for your untiring efforts to keep everyone informed of what is happening in Louisiana.  We must continue to be vocal and strive to educate the public to the truth regarding education reform.  I think your latest effort is remarkable! I think it is a wonderful idea to recognize those who stand up for students and traditonal public schools. I hope your list is infinite. 

Again, let me say I decided to seek the BESE position because of my desire to see positive changes in the education profession–contrary to the train wreck that is destined to occur.  I attended a National Association of State School Boards’ meeting in Washington, DC in July and had the opportunity to hear a speaker say the following:  No state should implement a teacher evaluation program with a 50% value added component–particularly, with the roll out of the Common Core (CC) curriculum.  He specifically stated there will be a decline in student achievement due to the rigor of the (CC). Consequently, there will be a greater number of teachers who will receive an ineffective rating. What are we doing in Louisiana? (50% Value-Added)  

To add insult to injury, we are rolling out the teacher evaluation program statewide without a full year of piloting.  My school district was one of nine participating school districts and the rubric used during the 4 month pilot was scrapped for another.  Using a quote from another state–New York–“we are building the plane as we fly it!”  Make no mistake about it, I  am not anti-teacher evaluations.  Teacher evaluations have been in place for years in Louisiana; however, a few districts neglected to evaluate annually. This fact was used during the 2012 Louisiana Legislative session to garner support for education reform and to vilify teachers, in my opinion.  

During my participation at the National Association of State Boards of Education, I was amazed to hear another presenter mention  the year, 2014, will likely be education’s Armaggedon–“eduggedon” or edu–cliff.  I agree with this assessment due to the likely decline in student achievement, increased teacher ineffective ratings, and the negative campaign against educators and traditional schools.

This reform movement is, by design, to dismantle tradional public schools and the aforementioned prediction is what will likely convince many that our traditional schools are dismal failures.  We must continue our efforts to educate the public and do everything we can to promote excellence.  When our students succeed, we must celebrate and publicize their success. There are many outstanding traditional schools in this country and Louisiana. As a grandparent of two grandsons enrolled in Louisiana’s public schools, I can proudly say they are receiving a quality education at  C rated schools which are deemed failing by Louisiana’s standards.  (Somebody, please tell me when did a C become a failing grade?) Someone obviously lied to me!  I was always told a C grade was average. 

Thanks to all who responded to Diane’s call.  I truly appreciate the emails!  I also want to publicly express my gratitude to Ms. Carolyn Hill, my BESE colleague. I want to publicly thank the members of the Louisiana Legislature who had the intestinal fortitude to stand up to ALEC and the governor –those who voted against Act 1 and Act 2–Choice. Often, criticism is generically stated; yet, there are many legislators who did not drink the Kool-aid. On behalf of Louisiana’s educators, I want to thank them.  Thanks to all of the other courageous educators who stand before our students each day providing a valuable service–educating and molding our future!  

Lottie P. Beebe, District 3
Louisiana Board of Elementary and Secondary Education 
lottieb@cox.net

To the honor roll of superintendents who stand up for public education and their students and communities, I add the name of Joe Bruni, superintendent of the William Penn School District in Lansdowne, Pennsylvania.

He was nominated by Charlotte Hummel, who was president of the local school board.

I know Charlotte from our email contacts. She wrote a terrific piece for Valerie Strauss’s Answer Sheet about her district’s efforts to shield the schools and children from unwise “reforms.”

Charlotte writes:

Your next super hero superintendent should be Joe Bruni of the William Penn School District in Lansdowne, Delaware County, PA. He attended the SOS rally, walked the walk and stood in the blistering sun. He tells our faculty each year about the DeVoss and Koch connections and implores people to return any school related or other purchases back to Walmart and to NEVER try to sell him any Amway! You should interview him. By the way, most of the kids in our school district (98% minority; 85% poverty) know this superintendent on sight and by name. He is the kids’ hero.

If you want to nominate a superintendent or principal or school board member, send in supporting evidence, preferably something that has been printed and has a link.

After I wrote a post praising Lotte Beebe, an elected member of the state school board, I received an email from an experienced educator in Louisiana. She nominated another state school board member who has stood up to the Jindal bulldozer: Carolyn Hill. Please take the time to encourage these two fearless women with your thanks.

Lottie Beebe has been a Godsend to those of us fighting for the survival of public education in Louisiana.  I have to bring your attention also to a more recent heroine – CAROLYN HILL.
Carolyn ran for her seat on BESE last year with the financial and political support of reformers.  She drank the Kool-aid and for her first few months on the board supported the 10 reformers on the 11 member board.   Evidently her exposure to the realities of reform transformed her thinking when she attended the National School Boards Association conference with Lottie.  For the last few months she has been fearless, untimidated, well spoken, and fully armed with research supporter of our public schools.   She is a beacon of hope for those of us who are trying to educate the masses about the devastation brought by reform.  She and Lottie make a powerful team. 
I hope Carolyn and Lottie will receive an outpouring of support from your readers nationally that will empower them to continue in spite of the intimidation and attacks they are receiving.  Carolyn can be reached at carolyn.hill2@la.gov and Lottie can be reached at lottie.beebe@la.gov.  
Thanks –  Lee Barrios