State legislatures these days tthjnkbthat they should pass laws telling teachers how to teach reading and what to teach in social studies. The latest example comes from Ohio, where the far-right legislature is in the midst of mandating a course on capitalism.
Denis Smith, retired educator, writes:
In case anyone hasn’t noticed, our republic is on fire. And that’s not being hyperbolic.
Incendiary language is now the norm in Congress and across the nation, further fanning the flames of overheated rhetoric in an election year. Indictments pile up against a former president, along with criminal trials looming in multiple jurisdictions. Perhaps even more ominous, jurors, judges, and election workers are being threatened with harm by extremists across our land.
But that’s only the short version of a narrative about a country at the brink, where democracy is threatened by the specter of authoritarianism.
Meanwhile, back in Ohio, the legislature has examined the state of the state and determined that in today’s volatile world, there is a pressing need to modify public school curriculum by teaching … capitalism.
That’s right. Ohio Republicans have decided that teaching about capitalism is more important in troubled times than strengthening student learning opportunities about democracy. Yes, learning about capitalism is more important for Ohio students than the critical need for media literacy and increased research and critical thinking skills in an age of artificial intelligence and fake news.
Add to that the importance of teaching about character and caring about others, a key cornerstone of character education.
To Republicans, whose former House Speaker and former state party chair are now serving prison sentences, along with their twice-impeached presidential front runner facing 91 felony criminal counts, there appears to be no pressing need for young people to learn more about personal ethics, citizenship, and the importance of character.
But we probably should know that when it comes to Republicans, caring about the needs of others might be tantamount to socialism.
After the passage of Ohio Senate Bill 17 by a margin of 64-26 on Feb. 7, a measure which calls for the addition of teaching about capitalism in high school financial literacy standards, one Democratic legislator told the Cincinnati Enquirer/USA Today Network that adding capitalism to carefully crafted financial literacy classes only dilutes the amount of content students can learn in this important course of study designed to prepare students for assuming adult roles and functions.
‘This bill is one part partisan message, one part ideological warfare and one part a poor fix’ to Ohio’s financial literacy class requirement, said Rep. Joe Miller, D-Lorain, a former social studies teacher who instructed students on the principles of capitalism.
The educator and legislator, now serving his third term in the Ohio House, is quite savvy in knowing the usual lockstep behavior of Republicans, none of whom voted against the bill. An additional observation by Miller might have also been influenced by knowing the tired rhetoric of one of the bill’s co-sponsors in the Ohio Senate, Andrew Brenner, who famously said in 2014 that public education was “socialism” and should be privatized.
The Enquirer piece continued, saying Miller worried opponents of the bill would be labeled socialists in future campaigns.
With Brenner and Senate President Matt (“we can kind of do what we want”) Huffman, it’s only a matter of time before they use the words socialism and socialist, along with other Republicans, as tired descriptors for the noun Democrat.
Come to think of it, if the titular head of the Republican Party is constantly complaining about witch hunts, what if we soon find out that the latest supply chain issue generated by the GOP might result in a shortage of witches? If they do run out of witches, look for socialist hunts in this election year.

The planners of the course on Capitalism might well start with Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the 21st Century, which shows that the rate of return on capital being greater than economic growth leads to a concentration of wealth at the top and to widespread poverty and insecurity and that this must be countered by high progressive taxation, or everything goes to hell.
LikeLike
I wish TF that reporters would start pressing these Repugnimoron politcians when they use terms like Socialist and Marxist. What exactly, Representative Bubba, is a Socialist? Could you explain for our audience what Marx’s idea of surplus value was and how that is stolen from workers? Of the varieties of worker alienation that Marx identified, which do you think is most egregious, and which ones can be addressed by legislation?
LikeLike
I could not agree more. I am loathe to suggest that there is real socialism in government run health care. The way I see ideas emanating from European experience with the beginning of super industrialized society, the word socialism should be reserved for government ownership of means of production of goods. Services are a different matter.
Political figures who throw the socialist stone should be forced to sit in their glass houses.
LikeLike
Funny how Trump throws words like “socialist,” “Marxist,” “radical left” at every government program he doesn’t like.
LikeLike
Isn’t it amazing how criticizing our economic system gets one branded ‘Marxist,’ or ‘socialist,’ or, god forbid, ‘communist’? There’s a reason for that, obviously. Brand and label ideas that are outside of the current neoliberal status quo–as well as those who free-think other ideas–as threats in order to maintain the current order. In other words, business as usual in American politics.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can certainly see the impending witch shortage. This is a real problem. Let me explain.
there was a time when things were pretty good. Sure, there were some problems, but the Republicans were sort of hard up to find someone to complain about. As the 2000 election approached, you started hearing calls for drug-testing teachers. There was a drug problem of course. Beleaguered teachers were drinking inordinate amounts of coffee. This was another silly way of distracting voters from what was already becoming abundantly evident 25 years ago, that economic policies of the Reagan era were not trickling down but up. So they had to have the witch of teacher drug problems.
Then the people flew those planes into the Trade Center. We never heard about drug testing teachers again. After that that there were better witches.
We have entered a strange period in our history. Beginning with the trainmen’s 1877 riots, conservative accusations of socialist were leveled at their opponents to try to rive slices of the electorate for the use of those who wanted to make the world safe for business. This persisted, rising to a crescendo in 1919 in the Palmer Raids, then again in the McCarthy era. Then Gorbachev dramatically stole the issue from American conservatives by ending Russian communism. The Republicans were like a preacher without a pulpit. Now those same republicans are supporting the heir to the Stalin inheritance. This is strange.
Watch out for the return of new witches.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well said, Roy!
LikeLike
Roy: ”There was a drug problem of course. Beleaguered teachers were drinking inordinate amounts of coffee.”
Now THAT’s funny.
But under a fascist/strongman sort of government, the new witches will be defined as “anyone or anything the strongman decides he doesn’t like . . . in the moment.” (Think Trump or Musk). The whole thing is tied not to the order of law, but to the ever-changing personality of the dictator . . . the libido dominandi. You, me, and others here will have to hide in the woods.
And BTW, people who didn’t have history classes in school probably can’t learn from it. Hmmmmm . . . . . when did you say STEM started to take preference over the humanities and social sciences in education? CBK
LikeLike
FACT: When Repugnicans talk about these matters, only very, very, very, very, very rarely, i.e., almost never, do they have a microbe on a hair on a rat’s tushy of an idea what TF they are talking about. They literally talk about stuff they know nothing whatsoever about.
LikeLike
Ohio will probably buy a Prager U video to teach little children the glories of capitalism and the horrors of government regulation.
LikeLike
Even Friedrich Hayek thought that government regulation to protect people from environmental pollution was necessary. I suspect that none of these classes envisioned by the knuckledraggers will address how Capitalism saved itself by inventing regulations to ameliorate its own excesses.
LikeLike
there was a remarkable diversity of ideas coming from Europe in the Nineteenth century. These ideas ranged from strange pseudoscience to radical communitarian dreams. From totalitarian advocates to anarchism, all the ideas tried to offer a solution to social ills that proliferated due to rapid urbanization and increasing specialization of labor. Treating all these ideas in a course that studied the history of capitalism would be the dream of any historian.
Somehow I do not think it was this that the Ohio Republicans had in mind.
LikeLike
It’s not enough that they want to spread propaganda in public funded private schools. They want to turn public schools into agents of right wing propaganda as well. Republicans know young people are less inclined to accept their messaging so they want to create a new generation of right wing zombies. The GOP is a hungry vampire trying to create a future generation of right wing zealots and using public funds to do it. Otherwise, their days of power are numbered in a genuine functioning democracy. Florida is already spreading propaganda in public schools as it is already allowing Prager U videos in public schools.
LikeLike
Retired Teacher: ”Otherwise, their days of power are numbered in a genuine functioning democracy.”
Exactly that . . . so to keep power, let’s go fascist and get a strongman. The other side of that is this: You cannot let the other guy win, and there must be something wrong with the playing field, so change it and, in the meantime, cheat. CBK
LikeLike
Bob: ”They literally talk about stuff they know nothing whatsoever about.” What else can you do when you are obsessed with power, when you hate change . . . like what happens when you read a book . . . when the other guy knows more than you do and actually has moral foundations, and you keep losing. You talk your effing head off because, hay, that’s what power and the other guy does, and teachers too. CBK
LikeLike
Petrilli is paid handsomely to run his mouth on the Deformer party line/about matters he knows nothing about.
LikeLike
and Atlas Shrugged.
LikeLike
Teaching all about cutthroat capitalism is designed to program future generations so they are ready for the brutal dystopian theocratic kleptocracy that MAGARINO Christian Nationalists, ALEC libertarians, Walmart poverty generators, et al. are planning to force on every state and the country. Their puppet master is Putin who is planning to destroy the EU and enslave that population. First Ukraine, then the old Eastern European soviet bloc, then the rest of Europe, followed by the world.
RED: Republicans, Nazis, MAGARINOs, Russia…
LikeLike
Fine. Since these scholars are located in Ohio. How about their Capitalism Cliff Notes focuses on Cleveland Ohio.
In 2008 The Democracy Collaborative began working in Cleveland. One of America’s poorest big cities, which had been losing jobs and residents for decades. The activists followed a strategy called “community wealth-building”. It aims to end struggling local economies’ reliance on unequal relationships with distant, wealth-extracting corporations – such as chain retailers – and to base these economies around local, more socially conscious businesses instead.
In Cleveland The Democracy Collaborative helped set up a solar power company, an industrial laundry, and a city-centre hydroponic farm growing lettuces and basil. All three enterprises were owned by their employees, and some of their profits went to a holding company tasked with establishing more cooperatives in the city. All three enterprises have succeeded, so far.
The goal of the project was summed up in blunt, almost populist terms by one of the Democracy Collaborative’s co-founders, Ted Howard, in 2017: “Stop the leakage of money out of our community.” Yet “community wealth building” also has a more subtle purpose. It is a concrete demonstration that economic decisions can be based on more than neoliberalism’s narrow criteria.
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2019/jun/25/the-new-left-economics-how-a-network-of-thinkers-is-transforming-capitalism
LikeLike
Exciting!!!
LikeLike
In case anyone hasn’t noticed…
State Actors “act” on behalf of the State, and are therefore
subject to the limitations imposed by the State.
“Back in the day” doesn’t change today anymore
than the words of a speech writer change a speaker.
LikeLike
I think that what they have in mind is a course in Miltonfreedumbomics for Dummies.
LikeLike
Dumb idea. Students should learn about capitalism within a course on economics, and economics is too specialized and advanced for a required course.
LikeLiked by 1 person
According to the National Association of State Boards of Education, 30 states require Econ as part of the high-school curriculum. 25 require it for graduation. All include it in their Social Studies standards. So, where Econ is not a separate class, it is supposed to be integrated into the curriculum.
LikeLike
interesting, thx
LikeLike
I wrote the glossary and did some editing of a textbook for high-school economics classes back in the late 1990s. However, it didn’t have any math. That was ridiculous.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If Ohio “lawmakers” want to teach kids about capitalism, they should have kids study today’s China because China is a textbook example of capitalism.
The basic premise of capitalism is that one should strive to accumulate as much capital as possible, with no regard for anyone else.
So, the ideal capitalist society is one that is ruled by a king who has an enormous amount of capital, and the king is surrounded by “royals” of many kinds, such as dukes, who also each have nearly as much capital and who defend the king and the system that enriches them.
Everybody else is a serf whose sole purpose of existence is to work to generate more and more capital for the king and his royals.
When President Nixon introduced capitalism into China, capitalism found a perfect fit for its precepts. Capital wealth flowed upward from the working class to the regional heads of the communist party, who are basically the “royals”, and to the head of the communist party, the king-like premier.
And the reason capitalism has flourished in China is because it doesn’t matter to the communist royals or to the premier what happens to the workers, so there are virtually no laws that constrain corporations from doing whatever they want to do to maximize profit, even if that means poisoning the air and water that the working class depend on, or defrauding them with rigged real estate investments.
Capitalism hates a republic, like America, because republics allow mere average citizens to vote to elect the government that can place laws on capitalist corporations, requiring corporations to produce safe products, to not defraud the average citizen, and to stop polluting the air and water.
Capitalism is a powerful horse that can pull a nation’s economy along at a steady pace — but if that horse is not well-regulated, it can trample the common folk.
LikeLike
That’s interesting and provocative but I don’t think feudalism is an example of capitalism, much less the “ideal.”
LikeLike
The fundamental premise of capitalism is to accrue to oneself all the capital possible. Ergo, the fundamental premise of capitalism is greed, and any form of even “enlightened” capitalism inevitably devolves into greed unless restraints are imposed.
With the continual removal of restraints on capitalism that has taken place in the United States during the past 50 years, U.S, capitalism has devolved into an oligarchy, which is the phase that precedes a feudal monarchical system.
The United States is now a let-them-eat-cake (or, in today’s idiom, “cereal”) Oligarchy:
After studying more than 20 years of government policy, Princeton University researcher Martin Gilens and Northwestern University researcher Benjamin Page documented that the U.S. is no longer a representative republic because the government does not represent the interests of the majority of the country’s citizens, but is instead ruled by the rich and powerful. The researchers analyzed 1,800 U.S. policies enacted over a period of two decades and compared the laws and regulations that were passed to those favored by average Americans to those favored by wealthy Americans and corporations: “EVEN WHEN A MAJORITY OF CITIZENS DISAGREES WITH ECONOMIC ELITES OR WITH ORGANIZED SPECIAL INTERESTS ORDINARY CITIZENS GENERALLY LOSE.” In short, the United States has long been an oligarchy. Today, America has the best government that money can buy.
https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746
LikeLike
That’s not the fundamental premise of capitalism. You’re conflating greed with capitalism. There is overlap but they are not identical.
LikeLike
Agreed that economic systems are not morally neutral.
A Middle Way: Socialism, Capitalism, and Social Democracy | Bob Shepherd | Praxis (wordpress.com)
LikeLike
To learn about how unregulated capitalism works, teachers can show students “The Hunger Games.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
They don’t have to show them The Hunger Games…..we are currently living in that dystopia right now.
LikeLike
Quickwit: I understand your consternation. However, isn’t it GREEDY capitalism and moral depravity you are railing about?
Capitalism can be understood as just a monetary system which, in fact, has its own principles, order, and dynamism, like physics–which can be either misunderstood or manipulated and applied for good or for nefarious ends, or even set up well, but then abused. (Orwell knew what he was talking about.)
Political systems matter of course. But in your note you add to capitalism the context of a variety of political systems (including socialism and kingship), but also greed and moral depravity . . .human developmental and choice issues, or just confusion . . . all can be operative along with all sorts of good brought about by the people who have the power to move things around in any system. For instance, there have been good kings in history (though political and social power does tend to corrupt.)
In other words, capitalism doesn’t hate a republic. Greedy capitalism and moral depravity, however, DO. And that, I think, along with racism and all sorts of group bias, go far in answering why the GOP and far right want a strongman to run things, as well as a Handmaid’s Tale dystopia:
Progressivism and good government (for the people) got the best of regressive conservatism, childlike ignorance, and the inability to change or share power; and when their over-control and scamming of the “useful” people didn’t work any more. . . and they kept losing because too many people don’t want that sort of thing, and people keep getting in touch with their own democratic ideals that Biden talked about; and so their only option is to ditch democracy (and all those black and brown people–how dare they?) and take up fascism and authoritarian power . . . so get a strongman, because democracy is just code for “I don’t get my way and they won’t let me keep my white social elitism anyway.”
Biden hinted at the depth of the problem when he said: You cannot love your country only when you win. CBK
LikeLike
The fundamental premise of capitalism is to accrue to oneself all the capital possible. Ergo, the fundamental premise of capitalism is greed, and any form of even “enlightened” capitalism inevitably devolves into greed unless restraints are imposed.
With the continual removal of restraints on capitalism that has taken place in the United States during the past 50 years, U.S, capitalism has devolved into an oligarchy, which is the phase that precedes a feudal monarchical system.
The United States is now a let-them-eat-cake (or, in today’s idiom, “cereal”) Oligarchy:
After studying more than 20 years of government policy, Princeton University researcher Martin Gilens and Northwestern University researcher Benjamin Page documented that the U.S. is no longer a representative republic because the government does not represent the interests of the majority of the country’s citizens, but is instead ruled by the rich and powerful. The researchers analyzed 1,800 U.S. policies enacted over a period of two decades and compared the laws and regulations that were passed to those favored by average Americans to those favored by wealthy Americans and corporations: “EVEN WHEN A MAJORITY OF CITIZENS DISAGREES WITH ECONOMIC ELITES OR WITH ORGANIZED SPECIAL INTERESTS ORDINARY CITIZENS GENERALLY LOSE.” In short, the United States has long been an oligarchy. Today, America has the best government that money can buy.
https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746
LikeLike
Hello quickwrit: Your premise about capitalism is that a monetary or economic system is already equipped with personal traits, e.g., greed.
Really?” The fundamental premise of capitalism is to accrue to oneself all the capital possible . . . greed.“ Again, really?
But on the premise that capitalism is not a human being, one can define it, again, as a monetary or economic system. In that case, good/bad/ignorant persons, countries, and cultures USE it as a way they order their economies in complex cultures.
But if a greedy or morally depraved or ignorant person or group (ignorant of how monetary systems work) puts $X here or takes away $Z from there, then, according to that system’s laws, and as operative in a complex arena of persons, absent other influences, $Y will happen. And so ditto for a good person or group who may be ignorant and so lucky or not. It’s a matter of human beings knowing (or not) the laws and using them well (or not).
The rest of your note only supports what I am saying about capitalism: you are not talking about capitalism or what can replace it, but rather about WHO has the power and how they employ it in their economic decisions. But if Atlas were a human being, he/she need not have shrugged.
Finally, as you IN PART and TACITLY point out, the wealthy but unelected (and some elected) oligarchs have made great strides in controlling “the government.” However, you seem to depict the problem as between US (we the people, etc.) and “the government.” But that government is still presently defined in the U.S. Constitution and in democratic institutions as the formal expression of a democracy, which by definition takes “the people” as its center point e.g., cratic/crasis/power in the demos/people.
So, and as long as that holds up, the struggle is between (1) those who want to take over a democracy for their own selfish and arrogant purposes and so actually demolish it and its established “government,” and (2) those who want to keep its democratic institutions and government in place.
I my view, a rethinking of your position, and perhaps a redefinition of capitalism/socialism/etc., is called for by what you say in your note? CBK
LikeLike
Really.
LikeLike
Quikwrit: Thank you for the link.
I do hope they include in their curricula the many ways that “capitalism” and other systems are defined; and how, without identifying economic and monetary laws that inform it, and without distinguishing those systems and laws from real people . . . who are or are not greedy . . . thinkers only allow some abstract but accepted idea to run interference for the rampant greed IN THOSE REAL PEOPLE that we continue to experience today.
In other words, if a person uses the definition of capitalism that you gave in your note (looks like an excuse for predatory to me), then they probably only gave away their own transactional and greedy horizon, while at the same time thinking they are excused from its moral, political, and cultural implications as they go about happily applying it to the world.
Do you think we are in the position we are in today across the world because THAT version of capitalism had nothing to do with it? CBK
LikeLike
I cannot relate in mere words how distressing and disrespectful it is to have non-educators tell me how to teach. It is a scourge. I have more to say about how horrible it is to be told how to do a complex job by political nincompoops, but dang, if I’m not exhausted dealing with it on a Friday evening. Legislators: Do YOUR job; let me do mine.
LikeLike
In other news, a new film, Cabrini, explores the life of Frances Xavier Cabrini, who ministered to Italian immigrants in New York and founded an orphanage and a hospital at a time when women were considered second-class citizens incapable of major public works. A life of service and healing. A great American immigrant. A hero.
LikeLike
The Cabrini movie is Dynamite! Went because you mentioned it here. Wowzer! Keep plugging the film because it absolutely speaks to everything we are up against at this global moment. And it is all about SOLUTIONS. Real, sweaty, bare knuckle, competent, visionary solutions.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Awesome!!!! Thanks, Kathy!
LikeLike