Dan Rather and Elliott Kirschner divert us from our daily concerns with a thrilling image transmitted from outer space by the James Webb Space Telescope. You have to open the link to see the image. If science can produce such wonders, how might it be deployed to slow and reverse the severe damage to the earth now caused by climate change? It’s hard to believe after a year of extreme events—storms, fires, flooding, drought, extreme temperatures—that there is a significant number of people who deny that climate change is a reality.
They write at their blog Steady:
With so much riveting us here on Earth, it is easy to forget that up there, out there in the High Frontier — outer space, the far cosmos, whatever you choose to call it — exciting, promising accomplishments are happening that will profoundly affect our future.
There is a reminder today as NASA marks the first birthday of the James Webb Space Telescope. Like any proud parent, NASA is sharing pictures. And these are literally out of this world (our apologies for the silly dad/grandad jokes, but we couldn’t resist).
When we look at the photo above, we see awe-inspiring beauty and mystery. But we also see the wonder and ingenuity of science. We’ll leave it to NASA Administrator Bill Nelson to put what we’re seeing into better context:
In just one year, the James Webb Space Telescope has transformed humanity’s view of the cosmos, peering into dust clouds and seeing light from faraway corners of the universe for the very first time. Every new image is a new discovery, empowering scientists around the globe to ask and answer questions they once could never dream of.
Empowering new questions. Isn’t that the very essence and promise of science? And that’s part of what makes this so exciting. It’s not just what we now have the ability to see — it’s all the unpredictable insights that will follow.
Putting a powerful extension of our human senses into space requires harnessing tremendous amounts of intellect. It requires planning, commitment, and funding. It requires a belief that our innate inquisitiveness as a species should be cultivated. And it requires cooperation. Dr. Nicola Fox, associate administrator of NASA’s Science Mission Directorate, called the Webb Telescope “an engineering marvel built by the world’s leading scientists and engineers.” Indeed.
So what are we looking at exactly? Once again, we will let the rocket scientists at NASA explain. Basically, it’s “star birth like it’s never been seen before.” And if you want a bit more detail:
The subject is the Rho Ophiuchi cloud complex, the closest star-forming region to Earth. It is a relatively small, quiet stellar nursery, but you’d never know it from Webb’s chaotic close-up. Jets bursting from young stars crisscross the image, impacting the surrounding interstellar gas and lighting up molecular hydrogen, shown in red. Some stars display the telltale shadow of a circumstellar disk, the makings of future planetary systems.
The vast majority of the millions of people around the world who will encounter this beautiful picture will not understand its astronomical implications. Even so, we can be comforted that there is a community of researchers — all across the globe — who see with the trained eye of science.
We can also be proud that we live in a country that supports this work. And we can celebrate a quest for knowledge, the yearning to cross horizons, and the intricate dance of data and discovery.
Yes, this image is breathtaking. And that is a reason to smile. But we can also find joy in all that it took to make this celestial camera possible and the future generations who will benefit from the knowledge it unleashes.

xoxoxoxox!!!!!!
LikeLike
https://inspain.news/explosion-of-fried-egg-jellyfish-in-mar-menor/
LikeLike
Sorry. A bit off the wall, but I am continually astonished by the forms that the natural world takes!
LikeLike
“there is a significant number of people who deny that climate change is a reality”
Do you remember the fable about the three pigs?
Climate change deniers live in straw houses.
When those climate deniers show up at our houses banging on our doors demanding we let them in so they can drink our water, eat our food and take advantage of our cooler or warmer indoor air, do not let them in.
While we, who think for ourselves, us avid readers, problem solvers, critical thinkers, are getting our houses ready for what’s coming, make sure your doors and windows are very strong to the MAGA climate deniers, vaccine refusers, and maskless mob arrives, they can’t break in.
While your at it, make your house soundproof, too, so you do not have to hear them begging or threatening us to open our doors and save them for their foolishness.
LikeLike
Good luck with that. Sadly the impacts will be Global. From droughts and flooding to food and water shortages. Not even denying federal aid to the S—Hole states is an option. When all states will be impacted.
Moving to Canada might be option after the forests burn and the tundra melts if the methane doesn’t get you.
LikeLike
https://cwfis.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/interactive-map
Choose Overlays–> Active Fires
LikeLike
YES, indeed. 👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽
Definitely EXCITING STUFF and more than terrific.
Hooray for Math and Physics…the BASICS.
Remember Galileo Galilei.
And do remember, Galileo and the pope: https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/horizon/sept98/galileo.htm
LikeLike
Amen
LikeLike
We need to put our best and brightest minds on how to mitigate the worst effects of climate change before widespread famine, political instability and extinction of multiple species, including our own, occurs. Our politicians should be united and fixed on this issue instead of serving the interests of ultra-wealthy and issuing more oil drilling permits. This is an existential, global crisis that requires collective attention from all industrialized nations.
LikeLike
How many grandmas have to die of heat stroke in Texas and Oklahoma and Arizona? How many Repugnicans lose their homes to wildfires, tornadoes, and hurricanes?
BEFORE THEY FREAKING GET A CLUE
LikeLike
The “best and brightest” are the ones who got us into all the messes we’re in, which is why Halbersham used the term ironically. Maybe it’s time to step aside and let some “mediocre” minds run things for a while.
Which is not to say I’m anti-intellectual, but just that we have a pretty poor system for determining who qualifies as “intellectual”. Ivy league degrees and lots of billions in one’s bank account are what seem to qualify as the “best and brightest”, but they’re obviously not very smart.
LikeLike
“I’m The Decider and I decide what’s best” – George Dumbya Bush
“The Club of Deciders”
Club of Deciders
“Best of the Best”
Club of Insiders
Source of The Mess
LikeLike
Dumbya was severely misoverestimated
LikeLike
My bad. Dumbya was actually right for once.
He was severely misunderestimated (ie, severely overestimated)
LikeLike
Joe Biden isn’t Ivy League. Neither is Kamala Harris. Maybe that’s why he has been such an outstanding president.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. went to Harvard.
Are there any Republicans running for president who didn’t to go Ivy League schools? including Trump
LikeLike
All those people who are out to get as much as they can while they can… I don’t think they plan to be around when existence becomes untenable.
LikeLike
Looking forward, in a few years. to running dive trips to visit the former Mar-a-lago.
“You got your Russia Hoax; you got your Climate Change Hoax” –Adjudged sexual predator, stable genius, and current presidential candidate Don the Con Trump
Glub Glub
LikeLike
Maybe you can find those missing documents on your dive.
But they’ll have to change the name to Mar-a-mar
LikeLiked by 1 person
haaaa!
LikeLike
The science of science: new discoveries providing unpredictable insights, the asking of questions and attempting to answer them, proving the answers, peer reviewing the methods. Science is real. Denying the unchanging methodology of science, the science of science doesn’t just cause self destructive waste and pollution contributing to climate change; it also causes fake science like the so-called science of reading: purposefully misinterpreting inaccurate data to market theory as fact. In many ways, politics has gone from liberal versus conservative to truth versus fiction.
LikeLike
Thank you, Diane, for emphasizing the importance of looking to science to help us address important societal issues. Just yesterday in a discussion with my family, I made the analogy between climate change denial and science of reading denial. I conceded that lots of people aren’t familiar with the cognitive and neuroscience research into reading–I get that–but what continues to baffle me is why, when presented with this research as I’ve tried to do over many years on your website, I am met with silence: no attempt to rebut it, just abject denial that it exists.
Since you have proven yourself to be someone who is committed to investigating the facts in a logical way, I would appreciate a response to my last post. Thank you. This is what I wrote:
Linda, I take your point that money is often the invisible (or visible!) motivator for many people. My support for the science of reading, however, arises from my experience as an educator (no big bucks there) and from reading a lot of the scientific literature myself as well as researchers themselves synthesizing it. I have reached my own independent conclusions about its merits, often using my classroom as a laboratory, and in order to have a good faith conversation I think we should discuss the science of reading on those merits. The brain changes as a student learns to read and both neuroscientists and cognitive scientists study these processes. In addition, there are empirical studies of teaching methods showing that those that are consistent with the brain science are effective (see link below). Altogether, these researchers have produced a scientific literature (complete with caveats and contradictions as all scientific investigations are) that provides a ‘science of reading’. Is there a particular part of this that you disagree with or a particular area of the scientific literature that you take issue with?
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10888438.2013.819356?src=recsys
LikeLike
lots of people aren’t familiar with the cognitive and neuroscience research into reading–I get that–but what continues to baffle me is why
An important observation. Quite true.
LikeLike
Comprehending an advanced calculus college textbook or an advanced graduate level physics textbook requires a lot more a reading curriculum.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It sure does!!! And the same is true of almost any reading at almost any level. There’s usually a huge knowledge component. And familiarity with conventions of genre and literary technique.
LikeLike
And with the grammatical structures used.
LikeLike
Why? Well, our teacher preparation programs could use some work.
LikeLike
Unfortunately some of the people that promote Science of Reading have argued that implementing Science of Reading means that factors such as poverty can be ignored. Also some of the people that post replies on this site seem to be very anti phonics, which Diane has indicated does not apply to her. I am glad that Diane accepts phonics and I agree with her that poverty should be addressed.
As the mother of a dyslexic son, I recognize that many schools are not giving students what they need to be able to discern the identities of words. Comprehending the meaning of an entire passage I regard as a separate skill.
I have read this blog for at least a decade and have agreed with the vast majority of what is on it. The Science of Reading debate that occurs on this site totally flabbergasts me.
My son learned to read because I could afford a tutor that knew how to teach dyslexic students, in spite of his public school.
I wish that everyone would watch the Rick Lavoie Frustration Anxiety and Tension workshop video and/or participate in a live learning disability simulation workshop.
The teachers that think that dyslexic students could learn how to discern the identities of words if they just tried harder make me very sad.
LikeLike
I wish that everyone would watch Rick Lavoie Frustration Anxiety and Tension workshop
I emphatically second this!
LikeLike
Unfortunately some of the people that promote Science of Reading have argued that implementing Science of Reading means that factors such as poverty can be ignored.
Yup. Really stupid, that.
LikeLike
Ignorance of contemporary linguistics and of the sciences of language acquisition, spoken and written, is, alas, widespread among administrators, English teachers, and, to a lesser extent, Reading teachers. I hate to say this, but it’s true. I have taught, and I have traveled the country working with teachers and administrators, for decades, and I know this to be the case. Most haven’t a clue how people go about acquiring the grammar of a first language. They have unscientific folk ideas about this that are entirely wrong. Most know nothing about contemporary models of syntax. And many–even Reading professors–are almost completely unfamiliar with the considerable body of science on learning grapheme-phoneme correspondences.
LikeLike
HIGHLY recommended: Diane McGuiness’s Early Reading Instruction: What Science Really Tells Us about How to Teach Reading. Bradford/MIT P., 2004, and Why Our Children Can’t Read and What We Can Do about It: A Scientific Revolution in Reading. Touchstone/Simon and Schuster, 1999.
LikeLike
Highly recommended! I was lucky to have discovered Diane McGuinness two decades ago, so I was well-grounded in the science even before becoming a reading specialist. This meant that I was able to experience my reading specialist credential program through her lens–which helped me separate the pseudo-science from the real stuff. Thanks for mentioning her!
LikeLiked by 1 person
The fact that English has words with French (Norman Conquest) origins and words with Anglo Saxon origins gives students more than one set of rules to navigate.
Thank you for the support!
LikeLike
For your amusement, Ms. Fan:
LikeLike
It is a breathtakingly promiscuous language! LOL
LikeLike
“And many–even Reading professors–are almost completely unfamiliar with the considerable body of science on learning grapheme-phoneme correspondences.”
This is so true, Bob! A third Diane McGuinness book is Language Development and Learning to Read: The Scientific Study of How Language Development Affects Reading Skill. She wrote it at the same time as Early Reading Instruction but realized that she simply had too much material for one book so divided it into two with publication in 2004 and 2005.
LikeLike
English is Promiscuous
English is promiscuous
Sleeping all around
German-Latin-Christ-Jew-ous
Horny as a hound
LikeLike
And don’t get me started on those copulative verbs.
LikeLike
All i need to do is say “David Coleman”
LikeLike
That three-inch fool?
“Away, you three-inch fool!”
–The Taming of the Shrew, Act IV, scene 1
LikeLike
LikeLike
Pavlov’s Bob
When Pavlov’s Bob sees “Coleman”
Saliva starts a flowing
Like Shakespeare on a roll, man
In terms that aren’t glowing
LikeLiked by 1 person
He and Gates destroyed my profession, like a couple of drunks driving up onto a sidewalk full of pedestrians.
LikeLike
True story! But, never forget the ed reform debate since 2000 has mainly been about undermining and eliminating unions!
LikeLike
A big part of it, yes!
But it goes even deeper than eliminating the last major unions. Gates gave a speech many years ago in which he argued that the costs of schooling were mostly in teachers and facilities and that these could me largely eliminated by switching to computerized instruction. Then he paid for the Common [sic] Core [sic] so that there would be one set of national “standards” to key online instruction to. There is language I would like to use to describe this, but Diane’s living room is meant to be a civil place.
LikeLike
Most haven’t a clue how people go about acquiring the grammar“
Hopefully, with the advent of ChatGPT, grammar acquisition has become a thing of the past
LikeLike
You’ve heard, I guess, that Billy Boy the Bilious Bloviator has declared that ChatGPT is going to take over for Reading Teachers.
LikeLike
If computer “scientists” have their way (which it looks like they will), ChatGPT will take over for all of us (except for plumbers, electricians, carpenters and other tradespeople who were smart enough not to get a degree and job as a “knowledge worker”)
The hilarious part is the computer “scientists” will be some of the first to be replaced. Turns out GPT is very good writing computer code. Ha ha ha.
LikeLike
Now this. YUP. It’s really good at writing code.
And from what I saw in my stint in the profession, I expect to see software management consultancies. Not that difficult to create programs that can design a Balanced Scorecard Dashboard or apply Lean Six Sigma principles to some operation, for example.
LikeLike
The images are beautiful and terrifying.
However, because everything simply MUST be political today, here’s a story about a fight over the efforts by some people to expurgate Mr. Webb’s name from the telescope and from research altogether.
LikeLike
Red, white and blue stars give off different amounts of light. By measuring that starlight – specifically, its color and brightness – astronomers can estimate how many stars our galaxy holds.
With that method, they discovered the Milky Way has about 100 billion stars – 100,000,000,000.
Now the next step. Using the Milky Way as our model, we can multiply the number of stars in a typical galaxy (100 billion) by the number of galaxies in the [known] universe (2 trillion).
The answer is an absolutely astounding number. There are approximately 200 billion trillion stars in the universe. Or, to put it another way, 200 sextillion.
That’s 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000!
–Brian Jackson, Associate Professor of Astronomy, Boise State University
Based on Kepler data, the SETI Institute estimates the number of habitable planets in our galaxy, the Milky Way, at 300 million. Let’s see, . . .
300 million planets per galaxy x 2 trillion galaxies
That’s 600,000,000,000,000,000,000 habitable planets in the known universe. That’s 600 quintillion.
We are not alone.
LikeLike
If you have not yet read the book Timefullness by Bjornerud, I highly recommend it
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much for the recommendation, Ms. Fan! Ordering a copy!
LikeLike
There are more stars in the heavens than there are grains of sand on all the beaches on the earth.
LikeLike
Yup
Est. grains of sand on Earth, 7.5 sextillion
LikeLike
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sand_Reckoner
LikeLike
It’s extremely difficult to comprehend large numbers. I used to tell my students this: The U.S. debt is 32.55 trillion dollars. So, how big is a trillion? Think of it this way. A million seconds is the number of seconds in 1.67 WEEKS. A trillion seconds is the number of seconds in 31,709.79 YEARS.
LikeLike
Bob: we may not be alone, but people still feel that way. Sometimes they want to be left alone.
I am concerned about all those aliens wanting to come here.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wouldn’t fret if I were you, Roy.
https://wordpress.com/post/bobshepherdonline.wordpress.com/1030
LikeLike
Oops. Here’s the link:
LikeLike
And this:
LikeLike
When I look at the likes of Matt Gaetz, Jim Jordan, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and Donald Trump, I’m worried about the aliens that are already here. And I start thinking that it would be a great thing if one day we developed intelligent life on Earth.
LikeLike
Tat tvam asi
LikeLike
Yes
LikeLike
For years, and all the time when I was teaching, Mamie, I wore a bracelet that read
Tat tvam asi
Sing me frumsceaft
LikeLike
Jai Bhagwan
LikeLike
Jai Jai Ma
LikeLike
🙂
LikeLike
There are more stars in the heavens than there are grains of sand on all the beaches on the earth.“
At high tide or low tide?
LikeLike
All grains, anywhere. In the ocean, in the beaches, on Biden’s butt on the beach, anywhere.
LikeLike
Well, Joe said on beaches, so it might matter how one defines “beach” .
Also, how small a grain are we talking about here?
If you included grains of sand down to the size of individual silicon dioxide molecules, there would be a lot more grains than if you just included micrometer size grains or larger.
LikeLike
Good point! I think we’ve been talking about average sand grain size, but, . . .
Click to access RFeynman_plentySpace.pdf
LikeLike
OK. Had to look this up.
sand grain: 0.0625 (or 1⁄16) to 2 millimeters
silt: >0.0625 mm
Ofc geologists have a system for this! HAAA!
LikeLike
That number of sand grains comparison seems pretty useless anyway.
Might as well just say “There are more stars than even Carl Sagan could imagine”
LikeLiked by 1 person
HAAAA!!!! perfect
yeah, a lot more than billions and billions!!!!!
LikeLike
I know, or strongly suspect, that you would know that beautiful paper by Feynman, SomeDAM, but some others here might not yet know it.
LikeLike
My window silt is much bigger than .0625”
Just saying.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LOL. Take it up with the USGS. They decide this shite.
LikeLike
I took something up with a geologist once.
Never again.
I was very gneiss but the geologist treated me like schist.
LikeLiked by 1 person
His fault. Chalk it up to his being beneath your stratum.
LikeLike
I was very gneiss but the geologist treated me like schist.
I freaking love that.
LikeLike
haaaa!
LikeLike
I should have expected as much.
No matter how it starts out, a discussion with a geologist inevitably turns to schist.
LikeLike
And while a conversation between an astronomer and a geologist might start out on a Sirius note, it too will inevitably turn to schist.
LikeLike
Cake is in attendance at weddings and birthdays and Quinceañeras, but Pisces more holidays.
LikeLike
Can you see the Plowman constellation from the Northern Hemisphere? You bet your Boötess.
LikeLike
Boötes
LikeLike
And then there is the Amazonian cocktail made from two parts pisco and one part Betelgeuse with a dash of Castor oil.
LikeLike
On today’s Now Your’re Cooking with Bob, pie crusts: doing pyrite, and doing pywrong.
LikeLike
Worked up in the Yukon Territory for a while, cutting saplings to make spars for boats. A couple jacks would come behind me, picking up the feldspars.
LikeLike
Schist Talk
No matter how it starts
The talk will turn to schist
Geologist imparts
His expertise on this
LikeLiked by 1 person
Seems like the world would be much better if we stopped naming things after people. Or corporations.
There comes a time when no one even remembers that a name originally came from a person, let alone what that person did or didn’t do. But it’s divisive, and unnecessary.
I recall how weird it was when cities in the Soviet Union that I learned about (Leningrad, Stalingrad) suddenly got their old names back. I don’t recall any outrage.
There is no longer a Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton. So what? So many colleges and universities and museums and music spaces keep naming buildings after donors. That should stop.
What happened to imagination and creativity? Or if it must be a name, just pick a random last name. Smith Hall. Zhang Center. Perez Telescope. Musa University. Maybe someone prominent will share that name, and someone living in poverty will, too. But it will just be a random name not associated with any particular person.
LikeLike
lol Climate change. Go look up HAARP which was used to cause a massive earthquake in Turkey. The government can control the weather. The climate hoax is 30 trillion dollar sham job. Insane listen to a brat named Greta .
LikeLike
Josh, you are very stupid. Go get an education.
LikeLike
Is there any one of these lunatic conspiracy theories that you DON’T believe in, Josh? HAARP causes earthquakes! Bigfoot photographed piloting space laser! LMAO.
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/environment/a42827842/turkey-earthquake-haarp-conspiracy-theory/
LikeLike
It’s true. The government does control the weather. Yes, Marjorie Taylor Green was right, the government has gazpacho police armed with space lasers to shoot the clouds. The government has the power to control everything, Josh. Everything… Watch out, Josh!!! THE GOVERNMENT CONTROLS YOUR MIND, JOSH! It is the government MAKING you think that climate change is a hoax. It’s a conspiracy! Break free, Josh, be free of government control! Don’t be sheeple! Change the way you think Believe in science. It’s the only way!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LikeLike
It’s too late, LCT. Once you have had the Covid vaccine nanochip injected into you, it’s all over. You are like one of those ants invaded and taken over by a fungus, or like those poor people in Invasion of the Body Snatchers, which, ofc, was based on TRUE EVENTS that THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO KNOW!!!
LikeLike
This just in:
Marjorie Taylor Green controls weather. Story inside!
LikeLike
One of my ants (my dads sister) was taken over by a fungus (psilocybin, to be specific) and she was never normal again.
Lots of fun to visit though.
LikeLike
Actually, we are all living in a Matrix type simulation so in a very real virtual sense, the government — or at least a 35 year old computer gamer sitting in his underwear in his parents basement — does control our mind.
LikeLike
I love climate change I believe in it too, just like wearing masks in cars and wonderful vaccines that save me from .4% dying yay.
LikeLike
sigh
LikeLike
.4% dying
Must be a terrible way to go.
LikeLike
I’ve heard 100% dying is the worst.
No chance of being revived.
LikeLike
I read about .4% dying and I think: Huh? Oh, being eaten by piranhas. Chomp, 0.4%. Chomp, 0.8%. Chomp, 1.2%. Chomp, . . .
LikeLike
Anyone who doesn’t see the impact of climate change in the increasing incidences of wildfires, hurricanes, heat dome over the South and SW, unprecedented flooding in Vermont, is an idiot.
LikeLike
Yeah, sadly, pretty much
LikeLike
One of the amazing astronomical factoids that always amazed me, amongst many, is the supergiant star Betelgeuse:
Betelgeuse is a red supergiant star roughly 764 times as large as the Sun. For comparison, the diameter of Mars’s orbit around the Sun is 328 times the Sun’s diameter.
In other words, if Betelgeuse were hollow, you could fit the sun and the planets out to Mars, in orbit, inside of the supergiant.
LikeLike
The September 17, 2017 episode of Science Friday, a radio program, has a piece on collecting micrometeorites from rooftops. Anyone can collect micrometeorites. Some meteorites that have not been highly processed have unaltered literal stardust. Our rooftops have mostly solar system dust, but if a carbonaceous chondrite ever falls on one’s land, one could separate out the pre solar stardust grains.
LikeLike
!!!!!
LikeLike
LikeLike
I’ve recently come to the conclusion that beauty and wonder is path out of the irrationalism pervading our politics and society. Beauty we can find in nature, at our parks and museums, in art and a child’s smile. Beauty, sustained long enough, that redirects the brain’s neuro-circuitry away from destructive, divisive impulses towards those that protect and preserve. The Webb telescope is more than just a Big Science project, but a wonder of cognitive science that uplifts us all.
LikeLike
R. Bruce Tuttle,
I agree with you: beauty, wonder, and art are paths out of our current politics and society. But if we turn away from the struggle for power, our society will be controlled by people who take control of beauty and art and turn them into instruments of government control. That’s what happened in Germany in the 1930s. Any art that offended the powerful was banned as “degenerate.”
LikeLike
I agree, Diane. Power – and who gets it when, where and to what purpose – is the reality we must deal with. But my (implied you may say) point is what a world without power-hungry irrationalism could look like and how we might sustain it. The role of aesthetics (beauty and wonder) is one key element. A much bigger one wold be promoting empathy and the critical role it would play in combating the anti-democratic authoritarianism of today’s Radical Right.
PS: The 1934 Nazi degenerate art exhibition backfired on them as it exposed many ordinary Germans to modernist art who took to liking it!
LikeLike
But if we turn away from the struggle for power, our society will be controlled by people who take control of beauty and art and turn them into instruments of government control.
Listen to this woman. These are the words of a compassionate warrior.
xoxoxoxoxoxo
LikeLike
that uplifts us all.
Yes
LikeLike
Power is the game we must contend with, I get that. But a struggle without a dream of the future after is not worth the struggle. As an old socialist once said, the fight for justice begins with beautiful dream…
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s beautiful, Mr Tuttle. Agreed!
LikeLike
awwwww Diane, watch co-founder of the weather channel go on cnn and expose the fraud.
https://www.cnn.com/videos/bestoftv/2014/11/01/global-warming-storm-at-weather-channel.cnn
https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/warmington-cops-suspect-arson-caused-wildfire-in-at-least-one-part-of-quebec
https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2023/06/08/danielle-smith-is-concerned-about-arsonists-causing-wildfires-experts-are-more-worried-about-misinformation.html
LikeLike
Josh. Josh. Josh.
Coleman is not a scientist. LMAO. He has a freaking journalism bachelor’s degree and read the weather on TV and then, with others, started a weather channel. So, his “science expertise” is precisely equivalent to, say, Vanna White’s.
LikeLike
omg its climate change…… no its arson making you want to believe its climate change
https://apnews.com/article/california-deadly-forest-fire-arson-arrest-a134175f355c70edf906d5ec3209f58c
LikeLike
Josh,
What evidence would convince you that there is human caused global warming? This is a very important question for the future of the planet.
LikeLike
Ideologues are immune to evidence.
LikeLike
But it would be interesting to hear an answer to that. LOL.
Sean Hannity or Tucker Carlson said it was real? No, probably not. It would probably require the Orange Idiot himself, to say that human-caused global warming is real, as in,
“People call me up, they say, you know more about the science than these so-called scientists do. And they’re right. Nobody knows science like Trump. I had an uncle. Big league scientist. MIT. Good genes. You want to stop these wildfires? These heat waves? I could do it in one day. One day.”
LikeLike
Al Gore predicted over 20 years ago, we would be underwater. Greta said this year was it for us. Why don’t we have 13 months 28 days a month, which is what works best with the planet, then 12 months 28 days 30 here 31 here makes no sense. You are the same people whom believe electric cars are greener and better for the planet, another lie.
https://gript.ie/nobel-laureate-climate-science-has-metastasized-into-massive-shock-journalistic-pseudoscience/
LikeLike
I earned 2 master’s by the time I was 26, nobody here did that lol.
LikeLike
Josh, why don’t you ever provide evidence for the crazy discredited conspiracy theories you post here? Did you get your two masters’ at an online university?
LikeLike
Master Baiter
With Masters in baiting
And trolling the web
Josh was just waiting
To bait on James Webb
LikeLike
debunked
https://www.cnn.com/videos/bestoftv/2014/11/01/global-warming-storm-at-weather-channel.cnn
LikeLike
Coleman has an undergraduate degree in journalism. Period. He is NOT a scientist.
Sorry.
LikeLike
Coleman apparently never learned that weather and climate are two different beasts.
By the way, what is it about Colemen that makes them weigh in on things they know nothing about?
LikeLike
HAAA!
Donald Trump actually said, “Climate change is just weather.”
LikeLike
“I believe that there’s a change in weather, and I think it changes both ways. Don’t forget, it used to be called global warming. That wasn’t working. Then it was called climate change. Now it’s actually called extreme weather — because with extreme weather, you can’t miss. –Donald Trump on a morning talk show discussing his talk with Prince Charles about climate change.
LikeLike
Trump change is chump change” — SomeDAM Poet
LikeLike
yup; it is wholly sufficient to buy chumps by the million
LikeLike
So, Coleman was a guy who stood up in front of a camera and read the weather before he went into business with others who actually knew something about weather. So, this is like holding up Vanna White as a climate expert. LMAO.
LikeLike