Jeremy Mohler is communications director for the nonpartisan organization “In the Public Interest,” which fights the privatization of public goods and services. This article draws a link between policies of privatization and the rise of rightwing populism
He writes:
It’s one sentence in a 1,244-word article, but it made me pause and think deeply.
The article is a guest essay in the New York Times about the rise of Sweden’s far-right political party, which was created out of a neo-Nazi group and resembles the increasingly Trumpian Republican Party with its hatred of immigrants, journalists, and others.
The sentence: “Once one of the most economically equal countries in the world, Sweden has seen the privatization of hospitals, schools and care homes, leading to a notable rise in inequality and a sense of profound loss.”
That makes me wonder: How much has privatization contributed to soaring far-right populism, white nationalism, and fascism in the U.S.?
In Sweden, argues journalist and author Elisabeth Asbrink, high levels of political and economic inequality leaves people looking for answers to why they’re suffering and who is to blame—and far right leaders are happy to provide them.
“It was better in the good old days, [those leaders] say, and people believe them,” Asbrink writes. “Back to red cottages and apple trees, to law and order, to women being women and men being men.”
Sound familiar?
As we have documented, the privatization of public schools, water, and other public goods increases inequality. Government contractors create new fees for things like delinquent tax payments and probation. They lower wages and benefits for workers. Privatization also has helped shred crucial parts of the social safety net, like Medicaid.
Scholars have argued along these lines for some time now. “Neoliberalism creates a failed democracy,” says cultural critic Henry A. Giroux, “and in doing so, opens up the fascists’ use of fear and terror to transform a state of exception into a state of emergency.”
But I think it’s important to highlight the role of privatization—something embraced by both parties for the past 40 or so years.
A Democratic candidate for governor of Pennsylvania, Josh Shapiro, recently endorsed private school vouchers, which would take public money from the state’s lowest funded public schools and give it to private schools.
Like privately operated charter schools, private school vouchers might help some students, but they leave most of the others behind in public schools starving for resources.
Conservatives have long pushed for such privatization schemes, and Democrats have too often joined them. Meanwhile, America’s far too many underfunded schools continue to suffer—with policies like charter schools and vouchers only making things worse.
And we wonder why “Make America Great Again” resonates with so many people.

Populism, i.e., fascism
LikeLike
GOPopulism
LikeLike
GOPerdition
LikeLike
Populism should not equal fascism.
“a political approach that strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups.”
Well it would seem that one does not have to be fascist to admit that there is some reason to agree that the concerns of “the people ” (tough to define) are all too often disregarded . ie. Gilens and Page .
Click to access gilens_and_page_2014_-testing_theories_of_american_politics.doc.pdf
So no doubt seeds are planted by a perceived decline in living standards whether real or not . Not that many have not seen a decline. But are these the same people who have flocked to fascist appeals.
An accountant married to the highest paid teachers or highest paid cops in the country living in Commack Long Island ranting about CRT or un-docummented immigrants while those immigrants do their pristine lawns; is not in economic decline.
As Lofgren said about Ohio .
“But a vulgar Marxist economic determinism only brings us so far.”
LikeLike
Yes, I know the various dictionary definitions, but it’s rather evident that the word is now current as a journalistic euphemism for what is clearly and rabidly fascism — demagogues pandering to the prejudices and delusions of a relatively small percentage of the population which has no respect for the democratic principles endorsed by the greater majority of the People. That is how fascists work to impose the will of the few on the real populists.
LikeLike
One disturbing connection between privatization and inequality emerges in changes in pedagogy. As inequality grows, so too do different pedagogies for the poor and for the rich: Success Academy defends the rigid, constraining and punitive pedagogy of its schools by arguing that poor kids need structure, discipline, and restricted curriculum, while Horace Mann and other private schools for the rich emphasize individual growth, permissive cultures, rich and varied curriculum (the arts, travel, sports), faculties unencumbered by self-defeating state education regulations, small class size, and private, elite college preferential admissions standards. The consequence of these pedagogical changes? These changes reinforce the inequalities that set these differences in motion in the first place.
This change is no accident: conservatives believe most kids are not worth generous expenditures on education because, well, most kids are losers, and not worth serious public support (just as most people do not deserve good public hospitals or well tended roads and reliable garbage collection and dependable energy). Now that they have power they are creating the inequalities they claim are natural and God given.
LikeLike
And as a Global Phenomena, we see the Privatization Movement’s Perks & Private Accommodations.
PRIVATE meaning Away From Prying Public Eyes.
No Transparency. Financially Lucrative. Ripe for the Propaganda PR Spin.
Example From London England.
No Wonder The Russian Oligarchs Made Out Like Bandits In the UK.
The New Chief Of Staff For PM Liz Truss is Mark Fullbrook.
He goes to work for UK Citizens but he doesn’t go on the Government payroll.
Instead, he pays himself through his own Lobbying Company!
It is all legit and easy on his income tax pocketbook.
It is also a Solid Shield Workaround protecting whatever he/they are really up to.
Fullbrook Strategies is his company.
A Very British Coup.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/sep/25/liz-truss-chief-of-staff-mark-fullbrook-paid-via-lobbying-firm-in-potential-tax-saving-move
LikeLike
When bank presidents start helping write speeches for presidents, be alarmed. Be very alarmed.
LikeLike
The Shapiro news is terribly troubling. Continuing evidence the the establishment of the Democratic Party is clueless when it comes to education and another reason why Democrats aren’t dominating the current political landscape despite the existence of a radical Republican Party.
LikeLike
If Democrats don’t offer actual alternatives to right-wing policies, they lose, and the Pugs take it all.
LikeLike
Sadly they have offered alternatives . You might argue that they have not been successful in achieving those alternatives. Or that those alternatives never went far enough. But why is that? Take the Pro Act as an example . It is a given that if the Bill actually had a chance of passing the Senate it may never have passed the House. Or if it looked liked Schumer had a chance of passing it with 50 rather than 60 votes instead of Warner and Sinema being the only 2 Democratic holdouts there would be a half dozen more. That still leaves an overwhelming majority of Democrats in both Houses who support the Bill with no Republicans in the Senate and only 5 BS artist Republicans in the house. Who also supported the Bill because it would not become law. So who should face the wrath of the working class the Majority of Democrats who support the working class or the Republicans who since Taft Hartley in 1947 have voted almost exclusively against the interests of workers. Republicans who in State after State have passed anti Union Right to Work Laws.And restrictions on Unions . How does a Jim Jordan get elected by working class Ohioans. How does a Red for Ed Teacher marching in protest state that he supports “Republicans but”. Did Granny suddenly turn into the big bad wolf or was he always the wolf .
What should happen in this election is that every Republican that did not support working class friendly policies should be booted. That they wont be is not because of any economic issues .
LikeLike
good points, all, Joel
LikeLike
Fascists always promise a return to a mythical golden age (make X great again), once the “enemies within” are eliminated.
LikeLike
Privatization, free trade, deregulation, no trust busting, no welfare but corporate welfare, union and wage suppression, over-criminalizing and devastating penalizing, technocracy, and fig leaf leaders al contributed to opening the door for scapegoating.
LikeLike
Chili is another example, depending on who you listen to.
“How Chile Successfully Transformed Its Economy” – Heritage Foundation 2006
https://www.heritage.org/international-economies/report/how-chile-successfully-transformed-its-economy
“How Pinochet’s economic model led to the current crisis engulfing Chile” – The Guardian 2019
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/oct/30/pinochet-economic-model-current-crisis-chile
LikeLike
Yet Chileans rejected a new Constitution this year .
LikeLike
Yes, 2-1 against, in a vote taken just 3 wks ago. But 80% voted previously in favor of drafting a new constitution; all political leaders and public agree new constitution needed. So it’s back to the drawing board. Leaders of rejection campaign agree to join negotiations on next draft. New (presumably more center-left [vs ultra-progressive]) cabinet members already in place.
Reuters called the rejected proposal “what would have been one of the world’s most progressive charters.” I gather one of the most controversial aspects was declaring Chile a plurinational state, establishing autonomous indigenous territories.
LikeLike
bethree5
There in is the problem with favor-ability polls ,calls for Constitutional Conventions and polls that ask general questions on what concerns voters.
Not until the proposal was detailed did we see it rejected 2 to 1 . It is speculation as to why. However we will not be so lucky as to have a referendum, if God forbid we have a constitutional convention .
LikeLike
Well, duh, this has been the sought-for outcome of the Neoliberal Project and its “libertarian” progenitors from 50 years ago. “Too much democracy,” and an “excess of democracy” in the 60s and early 70s threatened the free enterprise system a la Orwell via Emmanuel Goldstein: War Is Peace, Ignorance Is Strength. Enter Eugene B. Sydnor, Lewis Powell, and “nuclear” economist Milton Friedman to detonate the Keynesian economic way. Not that that system was working either but it gave America the “too much” and “excess” of the Baby Boomers who were all too eager to exploit what St. Ronnie, their avowed enemy from the Berkeley days, was selling them in 1980. From hippie to Me to yuppie.
LikeLike
Hey, hey, hey– not the same people. Hippies were early end of Boomers, Me-gen late end. I’ve never quite figured out who to blame yuppies on, but surely they were younger than me… 😉
LikeLike
YAVOMMM
Yet Another Victim Of Mainscream Media Mythology
LikeLike
Same thing going on in the UK. (This is satire, not a real MP.)
LikeLike
That can’t be real. Sadly it probably is. Worse she was elected by somebody. And the rest I dare not put on line.
LikeLike
It’s satire, she’s a comedian.
LikeLike
Well considering the cast of characters around these days in the US and elsewhere ; I don’t feel too bad about having gotten this wrong.
LikeLike
Oh the irony-
One of the network morning programs quoted a Harvard School of Education faculty member in a segment about the value of climate change instruction in public schools. HSE was a leader in privatization which delivered tax dollars to the schools of churches that are GOP and Koch network aligned. Those schools will probably avoid the instruction about fossil fuels. HSE, a self-appointed public policy advocate, works at counter purposes – expected.
LikeLike