Eve Blad wrote in Education Week about where Miguel Cardona, Biden’s choice for Secretary of Education, stands on the issues:
On reopening schools during the pandemic: He favors in-person instruction, but has not mandated it. He recommends face masks.
“We all know remote learning will never replace the classroom experience,” Cardona wrote in a November opinion piece published in the Connecticut Mirror. “We also know that the health and safety of our students, staff, and their families must be the primary consideration when making decisions about school operations. The two are not mutually exclusive.”
Charter Schools: He has not taken a strong position for or against charter schools, but the state board has not approved any new charters since he took office in August 2019.
“Charter schools provide choice for parents that are seeking choice, so I think it’s a viable option, but [neighborhood schools] that’s going to be the core work that not only myself but the people behind me in the agency that I represent will have while I’m commissioner,” he said during his state confirmation hearing.
During the campaign, Biden promised to stop federal funding of for-profit charters, a small segment of the industry. Charter advocates are pleased that he is not an opponent, but progressive groups are wary because charters drain funding from neighborhood schools. [My note: Connecticut has only 21 charter schools, including the no-excuses Achievement First, three of whose charters are on probation because of their harsh disciplinary methods. This action was taken last February, while Cardona was state chief.]
High-stakes testing: Before he was selected, Cardona made clear that he wants to resume annual testing this spring.
In a Dec. 7 memo, the agency said the state would conduct testing as planned this year, even as some schools remain closed for in-person learning and others are dealing with the fallout of interrupted schooling.
“State tests are the most accurate guideposts to our promise of equity for ALL,” that memo said.
The state plans to assess all students and report the data, but it will not use students’ test scores or to identify schools that need improvement, the guidance said.
[My note: Please, someone, tell Dr. Cardona that testing does not produce equity. Tell him about Finland, where there is no high-stakes standardized testing, and every school is a good school. Tell him that Finland aimed for equity and got excellence. Give him a copy of Pasi Sahlberg’s book Finnish Lessons 2.0, or the Doyle-Sahlberg book Let the Children Play. Tell him that test scores report gaps but do not close them. Tell him that the high-performing nations of the world do NOT test every student every year. Do not waste hundreds of millions of dollars on standardized testing. Teachers should write their own tests, because they can test what they taught and get rapid feedback about what students learned.]
English Learners and Students of Color:
Cardona wrote his doctoral dissertation on closing the achievement gap between English-language learner students and their peers.
As a Latino American and former English-language learner himself, he has said he relates to students of color and those who speak other languages at home.
(My note: These statements show he cares but it says nothing about what he will do.)
Teachers and Unions Cardona worked well with teachers and unions and will help Biden collaborate with the two big teachers’ unions, who were major supporters of his campaign. After four years of DeVos and eight contentious years with Arne Duncan and John King, the unions are looking forward to having a good relationship with Cardona.
Love your “notes.”
It’s my understanding that most members of the teachers’ unions were behind Bernie. Leadership chose Biden with faulty voting that upset members (some who claimed they were never notified TO vote) in hopes of being chosen for that cherry position.
The teacher unions took NO position on candidates and only endorsed Biden after other candidates dropped out
False: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/14/national-education-association-endorses-joe-biden-129794
Yes, this happened yet again: rank-&-file members were never surveyed/asked &, surely, most were pro-Bernie. This was a replay of 2016, except that the leadership of both unions early-endorsed HRC (like they early endorsed Obama in both 2008 & 2012). This is the craw in my throat RE: Lily & Randy. The rank-&-file IS the union. The leaders aren’t necessarily elected by members–it’s as bad as national or local politics–their “elections” become forgone conclusions. What happened in 2016 was why I quit the NEA (as a retiree: I would never quit a union while an active, & our union locals were particularly strong, w/excellent leaders–who were really elected!
But–I’m sure you all remember that, in 2016–a number of state EAs
(outstanding, the MA Ed. Assn, & their great leader, Barbara Madeloni–sp.–?) protested what amounted to both the NEA’s & the
AFT’s “coronation” of Hillary. &…good for them!
& Dienne is correct: Bernie was still in the race. If not for the covid epidemic, the Dem primaries were a rerun of 2016.
WE.WERE.NEVER.ASKED.
(Oh, wait, 2 wks. before the IL Dem Primary, the IEA did do a survey…the results of which were never made public, even though some of us tried to find out. So, our assumption was/still is that the rank-&-file voted for Bernie.)
The teachers and constituents of major union leaders have very little say in who the union endorses, unfortunately. The unions are anything but very democratic. The members are; the leadership, by-laws, and power structure within are NOT!
Diane, any way you can meet with Secretary Cardona?
This is devoutly to be wished!
“State tests are the most accurate guideposts to our promise of equity for ALL,”
Like the magic market that has been preached to a generation of MBAs. testing as “equity” has been a false tenet of bilingual education for the past twenty years. Testing has nothing to do with equity. In fact, unfair testing is harmful and useless. All forms of testing are simply a means to measure. Measurement does not improve outcomes for students. Formative testing in the right hands can be extremely useful and diagnostic if it informs instruction. Standardized summative testing merely tells teachers and districts whose family has money, and whose family is poor. Dr. Cardona needs to do some homework.
BTW Here’s a link to the Democracy Now program featuring Diane’s comments on the appointment of Dr. Miguel Cardona. She also talks about charter schools in Connecticut. https://www.democracynow.org/2020/12/23/miguel_cardona_education_secretary
Thanks, RT. As usual, Diane was magnificent! And it was so lovely to see these two wonderful women, Amy Goodman and Diane Ravitch, on a program together!
Thank you so much for posting this, RT! I was not able to tune in this morning.
I am crazy ’bout that gal. She’s got somethin’ important to say!
Thanks for posting! I turned on the show at midnight, but didn’t want to watch the depressing headlines & slog through the first story which, I believe, was about the coronavirus, so was able to watch just this segment.
Conn is where Stefan Pryor came from. Scandals under him that forced him to get out of the education business and be the economic development go-fer for RI’s Wall St governor raimondo. I will reserve judgment and see what he does once in office. Look at the past Democrat Sec. of Educations…Arne Duncan for one, appointed by Obama.. I remember at one point the Obama administration’s relationship with the national teachers unions became so toxic that the unions called for the resignation of former education secretary Arne Duncan. Let’s hope there is not a repeat performance of an disappointing appointment!
“State tests are the most accurate guideposts to our promise of equity for ALL,” that memo said.
Not so, as you and so many others who are well-informed know.
That statement is utter nonsense, ofc.
Dear Secretary Cardona: https://bobshepherdonline.wordpress.com/2020/03/19/why-we-need-to-end-high-stakes-standardized-testing-now/
Not everything school-related is coming up roses in Finland:
“Reading was an area where the Pisa tests flagged a worrying decline in student performance. Jaakko Salo, a development manager with teachers’ union OAJ, noted that the proportion of excellent readers has remained steady for 10 years. However, the number of poor readers identified in the Pisa tests has doubled over the same period. He said these students simply don’t get enough support in school.
National education studies have shown that immigrant pupils lag behind their Finnish peers at school. Salo said that while this is true for many Nordic countries, Finland performs worse in this area than neighbouring Sweden, Denmark and Norway. He said the system needs to provide these learners with more support.”
https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/time_out_what_happened_to_finlands_education_miracle/11160051
PISA is a sham.
Okay–so help me make sense of this. Finland does no standardized testing. And PISA is a “sham”. So exactly how do we know Finland is doing such a great job, so great that we should emulate them? What is the metric we’re using to judge Finland’s success?
Did you read Sahlberg’s books?
All recent immigrants whose native language is different from the language spoken in the new homeland will lag behind the students in the homeland until the newcomers master the new language. For most people we are talking about five to seven years. Additionally, if the students come from war torn nations such as Syria, there may be academic lags and emotional issues to overcome. They need time and support, not standardized tests.
Finland was surprised when it ranked at the top of PISA in 2010. Finnish educators don’t care about standardized tests or PISA rankings. They care about the health and well-being of children.
I visited Finland in 2011 and no one mentioned test scores. They showed off their arts programs, plays, performances. Three free meals a day for those who want them. Medical care for all children. Finland was recently ranked “the happiest country in the world.”For the THIRD YEAR IN A ROW. We were #18.
https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/finland-happiest-country-united-nations-world-happiness-report-a9414201.html
Would you rather be a child here or in “the happiest country in the world”?
So just to be clear: We will measure the success of Finland’s schools based on the “health and well-being of children”? And that’s it? Anything else to take into consideration as we make our schools more like Finland’s?
Snarky! Okay. So, you like harming kids? That can’t be good. Do not hurt the health and wellbeing of the children! And no, no, no, we do not want to measure the success of Finland’s schools. That would be dumb. When we evaluate something as complex as education, we need to use our ability to observe instead of the blunt, inaccurate, myopic tools of standardized tests. We are smarter than that. Also, I really want to help you make sense of all this, but I cannot help you if you do not do the reading. This course is for people who do their homework. Snarky enough for you?
Health and well-being is so overrated.
Yeah, along with nutrition.
Finland, by the way, did well on the 2018 PISA according to the data from the OECD. It had the best reading scores of any of the nordic countries. Denmark’s math scores were slightly higher. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA-results_ENGLISH.png
And the Finns don’t care about scores.
Well, if you knew how horrible the record of the Finnish national soccer team was, you’d understand why they don’t care about scores! Sorry, for my few soccer aficionados out there, I couldn’t resist. But seriously, I’ve only been there twice in my life and the abiding memory I have is the widespread sense of civic virtue–a genuine love of country (neither patriotism or jingoism)–and joyful seriousness about life and each other that every person I met had.
PISA like all standardized tests are chock full of onto-epistemological errors and falsehoods (as shown by Wilson) that using the results for anything is completely invalid, or as Wilson says “vain and illusory.”
“What is the metric we’re using to judge Finland’s success?”
There are no valid metrics for that comparison. Never have been and never will be.
Why do you feel a need to compare invalid metrics?
Wait a minute. Your post proves the point that testing only identifies the more privileged students. Immigant children coming into finland will not score as well as native Finns. Beside the fact that they probalby are not occupying well paying professions, they probably don’t speak the language either.
cx: immigrant, Finland, probably
Is it obvious that I did not proofread?
https://bobshepherdonline.wordpress.com/2020/03/19/why-we-need-to-end-high-stakes-standardized-testing-now/
PISA scores? “PISA feeds into an over reliance on standardized tests and an emphasis on learning that can be easily measured and, some experts say, has major flaws with how the tests are administered, how samples of students are determined, and how some of the test questions are constructed”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2019/12/03/expert-how-pisa-created-an-illusion-education-quality-marketed-it-world/
It sounds like you are saying there may be an issue with supporting English language learners and immigrants rather than the system itself?
Just came out and I do not agree with Biden’s pick for education and I said earlier I reserve judgment as to whether this candidate is the right one to represent public education- many schools are not ready for in person learning-he is following Trump’s way- put all children in a in-person school… Biden education secretary pick bucks school shutdowns: ‘No substitute for in-classroom learning’ https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/dec/23/bidens-education-secretary-bucks-school-shutdowns-/?utm_source=Boomtrain&utm_medium=manual&utm_campaign=newsalert&utm_content=newsalert&utm_term=newsalert&bt_ee=86r1WA368BlU0x53job0Lred%2FFul2RFXx2QUhS07nVyjxlJfaLg3Z9F1lT%2BNfRXV&bt_ts=1608755371317
This is a link to the Washington Times, a very right wing newspaper.
There are certainly issues that Cardona can be criticized on or that I disagree with, but he is not following Trump’s way at all.
Pushing for in person schooling during a once in a hundred years epidemic is what the tRump has been pushing. So maybe “he is not following Trump’s way at all”, but he sure is heading towards the same disaster as the tRump, taking the same highway.
Duane,
I disagree. Don’t you remember Carol Burris talking about the importance of re-opening schools, too? She is nothing like Trump. Trump just wanted everyone to pretend the pandemic wasn’t happening. More thoughtful people were considering the benefits and the dangers and trying to figure out a balance. Even if they were (arguably) wrong, they were trying to make policy for the right reasons.
Trump only made policy based on himself. Not at all the same.
And Carol Burris was wrong also, as were all those who insisted on in person learning.
“Even if they were (arguably) wrong, they were trying to make policy for the right reasons.
Trump only made policy based on himself. Not at all the same.”
Intentions mean squat. Don’t care a bit about intentions. What is the result of those “good intentions” in this case? A huge increase in the number of deaths and serious illnesses caused by Covid. And that’s acceptable to you because they had “good intentions”?
Everyone has good intentions (except the tRump who has the bigliest great intentions or is that the greatest bigly intentions?). Hell, Kyle Rittenhouse had good intentions, at least that is what his supporters say. Would you like more examples of when good intentions have resulted in death and destruction?
Very few act with bad intent.
Sounds like Cardona will not have an “aggressive” agenda, will leave decisions to the states, namely, charter schools, testing, etc, more interest increasing numbers of teachers of color, culturally relevant sustaining education, community colleges, college debt relief, Title IX, suspension rates, etc.
The stimulus Bill awaiting presidential signature triples Title I $$, will the regulations on the use of the $$ change?
Expect a low profile Secty ….the action may be in Congress
He and Biden have both made it clear that they will worry about a) student loan forgiveness, b) fixing the insane inequities we have in the funding of our schools, c) protecting people from sexual assault on campus, d) making sure that special needs children have the resources they need.
Very pleased to have people telling us, up front, that those are the items on their agenda!
What a relief after Ditzy DeVoid!
Cardona will probably be low key and much better than DeVos. At least he believes in public schools. Cardona seems deeply involved with on-line learning as Laura has noted. I hope he doesn’t turn the federal slush fund into a cyber slush fund in the name of ‘innovation.’
Here is Diane’s interview on DEMOCRACY NOW re: Cardona.
https://www.democracynow.org/2020/12/23/miguel_cardona_education_secretary?utm_source=Democracy+Now%21&utm_campaign=652405343a-Daily_Digest_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_fa2346a853-652405343a-192272069
Thank you, Diane.
Diane is sooooooo well prepared in this. The difference between the typical talking head and someone who actually knows what she’s talking about.
A-fucking-men! (In case you didn’t see my comment on another post, I’m enjoying this.) You so correct (no one I respect is ever Right). It pains me that the everyone in the nation does not understand these issues as clearly as Diane can present them.
Yes. And it’s frustrating to understand the discrepancy between the two (a typical talking head and Diane). If I was not a subscriber of this blog – I may be more hopeful about the new of the pick for Secretary of Ed. A colleague sent me a text celebrating the pick because on the surface, and in relation to DeVos, it seems exciting. But I am reluctant to think we will have the deep meaningful change and paradigm shift that is necessary.
Don’t be down. Cardona is a good and decent man. He’s replacing a witch.
We have to keep the pressure on. Ending the federal standardized testing mandate needs to be a top priority. It’s extraordinarily wasteful and worse than useless because of the attendant distortions of curricula and pedagogy.
He did NOT work well with unions during this pandemic and continually pressed for 100% in during dangerous times. Ask CEA. Call Jeff Leake, CEA president. Cardona has not been a friend to teachers through the at all.
:-(. So upsetting.
I just visited the Connecticut Department of Education website.
The testing schedule shows how much time is put into standardized tests from the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium and other standards-aligned tests. It show how test-centric this state is.
I then looked at the “Re-imagining Education” pitch on behalf of personalized learning and research-based practice.
In the pdf below, I found thick jargon about student-centered, mastery-based learning and a clear devotion to a particular “Leap Innovations Framework.” That framework is pushed as if the one and only way to think about “continuous improvement” in education. On the last page of this pdf a few references are provided. Two are for insights from the Clayton Christensen folks who think only about disruptive innovation.
Along the way I passed a visual based on tech lobbyist Ken Kay’s 21st Century Learning Skills, the four “C’s.” In other words, someone in the upper administration of the State Department of Education is all in for heavily marketed and external management schemes.
I then looked at the Leap Innovations website. The founder and CEO of this Chicago-based organization, Phyllis Lockett, is described as a serial entrepreneur. “Before starting LEAP, (she) was a driving force behind Chicago’s charter movement. As founding president and CEO of New Schools for Chicago, she helped raise more than $70 million to support opening 80 new public (sic) schools. Her work more than tripled the number of charter schools and drove Chicago’s first magnet school replication.”
At the 2020 Leap Innovation Conference, Phyllis Lockett joined John B. King Jr. in a fireside chat, King is now President and CEO of The Education Trust and Former U.S. Secretary of Education. A recording of that session is available, but his presence at a conference of cheerleaders for mastery-based personalized learning and whole school reform for continuous improvement (breathe) is not a reason to be cheerful about how the Connecticut Department of Education is “reimagining” education. https://www.leapinnovations.org
No big surprise, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative gave $14 million to scale up the Leap Innovations formula for education. Early funding in 2014 at $1.1 million came from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation followed the next year by another $5.1 million Gates grant. Altogether about $15.5 million was available for starting this tech-centric program of “whole school reform.”
This is to say that the Connecticut Department of Education has been sold and has bought a jargon-filled vision for education marketed by the long-standing and still standing would-be reformers who have fantasies about “managing” education absent any skill is doing so.
Leap Innovation research studies mainly rely on test scores in math and reading to show marginal improvements.
I hope someone will engage Dr. Miguel Cardona in some discussion of Connecticut’s reimagining school effort and especially the state’s apparent recent adoption of the Leap Innovations Framework.
Thanks for the excellent research.
Maybe Cadona needs a special assistant (you) to help him open his eyes and guide policy!
Having Laura, Jan, and Diane as special assistants would be about as good as it gets.
Agree
& then you, Duane, should be the “Tsar of NO Testing.”
& your Wilson rant shall be etched in stone, outside your office, to be read & followed by Cardona et.al.
This is the statement of purpose from the LEAP website.
“Personalized learning isn’t about the use of computer programs, the proliferation of online courses or a Trojan horse for allowing industry in the classroom. It isn’t about efficiency, marginalizing the role of great teachers or disrupting the critical importance of the teacher-child relationship. Personalized learning is exactly what it sounds like. It means connecting lessons to students’ communities and cultures. It is about cultivating agency by listening to students when they say what they need.”
They fail to mention that copious amounts of data collection is part of the process. They also say nothing about using on-line instruction with very young students. After “they connect lessons to students’ communities and cultures,” they disconnect human teachers from their employment.
Good comments, rt, & above at 3:21 PM. If Cardona really wants to promote a better education for ESL students, he’ll do away with spending money on all this useless crap Laura Chapman describes, & spending money directly on the students: more teachers, better programs, smaller classes for more individualized learning, etc.
IOW, everything we’ve all been saying on this blog since the beginning.
The truth about depersonalized learning:
Contemporary Online Learning Programs Are Behaviorist Programmed Learning Brought Back from the Dead–Put a Stake in Them before They Take Over Your Kid’s School
https://bobshepherdonline.wordpress.com/2019/03/17/a-warning-to-parents-about-online-learning-programs/
Here is the latest re: Biden selecting Cordova. Is this true? I guess the word “promising” can be used if one doesn’t get all excited since DeVoodoo was even worse than Duncan. Cordova is an improvement over DeVoodoo and Duncan. Just how much is left to be seen.
Teachers’ Unions See Biden Choice of Cardona for Education Secretary as Promising Choice
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/12/23/teachers-unions-see-biden-choice-cardona-education-secretary-promising-path-change?cd-origin=rss&utm_term=AO&utm_campaign=Daily%20Newsletter&utm_content=email&utm_source=Daily%20Newsletter&utm_medium=email
“Teachers Unions See Biden Choice…as Promising Choice.”
Oh, really? How many teachers were interviewed for this article?
Let’s see…Becky Pringle, President of the NEA, Randi Weingarten,
President of the AFT & the President of the Connecticut AFT..
In another article in the Hartford Courant, Randi was interviewed, &, again, the CFT President, a school superintendent, the Gov. of CT (who had appointed him in CT, so had nothing but praise) & then, President of the CEA, Jeff Leake.
Ask the teachers, too.
Been updating a friend who doesn’t follow the policy up close but was interested in getting the posts. The response: “So apparently like all of Joe’s melange he likes his porridge not too hot but not too cold. There’s a clear vision for the future of public education!”
That’s called preserving the status quo. That’s no vision at all.
Tell me about it! Of course, we have to wait and watch and continue to advocate, but wishy-washy, “middle of the road” policy does not cut it at all; in facts, it’s destructive. The public schools need a paradigm shift in their favor, molded more like Western Europe and Finland with the exception of “tracking and trapping”.
On the other hand, as DeBos has proven, the status quo sometimes is preferable to mutatio.
hardest fact
Omigosh…& here we are, back to the Arne years.
The biggest clue are his views on testing. Just as we could not survive anymore it45 time, our kids cannot stand one more year of testing. &–THIS SPRING?!
No…no. We need Dr. Bondy Shay Gibson, who said, “Go build a snowman.”
In a country with separation of church and state and fewer religious tribalists, Cardona could be asked about tax funding for religious schools (Espinosa v. Montana and Biel v. St. James Catholic school). Pro- Publica posted (12-23), “The Trump Admin’s Final Push to Make it Easier for Religious Employers to Discriminate”. Included in the article’s discussion of the final push, is a reference to a significant, related Trump 2018 executive order. The Pro Publica article concludes, “Among the largest supporters (of trump’s actions), Catholic Charities.”
And the COVID relief bills have provided more than ample precedents for those who would eliminate the wall between church and state.
So, do we call our senators’ offices…to vote yes or no? (Not that they care.)
Please see my rant on 4 posts before this on Cardona and testing. Short answer, calling your senators’ offices on a vote is useless–the political equivalent of “garbage in, garbage out.”
GregB, are we Charlie Brown kicking at the football again? I hope we fight back earlier and harder than we did against Arne. Just disgusted.
You and I have to work harder, I have “less” of a stake in this because I am not a teacher (assuming self-interest is the driving motivation). You and everyone else here need to give people like me a reason to invest time and passion into this. If you and the other pundits here don’t, I have little incentive to do so.
I think this space makes a difference. This is about the profession of teaching, and this is about the learning environment of every kid in this country. Every one of us who cares about this country has a self-interest in ending this misguided mission of turning every child into a collection of data points. Being fed up and jaded and abused and cynical doesn’t have to mean a loss of passion for trying to make changes to make things right. Keep fighting, GregB.
Excellent points made by both Greg and Ohio Teacher.
The Democratic party’s fear of tribalists from conservative religion prevents them from marshaling forces to oppose the Republicans’
attack on civil rights. The Party’s fear has enabled the Koch/religious alliance to turn the nation toward authoritarianism and against the common good.
The Evangelical/Catholic policy and judicial campaign thrives when met with an opponent’s silence.
CT Mayor had already chosen Dr Thompson to lead state Ed. At VERY LAST MINUTE Mayor switched and put Cardona in. Why?
https://ctmirror.org/2019/07/09/state-education-board-expected-to-recommend-bloomfield-superintendent-as-next-commissioner/
Just like with NY State “regent” Merrill Tisch selecting outsider John King, a principal of a Boston charter school, to lead NY, it was all a set up. These candidates are being groomed and selected well in advance. The “who is gonna be?” is all just theatre. CT Mayor Ned Lamont gets a call, “Listen Ned, Thompson is old, and we need someone young and fresh to lead once Devos is out of office. Thinking Latino and likeable because it could strengthen us in 2024. Who do you have? Any chance you can pull a switcheroo and get that guy Cardona in for a year as CT commish?” Consider it done, sir.
That’s a fine catch, Jack. We get a little smarter about this every four years.
Sharp observation, Jack. More thinking like that, please!
Jack, not quite right. Merryl Tisch was Chancellor of the Board of Regents. She is from the billionaire Tisch family.she was close to Speaker of the Assembly, Sheldon Silver. She called the shots in NY, picked the State Commissioner. She decided to get a doctorate at Teachers College, not the kind that takes 3-5 years, but a special program for busy professionals. A very young John King, who ran a no-excuses charter school in MA, was part of the cohort. When she had the opportunity, she picked him for state commissioner. He came to sell Common Core and high stakes testing. He was a disaster. Then he became US Secretary of Education.
scary how those two lines seem to work out so often with school ‘reform’ leadership — He was a disaster. Then be became Sec. of Ed.
Was (is) Cardona a salesman for Common Core 2.0 ? His article 5 years ago posted at Scholars Strategy Network suggests it would be foolish to think otherwise.
Dear Secretary Cardona:
I’ve been doing Zoom classes for my granddaughter–mi princesa latina, Abigaila. She calls me Papa, and we call our classes “Papa School.” Papa School, as I’ve framed it, has been a sort of masterclass for a seven-year-old in the children’s literatures of the world: fairy tales, tall tales, myths, pourquoi tales, trickster tales, parables, fables, jokes, riddles, nursery rhymes, jump rope rhymes, children’s poems, tongue twisters, moralia, wisdom literature, legends. And here’s what I try to make sure happens every time: she takes a journey. She falls head over heels down the rabbit hole, steps through the wardrobe, climbs the sky rope or the beanstalk, plunges through a rip in the spacetime continuum, sails away across oceans (of space and time) and ends up somewhere pretty darned cool. Papa School is VERY dramatic.
Why? Because that’s how literature (and orature) works. It transports you. You take the teller’s trip, and you have an experience, a vicarious experience. And because you have abandoned yourself to the tale; because you have suspended disbelief, as Coleridge put it; because you have fully lived that experience, it has significance to you. THAT’S (mostly) HOW STORIES “MEAN.” The American poet Denise Levertov tells one of her best poems from the point of view of a tree who hears the music of Orpheus and is driven, compelled, to uproot herself, painfully, and follow him, dancing, ecstatic, to a new place. Literature is like that. You have to take the trip, and that trip has significance to you and so has “meaning.” If it works, the experience of it is transformative. You are no longer the same person.
Because my granddaughter is so engaged in these stories, in taking these journeys, she cares about them A LOT. I read her stories (illustrated with slides). Then, she reads them back to me. We stop from time to time to talk about them. After a few months of this, she is reading really, really, really well. The focus is ALWAYS on the story.
Other stuff that we read works differently. Its meaning lies not completely in the significance of the experience, as in literature and orature, but also, and often primarily, in the author’s intention. Someone writes because he really wants others to know that octopuses are cool (They have brains in their arms!). Or she writes because she’s seen people get cancer due to dry cleaning solvents and wants you to rethink just how important it is to have that extra-sharp blouse for the status meeting on Monday.
Since people first started telling stories around campfires and instructing their young, we’ve had these purposes for listening and reading: to share significant experiences, to share knowledge and wisdom. To participate in THE GREAT CONVERSATION.
I’ve gone into these matters and said the obvious, or what ought to be obvious, because I want to explain one of the many reasons why I long ago declared WAR on Gates and Coleman’s puerile Common [sic] Core [sic] State [sic] Standards [sic] and the pedagogy and curricula that these have spawned.
When we set out to read, together, our focus needs to be on the work, on the communication—on the experience or the information and opinions that the work is conveying. THAT’S THE WHOLE POINT of reading. That’s why it’s at all worth doing. It’s about standing with Frederick Douglass and looking at the sailboats on the Chesapeake and envying their freedom, shaken to the depths of his being by that desire, vowing that HE WILL ONE DAY BE AS FREE AS THOSE BOATS. It’s about standing with Mother Jones and speaking truth in the face of the company thugs. But if we instead focus our activity as English teachers on giving kids practice on CCSS.ELA.L.WTF.666.xxx, THE WHOLE POINT OF READING GETS LOST. We make the incidental into the primary, as if the point of owning a house were to have a place to put a chimney.
Sometimes, with my granddaughter, I stop to do a little side lesson on some skill—the difference between fables and parables. A character as a foil. Comparing. Analyzing. Rhyming. Whatever. But always, always, always, this is INCIDENTAL. That instruction is GROUNDED in something that matters. The focus is always, always, always ON THE WORK.
We’ve gone far, far down the road of Core-ing ELA instruction in the United States—hollowing it out. Often, now, our curricular materials have become completely random exercises on CC$$ “skills.” The texts we use don’t even matter. The texts are simply PRETEXTS for practicing some skill. And instruction put together in that way DOESN’T WORK. For one thing, it is boring. And it’s boring because it doesn’t matter, not in the important ways that texts do. As Neil Postman used to say, kids have excellent crap detectors.
How I’m working with my granddaughter. I hook her on the piece. Then she reads it to me. And from time to time we stop, and I get her to think about something nifty the writer is doing, and I get her to do that, too. And, of course, I’ve organized all this so that she’s building a base that will help her to do the next thing. And all this works because she’s caring about WHAT THESE WRITERS HAVE TO SAY. She is participating in THE GREAT CONVERSATION. (I could go on about other things we are doing, but I’ll stop there because I want to make this point.)
When that administrator would come into my class and ask, “What standard are you working on right now, Mr. Shepherd?” it was everything I could do not to SCREAM at her, “We are finding out what Cotton Mather thought about Indians, for $&$@&$@&@$&@* sake!”
Bottom line: my granddaughter will know more and have better skills than will those poor kids subjected into endless test-preppy CC$$ skills exercises. SHE will be, is now, a reader.
And always, always, I ask myself, “What will by granddaughter leave this class knowing that she did not know before?”
The answer after the CC$$ skills exercises sessions now being done in so many of our ELA classes is “Nothing.”
What a beautifully written piece, Bob, and such a joy to read. It truly spoke to the English teacher in me. Thank you. I would love to know why you think what you’re doing with your granddaughter runs contrary to the intent of common core. The fact that CC is being misapplied in classrooms centered around curriculum-bytes (as Natalie Wexler warns against in The Knowledge Gap) doesn’t negate its intent to give students the learning experiences you describe. On the contrary–CC is just a roadmap for the full breadth of learning.
On Friday, I played this wonderful story, If Picasso Painted a Snowman, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AoY6RRfMZM&t=4s, prior to an art lesson with my third graders. It gives the full range of possible snowmen in the styles of various artists. The fact that some classrooms are just giving their students “Mondrian” and crowding out the other artistic experiences is a misapplication of CC and what it means to teach and learn.
Thanks again for taking the time to share!
Listen to Bob Sherpard on CC
Can you embroider that? My children keep asking me why I read your blog since I find it so frustrating. I respond that you are very influential, and we need to find common ground for the sake of our most vulnerable students. What Bob describes is absolutely in line with CC. What it’s NOT in line with is the misapplication of CC in the classroom. But that’s a different issue–an important one that does indeed need to be addressed–but a different one.
Bob is passionately opposed to CC. Based on his experience as a teacher. I don’t want to put words in his mouth. He will read this and get back to you.
Hi Harriett, CC standards require monitoring and measuring which can be time consuming, and take away rich learning experiences, for a class of K-2 students. While the skills seem reasonable on the surface, they are not just written as general goals to be considered in a broader learning landscape. They are meant to be measured.
For example in Grade 1 (which I will assume Bob’s granddaughter is) this is just a sampling of reading standards:
Craft and Structure:
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.1.4
Identify words and phrases in stories or poems that suggest feelings or appeal to the senses.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.1.5
Explain major differences between books that tell stories and books that give information, drawing on a wide reading of a range of text types.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.1.6
Identify who is telling the story at various points in a text.
So….. should students at age 6 and 7 for the most part be able to do these things. Sure. Is Bob addressing these standards – sounds like it. However to collect data on just one standard . . . . for 20 students WITH EVIDENCE…. interferes with a richer learning experience. Once we start segmenting, measuring and collecting evidence on learning it becomes something very different than what Bob is describing.
We should greatly pare down what needs to be measured K-2 and instead focus on building learning communities with a focus on play-based learning experiences, in which students have a degree of choice and voice. Think similar to Montessori.
Wow, Harriet! The snowman in different artists’ styles project sounds just WONDERFUL! I bet you are an awesome teacher. OK. Back to my cooking. I’m making mincemeat from scratch. Happy holidays! And yes, it would be wonderful to sit and talk Common [sic] Core [sic] with you. Long story short: I spent 25 years in the textbook industry, at pretty high levels. I saw firsthand how the curriculum devolved as it became a string of random CC$$ exercises. The only reason it exists is that Gates wanted a single national bullet list to key depersonalized education software to. A couple pieces about individual “standards”:
https://bobshepherdonline.wordpress.com/2014/04/10/on-developing-curricula-in-the-age-of-the-thought-police/
and
https://bobshepherdonline.wordpress.com/2014/03/15/what-happens-when-amateurs-write-standards/
This piece also touches on them:
https://bobshepherdonline.wordpress.com/2017/09/02/on-the-pseudoscience-of-strategies-based-reading-comprehension-instruction-or-what-current-comprehension-instruction-has-in-common-with-astrology/
There’s an egregious error in the post above. I said that from time to time I stop to do a little side lesson on some skill. Aie yie yie. What I MEANT to say is that I stop to do a mini-lesson on some bit of declarative (what) or procedural (how) KNOWLEDGE. There is no “skill” without procedural knowledge, typically heuristic knowledge. So, educators would do well to eliminate the term “skill” from their vocabularies. In that direction lies vagueness and wasted time. And today we are going to practice our “inferencing skills.”
That’s just idiocy. And if you don’t understand why, you shouldn’t be teaching, serving as an administrator, or running the Department of Education.
“21st-century skills; competency-based skills instruction; skills mastery; skills our future workers will need.” People who talk like this need some remediation.
Much of what they call skills would be dealt with more effectively if they called this stuff “procedural knowledge.” This would force them to think more concretely about what is being conveyed, transferred to, the student. If you can call it procedural knowledge, then you actually have something you can teach. A lot of what they call skills is just puffery–there is no there there, as Gertrude Stein said. And then there are actual skills that are acquired fully or almost fully incidentally, without conscious knowledge or effort, because there are built-in, inborn mental mechanisms for this acquisition. For those, just provide the environment and stand back and watch.
Oops! That link is to a wonderful Patti Lupone parody If Donald Got Fired. Sorry. Here’s the one to If Picasso Painted a Snowman.
I like the really pared down definitions: the how and the what neither of which can be described as discrete skills. Do you remember the old task analysis stuff? I remember having to break down behavior into of hierarchy of tasks which as a whole were supposed to add up to the behavior. Kind of like an assembly line. IEPs have an element of this mechanistic kind of thinking because it is much easier to “measure” (sorry, Duane) whether the student has mastered the particular “skill.” (Be careful what you wish for when talking about IEPs for every student!)
LOL. If only there were the time. This was my BIG issue as a teacher. Never. Enough. Time. To know this kid–really know him or her–and tailor the instruction, one on one! The ideal.
speduktr
Just put a (sic) behind “measures” so that the audience knows it’s a bucket of pig slop of a thought.
LOL. Merry Christmas, Duane!
Aren’t you tired of being more knowledgeable and a better teacher than the national secretary of education? Wouldn’t it be a pleasure, some day, to learn from the secretaries instead of having to try to teach them? I think it’s likely Cordona, unfortunately, needs to go to Papa School (which sounds like a great class).
I love going to Papa school right here on the blog, but I am not going to expect him to face down Congress. Bob’s experience makes him uniquely qualified to teach ELA. Physics? Probably not so much. Cardona has shown himself to be a savvy politician or he wouldn’t be where he is now. He has done a credible job of developing his professional credentials as well. I find politics fascinating and frustrating (especially when they don’t do what I want) but I understand the necessity,… I think.
Bob, you understand that reading is engagement with text and the mind. What you are doing with your granddaughter will enable her to be a thoughtful reader. It is an active process, not a passive one like cyber learning. You granddaughter will be a better learner because of your efforts.
Bob,
What a truly extraordinary experience your granddaughter is getting by dint of having you as a grandfather!
I am the lucky one!!!
As an elementary teacher, I love this and wish all students could have as rich a connection with literature as your granddaughter.
If you haven’t read Anansi – they are fun trickster tales.
Oh yes! In fact, I retold some of these for various textbooks!
Again, I quote the very wise LeftCoastTeacher:
“Education is wounded. Apply pressure.” & this is done…how? NOT by writing letters (we saw that worked so well w/Obama), NOT by calling Congress. NOT by signing petitions. Getting out in the streets–car caravans if we must. Yes, no more charter schools is a grave issue but–to me–this testing has GOT to stop–ABSOLUTELY NO testing this spring. &, then, NEVER AGAIN. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $pent on te$ting h$ been money meant for education, money for what this blog stands for, “a better education for all.” We have been posting & commenting & writing & moaning & whining about “standardized” testing for what, almost 30 years? (I recall this started in the ’90s.) Todd Farley’s book is ELEVEN years old. ALEC (yes, that’s where all of this watering down of education started–making “other peoples’ children” into widgets–is almost FIFTY years old!
Out in the streets–follow the lead of the Chicago Teachers Union, & then what happened all over the country.
“Power concedes nothing without demand. It never has & it never will.”
–Frederick Douglass
(&, Duane, I really wasn’t kidding up there, 12/23 @ 8:55 PM.)
We are wise. True educators have been made too wise by experience during the last twenty years. We are battle hardened veterans of education wars. We have learned: There can be no honeymoon this time. If Biden and Cardona will do nothing to get the greedy corporate wolves out of our house, at the first sign, we must take to collective action. It is the way. We know this: When we fight, we win.
ABSOLUTELY, LCT.
& everyone loves your motto/mantra: I had sent it to numerous people &, for some, changed it to “America is wounded. Pressure must be applied.” As Nina Turner’s first campaign as is titled, “No Honeymoon.”
rbmtk,
I’d be happy to be in charge of that “program.” Problem is all of the skeletons in the closet that someone could dig up. And I don’t have any money to pay anyone off.
Thanks very much though for the kind words!! 😉
Sorry–just saw this. LMAO!!!
You’re welcome. & I was serious about having you deck the halls of the U.S. Dept. of Education.
Well, the DFERs, billionaires and Wall Street are getting an early Christmas gift with the selection of Cardona.
How many corks have been popping off of those $10,000 bottles of champagne?
For America’s students and teachers, it’s just another sack full of coal.
Hello Diane and everyone,
I often wonder how my parents went through school and college without standardized testing and loads of professional development for teachers. How did my father get to be valedictorian of his HS class and then go to Cornell University and on to medical school? His parents were working class pharmacists and owned their own pharmacy. My father worked in the pharmacy growing up. No standardized tests and teachers didn’t get professional development. My mother grew up dirt poor and enjoyed going to school because that’s where the heat was in the winter. She grew up and worked on her family’s farm. No standardized tests and no professional development for teachers. But, she said the teachers TAUGHT and if you didn’t do your homework, YOU were an outcast. Her guidance counselor told her, “People like you (poor people) don’t go to college.” Yet, she worked her way through teacher’s college (as she called it) and became a science teacher. In her late 30’s she went to Syracuse University and became a lawyer. She loved teaching but there was no avenue for advancement for women because, as she said, the male teachers and administrators would go into the boiler room and make all the decisions. No standardized tests and no problems with teachers not knowing what they were doing. How did they do it without being constantly tested? How did teachers teach without having to do HOURS of professional development? I have some ideas….
Mamie,
You are so right. Somehow we became a successful nation with many avenues for social mobility in the pre-standardized test era. The test scores freeze social mobility.
The Federalist Society limited social mobility in the judicial branch- conservative religious credentials required.
But this data, data…. and personalized learning craze…. I’m afraid it’s been so ingrained and accepted that it’s too late to turn back.
Even the data show that the course we are on now has failed to improve education. Read my book Slaying Goliath for the facts (data).
I think about some of the admin in my district and think they would be well suited in the corporate world, accountants – something very concrete, tied to production. It almost as if this whole test, data, accountability machine was created so these types could be relevant and make a living in the education realm.
My thoughts on Cardona…
“Charter School Promoters Comfortable With Cardona”
https://dissidentvoice.org/2020/12/charter-school-promoters-comfortable-with-cardona/
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-12-23/education-secretary-should-curb-standardized-tests
Education Secretary’s First Task: Curb Standardized Tests
Miguel Cardona will need to address public school inequities by making better use of federal aid.
Having visited Finland twice to study their education system, I can say with certainty that the Fins assert high stakes testing as not developmentally appropriate (which it isn’t) and that the best assessment of students’ learning is developed and administered by the teachers themselves. I was so impressed with how Fins know what they value as a society and embed those values in their education system.
The Finland Matriculation Examination (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matriculation_exam_(Finland)) is a rigorous high stakes test ….. it determines post high careers …..
Finnish schools have no standardized exams from K-ninth grade. The early and middle years of school are a test-free zone.
For three years in a row, Finland has been ranked “the happiest country in the world.” There might be a connection.
https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/finland-happiest-country-united-nations-world-happiness-report-a9414201.html
“Finnish schools have no standardized exams from K-ninth grade. The early and middle years of school are a test-free zone.”
Are you in favor of having no standardized exams from K-ninth grade followed by a matriculation exam?
Finnish schools, 3% childhood poverty, lowest among OECD nations, US 23%, Finnish teachers: top 10% of college graduates, US teachers, bottom half of college graduates, also high on the list of average per capita alcohol consumption
Finland has low child poverty because the Finnish people pay high taxes to promote equality and excellent schools. They pay to attract the best people into teaching and to make teaching a respected profession. People enter teaching as a career, not as a resume builder or something to do until they get their “real” job.
The Finns have great schools because they pay for them. They have very low child poverty because they pay to keep poverty low.
We get what we pay for.
Harriet,
I oppose standardized exams. Period. I spent seven years on the federal testing board and saw how pointless they are. Teachers should write their own tests and get instant feedback. Don’t ask Pearson to tell you what your students know. And give you their number six months after the kids took the exam.