Mitchell Robinson, professor at Michigan State University, writes that Democrats must fully support public schools if they want to galvanize their base in November.
“If Democrats want to be successful in November they need to offer voters a true alternative to Republican and neo-liberal thinking on education policy. Sadly, we could add Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama to the list above of Democrats who don’t “get it” when it comes to understanding the importance of public education.
“I still run in to far too many Democrats who make distinctions between “for profit” and non profit” charters, as if there’s a meaningful difference…or support candidates who claim this belief. Or point to states with “strong regulations” on charters, like Massachusetts, as some sort of model for other states to follow when it comes to charter school policies. This ignores the fundamental charter problem–the presence of charter schools hurts public schools, period. In an economy that seems not to have enough money to fund 1 set of schools, we are trying to fund both charters and traditional public schools, with reformers clamoring for vouchers that would fund a 3rd group of schools–religious and private non-sectarian schools.
“What we need are Democrats who support real public education, not faux public charter schools that are governed by private management corporations.
“The only thing public about charter schools are the tax dollars that fund them. It’s way beyond time to eliminate all charter schools, and fully fund public education.”

The url link did not work.
I’m stamping $$$ out of politics. Sent from my iPhone
>
LikeLike
I will post it in a few days. I was rearranging schedule.
LikeLike
It’s not that some Democrats “don’t get it.”
It’s that they don’t want to get it.
It makes all the difference.
LikeLike
Because Democrats are divided on this issue, they tend to ignore public education entirely. If they want the support of the middle class and the poor, they should embrace public education for the extraordinary service it provides and its community based democratic governance. If they support government of, by and for the people, there should be no waffling on this issue.
LikeLike
Rejection of privatization is the litmus test that separates Democrats from DINOS like DFER.
LikeLike
I made an e-mail request to Prof. Strunck’s EPIC (Michigan State- a PUBLIC UNIVERSITY) for identification of its source of funds. Strunck was identified as a recipient of the REACH grant this summer that media describes as payment for product development and marketing for the private sector’s charter schools.
Strunck’s cv shows $20,000 from Gates (2017-2018). Is it true that Gates’ grants can not be applied for, that instead, proposals are by invitation only? Stunck’s cv shows $131,345 from Arnold (2017-2020), $189,299 from Walton (2016-2018), and $85,000 from Walton (2016-2017).
If readers of the Ravitch blog can identify the grants and amounts that Prof. Cathy Davidson (CUNY- a PUBLIC UNIVERSITY) has received, it would be helpful. Her program, HASTAC, appears to have had origins linked to Gates.
LikeLike
I would like to assume we win. I would like to think that charters will go away and public money will funnel into public schools again. What if this happens? Are we ready to do something with the win? I have some positive suggestions:
Establish community schools that have the effect of helping to stabilize communities by providing services not just to the students but also to the community.
Fund schools not by how successful people think they are but by the perceived need of the community.
Distribute funding on a broad scale so that out-migration does not leave some schools poor.
Realize that any benefits from electronic platforms for delivery of content require more, not fewer teaching personnel with more, not less preparation.
Restrict testing to small samples designed to answer questions that are general instead of specific, and quit saying we are “measuring learning outcomes.”
Encourage innovation within the buildings that house all children by allowing teachers who have ideas latitude to try them
Promote school compliance with mandates for special needs wig more carrot than stick, reducing paperwork associated with here efforts and increasing the number of personnel involved directly with the children who have the special needs.
If we who feel the direction of school reform has been groping down a blind alley for the post Sizer generation, we better be ready with positive suggestions that build communities, broaden learning, and attract the best and brightest young people into the profession of teaching our next group of citizens.
LikeLike
If I may be so presumptuous, allow me a bit of a revision:
“If Democrats want to be successful in November they need to offer voters a true alternative to Republican and neo-liberal thinking PERIOD.”
Sorry, but I (and many, many other progressives/independents) need the whole package. Education is but one aspect of neoliberalism. Ralph Northam, for instance, said all the right things about education, but he’s still a neoliberal nightmare. Public education vs. privatized education isn’t going to make much of a difference if the world we’re preparing students for is one devoid of humanity where the market rules and value rests solely in monetary worth. We have to draw down the American empire, we have to re-invest here at home and we have to protect ordinary Americans and our environment from predatory banks and corporations.
LikeLike
I am missing your point. Should Democrats support public education or not? Should that be a litmus test or not?
Are you saying that it would have been better for the DFER “progressive” to have defeated Ralph Northam and turned Virginia into another pro-charter state?
Politics isn’t about having it all unless you believe in fascism. Politics – in a democracy – is making compromises and deciding what you believe is more important.
Democrats have never stood for “value rests solely in monetary worth”. Some Democrats are sell-outs but so are people who label themselves progressives. LBJ and Truman were both bad and good.
It isn’t just that our market is devoid of humanity. It is that Republicans are devoid of humanity and the Democrats are trying to compromise with people who have no humanity or goals beyond what makes their right wing billionaire funders happy.
I know that if a Democrat supports public education, that Democrat stands for something. Not all do, and then we need to decide if their admiration for “good charters” is a sign that they are corrupt (Cuomo) or simply inexcusably ignorant (Warren).
LikeLike
^^By the way, Jimmy Carter was a very strong believer in the market. That’s why long-time progressive Ted Kennedy ran against him in the primary from the left. Carter spent his entire term selling out progressive values in the economy.
I still made a mistake by not voting for him and insisting he was evil.
Think about it.
LikeLike
Far too many, who make distinctions between “for profit” and non profit” charters,
or the lack of regulations on charters, or the funding shift to the 15%,
draws attention away from the funding consumed by the testing complex.
The testing complex isn’t “democratic, transparent, or non-profit”, nor is it
“real public education”. Bark up the charter/private school tree, hey TFA,
get off of my cloud, bite it Betsy…on and on. As long as the testing complex
is joined at the hip, with public schools, NOTHING will change.
LikeLike
“As long as the testing complex is joined at the hip, with public schools, NOTHING will change.”
We have a winner! Hand that man a Kewpie doll!
LikeLike
My concern is that the Democrats will lie to get elected. They do it all the time. In New York, members of the Assembly have taken NYSUT’s endorsement and then voted for horrible APPR and testing legislation, voted for more charter schools, voted to give the charters hundreds of millions of dollars in state aid, voted for terrible members of the Board of Regents, voted to lengthen the probationary period to four years, voted for two new retirement tiers with far less generous benefits and extremely expensive new costs to members. The Democrats are a back of liars, just like the GOP is.
LikeLike
When Tulane’s Douglas Harris and his colleagues at 14 universities, including Michigan State, fulfill the terms of the Ed. Dept. grant ($10 mil.) to develop products and marketing
for the private sector of charter schools, it will be interesting to see what curriculum has a place and doesn’t, like music, Mitchell Robinson’s field of study.
Douglas Harris is Director of the Education Research Alliance which is funded by Arnold.
Michigan State’s WKAR reports that 1/4 of the 101,000 students (a number growing since the 2016 data) who are enrolled in virtual schools failed to pass even one class. 80% of charter schools in Mich. are for-profit.
IMO, it’s past time that university faculty who care about their schools’ missions, should have made their colleague$$$ accountable for carrying out the agenda of the richest 0.1% to privatize schools, particularly those at PUBLIC universities.
LikeLike
Speaking of funding- The Arnold-funded Penn Wharton Budget Model has paired with Urban Institute, whose pension papers are funded by Arnold and with the Gates-funded Tax Policy Center. Given, the way Arnold and Gates spend their money, it’s a shame they can’t take it with them to hell.
LikeLike
In related news, Andrew Cuomo thinks Cynthia Nixon is a corporation. Said so in the debate with her.
Ha ha ha.
I’m not sure where Mario and his wife found Andrew, but they should have left him there for someone else to take.
LikeLike
Then again, maybe I just cant follow the logic because I lack Andrew’s keen legal mind:
Te Supreme Court has ruled that corporations are persons.
And Cynthia Nixon is a person.
So, Cynthia Nixon is a corporation.
QED.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Cuomo is still jerk. He still doesn’t get it. I’m looking forward to voting for Cynthia Nixon two weeks from now. I hope she does well.
LikeLike
From the debate:
Cuomo to Nixon: “Can you please stop interrupting? Can you please do that?”
Nixon to Cuomo: “If you stop lying, I will stop interrupting”
Ha ha ha ha.
I think a person would have to be brain dead to vote for Cuomo over Nixon.
LikeLike
It was refreshing to see Nixon interviewed (was it CNN?) and talk about public education right off the bat.
One the other hand, I was in NY recently and treated to his campaign commercial. Seems like a wonderful guy! 🙄
LikeLike
GREAT Line: ““The only thing public about charter schools are the tax dollars that fund them.”
LikeLike
Public education is 90% financed by state and municipal governments. If the citizens of this nation truly want to have control over their public schools, they should exercise their franchise at the local level. Many people believe that the feds should just get out of the school house.
LikeLike
Charles-
“Feds get out”
Like racist Georgia Gov. Talmadge wanted, when he proposed school privatization to avoid integration?
Like the secessionist South wanted, so slavery could continue?
Like ALEC and ACCE want because it’s easier and cheaper to control state and local government?
LikeLike
@Linda: Be Fair. Do NOT link me with segregationists. Public education can and should be a local responsibility. This nation got along very well, without a federal Department of Education, until 1979.
The constitution does not give authority for the federal government to get involved in education at all. Many people on the right and on the left have advocated abolishing the department of Education. I am one of them.
Public schools are much better off, NOT having to follow weird rules promulgated by faceless bureaucrats in WashDC. Seems like all of the programs that come oozing out of the WashDC swamp, like ESSA, Common Core, mandatory testing, etc. are equally despised by the right and the left.
School integration was ordered in 1954. It is a done deal, so let it die (with respect to school choice). That dog don’t hunt anymore.
LikeLike