Writing in the Business section of the New York Times, Paul Sullivan describes Trump’s tax plan as a path to “dynastic levels of wealth.”
He begins:
“If Donald J. Trump follows through on his campaign promises, a host of taxes that affect only the very richest Americans may be eliminated, along with almost all tax incentives to be philanthropic. As a result, wealthy families may find it much easier to amass dynastic levels of wealth.
At the top of the list is the estate tax. Currently, the rules are straightforward: A married couple is exempt for the first $10.9 million in their estate, and they pay a 40 percent tax on the amount above that.
“Mr. Trump’s campaign proposal seems straightforward: Repeal the estate tax — the death tax, in his words.
“Back in 2012, most tax experts had considered the estate tax issue resolved when, on New Year’s Eve, the Republican-majority Congress and President Obama reached a so-called grand bargain on taxes. As part of that deal, the current estate tax exemption was set, with annual increases indexed to inflation.
“With that agreement, more than 99 percent of Americans were exempted from the estate tax.
Last year, for example, the Internal Revenue Service processed just 4,918 federal estate tax returns (though it collected about $17 billion in taxes).
“Working on a policy to appease such a small number of people could be seen in two ways: a waste of political capital or an end to a tax that Republicans have historically decried as unfair and Democrats have held up as a guard against generational wealth.
“But Mr. Trump’s proposal is not as straightforward as simple repeal. His plan also said, “Capital gains held until death and valued over $10 million will be subject to tax to exempt small businesses and family farms.” In other words, the tax on capital gains above $10 million would have to paid only when, or if, the assets were sold.
“For some accountants, the proposal brought back memories of 2010, when the estate tax briefly expired and assets in a wealthy person’s estate were subject to capital gains tax on the appreciated value. This proved to be a headache. Few people keep sufficiently detailed records to find the original purchase price on stocks or to account for improvements to properties over decades.
“Yet the Trump plan, as some attorneys and accountants have read it, would allow the wealthiest heirs to never pay capital gains taxes if they did not sell what they inherited. This would be difficult for those with a modest inheritance because they generally sell and spend what they get. But it might not be for people with a large inheritance, like Mr. Trump’s children, who would receive a portfolio of income-producing real estate and golf courses, which they could borrow against and never sell.
“Most people who have substantial wealth have that wealth in capital assets that tend to grow in value,” said Marc J. Bloostein, partner in the private client group at Ropes & Gray. “It comes down to whether you’re going to sell those assets. Someone who inherits the family compound, that’s great. Someone who inherits a business on the auction block, you have to pay the taxes.”
No surprise. Democrats need to be ready to step in when Republicans ultimately fail. The danger for Democrats is they will continue to focus on race, religion, and gender issues which, while important, are not the reasons Democrats lost. Democrats need to elect a full time DNC chair outside the Clinton coalition that can represent all disenfranchised working Americans, including the white, rural Americans who voted for Trump. Otherwise, the Democrats are relegated to the sidelines for at least the next 8 years, maybe longer if Republicans control apportionment again in 2020.
Please explain how these white blue collar voters who supposedly turned away from Hillary due to her secretly being in bed with big banks and corporations are handily re-electing Republicans who are NOT secretly in bed with them! They are right out in the open and passing anti-union laws and anti-labor laws and yet those some blue-collar working class folks sure seem to keep re-electing them in midwestern states.
Sure it’s fine to ask why Hillary lost, but you might ask yourself why so many right wing Republicans got re-elected. When running against Bernie Democrats who are approved by the Hillary haters on here. Quit blaming Hillary when Ron Johnson got more votes than Trump against exactly the candidate that offered something to those workers.
This election was lost because the Hillary hatred suppressed the vote. In places where people needed her (and Bernie’s) platform the most, they were given a constant drumbeat of how awful and corrupt she was. Why bother to come out to vote for a crook. After all, so many Bernie voters keep telling them how crooked she is.
“This election was lost because the Hillary hatred suppressed the vote.”
You keep believing that. Let me know how it works for you in 2020. And 2024. And 2028.
Or, you could try actually listening to what people are trying to tell you. Your choice.
Hillary lost through the electoral college because the blue wall of the Rust Belt crumbled. Obama was a master at building a coalition and inspiration.
“Please explain how these white blue collar voters who supposedly turned away from Hillary due to her secretly being in bed with big banks and corporations are handily re-electing Republicans who are NOT secretly in bed with them!”
That’s right it was Hillary hatred, .It is the vast right wing conspiracy. That’s why she lost, the smear machine . You sound like a Trump supporter.
That their vote was for an even worse alternative is another story . People turn to demagogues in times of economic stress.
15 million , 5 x 3 jobs lost to trade policy .I will explain that number if you need one ,you probably do. Economic explanations do not seem to come easy to you. Nobody built many new factories in this country maned by robots . Those new factories were built in China, Mexico … …
http://money.cnn.com/2016/03/29/news/economy/us-manufacturing-jobs/
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-baker-robots-20150507-story.html
“But the data don’t support that theory either. If Autor’s story were true, we would expect to see higher demand for high-skilled jobs relative to less-skilled jobs. That’s not happening. Instead, there’s been a modest decline in the relative demand for almost all occupations above the bottom 25% to 30%. In the years since 2000, most of the job growth has been in occupations at the bottom end of the wage distribution, with the share at the middle and top both declining.
“Turning to the evidence, if technology were rapidly displacing workers then productivity growth — the rate of increase in the value of goods and services produced in an hour of work — should be very high, because machines are more efficient. In the last decade, however, productivity growth has risen at a sluggish 1.4% annual rate. In the last two years it has limped along at a pace of less than 1% annually. By comparison, in the post-World War II “Golden Age,” from 1947 to 1973, productivity grew at an annual rate of almost 3%.”
. The next time I hear how wonderful and caring Hillary was for Americas children. I might barf
Caring for children is creating jobs for their parents ,not prisons to lock them in , while there jobs go overseas.
Caring for children is not the Bankruptcy bill that disproportionately punished divorced women.
Nor the welfare reform bill .
Caring for Children is fixing the pipes in Flint not drinking a glass of Flint water. Caring for children is going after the murderers of Eric Garner . Not paying lip service.
Caring for children is protecting their homes from foreclosure. Not the bonuses of the Bankers who caused the crises . Even Ronald Reagan prosecuted a thousand bankers in the S&L debacle.
https://www.thenation.com/article/hillary-clinton-does-not-deserve-black-peoples-votes/
“Obama’s decision to push the TPP this year was in effect waving a red cape in front of an angry bull” He didn’t do it to pivot to Asia .Few of the Natioins were even in Asia . He didn’t do it to increase trade flows . He did it to increase flows of cash into the Democratic party . Having the hubris to think he could smile and wave at those voters in Ohio , Wisconsin, Michigan , Pennsylvania. .Telling them everything is just ducky . Never mind, what you think you see with your own eyes.
Obama thought he would get away with it.
Don’t dare tell me, I am conflating Obama with Hillary.
Just like Trump you are who you associate with . Nobody wrapped themselves in Obama more than Hillary did . Trying to play the Black vote against any progressive, who questioned the failures of his policy .
They told him and Hillary where to stick the smile . Now they and those of us who saw the danger ahead are stuck with Trump.
Hillary and Obama will fade off into the sunset very comfortably.
Dienne
2020 its going to stink in 2018
The 5,000 tax returns, mentioned could have used http://www.bankrate.com/finance/taxes/estate-taxes-trusts-1.aspx
Maybe they died unexpectedly I guess they should be penalized for dying without proper planning
Only half joking
PENCE ON EDUCATION !!!!!!!!
Mobilize to get donald to see your side of it
With all these massive tax cuts at the upper echelons of our society, how will Trump make up for the lost revenue? Easy speezy, slash the so called “entitlements.” Reagan and Bush slashed taxes on the rich and ballooned the national debt and the deficits. Trumponomics and Bushonomics, same beast. If Trump is cutting taxes on the rich, where will he get the money for the infrastructure which he says he wants to improve? See above for the answer.
Side note: NY rep Eliot Engel was on WABC TV this AM and talked about reaching across the aisle; I wanted to vomit. Sure, reach across the aisle which the GOP now owns and get your arm ripped off. Sigh.
Of course he can always borrow from social security. Then the Republicans can declare its insolvency and privatize it.
A September 15, 2013 CNN article stated that Obama KNEW his policies had 95% of the income gains going to the top 1% of the population. This was never turned around. Trying something different could turn out to be a good thing for everyone.
What is Trump doing different?
Now we all get to pay for the Democrats love affair with neo-liberalism.
What is different in Trump’s plan? Unless he slashes entitlements or other programs, he will cause the deficit to swell.
And over 50% of the voters approved of Obama’s performance.
And a huge number also say they wish he could stay instead of Trump.
And 49% approved of shrubs when he left . I would take a slug over trump.
Sure Donald! Go ahead! Give more tax relief to the rich. Slash all departments other than Defense. End entitlements. Let the populace roam the streets barefoot, hungry and homeless. Who will be left buy Ivanka’s fashions?
The Chinese, of course …
Such a dynasty man …
It’s obvious that Trump is going to use his position as president to make it easier to add to the wealth of his family business and hold onto that wealth after he is out of the White House.
I do not think he will do anything to bring back the blue collar jobs that mostly went to automation and not to China or Mexico. In fact, I suspect any jobs creation will be poverty wage paying jobs as they become available after illegal aliens working those jobs are deported.
Trump will say, “You wanted jobs, so I provided them.” Those jobs will be picking crops, mopping floors, mowing lawns, cleaning houses, all for poverty wages with no benefits because the social safety net will be gone or reduced to almost nothing. Out of desperation, the unemployed and underemployed will lose their unemployment, their health care, food stamps, etc. and be forced to become migrant workers working in sweat shop environments for poverty wages with no benefits at all.
If you want a snapshot of Trump’s Make American Great again country, we have to go back before the progressive movement for the answers.
In 1900, 40 percent of Americans lived in horrible poverty and only 7 percent graduated from high school. It was the age of the Robber Barons, and children as young as 7 could be sold by their starving parents into a form of slavery called indentured servitude. These children were even sold into houses of prostitution so men like Donald Trump could grope them, and grab them by their p _ _ _ y, and even beat them for the psycho thrill of it.
I don’t see us going back to 1900 at all, Lloyd, but I do see us turning into a typical South Central or South American country or Mexico over time.
Do you mean a banana republic where private militias terrorize the population to enforce the latest tyrant’s agenda, while other private militias rebel against the tyrant and also terrorize the people?
Yes, and where the rich and corporations ARE the government and where there is a nominal or small middle class.
Lloyd,
I agree with your Doomsday prediction.
Sadly.
Where I am now, on Long Island, the crops are planted, tended, and picked by immigrant workers, many of them undocumented. The restaurants rely on immigrant workers to cook and clean. The hotels and bed-breakfast, the same. The construction industry. I wonder who will take those jobs, many of which are below minimum wage?
You just hit one of those issues that Trump won on .Many of those jobs once paid middle class wages. Undocumented immigration was used to brake the back of wages , of Unions from meat packing ,to garment workers, to construction. Most undocumented labor is not on your lawn or the farm . (I still have one down the Block ).
These are not jobs that Americans wont do . They are jobs that Americans wont do at minimum wage or less. There are few teachers on long Island who earn what NYC union Tradesmen does especially when overtime is taken into consideration. (it is feast or famine )
That construction is predominately Commercial/office and large public works. Most trades have increasingly become more reflective of the city they work in. The City is in the midst of a residential tower boom not one of the residential buildings that broke ground in 2016 was Union. They look out the window of the commercial project they are on to see a Mexican flag flying over a non union building. You want to know where that 29% of the Trump Hispanic vote came from. I’ll introduce you to a few.
Try telling them that Trump is a union busting demagogue who has no intention of deporting anybody. He loves the cheap labor.
Green cards will be issued without any path to citizenship.,He would love to change the 14th amendment as well,denying their future children the right to vote. I suspect he issues the green cards then proposes the amendment that he knows wont pass . Before he does anything on the wall.
A return to the era of Steinback’s “The Grapes of Wrath” and “Of Mice and Men.” There will be no Special Ed programs for the Lennie Small’s when they are K-12 children. They will be working by the time they are 7 if not earlier and they will never be able to live on their own.
Everything but :
the robots /automation myth . The Jobs lost to automation were lost mostly before the 90’s .As industry moved to modern plants in the non union south.
Like many of the myths we deal with , ie “skills gap” “failing schools ” “Ineffective teachers” they are convenient but not supported by the data. . Factory losses were stable through the 90’s. They fell off a cliff from 2000-2007 further through the recession. As jobs were shipped overseas .
Construction of new plants and machinery was minimal . .
‘
I got tired of quoting Dean Baker just because i read him daily
https://www.ft.com/content/0b16754e-45c6-11e5-af2f-4d6e0e5eda22
I don’t think the facts support most if not all of your allegations about the U.S. manufacturing sector.
Top 20 Facts About Manufacturing in the U.S.
http://www.nam.org/Newsroom/Top-20-Facts-About-Manufacturing/
Lloyd Lofthouse
http://prospect.org/article/plight-american-manufacturing
Lloyd Lofthouse
On slippery turf when you quote a lobbying association . Try some independent economists. We hear the same from them about the skills shortage . The one that even
Larry Summers ,Mr Wall Street can not find . Check out the graph in this article
http://cepr.net/blogs/beat-the-press/trade-deficits-and-secular-stagnation
Chief Council Steve Bannon . Here we go
The horror show continues. Those who are vulnerable (with little or no wealth0) and voted for Trump will understand they are part of the horror show because it will show up on its doorstep in time. The ugly “honeymoon” will be over. Compulsive patriotism will lose its anger and have to face the pain of being “trumped”.
It won’t matter when (not if) the deplorables wake up and realize that nothing has changed for them, because the alt-right media hate machine is repeatedly grinding out lies and misinformation 24/7 blaming “liberals” for everything. That machine has been doing this for more than 30 years and the hate it encourages works.
The deplorables will buy the lies 100 percent and keep on hating and voting for the very people who are wrecking their lives until the U.S. Constitution and its safeguards for the people has less value than toilet paper.