A new study based on publicly available data on the state’s website finds that the state has wasted millions of federal dollars designated for charter schools. Of the state’s federally funded charter schools, 37% either never opened or were among the state’s lowest performing schools. Only recently, the U.S. Department of Education decided to award another $71 million to expand the charter industry in Ohio, but the new funding has been delayed because of outrage over scandals in the state’s charters. The study was conducted by the Ohio Charter School Accountability Project.
New Study Shows Millions Intended for High-Performing Charter Schools
Went to Some of Ohio’s Worst – and Others That Never Even Opened
For Immediate Release: May 26, 2106
COLUMBUS – The federal government has sent more money to Ohio to expand “high-performing” charter schools than all but two other states, but Ohio spent millions on some of the lowest-performing schools. And nearly $4 million went to schools that never opened, according to a new analysis.
The Ohio Charter School Accountability Project did the analysis to determine how a state with so many of America’s worst-performing charter schools could be in line for so much federal money intended to help the best ones.
Ohio ranks third nationally in total money received during the program’s 21-year history. During that time, the U.S. Department of Education did just one assessment of the grants’ success in Ohio. Although it raised serious questions about the Ohio Department of Education’s ability to properly distribute the money, nothing appears to have changed as a result.
“As Ohio takes steps to make charter school sponsors more accountable under the reform law passed last year, it’s important that policy makers understand the past,” said OEA President Becky Higgins. “Together with our colleagues at Innovation Ohio and ProgressOhio, we examined how these Charter School Program (CSP) grants have been awarded, and tried to identify the shortfalls along the way. Ohio cannot afford to waste money on failing charter schools. It needs to invest in the good ones.’’
The new analysis, Belly Up: A Review of Federal Charter School Grants, shows how state and federal education departments ignored warning signs, systemically wasted tax dollars and made learning more difficult for many Ohio students.
Among the main findings:
· Of the 292 Ohio charter schools that have received federal CSP funding since 2006, 108 (37 percent) have closed or never opened, totaling nearly $30 million. Meanwhile, barely 2 percent of all companies nationwide that have received any federal grants or incentives since 2000 have failed.
· The Ohio tally includes 26 charter schools that received nearly $4 million in CSP funding but never opened. There are no records to indicate whether any of these public funds was returned.
· Ohio charters that received past CSP funding and State Report Card grades in the 2014-2015 school year had a median Performance Index score that was lower than all but 15 of Ohio’s 613 school districts.
· Since the federal grant program began 21 years ago, its lone assessment – conducted by WestEd – identified material weaknesses that appear to have been ignored by federal grant makers. In one instance, a potential grant reviewer even told the Ohio Department of Education that she was unqualified for the job and asked to be excluded from its reviewers’ list. Instead, the department thanked her for “agreeing to participate as a community school grant reader.”
· Paolo DeMaria, recently appointed Ohio Superintendent of Public Instruction, was Associate Superintendent of Finance and School Options at the time WestEd raised concerns about Ohio’s processes for distributing the federal money to charter schools.
Of the 44 Ohio charter schools where State Auditor David Yost conducted surprise attendance audits recently, 17 had received federal CSP funding. One of them – the London Academy – only had 10 of the 270 students ODE thought it had in attendance the day Yost’s investigators showed up. All told, these audited schools received about $6.6 million in federal funding.
Last September, federal officials stunned education experts by announcing that Ohio would receive $71 million in CSP grants – more than any other state. Ohio’s large award came in spite of its reputation as one the worst charter states in the country, according to national charter advocates. The swift and severe criticism that followed prompted USDOE to put Ohio’s award on hold.
“We urge federal regulators to revamp the way in which it makes grants so that the money goes to the best performing charter schools,” said Innovation Ohio President Keary McCarthy. “The mistakes of the past should not be repeated in the awarding of future grants.”
Those mistakes include giving millions to the state’s most notorious charter school scofflaws, including:
· Horizon Science Academies and Noble Academies: Total CSP Grants: 7.6 million
Linked to a Muslim cleric exiled in Pennsylvania, the chain is the subject of an ongoing FBI investigation, and WikiLeaks revealed cables showing the U.S. State Department notified the CIA about suspicious visas for teachers and administrators. In June 2014, 19 of its schools were raided by the FBI, including four in Ohio. The Ohio schools also have been dogged by allegations of test-tampering, teachers using racial slurs in the classroom, unqualified teachers, sexual misconduct in the classroom. ODE investigated allegations raised by teachers who witnessed the problems but found no wrongdoing.
· Imagine Schools: Total CSP Grants: $5.9 million
The chain has been under fire nationally for saddling schools with exorbitant leases paid to its subsidiary, SchoolHouse Finance. Imagine recently lost lawsuits in Indiana and Missouri over the same type of abusive leases seen in Ohio. A federal judge in Missouri ordered Imagine to pay $1 million and called the lease arrangement “self-dealing.’’ One of the chain’s worst-performing Ohio schools, Romig Road in Akron, is among the charters that closed – but received federal grant money. All of Imagine’s Ohio schools received a D or F on the most recent state report cards.
· White Hat Management: Total CSP Grants: $1.4 million
Owner David Brennan has been the most powerful and influential of Ohio’s charter school operators since state money started flowing to them. Brennan’s schools also are routinely among the lowest performing. While Ohio’s historically lax regulations make it difficult to close even the worst schools, several of Brennan’s schools have been shut down for academic reasons or contractual non-compliance. Staffers for GOP state Auditor David Yost made surprise visits to charters to see if they are padding attendance records and concluded that White Hat’s dropout recovery schools were among the worst.
It’s been well documented that ODE’s grant application for the $71 million was inaccurate and misleading, prompting state officials to revise the number of poor-performing charter schools in Ohio from six on its initial application to 57 – a tenfold increase. The author of the application, David Hansen, was forced to resign as head of ODE’s office of school choice and community schools after getting caught illegally cooking the state’s accountability system to benefit Ohio’s politically connected eSchool operators.
It is unclear when or if federal regulators will release the $71 million.
The Ohio Charter School Accountability Project is a joint venture of the Ohio Education Association, Innovation Ohio and ProgressOhio. OEA and IO host the website, knowyourcharter.com, which provides data from the Ohio Department of Education on how the state’s charter schools are faring compared to local public schools.
For More Information, contact:
Stephen Dyer, Innovation Ohio Education Fellow, 330-338-1486
Keary McCarthy, Innovation Ohio President, 614-425-9163

I welcome all of this documentation of fraud. I wish that would leverage a full stop to all federal funding for charter schools in every state, and an alliance of state auditors who would look at the fraud and waste and the continued posturing that these schools are so….so … much better than the “comparable” public schools. There are few “comparables” because the resources for public schools are damaged by funds traveling to charter schools.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agree.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Senators Sherrod Brown and Rob Portman owe Ohioans an answer, as to why they support charter schools and, why they support current Secretary of Education, King.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I asked Brown that very question regarding King. Here is his reply:
“Thank you for getting in touch with me about the nomination of Dr. John B. King to lead the Department of Education (ED) as Secretary of Education.
In October 2015, Secretary Arne Duncan announced that – after serving as Secretary for almost seven years – he was leaving ED at the end of 2015. Dr. John King Jr. was then named the Acting Secretary of Education. President Obama formally nominated Dr. King to become the next Secretary of Education in January 2016.
Dr. John King Jr. is highly qualified to serve as the Secretary of Education. He started his career in education as a social studies teacher in San Juan and Boston. He later became an administrator, a principal, and a founder of the Roxbury Preparatory charter school network. Dr. King also served as the commissioner of Education for New York State and was Senior Deputy Commissioner of P-12 education for New York. He has demonstrated a longstanding commitment to educational equity, closing the achievement gap, and making sure all students graduate prepared for college or career ready.
The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions held a hearing on Dr. King’s nomination in February and his nomination was moved forward for consideration by the entire Senate. Some groups have expressed concerns about his relationship with charter schools and other concerns about his tenure as commissioner of New York schools. I met with King and discussed the importance of strong defense to repayment regulations to protect students and taxpayers as well as the need for oversight and accountability for all schools, especially charter schools that receive public funding. I was pleased to hear Dr. King’s willingness to address my concerns. Moreover, it is important to have a confirmed Secretary of Education to direct the implementation of the Every Student Succeeds Act and who can be held accountable for the work of ED throughout the remainder of this administration.
On March 9, 2016, the Senate voted on Dr. King’s nomination. While a delayed flight from Ohio back to Washington, D.C. prevented me from casting a vote, my intention was to support Dr. King’s nomination. Dr. John King Jr. was confirmed by a vote of 49-40.
I appreciate hearing your thoughts on this confirmation. The Senate has a constitutional duty to provide advice and consent on all presidential nominees. I will continue to work with my colleagues to ensure that all nominations are quickly and fairly reviewed. As Congress considers education-related legislation, I will work to ensure that all students – regardless of income or geography – have access to a high quality education.”
LikeLike
Doug,
Say this for Secretary King. His rigid imposition of Common Core and testing and VAM set off the opt out movement
LikeLike
At least he’s good for something, Diane.
LikeLike
Brown’s image as a progressive, is damaged, beyond repair, by his support for privatization of public education.
LikeLike
“Based on publicly available information” so how rigorous could the federal funding analysis be?
They don’t even check the state’s application against the information the state reports on a website?
Who conducts these evaluations? What could they possibly consist of if not information the state collects about charter schools?
The worst part about the “eschools” isn’t the eschools themselves- it’s the big push to jam “online and blended learning” into EVERY public school.
We won’t be able to AVOID this garbage. We’ll be stuck with it, and stuck paying for it.
I am told again and again by tech promoters that tech doesn’t “replace” teachers- except it DOES:
“Though the new report points out disparities in teacher-to-student ratios — with traditional schools reported as having around 16 students per teacher, blended schools with 32.4 per teacher and virtual schools with 35 per teacher — that alone certainly isn’t why the schools have been performing so poorly. Without rigorous accountability standards in place, the door is left open for for-profit ventures to cash in without any negative repercussions. As with any industry, regulation can provide a framework for consumer protection. It’s also worth considering that some students simply aren’t prepared for the greater level of self-motivation required to succeed in such programs, though that’s another area regulation could potentially address.”
This is a rip-off for poor and middle income students. I don’t want a screen replacement for a teacher. I want a teacher just like wealthy schools get.
Given the Obama/Kasich track record why would I ever trust either of them to “reform” my public school with a reasonable and responsible ed-tech initiative? They’re completely reckless and fad-driven. They haven’t earned anyone’s trust.
http://www.educationdive.com/news/virtual-schools-expanding-in-spite-of-issues/419580/#.V0CbnRoD7QY.twitter
LikeLiked by 1 person
Chiara, you have really done a fine job of keeping the rest of us abreast of this disgrace, and I, for one, thank you for it.
LikeLike
Speaking of wasting money, and poor reporting, take a look at this:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/education/wp/2016/05/24/this-company-says-it-can-predict-whether-a-teacher-will-be-any-good-before-entering-a-classroom/
Guess who sits on the advisory board of this very for-profit company?
If you guessed Peter Gorman, who imposed a massive testing regimen in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg schools and later went to work for Rupert Murdoch, and Charlotte Danielson, who sells the Danielson Framework for Teaching, you would be correct. Both are tied to Gates and the Common Core. Gorman’s emphasis on testing brought Charlotte-Mecklenburg a Broad Foundation prize. Woo-hoo. And Danielson? Her Framework has been discussed on this blog a number of times.
The company doesn’t release much about the “research” that is the basis for its teacher placement test.
I’d guess there’s a reason for that.
LikeLike
The irresponsibility and recklessness of ed reform, Part One Thousand:
“After hearing students and teachers overwhelmingly say iPad computers are used to play games in class, while laptops are better for schoolwork, Auburn and other districts are sending iPads packing and returning to laptop.
The Maine Department of Education and Apple are offering Maine schools a “Refresh” swap offer at no additional cost.
Laptops and iPads ordered in 2013 can be returned for new and improved Apple MacBook Air laptops, which cost less than the Apple laptops three years ago.”
Why would people in government, people who are paid by the public, launch this frantic “Future Ready” marketing campaign so schools make stupid, rushed decisions on huge purchases?
I don’t know- are these politicians secretly employed by Apple? It was so important they put every kid in front of a screen immediately they wasted millions of dollars on iPads which teachers say have “no educational value”?
Stop listening to them, public school leaders. They offer consistently bad advice. Use your own judgment. Break with the herd. Local people will love you for it.
http://www.sunjournal.com/news/lewiston-auburn/2016/05/19/state-offering-schools-ipad-trade/1927446
LikeLike
What a joke! Big government and greedy corporations deserve each other on the left and the right! Why people are for Bernie and Trump!! Hard working people are tired of inept government and politics!
LikeLike
What does it take to get such scandalous misappropriation of taxpayer funds in the public consciousness? It is an outrageous misuse of tax dollars! If this occurred in public schools, the evening news would be all over it. This is not just poor journalism; it is a deliberate attempt to control the narrative.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Retired teacher,
The charter industry pays PR firms to control the narrative, to continue claiming that they are better than public schools. The public system can’t waste money creating or controlling the narrative. The good news is that many newspapers in Ohio have begun asking inconvenient questions about the charter industry’s greed and incompetence.
LikeLike
When does Fordham take responsibility, for its part, in the corruption of Ohio’s state capitol, harm to students and, the fleecing of taxpayers?
They’ve been, big player, advocates, for the political creation of the charter school shark pond.
If Fordham has done anything, to fence in the (un)attractive nuisance, where’s the result? Yet, they’re always out there with a quote for the newspapers.
LikeLike
It isn’t because local media have ignored it. There is no bigger ed reform charter cheerleader than the Columbus Dispatch, and even they have been forced to address what’s going on in this state:
“But the straightforward experiment went off the rails when some clever operators figured out how to get rich by sponsoring charter schools. And to keep the gravy flowing, they began making major political contributions to the lawmakers who control the gravy.
And that is why rumors have been flying around the Statehouse about proposals to weaken accountability standards for charter schools so that they can continue to receive millions of taxpayer dollars even as the students they are supposed to educate continue to fall behind. In many cases, particularly with online charter schools, it appears that many students don’t even participate in learning, but the school’s operators continue to be paid by the state as if these students are receiving an education.”
So how does the Obama Administration miss the ongoing ed reform disaster in Ohio? Do they do any due diligence at all? It’s not like they even have to visit these states they’re reforming- all of this is available online.
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/editorials/2016/05/26/1-charter-schools-purpose-forgotten.html
LikeLike
Ignorance is bliss to Obama and his charter cheerleaders! No matter which Democrat prevails, groups that care about public schools should pressure the candidate to address Obama’s disastrous policies and refusal to hold charters accountable.
LikeLike
Rheephorm math:
“Of the 44 Ohio charter schools where State Auditor David Yost conducted surprise attendance audits recently, 17 had received federal CSP funding. One of them – the London Academy – only had 10 of the 270 students ODE thought it had in attendance the day Yost’s investigators showed up. All told, these audited schools received about $6.6 million in federal funding.”
10 of 270. Students, that is. But when it comes to the “data analytics” of corporate education reform, turn those frowning numbers upside down: how much better can it get if you’re getting $tudent $ucce$$ for 270 when you only have 10?
😎
LikeLike
On Monday, Ohio’s state auditor said he wants to split the Dept. of Ed. Yost called it “possibly the worst-run agency in state government.” IMO, Yost thinks the Dept. is unwilling (corrupt) or incapable, based on legislative mismanagement, to be responsible for taxpayer money.
LikeLike
And just where is Governor “I balanced the federal budget” Kasich?
LikeLike
Also, aren’t they always pushing for more fiscal responsibility? Can you actually have fiscal responsibility with no regulation or accountability?
We’ve had a number of these “ghost” charters in MI as well. What a waste and what a shame.
LikeLike
Kasich has invented a new term this week. He said he now wants to “Ubertize” Ohio. I’m not kidding. This won’t go well for many.
LikeLike
Maybe Kasich wants to outsource Ohio
LikeLike
A happy day for me is when John Kasich serves his last day as Ohio governor. It was awesome seeing him get nowhere in the presidential race. That had to frustrate him. He is quite the arrogant man. Instead of giving so much money to failing charters, he needs to be making higher education more affordable in Ohio. He has no clue. I was so tired of hearing him say that he is the son of a mailman. John Kasich could care a less about the working middle class. He wishes to destroy our public schools. His daughters go to private school and will have their pick of universities.
LikeLike
Politicization of state governance + privatization of public education + deregulation = profiteering at the expense of the children raised in poverty. State governance is a dry and abstract topic, but it has corroded public education. If you are fortunate enough to reside in a state where the State Board is independent of the Governor’s office fight to keep it that way! https://waynegersen.com/2016/05/27/knowyourcharter-com-profile-illustrates-everything-wrong-with-ohios-de-regulated-for-profit-charters/
LikeLike
And, deny governors the right to select public university trustees.
LikeLike