Ah, the Brave New World of free-market schooling! The for-profit corporation Imagine Schools just sold its campus in east Manatee, Florida, for $6.6 million. The school will continue to operate there; it has a capacity of 650, and an enrollment of 500 students.
The school, which has about 500 students and a capacity for 650, has roughly nine years left on a lease commitment for the two buildings involved in the sale.
Completed in 2009, the school at 10535 Portal Crossing occupies about three acres. The sale equated to a 10% capitalization rate based on the school’s rent, says Ian Black, whose commercial real estate brokerage firm represented both sides in the transaction.
“What made this transaction somewhat unusual was that Hemisphere didn’t know where Lakewood Ranch was at first, but as they conducted their due diligence and discovered that the ranch had just turned 20 years old, they began to recognize the area’s value and the value of the school, which is a beautiful facility that’s well located,” says Black, founder and president of Ian Black Real Estate.
The Imagine School in Lakewood Ranch is one of 17 such charter schools in Florida, and among 71 Imagine campuses nationwide. In 2013, Imagine’s parent company generated revenue of $250 million, according to marketing materials compiled for the sales effort.
Meanwhile, in Ohio, Imagine Schools was fined nearly $1 million by a federal judge for forcing a lucrative lease agreement on a school it operated.
Under the complex deal, Imagine Schools negotiated the pricey lease with SchoolHouse Finance and presented it to the school board of the Renaissance Academy for Math and Science for approval. Imagine Schools owns SchoolHouse Finance and directly benefited by the agreement.
“This clearly constituted self-dealing,” U.S. District Judge Judge Nanette K. Laughrey wrote in a blistering 29-page ruling.
The Columbus Dispatch added:
Sound familiar? The Dispatch in October reported about a North Side charter school spending more than half of the tax dollars it receives on rent in a very similar lease deal with Imagine Schools and SchoolHouse Finance. The board of the Imagine Columbus Primary Academy asked Imagine to renegotiate the lease but that has not happened.
Other Ohio charter-school operators use similar lease deals, and while apparently legal, supporters and opponents complained that they wasted tax dollars and lawmakers pledged to take a look.
In the earlier story, the Columbus Dispatch learned that an Imagine Schools charter school was paying more in rent than to staff and other costs.
A North Side charter school expects to spend more of the tax dollars it receives this school year on rent than on teachers and staff.
Imagine Columbus Primary Academy projects building-lease payments of $700,000, making rent the school’s top expense, eating up more than half its annual state revenue, according to a school financial report. The school expects to pay $614,000 on salaries and benefits this year.
Similar arrangements are in place for the other five Imagine Schools in Franklin County.
Who is charging the charter schools such high rent? A company called SchoolHouse Finance — which is a subsidiary of Imagine.
It gets even more complicated: SchoolHouse buys the buildings, resells them typically for two or three times the purchase price, and then leases the facility from the new owner so it can rent the space back to Imagine.
Five of the schools in Franklin County received a combined $20.2 million in the 2012-13 school year, according to their most recent state audits. A quarter of that money — more than $5.1 million — was spent on rent, all under long-term leases with SchoolHouse Finance.
A sixth school, Imagine Integrity Academy, spent 81 percent of its $440,009 in state aid on rent, according to an audit for the 2011-12 school year, the most recent available.
And on top of the leases, Imagine is being paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for “indirect costs” as operator of the schools, records show.
The upshot is that the complex deals are diverting hundreds of thousands of public dollars to one of the nation’s largest charter-school operators, Imagine Schools Inc., and its affiliates. Imagine operates 67 charter schools in 11 states and the District of Columbia. At least three states and Washington, D.C., are investigating Imagine for real-estate maneuvers like those in Ohio, and a fourth state, Missouri, already has shut down several Imagine schools.
Why aren’t these for-profit schemes illegal? Why should tax dollars enrich profiteers?

“And on top of the leases, Imagine is being paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for “indirect costs” as operator of the schools, records show.
The upshot is that the complex deals are diverting hundreds of thousands of public dollars to one of the nation’s largest charter-school operators, Imagine Schools Inc., and its affiliates. Imagine operates 67 charter schools in 11 states and the District of Columbia. At least three states and Washington, D.C., are investigating Imagine for real-estate maneuvers like those in Ohio, and a fourth state, Missouri, already has shut down several Imagine schools.”
It may be impossible to find out, but I bet people in Ohio would like to know if tax money collected for K-12 education in Ohio stays in Ohio.
Does anyone know if the national charter chains can transfer public funds from one subsidiary to another, in another state, either directly or thru the use of creative accounting? Money is fungible. They can shift costs and funding in an almost endless variety of ways. Public schools, of course, can’t do this. If I need funding for a Toledo public school I can’t transfer funds from Chicago Public Schools.
LikeLike
That’sa very good question. i’m sure legally you shouldn’t be able to but the way these natonal orgnizations work, i’m sure some of that is being done. Whose overseeing them to ensure this, no one. Charters are basically doing whatever they want with public funds, that’s why they exist.
LikeLike
I think the PROFIT is definitely transferable. It’s a private company. I don’t know how states could regulate that.
I was curious if Congress grappled with any of these issues when they put in the new huge charter building program. They didn’t. I guess the plan is to pump in money and dump all the pesky details on local communities.
It’s wildly irresponsible. No one has thought this thru at all.
LikeLike
I hope our local public’s legal community (starting with our City Attorney, Jackie Lacey ….and state AG Kamala Harris) is looking into this kind of self serving profit making with Ref Rodriguez and his 16 PUC charter schools in LA. The red flag went up on this BoE candidate last week when an internal LAUSD audit report finally was leaked to the public over the objections of his pal, LAUSD BoE member Monica Garcia who wanted it kept hidden. And then as a result, it showed insider profits from a food vendor who was on his payroll as an exec of PUC among other long term fiduciary violations.
BTW, researching his donors, most are the wealthy friends and colleagues of not only Eli Broad, but also sit on Boards with Carrie Walton and other billionaire privatizers who are supporters of charter schools and killing teachers unions.
This lease back and sale of land financed by the taxpayers is a major source of profits for charter operators…and it seems crooked on its’ face. These charter merchants work with developers to enrich themselves at the public’s expense. I wrote about this in regards to Chicago and Rahm’s gifting of many schools to these charlatans for mere pennies on the taxpayer dollar. (See the New London, Conn. case I refer to there as precedent…’stare decisis’.) The real property aspects of embedding charters on existing public school campuses is fraught with the potential for illegitimate profiteering.
LikeLike
From the posting, a bit from the Columbus Dispatch:
“A North Side charter school expects to spend more of the tax dollars it receives this school year on rent than on teachers and staff.”
The newspaper is obviously missing the point—it’s all for the kids! Because charters, by their very nature, do more with less!
😳
Translation from Rheephormish: they do a lot more for a few adults and a lot less for the kids and all the adults that do the actual work.
When did smash-and-grab artists become the “new civil rights movement of our time”?
😎
LikeLike
Ohio charters pay their teachers 40% less than Ohio public schools.
It’s not cage-busting. We’ve known how to do race the bottom wages for a very long time in the US.
I guess what’s new and different is it’s all public money. I can’t tell you how thrilled I am to support an industry that lowers wages where I live and work. At least Wal Mart isn’t publicly-funded.
LikeLike
Walmart’s employees are publicly funded when the taxpayer subsidizes their wages, by providing essential healthcare, food stamps, etc.
The harm caused by the amount the Waltons take out of each state, in profits, has yet to be exposed.
LikeLike
The “market” ramifications are really interesting, too. If Imagine can clear a profit on kids they can take that profit and expand and compete with a public school district anywhere.
That puts public schools at a competitive disadvantage. You have one actor that has to operate within the strictures of a public and restricted funding stream and another that has a national for-profit funding stream.
Public schools can’t win this game. They’ll eventually be knocked out by the national chains.
LikeLike
Inevitably, it’s a bubble. Who loses when it bursts?
LikeLike
Aha, you have it, a public stream of money for private interest. Could this be any sweeter for privateers? That’s why I say charters are scamming the public. Will people wake up in time to stop this? I truly hope so.
LikeLike
This is crazy. I’m sure the only people that want their tax dollars spent in this way are the ones profiting from the convoluted purchase and lease agreements. Thanks for shedding light on this. More transparency is needed.
LikeLike
There is an unhealthy collusion between legislators and charter schools. In this morning’s paper there was an article about Eric Fresen, a Miami Republican. He just sponsored a bill to shift millions of dollars from public education to charters. This guy owns a design firm that builds charter schools.. His sister is married to the head of one the state’s biggest charter chains. This is disgusting! Too many of Florida’s legislators are just there to feather their own nest. This should be illegal. This guy has an obvious conflict of interest. The voters need to wake up.
LikeLike
OMG…where is the public protest?
LikeLike
US DOE is investigating them.
http://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2015/04/south-miami-based-charter-school.html
Here is the Miami-Dade School Audit.
https://algaonline.org/DocumentCenter/View/2446
LikeLike
Substitute teacher,
Don’t hold your breath waiting for US DOE to investigate a charter chain
LikeLike
Are the Wall Streeters backing this really telling the public that it’s a better deal not to own the property and facilities the public funded?
Would they take that deal? Trading an ownership interest for a lease? The public finances the facility and then pays the owner to use the facility they just finished funding? How is this not a blatant rip-off?
It would be great if we had some group of people we elected who could work in our interest and protect our investment 🙂
Maybe we can hire some lawyers.
LikeLike
Well, but, public schools sell their campuses for obscene profits and turn around and pay exorbitant rent to affiliates all the time.
Oh, wait, they don’t. Any of our resident charter advocates want to come and defend this practice?
LikeLike
“Imagine Cheaters”
Dealing oneself a straight-flush hand?
Imagine that? I simply can’t
The charter is a card-shark scam?
Imagine that. Well, I’ll be DAMmed
LikeLike
“Charteracketeering”
One hand pays
The other grabs
Charter ways
To launder cash:
Rent to self
At sky-high rate
Accrue the wealth
For later date
LikeLike
“The Cost of doing Business”
A slap on wrist
A minor fine
Such is the cost
Of charter crime
LikeLike
“…resells them typically for two or three times the purchase price…” that’s going to generate securitized mortgages, insured by hedge funds. And, whenever the mortgages are for that much more than the real estate value, somebody will have a lot of loose money to bank offshore. This goes way beyond just stealing taxpayer money to pay the rent.
LikeLike
So if a chain or chains were able to knock out the public schools in a given area, what happens if the charter chain then goes under or simply becomes less profitable and the owner pulls out?
They then re-establish a publicly-owned school system? We all know the answer is “no”. Once we lose “publicly-owned” we will never, ever get it back.
LikeLike
That’s why we have to keep working to push back against the charter invasion. Keep schools local with parents’ voices being heard.
LikeLike
Columbus Disgrace reporter, Catherine Candisky, is one more “journalist” who apparently has Fordham on speed dial but, fails at balance, by getting neither an opposing view nor, citing the funding source for Fordham, in her articles.
The latest slippery charter accountability avoidance scheme, is the “research” that says students aren’t hurt by school closure disruptions. Is it too much to expect a reporter to ask the follow-up question? Impact on the community, taxpayers, employees and their families……?
LikeLike
Just Imagine the possibilities!
LikeLike
You saw my prior comment about free market economist and MIT grad, Steven Levitt’s board membership at Blueprint Schools?
LikeLike
State schools launder money … the very people you want to regulate the private sector probably taught them all the tricks. Any one can donate to a school, and those in cahoots use school funds for their pet projects …. like excess travel, paying their friends $$$,$$$.$$ for “Expert” advice … I was looking for news on this situation and found this article. I would say look for the money from this “Private” enterprise and political collusion will be hiding in the dorm somewhere.
LikeLike