Bob Shepherd, veteran designer of curriculum, texts, and educational publishing, explains here why the Common Core is wrong to favor informational text over fiction, argument over narrative.
Shepherd writes:
One of the many things that Coleman didn’t know about ELA (one could make a very long list there) is that getting a handle on narrative is essential. He decided unilaterally, for the rest of us, to de-emphasize narrative in favor of argument.
Narrative is arguably the primary means by which we make sense of the world. Let me tell you a story
Not so long ago. . .
the world was completely different.
Anatomically modern humans have existed for about 200,000 years.
But only since the end of the eighteenth century has artificial lighting been widely used. Gas lamps were introduced in European cities about that time, and electric lights came into use only in the twentieth century.
In other words, for most of human history, when night fell, it fell hard. Things got really, really dark. . .
and people gathered under the stars, which they could REALLY see in those days before electric lights. . .
and under those stars, they gathered around fires and told stories.
In every culture around the globe. . .
Storytelling existed LONG before the invention of writing. We know this because the earliest manuscripts that we have in every case record stories that were ancient then.
Where does this storytelling urge among humans come from, and why is it universal?
Contemporary cognitive scientists have learned that storytelling is an essential faculty of the human mind, involved in every aspect of our lives, including our dreams, memories, and beliefs about ourselves and the world.
Storytelling turns out to be the fundamental way in which our brains are organized to make sense of our experience. Only in very recent years have scientists come to understand this. We are ESSENTIALLY storytelling creatures.
If that sounds like an overstatement, attend to what I am about to tell you. It’s amazing, and it will make you rethink a LOT of what you think you know.
When you look out at the world, you have the impression of taking everything in and seeing a continuous field.
But scientists have discovered that in fact, at any given moment, people attend to at most about seven bits of information from their immediate environment. The brain FILLS IN THE REST, based on previously gathered information and beliefs about the world. In short, your brain tells you a STORY about what you are seeing, and that is what you actually “see.”
Again, at any given moment, people attend to at most about seven bits of information from their immediate environment, even though there are literally millions and millions of things that they could be thinking about or attending to. This limitation of our mental processors to seven bits of information at a time is why telephone numbers are typically seven digits long. That’s the most information that people can attend to at any particular moment. So, at any given moment, you are attending to only a few small bits of your environment, and your brain is FILLING IN THE REST, based on previously gathered information, to create a complete picture for you. In short, your brain is continuously telling you a STORY about what you are seeing. The rods and cones at the back of your eye that take in visual information are interrupted by a place where the optic nerve connects to your brain. In other words, there is a blind spot where NO INFORMATION AT ALL IS AVAILABLE, but your brain automatically fills that information in for you. It tells you a story about what’s there.
The same thing happens when you remember something. Your brain only stores PARTS of the VERY FEW THINGS that you attend to in your present moments. Then, when you remember something, it CONFABULATES—it makes up a complete, whole story of what was PROBABLY the case and presents a whole memory to you, with many of the gaps filled in. In other words, memory is very, very, very faulty and based upon the storytelling. (For more on memory as confabulation, see the wonderful work of psychologist Elizabeth Loftus.)
Years ago, I had a dream that I was flying into the island of Cuba on a little prop plane. Through the window, I could see the island below the plane. It looked like a big, white sheet cake, floating in an emerald sea. Next to me on the airplane sat a big, red orangutan with a golf club.
Weird, huh? So why did I have that dream? Well, in the days preceding the dream I had read a newspaper story about Fidel Castro, the leader of Cuba, being ill; I had flown on a small prop plane; I had attended a wedding where there was a big, white sheet cake; I had been to the zoo with my grandson, where we saw an orangutan; and I had played golf with some friends.
The neural circuits in my brain that had recorded these bits and pieces were firing randomly in my sleeping brain, and the part of the brain that does storytelling was working hard, trying to piece these random fragments together into a coherent, unified story.
That’s the most plausible current explanation of why dreams occur. They make use of this storytelling function of the brain.
Who you are—your very SELF—is a story that your brain tells you about yourself and your history and your relations to others—a story with you as the main character. The story you tell yourself about yourself becomes the PERSON you are.
The word person, by the way, comes from persona—the Latin word for a mask worn by an actor in the Roman theatre (which was, in turn, based on Greek theatre).
So, our very idea of ourselves, of our own personal identity, is dependent upon this storytelling capacity of the human brain, which takes place automatically.
In fact, there is a new form of psychotherapy called cognitive narrative therapy that is all about teaching people to tell themselves more life-enhancing, affirmative stories about themselves, about who they are.
Telling yourself the right kinds of stories about yourself and others can unlock your creative potential, improve your relationships, and help you to self create—to be the person you want to be.
So, storytelling is key to being human. It’s one of our essential characteristics. It’s deeply embedded in our brains. It fills every aspect of our lives. Years ago, the historiographer Hayden White, in an essay called “The Literary Text as Historical Artifact,” pointed out that we tell ourselves that we’ve understood historical events once we have imposed a narrative frame upon them.
We make sense of the world via storytelling.
So it’s no wonder that people throughout history have told stories. People are made to construct stories—plausible and engaging accounts of things—the way a stapler is made to staple and a hammer is made to hammer. We are truly Homo vates, man the storyteller.
Storytelling is an essential, or defining characteristic of our species, one of those things that makes a human a human.
But Coleman understood nothing of that, clearly.
Why is anyone taking him at all seriously?

I know that I am probably late to the party but I just saw the Forbes cover for Dec…Walton, Milken and Malala together…wtf???!!!
LikeLike
Wow. Those three on the cover together. Must be an attempt to virtualize and privatize education in Pakistan.
Regarding the article, I have found that narratives can inform youth on how to solve their own social circumstances by how characters in narratives behave when confronted by social dilemmas. Heck, can work for adults, too.
LikeLike
Ugh. We need rewrite that false narrative. The narrative that this Forbes agitprop evokes is ‘The Picture of Dorian Gray.’
LikeLike
Coleman spit upon the many great story tellers of our time the Twains, the Bradbury’s and let’s not forget the storytellers beyond our borders (and boy are there many there too)… there are those that imagined other times or worlds… there are those that poked fun of their current world. The arrogance of Coleman to singlehandedly decide for each child and future adult of this nation WHAT THE HUMAN EXPERIENCE SHOULD BE!!! Shepard… thanks for honoring the importance of story telling. While great stories unfold from the seemingly small package of a book cover… sometimes great things DO NOT EMERGE from small packages – I endured listening to Coleman spew his garbage at the Teaching and Learning Conference in DC and boy is he ONE SMALL PACKAGE spewing SH – nothing grand!
LikeLike
I continue to wonder if these same play-an-expert-on-TV CorpEdDeformers decided to ‘take over’ other professions such as Law, Architecture, Engineering, Medicine… Would those professionals continue to correct and ‘teach’ these Non-Educated PolicyWonks the details of their professional knowledge? Would they for years try to react to why specific medical procedures are used and should be used, why engineers & architects do what they do? Of course not!
In the field of Education, we are historically used to having untrained folks telling us what to do, how to do it, how children learn and what happens to us if we do not cooperate with these nitwits!
Historical because it is still a ‘female’ profession and America can’t let go of the ‘Ring around the collar’ mentality that little women know little & must be told what to do.
When will this ever stop?
Now, it is worse than ever, at least in my years as an educator. The quantification of every data point and misuse of such data, aligned with the $B pumped into it, is killing Teaching, schools, children and our families.
David Coleman and thousands just like him are the Poster Children…the new Beautiful People who are telling RealEducators what we need to do. Unreal!
Now, on to Higher Ed!
The Obama Social Revolution will run its course. How long?
LikeLike
Hey Bob,
As a novelist (besides elementary school teacher in protest/sanity-saving retirement),
I especially appreciated your explanation of the importance of story telling to people’s lives. It’s important for people to reflect upon, do some meta-cognition about what is driving their own story, to ascertain whether they are creating something truly uplifting and fulfilling, truly connected to the real world, or whether those seven details focused upon are cherry-picked to wallow in personal neuroses. I think this is where Coleman’s story, about both himself and the world of education, has gone off the rails. One cannot give up hope that many of the people telling the education reform tale will finally wake up and realize that, after all, their story makes about as much sense as flying over a floating sponge cake discussing graphite versus iron shafts with an orangutan.
thanks again!
LikeLike
Here is a good one from the NY Times: “How Reading Transforms Us”
I ‘taught’ reading for four decades, first in primary grades, and finally in middle school, where I CHOSE the stories and ALL texts that the kids would read. I introduced them to the lyrical language, the powerful human themes, the of craft of story-telling, and we read Guy De Maupassant, Ray Bradbury, Saki, O’Henry, Poe, Rawlings (The Yearling) and many more. They also read a minimum of 100 books for the individualized reading program, all of which led to the highest scores in NYC on the reading tests.
They wrote stories and essays, and won every writing competition in NYC; they placed third in NYS on the ELA (writing) test, which was why my practice was chosen as the cohort for the real National Standards.
I cannot grasp the insanity that is allowing non-educators to hi-jack American public education. It is a coordinated assault, and they are using ‘Weaponsof Mass Instruction”..John Taylor Gatto’s latest book.
LikeLike
Bob: nice summary of Constructivism (and why it is pretty much incompatible with CCSS).
LikeLike
Beautiful article! I couldn’t agree more. Like Susan commented, I can’t believe the insanity of allowing non-educators to destroy curriculum that we know worked and worked well. I miss my old curriculum so badly. It’s like I lost my friend.
All I can say is that they have destroyed our economy, so there is plenty of time for them to focus on and finally destroy our public schools. They have destroyed everything else. There is so much money for them to make on the way of finally ending public education as we know it.
All I am going to do when I return from Christmas break is practice for PARCC testing. More and more teaching time dissolves and is no longer available for my students and me. It is so sad.
LikeLike
Thank you Bob! for a wonderful, readable review on the anti-storytelling debacle of CCSS. Yes, you are right, we humans are animated storytellers who use narrative to make sense of their experience and to for other tasks like building bonds and also defending ourselves from blame. Can I ask, is it possible that non-fiction can also be a kind of storytelling about the world–telling us in words and pictures what exists, what is good and bad, what is possible and not possible, generally what things around us mean? I’m wondering if it’s reasonable to consider “narrative” a sub-genre of storytelling while non-fiction prose of all kinds is another? This could mean that “storytelling” is even more pervasive and compelling than its form as literary narration. Perhaps the literary qualities of narrative do compel attention in ways that most non-fiction texts and utterances cannot(certainly true of technical texts), so this elevated or sensory language us in fiction makes that form of storytelling magnetic and inspiring to kids and adults both. There has been a new genre evolving for 20 yrs now–“creative non-fiction”–which uses literary language and storytelling tropes like “dialogue” to convey character, conflict, and situations. Perhaps Dr. Coleman the Gradgrind of American Education promotes “non-fiction” b/c he sees it as a tool to discipline, manage, and even punish kids and teachers with dull informational texts. But, I’m wondering if we should refuse to let Coleman own “non-fiction.” Maybe narrative is simply pervasive across many forms of communication, from which we learn what things mean in the world, our places in it, and what we should do and think in regard to representations of reality.
Well, a wonderful holiday season to you Bob and your family–learn so much from all your posts, many thanks. And many thanks to Diane for hosting this indispensable site and all the exceptional folks who post here.
LikeLike
Well stated. Love your mind.
LikeLike
Thanks for your kind words.
LikeLike
Bob is right, as always, about how our minds are “made” for narrative. For an excellent extended explanation and exploration of this fascinating topic, equally critical of the CCSS, see Thomas Newkirk’s Minds Made for Stories (Heinemann 2014)
Great post, Bob!
LikeLike
Bob Shepherd, Great article about how vital storytelling is. I echo those who are in disbelief that we are permitting non-educators to destroy curriculum in public education. In removing narrative writing, and altering persuasive to argumentative form, it appears the intent is to remove human connection from writing. By eliminating narration, even factual writing loses context. What is happening today appears to be a cynical attempt to make the general population susceptible to manipulated data, and prey to mis- and disinformation.
LikeLike
That’s why my old blog was almost purely stories.
http://maestraG.blogspot.com
Most people do not understand “those kids.” Why? Because they cannot imagine lives so radically different from their own. Stories can help.
LikeLike
“A Whale of a Tale”
Coleman tells a tale
Both fanciful and grim
The Common Core’s a whale
That swallows Huck and Jim
LikeLike
good one, sOME dam pOET!
LikeLike
Interestingly, some of the people pulling the levers of power in this country have no qualms about telling us THEIR narratives. That’s the power they have….they negate other peoples’ stories and elevate their own. I’m trying to imagine David Coleman, for example, confronting Bill Gates or Arne Duncan and telling them that, “people really don’t give a **** about what [they] feel or think.” We know that Coleman’s advice applies only to the lower classes. We know that because it’s part and parcel of the underlying narrative that permeates our winner-take-all economy: KISS UP AND KICK DOWN. That’s a sick lesson to teach our children.
To cite another example, consider NYS Ed Commissioner John B. King, whose biography has been repeated endlessly. I was sitting next to a well respected member of the NYS Assembly one time and I remarked about King’s tough childhood. He did face a truly bad situation. “A lot of people had rough times,” the lawmaker replied, obviously weary of hearing King’s rags to riches story.
It’s probably no surprise that, since our nation is heading back towards the economic inequity of the late 1800s Gilded Age, Horatio Alger-style rags to riches stories are in vogue. Except this time around, so many of those sagas come in the form of people competing on reality TV….. the Voice, American Idol, Survivor etc….etc, Of course, the chance of winning these shows is about the same as taking home a huge lottery jackpot.
I’m a history teacher and history, of course, relies on storytelling. Proponents of the Common Core say they intend to pare down the scope of what’s covered in history classes and focus on material in depth. Hmmm. It’ll be interesting to see whose history gets cut out in their plans. Or. will history teachers once again be expected to do it all…which is impossible.
Whose story gets told? We will see.
LikeLike
Meant to mention that the works of Walter Ong are really indespendible for anyone interested in human cultures very, very slow transition from orality to print literacy (still going on in Shakespeare’s day, surprisingly enough, and the the relatively rapid transition to the world of “secondary orality” with which we are all so familiar today. And I suppose one could also say that Nicholas Carr’s the shallows brings us right up to the present, for better or worse, re how our fascination with (addiction to) electronic communication via the Internet is actively and continuously “rewriting” our brains. Oy vey.
LikeLike
Glad you brought this up, Jonathan. Before the priniting press, it was the troubadors who went from town to town recounting events through musical stories. Even now, some pop and hip hop and rap follows in that tradition.
Shakespeare certainly told many historical stories and they lasted through the years. As a student, I learned more about British history from his lyrical language than from my history books.
But then, I also learned ancient history from the plays of Aristophanes and his cohorts.
Thanks Bob for this wonderful essay. I am sending it to colleagues and others who still stand ridiculously strong for CC.
LikeLike
Thanks Ellen. Another great contributor to this fascinating tale of how our minds became shaped to and shaped by narrative is Alfred B Lord’s Singer of Tales. Building on the work of Millford (sp) Perry’s study of oral traditions, and the way that such traditions would inform a pre-literate society of not only their history but even their laws and customs, he travelled to Yugoslavia is the mid 30’s (if memory serves) to discover a stll-living “singer of tales.” He found one, who could “recite” for hours if sufficiently lubricated, and returned a number of years later, as I recall, to see how this singer’s tale had changed. It was largely the same, as I recall, except that now Harry Truman had made it into this singer’s narrative.
Anyone who purports to ignore or reverse the primacy of narrative in our deep cultural consciousness (and yes, I would include creative non-fiction under this banner) does so at his or peril. And we now have literally hundreds of thousands of CCSS-enveloped elementary school teachers (not to mention a growing number of middle and high school focused educators like myself) who can testify to this reality.
LikeLike
That’s Milford Parry, as it turns out, and it was he, accompanied by Lord, who originally traveled to Yugoslavia to record still-extant “singers of tales.” Lord returned several times to make further recordings. These are now available online, as well as in the archives of Harvard’s Widener Library. Our great works of contemporary narrative non-fiction (Krakower’s Into Thin Air, and David mcCulloch’s John Adams come immediately to mind) are the direct descendents of this deep seated tradition.
How incomprehensible that our present day policy makers at USDOE seem utterly and completely ignorant of these nourishing and abiding steams that feed our collective consciousness in such important and humanizing ways!
LikeLike
That’s Nicholas Carr’s The Shallows, and that should have been and end parenthesis after “surprisingly enough.” Seems I more in Carr’s world than I care to admit to myself!
LikeLike
Do you remember that old poem?
Yesterday upon the stair
I met a man who wasn’t there
He wasn’t there again today
I wish, I wish he’d go away
Somehow the post made me think of this poem. Coleman isn’t really “there” … in my classroom, among my students, during the hours we read, discuss, argue, laugh, and cry about novels, short stories, and poetry. Yet the effect of his ideas is palpable enough that I do find myself wishing he would go away.
LikeLike
“Yesterday” (with apologies to Paul McCartney)
Yesterday, David Coleman seemed so far away
Now it looks as though he’s here to stay
Oh, I believe in yesterday
Suddenly, I’m not half the teacher I used to be
There’s a VAM score hanging over me
Oh, yesterday came suddenly
Why I have to go
I don’t know, they wouldn’t say
I did something wrong
Now I long for yesterday
Yesterday, ed was such a worthy game to play
Now I need a place to hide away
Oh, I believe in yesterday
Why I have to go
I don’t know, they wouldn’t say
I did something wrong
Now I long for yesterday
Yesterday, tests and VAMs just seemed so far away
Now it looks as though they’re here to stay
Oh, I believe in yesterday
LikeLike
SomeDAM Poet: you’ve outdone yourself!
TAGO!
😎
LikeLike
I’ve been studying storytelling and metaphor for quite a few years now. Along the way I’ve collected a few dozen books that support exactly what Bob Shepherd is saying. And I’ve pointed out on Diane’s blog that one of the many things Coleman doesn’t understand is that narrative is more important than argumentation.
(Not that argumentation is bad, in its place. What’s left of the Center for the Study of Reading, which in its heyday cranked out lots of influential research, has an interesting project focusing on “Collaborative Reasoning”: http://csr.education.illinois.edu/CR/index.html )
Still another thing Coleman doesn’t understand is that stories have arguments built into them. Memorable works of fiction and drama tend to embody a clash of values, but unlike most formal arguments, they also embody the ambivalence and ambiguity of life. It’s this embodiment–in the characters, events, and physical details of a story–that creates an emotional experience for the audience.
Especially for students, the disembodied nature of formal argument is less engaging by far, and less meaningful. To de-emphasize literary and dramatic art in favor of argumentation is to miss the points of both story and argument.
For a great example of argument embedded in art, turn on It’s A Wonderful Life. Bedford Falls versus Potterville, George Bailey versus Mr. Potter, and so on. But please don’t ruin it with a Coleman-style “close reading.” (For an extra treat, watch the Saturday Night Live parody of the big confrontation between George and Mr. Potter.)
Happy Holidays to All!
LikeLike
Good comment, thanks Randal.
In the story telling of fiction, metaphor and innuendo encourage critical thinking. I was just reviewing this with some university book club members re: The Museum of Extraordinary Things. Their take was so different from mine (they were all science majors, and I was English/Language Arts) in that they dissed the book as shallow and trite. I was in shock and said it was a morality tale on many levels, i.e. human interaction, parents and children, politics (unions, wealth inequality, false values, honor, dishonor, etc.) So much rich information. Great reading for a high school class.
Only one person agreed with me…and she was an English teacher. As so…..
LikeLike
Wonderful post! Coleman may not care about others’ feelings or opinions, but I do. The heck with Common Core. I let my 1st graders write narratives anyway.
LikeLike
Randal,
Thanks for taking the time to add to Bob’s wonderfully constructed lesson on the importance of storytelling.
While I was reading it, I missed any explicit reference to metaphor as no less important in making sense of the booming buzzing confusion thrust upon us as infants.
I am still taken with the work of Lakoff and Johnson on the reach of metaphor in sense-making and the human body as the main referent for the first little stories we construct.
Thanks again Bob, and to Diane for getting all these wonderful lessons in front of us.
LikeLike
Here, Laura, a little something I wrote to make up for that omission:
LikeLike
How wonderful to have such a teacher’s room to talk with such special teachers.
You made my xmas special.
LikeLike
Ditto. Thanks for the comment, Susan.
From yet ANOTHER English major!
LikeLike
Reblogged this on whatisarealeducation.
LikeLike
Thanks to all that have contributed to this thread.
And let me add my dos centavitos worth—
When we hear of 100% charter graduation rates [attrition? what attrition?] and how charters are public schools just like all the “traditional government monopoly” ones [except for human rights and transparency and taking on all comers and midyear dumps and such] and rheephorm “personalized learning” [aka computerized homogenized learn-by-the-numbers] and all the rest—
It suddenly becomes clear that in order to separate FACT from FICTION, it helps a lot, nay it’s crucial, that you know what FICTION is and is not so you can recognize when you’re dealing in FACT or not.
But surely the “hard data points” crowd couldn’t be any worse in dealing with fact & fiction than anybody else? Or perhaps, just perhaps, when a [now fading] supernova of the self-styled “education reform” firmament can believe [without the slightest proof or documentation] that she all by her lonesome [forget that pesky co-teacher!] took “her” students from the 13th to the 90th percentile, or that the Teach Plus report on testing says it only takes up 1.7% of classroom time when the report literally says something quite different, then I guess anything is possible…
Proof by assertion. Make up your own facts. Pretend no one has ever brought up even the idea of the inconvenient fact. Massage and torture numbers until they say what you want them to say. *In other words, that mix of word salad and cognitive dissonance that David Coleman labels “informational text” or what his critics would label a fanciful mix of fact and fiction.*
So would it be fair to say that the above is the SOP of the self-proclaimed “new civil rights movement” of our time?
“I reject that mind-set.” [Michelle Rhee-Johnson]
Of course, we already knew she would say that…
😎
LikeLike
Nice post. I would add that there is zero evidence that reading more informational text makes students better at anything, not excluding reading informational text. I looked into this a couple of years ago and found that the supppsed experts on this stuff have basically no evidence for their policy recommendations.
http://literacyinleafstrewn.blogspot.com/2013/05/evidence-shows-that-reading.html
LikeLike
Agree with this post. All secondary English teachers know this, and why National Council Teachers of English people have not been more involved in the writing of the Core Standards is beyond me.
LikeLike
And for the answer to THAT puzzling and altogether legitimate question, there is no better answer, at present, than what can be found by reading Anthony Cody’s The Educator and the Oligarch.
LikeLike