Vicki Cobb, a prolific and successful writer of books for children, writes here about the replacement of handcrafted items by machine-made items.
And yet, even with all that is easily available made by machine, more than half of the population, she says, like to make things by hand.
She writes:
Unfortunately the factory mentality has invaded our educational system with the goal of mass producing children to be compliant, conformist, college and career-ready citizens as measured by their performance on standardized tests. It has sucked the passion and joy of learning from classrooms all over the country. This kind of conformity, controlled by fear, runs counter to the “inalienable” right to the “pursuit of happiness” in our Declaration of Independence — our definition of freedom. I would also maintain that this right is behind the United States as a cradle for innovation. Political leaders with an eye to the future say education needs to produce workers who are self-starters, able to independently process enormous amounts of material, sift through it and create new works with added value. In other words, we have to be able to reshuffle what exists, innovate and invent to fill new needs. We must also create people who can adapt to a fast-changing world and to be able to work with people globally, as well as locally. The classroom that can produce such students must allow for diverse interests and abilities, and be a safe place to practice skills and to fail.
I wish I could share her enthusiasm for the Common Core standards. I fear that their purpose and their goal is to mass-produce standardized children. She disagrees. Disagreement is healthy. Let’s keep talking about it.

There seems a disconnect between her observations that so many like to make things by hand; that “the factory mentality has invaded our educational system with the goal of mass producing children to be compliant, conformist, college and career-ready citizens as measured by their performance on standardized tests” and the few lines which suggests some sort of support for the common core standards before the Monkey Wrench in the room is mentioned:
“The Common Core State Standards can be interpreted as an opening to a path of diversity in education. It stipulates what individuals should be able to do with language and with math but it is careful to avoid inserting any specific curriculum. It encourages students to read all sorts of books on many subjects. The common denominator is the ability to read, but what is read is up to the individual. The insistence on standardized testing and test scores is the monkey wrench in this best of intentions. It is having the effect of mechanizing classrooms. ”
Support for the “Standardization” that may be the intended or unintended consequence of implementation of the CCSS would seem the polar opposite of the ultimate hand crafted one-of-a-kind child that is what I would hope to be the shared goal of both parents and educators.
LikeLike
One can judge Common Core by how it was developed and instituted. The deception used to market it to the public is its ultimate demise, despite any small value it may contain.
I, too, fear its purpose is to “mass-produce standardized children”. When I look over a group of children taking standardized tests, I see oppression and control in action. We must develop a better view of what it means to educate children.
“It should be your care, therefore, and mine, to elevate the minds of our children and exalt their courage; to accelerate and animate their industry and activity; to excite in them an habitual contempt of meanness, abhorrence of injustice and inhumanity, and an ambition to excel in every capacity, faculty, and virtue. If we suffer their minds to grovel and creep in infancy, they will grovel all their lives.”
― John Adams
LikeLike
What a beautiful quote from John Adams . . . . I’m assuming the 2nd American president here?
Thank you! It made my month . . . . .
LikeLike
Ms. Cobb’s last paragraph in the article said it well.
It’s not standards that harm children, but I think it’s the rate at which they are taught, the age level at which they are taught, and the amount of items to be covered which don’t allow for true spiraling back and reteaching.
And let’s not forget the high stakes attached to the standards through standardized testing and APPR. This policy and practice is enought to take ANY kind of standard – the best and the worst – and render it frustrating, unfair, and unquestionably counter-productive.
So for those of us who are neutral or even proponents of CCSS, we have shot ourselves in the foot and face if we continue to put most or all of our eggs in the testing basket and define children’s intellects and teachers’ employability in our current APPR as laid out by Arne Duncan and each state education department’s handling of RttT.
What a train wreck . . . . . .
LikeLike
“It’s not standards that harm children,. . . ”
Quite correct as standards are not human and can’t do anything to anyone. It is the human implementation of them that causes all the harm.
LikeLike
Perfect! I agree.
LikeLike
“All of us have eyes. But those eyes are attached to brains, and brains sculpt what we take in, emphasizing this, avoiding that, so that one man and one cat can be as many men and as many cats as the number of people looking. If you’re a salesperson, trial lawyer, cop, robber, politician, parent, friend, anybody … this is worth remembering.” Robert Krulwich on “Krulwich Wonders” NPR 12/22/13
Pretty much what teachers used to do before CC$$ and uber testing. Spoke to a colleague last night who is one of the most radiantly alive, excited teachers I’ve known. 23 year veteran, revered in her district. She said she’s had to cut almost all of the meaningful, creative activities, because they can’t be measured by the SLOs or the tests. A first grade teacher, now counting the years until she can retire because she feels her students suffer instead of experiencing the joy of learning, each in their unique way. She reads Diane daily just to keep afloat. I guess if you predict the future of our country based on what CCSS is doing to education, you’re not going to see the creativity that Vicki Cobb thinks essential. It’s all be the same cat, the same man, and no laughter. (read the Krulwich article.)
LikeLike
Ms. Heckler, your second paragraph characterizes what is going on in almost all school with almost all teachers throughout the United States.
The reformers not only want to reform education; they want to forever change the face and eyesight of democracy by throwing acid upon it . . . .
LikeLike
“She said she’s had to cut almost all of the meaningful, creative activities, because they can’t be measured by the SLOs or the tests.”
Another GAGAer, eh!
(and that’s not to discount her as a teacher, but until any and all teachers stand up and refuse to be GAGAers we’ll have all the same excrement poured on our heads.)
LikeLike
Doo-ane:
Teachers are not standing for it. I am remembering that teachers are parents also who send their kids to public schools.
It’s a process, we teachers not standing for this.
Refuse to do any of this and see how long you last in the school system or can make a liviing . . . .
But I share your sentiments. It’s too bad the AFT and NEA can’t seem to permanently pull out their you-know-what out of the reformers’ you-know-what.
LikeLike
The genesis of the Standards shows they are inseparable from the high stakes exams, and are in fact a vehicle for them. It’s in their DNA.
With the exception of high performing schools/districts serving communities that have some political juice, giving them the political wherewithal to carve out a wee dram of autonomy and discretion, the tests are intended to be the curriculum.
LikeLike
“The genesis of the Standards shows they are inseparable from the high stakes exams, and are in fact a vehicle for them. It’s in their DNA.”
EXACTLY!!
And that is why I implore all who read this and everyone else to read Noel Wilson’s complete destruction of educational standards and standardized testing, and even the “grading” of students in his never refuted nor rebutted seminal dissertation “Educational Standards and the Problem of Error” found at:
http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/577/700
Folks, it ain’t rocket science that we’re talking about here, it’s much more important, the lives and being of the most innocent of society, the children and how they are used and abused by these educational malpractices.
LikeLike
Common Core *is* factory production of our children.
LikeLike
“Unfortunately the factory mentality has invaded our educational system with the goal of mass producing children to be compliant, conformist. . .
Been that way for well over 100 years.
LikeLike
“Political leaders. . .”
In an ideal democratic nation there wouldn’t be any concept of “political leaders”. Those who chose to serve the country in the political realm would know and realize that they are the servants of the people and not leaders.
The concept of “leaders” is one of the base/fundamental, flawed problems of most people’s thinking as it inures them into being “followers” who will unknowingly. unconsciously perpetrate the greatest harms to others. Need I give any examples??
LikeLike
“We must also create people who can adapt to a fast-changing world and to be able to work with people globally, as well as locally.”
REALLY???
Says who???
That is a truly appalling and enslaving thought-that someone should/can “create people”.
As a teacher I don’t “create” no one (yes that’s a double negative on purpose, hell over 50% of the world’s languages allow double negatives, but then again maybe that’s why English has become the world’s top language at the moment, who knows). I help students to learn Spanish and whatever else they learn along the way is up to them.
LikeLike
Agree, Duane. It’s really EMPERIAL-LIKE. The politicians and deformers think they are kings and queens with their proclamations about what WE should do. Like they know.
LikeLike
“Empirical” vs. “Imperial”: A Pair of Words That Really Should Not Be Confused
LikeLike
I work in a very fast paced and very diverse ER. I did not need any specialized training to work here. The “golden rule” seems to have worked just fine. We can’t embrace diversity by selling a singular experience in education.
LikeLike
My response to Vickie Cobb at Huffington: I don’t understand how you can state that CCSS “stipulates what individuals should be able to do with language.. but it is careful to avoid inserting any specific curriculum.” I can only speak to literature, but I have examined many of the ELA standards. Almost every one I have looked into imposes very specific, and often narrow pedagogy, such as ‘close reading of a text’ (one school of mid-20thc. literary analysis), ‘identifying structure of a text’ (a jargonated module which packages a misinterpretation of 1 or 2 passing ed studies), passing analytical fads such as teasing out an author’s [supposed] intention rather than letting the work stand on its own– I could go on & on. A few are fine. A few are garbled, conflating several ideas in a mish-mosh. Most egregiously, the K-2 standards are wildly age-inappropriate, requiring taking notes and writing summaries on a text while kids are still in the process of learning to read and write!
LikeLike