Wendy Lecker, a civil rights attorney in Connecticut, remembers when Connecticut Governor Dannell Malloy was a champion for equitable funding.
But no longer.
He recently spoke at the conservative American Enterprise Institute in Washington, D.C., and boasted about the success of his “reform” program.
According to Lecker:
At his AEI speech, Malloy shockingly dismissed the need to provide all children with educational opportunities as “old rhetoric.” His focus is not on educational opportunity, he claimed, but rather “educational success.” Malloy trumpeted his 2012 education “reform” legislation as providing the path to educational success.
Contrary to Malloy’s contention, educational opportunity is not just “old rhetoric.” The concept of educational opportunity has a specific constitutional meaning in Connecticut. Under our constitution, Connecticut must provide all children with “suitable educational opportunities.” Connecticut’s highest court has defined those opportunities as schools with sufficient resources to provide an education that prepares Connecticut’s children to participate in democratic institutions, attain productive employment and otherwise to contribute to the state’s economy, or to progress on to higher education.
As mayor of Stamford, Malloy understood the constitutional significance of educational opportunity. He was a founding member of theCCJEF coalition and one of the original plaintiffs in the suit demanding the state fulfill its legal obligation to provide fair and adequate funding to all Connecticut public schools.
Two days after Malloy spoke to AEI, a judge in Connecticut denied Malloy’s motion to dismiss the court case that he had helped initiate on behalf of fairness.
Malloy has abandoned his commitment to equality of education opportunity and now relies on high-stakes testing, evaluation of teachers by test scores, and ample funding to charter schools as the reforms that can take the place of equitable funding.
He even appointed a co-founder of the state’s leading charter chain as his state commissioner of education.
In his re-election campaign, Governor Malloy can count on the financial support of some of the wealthiest equity investors in the nation, who live in sheltered enclaves in places like Greenwich and Darien and support charter advocacy organization like ConnCAN.
Lecker writes:
In his motion to dismiss the CCJEF case, Malloy claimed there was no need to continue with this case because his 2012 education reforms cured all the constitutional deficiencies in Connecticut’s educational system. The judge disabused the governor of the fantasy that his reforms have actually improved Connecticut’s schools. He ruled that Malloy and the state presented no evidence to prove that his 2012 reforms were enacted to correct the constitutional inadequacies of Connecticut’s educational system or state school funding.
Malloy’s 2012 education legislation was not designed to provide Connecticut’s children with equal educational opportunity. As he admitted in his AEI speech, educational opportunity is no longer the governor’s focus. He would rather push unproven “reforms” that bear no relationship to what our highest court and our constitution recognize that our children need.
Another incredible claim made by Malloy at the AEI appearance was that his 2012 education legislation, for the first time in Connecticut history, directed copious amounts of money to Connecticut’s neediest districts.
A few hard numbers may help bring Malloy back to this planet. According to CCJEF’s expert’s analysis, updated to 2012 dollars, East Hartford’s school district is owed $6,131 per child in state funding. Malloy’s 2012 legislation gave them an increase of $214 per pupil. Bridgeport’s school district is owed $7,505 per child, but only received an increase of $209 per pupil in the 2012 legislation. The state owes New Britain’s children $10,185 per student. The 2012 legislation provided them with a whopping $245 per pupil increase. The list goes on and on. Moreover, as a condition for each tiny increase in ECS funding, these districts were saddled with costly mandates.
By contrast, charter schools, which educate 1 percent of Connecticut’s public school children and 90 percent of which serve a less needy population than their host districts, received an increase of $2,600 per pupil over three years in the 2012 legislation. Diverting state funding to 1 percent of public school children, who are often not the neediest, is likely to increase educational resource inequity in the state, especially when our neediest schools are getting so little.
Diane Ravitch's blog 
It’s kinda like Trickle Down Education!
Appointing a charter school corporate type to be the Ed. Commisioner of a state has to be some sort of major conflict of interest… Is he still running a charter?
This is why no Teachers’ Union should ever support Malloy again. But, I fear that Ms. Melodie Peters will try to sell our collective souls for him.
This is from wikipedia
“As a child, Malloy suffered from learning disabilities and difficulties with motor coordination. He did not learn to tie his shoes until the fifth grade. Malloy eventually was diagnosed with dyslexia and learned the skills necessary to succeed academically. He does not write or type, and rarely reads from notes in public, but developed an extraordinarily useful memory.”
I’ll bet he is completely awful at timed, standardized tests. Moreover, since he does not type, he can’t possibly be prepared for a 21st century career. This man ought to wake up every day and ask himself, “what am I doing in my educational policy to help a low-income dyslexic fifth grader in Bridgeport…a kid who is getting bullied because he can’t tie his shoes…be able to make it to the governor’s mansion someday?”
If only Common Core had been in place when Malloy was a child. With his considerable disabilities its rigid standards and timelines would have chewed him up and spit him out with it’s compassionless, one size fits all approach, thus sparing future generations the misery of living under his “leadership”.
And now that he’s a big boy and governor, the voters of Connecticut not CCSS, need to spit him out . . . .
Once again, Ms. Lecker exposes Governor Malloy for the Magwai-turned-Gremlin that he has morhped into.
This is yet another example of a governor, fresh from the agenda of the National Governor’s Association, an organization almost as pernicious as the NSA and ALEC, who will stop at nothing to destroy the public trusts that made his state great.
He is a disgrace, yet not at all a surprise in the plutocratic landscape that we find ourselves in . . . .
I hope Esquire Lecker will continue to report out on the governor’s disgusting “leadership” and the constituents’ lives he jeopardizes and compromises with his anti-public school villainy . . . . .