I don’t live in Los Angeles, but then neither do the hedge fund managers and equity investors and billionaires who regularly pump money into campaigns in districts where they don’t live. I am giving Bennett Kayser’s campaign $100 because he expects charter schools to be financially and academically accountable. All schools that receive public money should be held to the same standards. His opponent Ref Rodriguez operates a charter school which tried to keep a recent audit secret until after the election. It has been leaked, however. See the KPCC public radio summary here. Rodriguez is the charter’s co-founder and treasurer; the audit finds the school was “insolvent” for nine years and was poorly managed in terms of its finances.
Here is a comment on the blog:
“Here’s where you can donate on-line to Bennett’s campaign:
“http://www.bennett2015.com/donate-online.html
“Here’s his website in general:
“One more thing, Ref portrays himself as a poor Chicano from the barrio who cares about the education well-being of poor Chicanos in the barrio.
“Well, let’s see… because charters are unregulated, he can pay himself whatever he wants, and he works as little as he wants.
“So what does he do?
“He pays himself $350,000 (a third of a million dollars) annually, while he pays his custodial and cafeteria workers—all low-income Latinos—$8/hour instead of the living wage that their counterparts in the traditional public schools get paid… while principals in traditional public schools earn around $100,000 annually.
“Try to live in L.A. on $8/hour.”

Diane there will be a National Conference on Student Assessment in San Diego at the Grand Hyatt June 22-24. It is hosted by CCSSO This an an opportunity for the public and educators to make their voices heard.
LikeLike
Yep, that NCSA is more of the same deform blatherings:
1- Assessments adhere to best practices in test administration
2- Assessments align to college- and career-readiness standards
3- Assessments are fair and accessible to ALL students
4- Assessments meet overall assessment goals and ensure technical quality
5- Assessments support state goals and policies
6- Assessments yield valuable reports on student progress and performance
7- Balanced assessment systems improve student learning.
1–“Best practice in test administration” would be to not administer those COMPLETELY INVALID test.
2–And what are those “college and career-readiness standards”????
3–Who cares if they are COMPLETELY INVALID, age inappropriate, just make sure that all test takers enjoy the same environment of computer crashing, no AC, etc. . . .
4–Make sure you get 100% compliance, punish the opt outers/refuseniks.
5–Yep, state goals, don’t give a damn about the students’ needs.
6–Maybe sometime next year.
7–And finally, I’ve got some great ocean front property at Lake of the Ozarks in Central Missouri to sell the folks who will be hopefully enjoying some sunsets from similar properties.
To see all the sessions and it reads like an edudeformer textbook see:
https://ccsso.confex.com/ccsso/2015/webprogram/GENERAL.html
Wish I could go but it’s just a tad steep in price-about 10Xs the NPE Conference in Chicago this year. Oh well, maybe that money tree I planted this year will blossom forth next year so that I can go have some fun with edudeformers and GAGA adminimals.
Boy I hope those topics didn’t come through as urls.
LikeLike
Thank you Diane and all the readers here who are giving this critical race some of your attention. As the largest school district in California, LA impacts far beyond its borders. With your help, we can ensure Bennett Kayser stays right where he is, representing us against the forces of corporate privatization.
LikeLike
Thanks so much Diane for your contribution. Hope others follow your lead. The billionaire privatizers, and the California Charter School Association are pouring a fortune into charter school owner Rodriguez’s campaign. Here is a comment I made moments ago on your other post today on Rodriguez.
—————————————————–
In addition to other information on how unfit Refugio Rodriguez is to be elected to the LAUSD BoE, he claims in his blanketing of costly, almost daily, mailers throughout the district, that the Governor of California endorsed him. This is a flat out lie. All Democratic organizations have endorsed his opponent, the incumbent, Bennett Kayser.
This charter school millionaire without scruples, Rodriguez, with photos of his wistful baby faced smile, is also complicit in the attempted bribery by the Latino SouthWest Voters project to get many uninformed and first time voters of the Chicano/Latino community to come out and vote on May 19 by paying them for their votes through a $25,000 lottery, and by extension, to vote for the Latino surnamed candidate for School Board. This scandal is reminiscent of Tea Pot Dome.
Anyone who votes for this charlatan seems either out of touch, or biased.
Karin Klein, you still have time to change your ill-advised LA Times endorsements.
Remember that BoE member Monica Garcia tried in desperation to get all sources not to publish Rodriguez’s PUC audit last week showing all his potential malfeasance over many years as the Director/Treasurer of PUC charter schools (see the complete audit in the comments link above by Robert Skeels.)
And also, Karin, While you are changing the Times endorsement to the Honorable Bennett Kayser, please change your endorsement also to Scott Schmerelson, and away from Tamar Galatzan (the cookie cutter clone and close BoE partner of Monica Garcia), who, though a Democrat, has not received Democratic endorsements. As a lawyer, Tamar must be sweating bullets as all this information about her partners, Rodriguez and Garcia is emerging.
You will all remember that Galatzan and Garcia were the two sure votes on the LAUSD BoE for all Deasy projects. John Deasy, the former LAUSD Superintendent, is now under investigation by both the FBI and the SEC. He is now a full time employee of Eli Broad.
Vote for Bennett Kayser and for Scott Schmerelson for LAUSD BoE. Let’s clean up LAUSD starting with a focused Board which actually welcomes input from the public which votes for them, and pays them.
LikeLike
http://www.ccsso.org/News_and_Events/Meetings_and_Events.html
Participate in conferences on Assessment to get your voices heard. This is the link.
LikeLike
We teachers and most parents don’t have access to the same kind of “professional development” cash that the district supes have access to.
I’d be happy to go and raise some hell, oops I mean civilly attend, if someone wants to come up with about $1500 (flights, hotels, car rentals, meals and conference fees).
Go here to find all the funders of the CCSSO (the usual suspects and then some):
http://www.ccsso.org/Who_We_Are/Business_and_Industry_Partnerships/Corporate_Partners.html
LikeLike
There is also this news from yesterday: “LAUSD charter group gave food contract to employee’s firm.”
“Los Angeles-based charter group awarded food-service contracts worth millions of dollars to a company partially owned by one of the schools’ high-ranking employees, a state investigation has found.” That would be charter group, PUC, “co-founded by L.A. Unified school board candidate Ref Rodriguez. Rodriguez is on the charter group’s board of directors and works part-time as its treasurer.”
http://www.latimes.com/local/education/la-me-charter-food-contracts-20150503-story.html#page=1
LikeLike
You’re right. Ref Rodriquez is a scam as is his PUC charters. No one should vote for him as a school board member. New evidence of malfeasance in his charters has surfaced which highlight cronyism and conflicts of interest that LAUSD supposedly knew nothing about. How much more malfeasance do we not know? Where did they get their management training, at LAUSD?
LikeLike
Diane I will pay for half of your registration fee if you attend the National Conference on Student Assessment in Sunny San Diego. I want your voice to be heard. Come out for a vacation. June 22-24
LikeLike
Will PUC’s Jacqueline Elliot and Ref Rodriguez be indicted? (http://www.latimes.com/local/education/la-me-charter-food-contracts-20150503-story.html) The latest revelations in the LA Times that Rodriguez received $2,200 in campaign contributions from his employee who was paid $96,000, yet managed to hire her own food services company hired to gross an additional $970,000.00? Fraudulent self-dealing is just the tip of this iceberg.
LikeLike
“The company was ineligible for the food contracts because it lacked a health permit and relied on a subcontractor to prepare meals.”
That’s lovely. No health permit. Students First!
So what is the “the food company” if it relies on a subcontractor to prepare meals? A shell they can pass public funding through and take a cut off the top?
LikeLike
Only the tip of a very dirty iceberg, Chiara.
Monica Garcia who is the BoE member who tried to shut down the Rodriguez PUC audit report for her pal and cohort Ref, also voted with Galatzan to feed LAUSD small children (during the Deasy classroom breakfast (photo op) program) outdated and possibly defiled food. Nothing it is too good for these Broad/Deasy supporters who see to their own enrichment and that of their cronies, but it is all lip service when feeding crap to unsuspecting inner city kids.
LikeLike
Thank you once again for keepin it 100
LikeLike
Hello, Diane and everyone.
We sure could use your help here in Dallas, TX. We, supporters of our independent public school system, are fighting for our lives here. It doesn’t matter how much corruption, and conflict of interest this superintendent causes, the DISD board members who are complicit in destroying DISD in order to implement charters will not relieve him of his duties. We have assembled a grassroots effort to kill the takeover, but until we can remove MOST of these school board members, it seems as if we’re spinning our wheels. If you, or anyone else who’s experienced this, please give us ANY advice you might have. Between the big business takeover, and this Texas legislature, it looks like we’ll be losing our public school system soon (I’m sad to say). Thanks.
LikeLike
Downindallas,
The only route to change is through the political process. Organize with parents and take back your schools.
LikeLike
Dr. Ravitch, with respect, when parents have organized, Miles retaliates against their schools, see Rosemont. He has the business and political community in the palm of his hand. Our schools are falling apart, exactly what they want. Under home rule charter, basically a blank slate, our schools and the land could be acquired by the rich and powerful, then rented back to the taxpayers. No regulations from state Texas Education Agency. As stated below, the school board election is Saturday, May 9. Over 5000 veteran teachers have left since Miles arrived. Churn is rampant in most schools. Instability is the last thing these kids need. The district is made up of 89% students at or below poverty level. Any assistance through your blog you can provide in this crucial time would be greatly appreciated. BTW, your January 1 post was the inspiration behind the creation of this site. I decided there are plenty of blog post, this is more a compilation of sites and articles. Thank you for all you do.
http://trueschoolreform.org/
LikeLike
http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/20150401-editorial-we-recommend-edwin-flores-for-disd-district-1-trustee.ece
Miles and the reformers even have the Dallas Morning News Editorial Board convinced. Dr. Renard did not get their recommendation because “She’s smart but seems captive to anti-reform thinking. She wrote in her Voter Guide questionnaire, “We do not need outside charter schools within our system.” She also objects to Teach for America teachers, who she says “just contribute to the constant turnover in the schools.”
Flores got the recommendation because “he passionately supports innovative teaching and school choice. He serves on the local boards of KIPP charter schools and Teach for America, and he was a member of the Home Rule Charter Commission to determine whether DISD could operate more efficiently with autonomy from traditional state regulations. “School choice is something I supported back when I ran the previous time and will continue to support,” he said.
Also see
http://www.disdblog.com/2014/10/31/follow-the-money/
http://www.disdblog.com/2014/08/01/big-alec-and-little-alec-together-in-dallas/
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Crazy Normal – the Classroom Exposé and commented:
Reform candidate running for Los Angeles school board claims he is poor, but he pays himself $350,000 annually while paying his employees $8 an hour.
LikeLike
This slimey guy, Refugio Rodriguez, is a multi millionaire. He owns, partners, in approximatley16 charter schools and has been in the business for way over a decade. So the $350 K a year salary listed is peanuts to his extended potential income from sources such as this food scam and others available to him as an insider. This new audit was internal by the District and showed many instances of long time potential malfeasance….just think what an independent outside audit could show.
He has always been active in California Charter Schools Association since early in his career, and was their exec officer (I have read). He only ‘plays poor’ Mexican when he tries to manipulate the Chicano/Latino inner city community.
Sadly, his claque includes some current and former legislators like Antonio Villaraigosa who is also a prime Broadie supporter of privatizing public schools and who was the mayor who, with Broad, got Deasy his LAUSD job…. which has decimated the finances of the district…and Tony plans to run for Governor of California in 2016.
Get ready for war!
LikeLike
We are already at war. The next step is sniper bullets, bombs, armed drones and IEDs.
LikeLike
I wonder if Eva Moskowitz has played the poverty card too.
LikeLike
Ref Rodriguez’ backers DON’T EVEN BELIEVE IN THE EXISTENCE OF DEMOCRATIC SCHOOL BOARDS LIKE THE ONE FOR WHICH RODRIGUEZ IS RUNNING. The California Charter School Association’s true and openly-expressed (BELOW) end game is to abolish the LAUSD Board that meets down at 3rd and Beaudry (and abolish all schoolboards everywhere, by the way).
Their goal is to eliminate any voting or input from the public, and have unelected charter school boards—made up of businessmen, profiteers, and non-educators—free to whatever they want, whenever they want to maximize profits, and with no one to stop them.
In short, Rodriguez is cynically running for an elected position, and to serve on an elected body—per his masters’ marching orders—whose functioning he will endeavor to undermine and hopefully eliminate… or, failing to do that while in office, Ref will do his corporate masters’ bidding and do as much damage to the board’s functioning, and lessen the number schools under its oversight, and make as much progress towards the board’s elimination as he can while serving on it.
His whole campaign is an affront to the citizens and taxpayers in his district. Tell them a bunch of lies to trick them into voting for someone—funded by out-of-state billionaires—who will endeavor to… END THOSE SAME CITIZENS’ POWER TO VOTE FOR, AND ULTIMATELY TO CONTROL PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
Netflix CEO Reed Hastings just dumped $1.2 million dollars into the PAC that is backing the slate of Rodriguez, Lydia Guttierez, and Tamar Galatzan.
In his keynote address at the California Charter School Association’s annual dinner last year, Netflix CEO and corporate ed. reformer Reed Hastings stated the CCSA’s goal should be to abolish all democratically elected school boards, and end any input and participations of citizen-taxpayers in how their tax money in spent in education, and in which people are chosen to decide how money is spent. (CCSA is Rodriguez primary financial backer… he serves on its board)
REED HASTINGS (March 3, 2004): “The importance of the charter school movement is to evolve America from a system where governance is constantly changing… (i.e. democratically elected school boards, where the citizen-taxpayers have decision-making power.) to an all-charter school system, with no traditional public schools under the governance of an elected school board.
Hastings further says charter school chains are superior because “they don’t have an elected school board.” He celebrates New Orleans system where every school is a privately-run charter with ZERO accountability to the public, and where the public has ZERO power to influence their governance.
“Now if we go to the general public and we say, ‘Here’s an argument for why we should get rid of school boards,’ of course, no one’s going to go for that. School boards have been and iconic part of America for 200 years.”
Since in most cities, corporate reformers cannot do a New Orleans-style wiping out of democratically controlled school boards—as there’s no Katrina-like catastrophe to exploit—Hastings instead recommends a slow, deceptive, stealth strategy. He instructs the charter schools and their advocates to “work with districts” quietly and “grow steadily”. This means that the charter industry will falsely profess that they wish to co-exist with the traditional public schools, and complement the public school system, while the truth is that they are merely putting on that façade with the ultimate goal being the total elimination of public schools via this “slow growth” strategy.
The other prong of this strategy—one that Ref will be engaging in—is to sabotage the traditional public schools through starving of them of funds, jacking up class size, cutting the arts, libraries, etc. … all to trigger low performance… and use that low performance that they initially and actually caused, as justification for closing public schools and replacing them with private charter management.
Eventually, as the percentage of traditional LAUSD public schools shrinks, and the percentage of charter schools within LAUSD grows, they cost of maintaining the salary, health benefits, retirement, etc. will cause the district to collapse from within. The end game is a small pseudo-“board” whose sole function is to rubber stamp charter school authorizing… and no control actual over charter schools’ functions after doing so… no transparency to the public, no accountability to the public, and that can and will refuse to educate all of the public—i.,e. those who are expensive to educate, and who will not produce high scores on tests… special ed., English language learners, recent immigrants, homeless, foster care.
That’s why out-of-state billionaires, Wall Street hedge fund charter proponents, etc. are pumping millions into his campaign. Even though Ref has more money, this fact can be used against him—ju jitsu stye—as it was successfully used in the Zimmer, Ratliff, and McKenna campaigns (and in Bennett’s first race for the board.)
If the public knows all this, there’s no way they will want to to vote for Ref Rodriguez (or for Tamar Galatzan, or for Lydia Guttierez, for that matter.
And right after Hastings’ speech at the same CCSA celebration, guess who gets an award from the CCSA—the “2014 Hart Vision Elected Official of the Year”?
Why it’s the privatizers’ and corporate reform’s bought-and-paid-for LAUSD School Board Member Monica Garcia:
The best part of her speech is when Garcia courageously uses this opportunity of her acceptance speech to respectfully contradict Hastings’ fervent dream—expressed moments earlier to a rapturous standing ovation—that school boards like the one on which she serves should not be wiped off the face of the earth, as Hastings so desires… as, you know, Hastings’ goal would end two centuries of democratic control of schools in the United States… and how not responding and contradicting Hastings would be a total betrayal of the voters who voted for her to serve on the LAUSD Board, not destroy it through a Smarick-ian, Hastings-ish slow stealth charterization / privatization.
Just kidding 😉 she never says anything of the kind.
Seriously, when Garcia asks the charter honchos in the audience, “Do you believe that all kids can learn?” and they chant “Yes”, keep in mind that included in those charter leaders chanting are folks who have unashamedly kicked out… errr… counseled out up to 70% of their students before graduation. (see Caroline Grannan’s investigation on charter school attrition)
LikeLike
Dr. Ravitch might you consider a small, token donation to the following candidates in Dallas ISD elections – Dr. Kyle Renard, David Lewis, Bernadette Nutall. Contact information for Dr. Renard and Mr. Lewis is on their websites.
http://www.kylerenardfordistrict1.com/
http://davidfordisd.com/
Trustee Nutall’s contact information can be found by clicking on this link
http://www.dallasisd.org/Page/2183
(click on 8th day before election report)
These are the candidates NOT backed by the PAC’s and astroturf organizations, the rich real estate tycoons who support Mike Miles and who want home rule charter in Dallas. These PAC’s have greatly influenced voting patterns in favor of Miles. This needs to be stopped. The donation from you, even $25 to each candidate, might just make the news, might wake up more voters in Dallas to what might happen if the other candidates are elected.
The election is Saturday, May 9. It is the most crucial election is recent Dallas history.
http://trueschoolreform.org/2015/03/dallas-school-board-and-mayoral-elections/
LikeLike
LikeLike
r. Ravitch, might you consider a small, token donation to the following candidates in Dallas ISD elections – Dr. Kyle Renard, David Lewis, Bernadette Nutall. Contact information for Dr. Renard and Mr. Lewis is on their websites.
http://www.kylerenardfordistrict1.com/
http://davidfordisd.com/
Trustee Nutall’s contact information can be found by clicking on this link
http://www.dallasisd.org/Page/2183
( click on 8th day before election report)
These are the candidates NOT backed by the PAC’s and astroturf organizations, the rich real estate tycoons who support Mike Miles and who want home rule charter in Dallas. The donation from you, even $25 to each candidate, might just make the news, might wake up more voters in Dallas to what might happen if the other candidates are elected.
The election is Saturday, May 9. It is the most crucial election is recent Dallas history.
http://trueschoolreform.org/2015/03/dallas-school-board-and-mayoral-elections/
LikeLike
Also, the charter spokesman called this a “perception of a conflict of interest.”
Hey, there’s no “perception” here. It’s a blatant “conflict of interest.” PERIOD. THE END.
1) Jacqueline Duvivier Castillo, PUC’s Director of Business and Development, is in charge of procuring a multi-million-dollar food contract for the charter chain PUC, and Ref Rodriguez, as the charter chain’s founder, CEO, and—perhaps most importantly—the charter chain’s treasurer, is also involved in and ultimately approves the procurement;
2) Instead of having multiple bids and—per LAUSD directive—choosing the lowest bidder, Duvivier Castillo gives the contract to a company that audit report claims “is one hundred percent owned by Ms. Duvivier Castillo”, and also a company where her husband Fernando is a top (and presumably high-paid) official…
There are all facts that Board Candidate Ref Rodriguez surely was aware of… he hired her to work at PUC, for God’s sake… how could he possibly not know her previous / simultaneous employment and/or business ownership or interests?
Furthermore, they announce that she’s leaving PUC, while claiming she and Rodriguez did nothing wrong. Well, if she did nothing wrong, why are you canning her? (or why is she “voluntarily” leaving?)
On top of all that, this food company had a well-known, prior track record of doing a sucky job at food service, and then, consistent with that record, proceeded to do a sucky job servicing the PUC charter chain—i.e. no required government health permits.
Read on—
http://www.latimes.com/local/education/la-me-charter-food-contracts-20150503-story.html#page=1
L.A. TIMES:
“The company (‘Better 4 You’) received several contracts from the (PUC) charter organization, frequently failing to receive the highest score from panels reviewing the bids, according to a state analysis. Elliot said that other companies also received food contracts and that PUC hired ‘Better 4 You’ because it had the best ideas and most complete understanding of how to run a breakfast program. The decision was not based on a track record; she said she was not aware of any work the company had done elsewhere and that it may have been a start-up.
“The company did not make meals or have its own health permit until last year, instead partnering with another business that was responsible for food storage, handling and delivery. But Elliot said she was assured that the other company’s health permit would cover legal requirements.
“L.A. Unified released an unrelated audit of a PUC school last week. The district’s inspector general found fault with financial operations and record-keeping at Lakeview Charter Academy.”
LikeLike
Some years back there was a recall drive to get Monica Garcia out of office. Time for another recall drive. Dump Monica Garcia!
LikeLike
Already sent in my donation, based upon NPE comments on the issue.
LikeLike