Archives for category: Coleman, David

The answer to the question posed in the title of this blog is: I don’t know. I can’t imagine.

In fact, I don’t know how one develops imagination without reading fiction.

I have been told by several people who attended David Coleman’s lectures that he speaks disparagingly of fiction. That’s why the Common Core standards permit 50% fiction in the early grades but only 25% fiction in high school.

I don’t get it.

First, because teachers should make that decision.

Second, because I can’t imagine a well-developed mind that has not read novels, poems and short stories.

I love poetry. I compiled two anthologies–“The American Reader” and “The English Reader” (the latter with my son Michael)–in large part because I wanted to preserve and pass along the poems I love.

I love poems that rhyme and romantic poems. I love John Greenleaf Whittier’s “Barbara Frietchie” (“Shoot, if you must, this old gray head,/But spare your country’s flag,” she said).

I love Whittier’s “Barefoot Boy” (“Blessings on thee, little man/Barefoot boy, with cheek of tan!”)

I love Eugene Field’s “Little Boy Blue” (The little toy dog is covered with dust/But sturdy and stanch he stands”); it makes me cry.

I love Robert Frost’s “Road Not Taken” (“Two roads diverged in a wood, and I–/I took the one less traveled by,/And that has made all the difference.”)

I love Joyce Kilmer and Edna St. Vincent Millay and Countee Cullen, and James Weldon Johnson, and Langston Hughes, and Carl Sandburg, and…so many more.

There are so many novels that I loved and still love. When I was in high school, we read George Eliot’s “Silas Marner” and thought it boring and pointless. I read it as an adult and found it deeply moving. I also loved “Middlemarch” and so many other novels.

Maybe David Coleman thinks that education is wasted on the young. But how sad it would be if future generations of young people never read the poems and stories and novels that teach them not only how to think but how to feel, how to dream, how to imagine worlds far beyond those they know.

Diane

A few years ago, I met David Coleman for lunch and we talked about education. At the time, I didn’t know much about him, but I knew that he was deeply involved in the writing of the Common Core standards, which were then in the formative stage. We had a wonderful conversation about books and education, and David reminded me that he was a classicist, that he loves ideas and reading, and that his values were the same as mine. I left the lunch feeling that I had met a kindred soul.

I saw him once briefly since then, at a meeting of the Albert Shanker Institute, where he encouraged the AFT to endorse the CC standards. The board agreed, though I demurred. I remain agnostic.

I thought I knew David Coleman. I knew that he had created a data and assessment company that he sold to McGraw-Hill. I knew that he had been a Rhodes Scholar. I knew he had all the right credentials. I came to realize that David was the architect of the Common Core standards, not just one of many hands. I also knew—from the accounts of others—that he disdains fiction and personal writing. I don’t like the idea that some disembodied national agency tells teachers to cut back on the novels, poetry, and short stories and focus on informational text. That shows not only a hostility to imaginative literature but a disregard for teachers’ professionalism. I mean, he can have his opinion but why foist it on the nation?

Last week, the College Board announced that David Coleman will be its new president. One assumes that David will integrate the AP assessments with his prized Common Core standards.

But I just discovered that I don’t know David Coleman at all. I just discovered that he was the treasurer for Michelle Rhee’s Students First. (http://kenmlibby.com/?p=300) I assume that means he supports what she advocates. One doesn’t join the inner circle of a group with which you are not in sympathy. So I assume he supports her well-publicized war against collective bargaining. He supports her opposition to seniority and tenure. He supports her battle to base evaluation on test scores. He supports her efforts to privatize public education. He supports her contempt for experienced teachers.

Not only is he the treasurer, but the other officers of her board are (or were) part of his organization, Student Achievement Partners. One of the directors wrote the math standards for the nation. His organization seems to be integrated with hers.

In the version of this blog that I published this morning–very early–I wrote that I had heard that he stepped down from his role as the keeper of the accounts for Students First. But a friend called to tell me that this was not true. He did  not step down. He is still treasurer of Michelle Rhee’s Students First.

Now I am certain that I don’t know who he is or what he believes.

Diane

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/16/education/david-coleman-to-lead-college-board.html

http://nycpublicschoolparents.blogspot.com/2011/10/kick-off-of-parents-as-partners-week.html

http://www.dailycensored.com/2011/10/18/the-crocodile-in-the-common-core-standards/