The Washington Post reported that Elon Musk has used Twitter to spread lies about our elections. He owns Twitter and is accountable to no one. Musk has 197 million followers on Twitter, he says. He has repeatedly posted lies and conspiracy theories about our elections that have been debunked by independent experts.
I follow Musk’s tweets, and I can attest that he regularly repeats lies about the election. He posts incendiary comments about non-citizens voting in large number. He seems to get his ideas straight from Donald’s mouth. He posted that some 2 million noncitizens had registered to vote in Pennsylvania, Texas, and Arizona. He has used his personal account to spread fear, uncertainty and doubt about the integrity of elections.
Musk’s online utterances don’t stay online. His false and misleading election posts add to the deluge of inaccurate information plaguing voting officials across the country. Election officials say his posts about supposed voter fraud often coincide with an increase in baseless requests to purge voter rolls and heighten their worry over violent threats. Experts say Musk is uniquely dangerous as a purveyor of misinformation because his digital following stretches well beyond the political realm and into the technology and investment sectors, where his business achievements have earned him credibility.
After Musk bought Twitter, he made deep cuts in staff responsible for maintaining standards on the site, courted major conservative figures, and reoriented the platform to boost the reach of his account, which frequently spreads false statements without being subject to the kinds of fact checks that previously existed on the site. He reinstated accounts previously banned for violating the platform’s rules, including Donald Trump’s, and promised to usher in a less restrictive era…
Musk, who bought Twitter in November 2022, has repeatedly claimed without evidence that Democrats are “importing” undocumented people to vote in the coming election, a popular 2024 iteration of the Great Replacement Theory, which holds that a global elite is replacing European-descended populations with non-White people. He has falsely asserted that electronic voting machines are unreliable and that the country should return to hand-counting ballots. And he has promoted deepfakes and other deceptive images aimed at undermining politicians he doesn’t support.
Between his purchase of Twitter and Thursday, Musk’s 52 posts or reposts about noncitizen voting — one of the main topics of false or misleading election claims he made in that time period — drew almost 700 million views, according to a Post analysis.
A separate analysis found that 50 of Musk’s false or misleading claims about the U.S. election between Jan. 1 and July 31 were debunked by independent fact-checkers and still generated almost 1.2 billion views, according to a recent study from the Center for Countering Digital Hate. None displayed community notes, X’s term for user-generated fact checks that Musk has promised serve as an “immediate way to refute anything false” that is posted on the platform…
His frequent amplification of election untruths has spurred typically low-profile election officials to publicly fact-check him. His immense reach far outstrips theirs, so they say they attempt to blunt the damage of his false posts by piggybacking on them with truthful fact checks of their own.
But in their effort to spread accurate election information, they are up against a formidable adversary. “The great risk in a privatized public sphere,” said Sophia Rosenfeld, a history professor at the University of Pennsylvania and author of “Democracy and Truth: A Short History,” is that the owner, in this case, Musk, “can control both the flow of information and the content of that information to suit their own needs, whether financial, ideological, or both.”
Musk’s control of X and his large following mean a single post from him can effectively take fringe election-denial falsehoods mainstream, experts say.
In Michigan, Democratic Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson said her office tracked a direct correlation between Musk’s inaccurate tweets about elections and subsequent waves of harassment of local and state election administrators.
Musk is an enthusiastic supporter of Trump. They share hostility to the most basic activity in our democracy: voting for our leaders. Discredit elections, and the ground is set for authoritarianism.

Twitter under Musk has generally gotten worse, with one exception: the addition of “Community Notes,” the feature that allows users to append notes that correct or add context to false or misleading tweets. Musk himself has gotten community-noted.
LikeLike
Musk should ban himself for posting lies. Repeatedly.
LikeLike
Musk’s X may have more than 200 million followers, but they are not all in the United States.
40 million are in one country, Brazil, and Brazil was the 8th country to ban X.
Elon Musk’s X Banned in Several Countries. – CHANNEL8
X has more than 50.5 million monthly users in the United States. –according to Backlinko dot com, dated 2024
Most of them are probably MAGA cult members who also follow FOX fake News and avoid everything else.
LikeLike
The failure of democracy becomes secured when self-regulation becomes the only regulation. When that occurs, a person’s character becomes open and available for all to see.
Musk and Trump are cut from the same degenerate cloth. Like a child playing with a loaded gun, their childlike comportments go untempered by conscience, moral development, even an awareness of others, or the significance of social, political, or social order (manifest as institutions); and both have the power to forge a path to well-being for those who follow them and over whom they wield power, while instead treating everyone and the world as they would a Monopoly game.
Like Putin and the rest of the personally defunct fascist-authoritarian murderers, they are both leaders . . . of cultural decline in our time. In either case, it’s just a matter of “how fast.”
Kudos to the countries who ban X, and who criticize Trump while they can. I think they are good examples of the fact that, sometimes, power for the good has to break its own rules in order to preserve them. I hope they know to watch their backs. CBK
LikeLike
BTW, Biden is in an interesting position: SCOTUS also gave him absolute power for this window in U.S. history. I wonder, if it comes to that, whether he will use it for the good of the country, even for its survival, if not the world’s. CBK
LikeLike