Heather Cox Richardson wrote a compelling piece about the challenges we face in the year leading up to the 2024 election. The media keeps warning us about ominous polls, about the dangers of Trump, about Biden potentially losing this or that demographic. Trump seems to be driven by two goals: 1) to stay out of prison (as president, he could pardon himself for federal crimes, not state convictions); and 2) the chance to wreak vengeance on his enemies.
Richardson wrote:
Yesterday, David Roberts of the energy and politics newsletter Volts noted that a Washington Post article illustrated how right-wing extremism is accomplishing its goal of destroying faith in democracy. Examining how “in a swing Wisconsin county, everyone is tired of politics,” the article revealed how right-wing extremism has sucked up so much media oxygen that people have tuned out, making them unaware that Biden and the Democrats are doing their best to deliver precisely what those in the article claim to want: compromise, access to abortion, affordable health care, and gun safety.
One person interviewed said, “I can’t really speak to anything [Biden] has done because I’ve tuned it out, like a lot of people have. We’re so tired of the us-against-them politics.” Roberts points out that “both sides” are not extremists, but many Americans have no idea that the Democrats are actually trying to govern, including by reaching across the aisle. Roberts notes that the media focus on the right wing enables the right wing to define our politics. That, in turn, serves the radical right by destroying Americans’ faith in our democratic government.
Former Republican National Committee chair Michael Steele echoed that observation this morning when he wrote, “We need to stop the false equivalency BS between Biden and Trump. Only one acts with the intention to do real harm.”
Indeed, as David Kurtz of Talking Points Memoputs it, “the gathering storm of Trump 2.0 is upon us,” and Trump and his people are telling us exactly what a second Trump term would look like. Yesterday, Trump echoed his “vermin” post of the other day, saying: “2024 is our final battle. With you at my side, we will demolish the Deep State, we will expel the warmongers from our government, we will drive out the globalists, we will cast out the Communists, Marxists, and Fascists, we will throw off the sick political class that hates our Country, we will rout the Fake News Media, we will evict Joe Biden from the White House, and we will FINISH THE JOB ONCE AND FOR ALL!”
Trump’s open swing toward authoritarianism should be disqualifying even for Republicans—can you imagine Ronald Reagan talking this way?—but MAGA Republicans are lining up behind him. Last week the Texas legislature passed a bill to seize immigration authority from the federal government in what is a clear violation of the U.S. Constitution, and yesterday, Texas governor Greg Abbott announced that he was “proud to endorse” Trump for president because of his proposed border policies (which include the deportation of 10 million people).
House speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) has also endorsed Trump, and on Friday he announced he was ordering the release of more than 40,000 hours of tapes from the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, answering the demands of far-right congress members who insist the tapes will prove there was no such attack despite the conclusion of the House committee investigating the attack that Trump criminally conspired to overturn the lawful results of the 2020 presidential election and refused to stop his supporters from attacking the Capitol.
Trump loyalist Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) promptly spread a debunked conspiracy theory that one of the attackers shown in the tapes, Kevin Lyons, was actually a law enforcement officer hiding a badge. Lyons—who was not, in fact, a police officer—was carrying a vape and a photo he stole from then–House speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office and is now serving a 51-month prison sentence. (Former representative Liz Cheney (R-WY) tweeted: “Hey [Mike Lee]—heads up. A nutball conspiracy theorist appears to be posting from your account.”)
Both E.J. Dionne of the Washington Post and Will Bunch of the Philadelphia Inquirer noted yesterday that MAGA Republicans have no policies for addressing inflation or relations with China or gun safety; instead, they have coalesced only around the belief that officials in “the administrative state” thwarted Trump in his first term and that a second term will be about revenge on his enemies and smashing American liberalism.
MIke Davis, one of the men under consideration for attorney general, told a podcast host in September that he would “unleash hell on Washington, D.C.,” getting rid of career politicians, indicting President Joe Biden “and every other scumball, sleazeball Biden,” and helping pardon those found guilty of crimes associated with the January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol. “We’re gonna deport a lot of people, 10 million people and growing—anchor babies, their parents, their grandparents,” Davis said. “We’re gonna put kids in cages. It’s gonna be glorious. We’re gonna detain a lot of people in the D.C. gulag and Gitmo.”
In the Washington Post, Josh Dawsey talked to former Trump officials who do not believe Trump should be anywhere near the presidency, and yet they either fear for their safety if they oppose him or despair that nothing they say seems to matter. John F. Kelly, Trump’s longest-serving chief of staff, told Dawsey that it is beyond his comprehension that Trump has the support he does.
“I came out and told people the awful things he said about wounded soldiers, and it didn’t have half a day’s bounce. You had his attorney general Bill Barr come out, and not a half a day’s bounce. If anything, his numbers go up. It might even move the needle in the wrong direction. I think we’re in a dangerous zone in our country,” Kelly said.
Part of the attraction of right-wing figures is they offer easy solutions to the complicated issues of the modern world. Argentina has inflation over 140%, and 40% of its people live in poverty. Yesterday, voters elected as president far-right libertarian Javier Milei, who is known as “El Loco” (The Madman). Milei wants to legalize the sale of organs, denies climate change, and wielded a chainsaw on the campaign trail to show he would cut down the state and “exterminate” inflation. Both Trump and Brazil’s Jair Bolsonaro, two far-right former presidents who launched attacks against their own governments, congratulated him.
In 1959, President Dwight D. Eisenhower took on the question of authoritarianism. Robert J. Biggs, a terminally ill World War II veteran, wrote to Eisenhower, asking him to cut through the confusion of the postwar years. “We wait for someone to speak for us and back him completely if the statement is made in truth,” Biggs wrote. Eisenhower responded at length. While unity was imperative in the military, he said, “in a democracy debate is the breath of life. This is to me what Lincoln meant by government ‘of the people, by the people, and for the people.’”
Dictators, Eisenhower wrote, “make one contribution to their people which leads them to tend to support such systems—freedom from the necessity of informing themselves and making up their own minds concerning these tremendous complex and difficult questions.”
Once again, liberal democracy is under attack, but it is notable—to me, anyway, as I watch to see how the public conversation is changing—that more and more people are stepping up to defend it. In the New York Times today, legal scholar Cass Sunstein warned that “[o]n the left, some people insist that liberalism is exhausted and dying, and unable to handle the problems posed by entrenched inequalities, corporate power and environmental degradation. On the right, some people think that liberalism is responsible for the collapse of traditional values, rampant criminality, disrespect for authority and widespread immorality.”
Sunstein went on to defend liberalism in a 34-point description, but his first point was the most important: “Liberals believe in six things,” he wrote: “freedom, human rights, pluralism, security, the rule of law and democracy,” including fact-based debate and accountability of elected officials to the people.

Liberalism, as summarized here by sunstein, provides the bookends of freedom and democracy. I like this image, for whatever goes between these ideals is held together by the power of the voter.
Still, the power of a voting public that does not have accurate information or chooses to ignore it tends to fail to understand that the freedom their vote supports can restrict the freedom of a fellow citizen if the situation allows it. Democracy as an ideal presupposes general human dignity awarded to one’s neighbors. As Mill noted, the freedom of one person extends only to the point where it begins to impinge on the freedom of another.
LikeLike
You and Heather are my favorites. Helping to keep me sane through all this.
LikeLike
I’m a proud onetime and once-again liberal, and former progressive.
LikeLike
The good news bad news about democracy is that the pendulum swings back and forth.
The good news about democracy is sometimes you get what you want, sometimes you don’t. Sometimes a little of both. It’s swung more widely with Reagan, Clinton, Bush and Obama but life goes on.
The bad news is the good is normalized. “We’ll get through this.” “Our guys will make sure it doesn’t go too far.” “Not much I can do and my vote doesn’t count much where I live.” “I trust them, even the ‘other side’ knows what is too extreme.”
Add targeted media and selective viewing and reading of news that agrees with you, and millions, MILLIONS, of Americans accept this is NORMAL. OR “Oh, no one will actually vote for this guy” (see 2016).
Presidential candidates do not get to target enemies, call segments of the population vermin, use the term “fight” and take the presidency back dozens of times just hours before a terrorist attack on the Capitol, campaign on retribution to dissenters. THAT IS NOT NORMAL. But 40 million people must think so.
And, the “The republicans offer simple answers to complex issues” – – – – most of those 40 million couldn’t name five issues if their lives depended on it. And, if they can name them, they can’t explain them. They just like that some loudmouth is howling at the night sky about it.
A commenter on an NYT editorial listed over 100 actions of Trump of which ONE would not pass muster if Obama had done so. And, 24 years ago if Bush had uttered and promised the same vile Republicans beginning with his father would have taken him out of the picture.
Complacency? Apathy? It doesn’t matter what we think or do? This, too, will pass?
NO IT WON’T.
Please, democrats and normal conservative republicans – – tell us you are waiting until it’s closer to the primaries and elections to come out blasting with all barrels against this vile.
And, that includes the candidates in Statehouses and Congress who say nothing – – – and are not asked by the daily media for reactions.
AND the same “this too shall pass” attitude is occurring in SCHOOL BOARD elections and state houses across the country.
LikeLike
Democrats tend to be terrible at countering the extreme right’s propaganda machine (that includes Putin’s disinformation machine in Russia). They have been for decades. The extreme right in the US and Putin are allies.
Still, I’m seeing the governor of California, where I was born and live, attempting to do just that. When one of Newsom’s email newsletter lands in my e-mail I read it because it’s the first time ever that I’ve seen a Democrat counter extreme right lies with facts and truth in a simple format that even a MAGA might understand if they paid attention outside Traitor Trump’s box of lies and could think independently. MAGA has been programed heavily to label and hate EVERYONE that doesn’t agree with them as liberals. It doesn’t matter what their politics are, if they don’t support the MAGA crap 100% and worship Traitor Trump, they are liberals to be insults, bullied, trolled, hated. Even the conservatives behind the Lincon Project, who are called RINOs and/or liberals.
Has any elected Democrat done what Newsom is doing now?
“Through an aggressive, coordinated and sustained state-by-state organizing campaign through the 2024 election, the Campaign for Democracy’s mission is to confront and defeat unAmerican authoritarianism. America is in an existential struggle for democracy.”
https://campaignfordemocracy.com/
Newsom even challenged DeSantis to a debate!
“Fox News has announced details of its planned debate between Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis later this month. The event, which the network is billing as “DeSantis vs. Newsom: The Great Red vs. Blue State Debate,” will take place at 9 p.m. Nov. 30 and span 90 minutes.”
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/4319108-fox-announces-details-for-desantis-newsom-debate/
LikeLike
“reading of news that agrees with you”
News and opinions are not the same. Still, too many people, certainly everyone that belongs to Traitor Trump’s MAGA cult, don’t know the difference between proper and acceptable news reporting and opinions.
I think “reading opinions that agrees with you and considering those opinions the same as real news” is more accurate.
The problem is too many people cannot tell the difference between a fact only news piece where the reporter does not share their opinion and someone who does.
https://ccnyintroductiontojournalism.com/2023/07/15/opinion-vs-news/comment-page-1/
Yes, bias can be inserted into a news piece using loaded words and quoting more sources that the reporter may agree with as long as the facts are not lies or misleading, but bias is not the same as lies. The media in the US and probably the world has a long history of reporting biased fact-based news.
“Biased? Sure. Lying, no”
https://www.mpsanet.org/biased-sure-lying-no-2/
“History. Political bias has been a feature of the mass media since its birth with the invention of the printing press. The expense of early printing equipment restricted media production to a limited number of people. Historians have found that publishers often served the interests of powerful social groups.”
LikeLike
Democrats need better messaging, and bolder messengers like Newsom that call the right wing out for their misinformation and blatant lies.
LikeLike
YES! Said perfectly – “…bolder messengers like Newsom that call the right wing out for their misinformation and blatant lies.”
LikeLike
https://www.mediamatters.org/google/mike-davis-were-gonna-put-kids-cages-its-gonna-be-glorious
LikeLike
Grover Cleveland is the only president to lose office and then regain it. He wasn’t the only one to try. Martin Van Buren tried it. Fail. Millard Fillmore tried it. Fail. U.S. Grant, Teddy Roosevelt, and Herbert Hoover tried. No go. There’s no Trump card against them odds.
LikeLike
LCT,
The American people have a choice between a President who will be 81, experienced, and steady vs. a former President who tried to nullify the Cinstitution and currently faces 91 indictments for crimes large and small. Oh, and he’s only three years younger than Biden, but is vigorous, vindictive, an inveterate liar, and is known for mishandling top secret documents.
LikeLike
We are a republic, remember that.
LikeLike
republic, n. a state in which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives, and which has an elected or nominated president rather than a monarch. –Bing Dictionary
In other words, a republic is a type of democracy. Democracy, from kratos (rule) + demos (people)
LikeLike
Thank you. For decades, the John Birch Society and like minded cranks have said “we are a republic, not a democracy.” A distinction without a difference.
LikeLike
When someone says that the US is actually a “republic” and not a democracy,” it is actually a good sign that he is a Know-Nothing who subscribes to authoritarianism and is OPPOSED to a government “of the people, by the people, for the people.”
Constitutional scholar Eugen Volokh wrote this in The Washington Post more than eight years ago:
“John Adams used the term ‘representative democracy’ in 1794; so did Noah Webster in 1785; so did St. George Tucker in his 1803 edition of Blackstone; so did Thomas Jefferson in 1815. Tucker’s Blackstone likewise uses ‘democracy’ to describe a representative democracy, even when the qualifier ‘representative’ is omitted…”
“James Wilson, one of the main drafters of the Constitution and one of the first Supreme Court Justices, defended the Constitution in 1787 by speaking of the three forms of government being the ‘monarchical, aristocratical, and democratical,’ and said that in a democracy the sovereign power is ‘inherent in the people, and is either exercised by themselves or by their representatives.’ And Chief Justice John Marshall — who helped lead the fight in the 1788 Virginia Convention for ratifying the U.S. Constitution — likewise defended the Constitution in that convention by describing it as implementing ‘democracy’ (as opposed to ‘despotism’), and without the need to even add the qualifier ‘representative.'”
“… there is no basis for saying that the United States is somehow ‘not a democracy, but a republic.’ ‘Democracy’ and ‘republic’ aren’t just words that a speaker can arbitrarily define to mean something (e.g., defining democracy as ‘a form of government in which all laws are made directly by the people’). They are terms that have been given meaning by English speakers more broadly. And both today and in the Framing era, ‘democracy’ has been generally understood to include representative democracy as well as direct democracy.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/05/13/is-the-united-states-of-america-a-republic-or-a-democracy/
LikeLike
All I want for Christmas is the Trumps in prison. Is that too much to ask?
LikeLike