Mike Bloomberg knows there are many ways to buy an election. Such as flooding airwaves with campaign commercials.
Then there is hiring the vice-chair of the state Democratic Parties in Texas and California. In addition to their influence in the party, they just happen to be superdelegates who will get to cast a vote if no candidate wins a majority of votes on the first round. Have any other candidates thought of putting superdelegates on their campaign payroll? Doesn’t it appear kind of like a conflict of interest or a bribe?
Why not hire all the superdelegates to guarantee their second ballot vote at the convention?
FORMER NEW YORK City Mayor Mike Bloomberg has hired two state Democratic party vice chairs in Super Tuesday states with two of the top three highest number of pledged delegates. Bloomberg hired Texas Democratic Party Vice Chair Carla Brailey as a senior adviser to his campaign in December, and he hired California State Democratic Party Vice Chair Alexandra Rooker for a similar role in January.
Both Brailey and Rooker are superdelegates who will likely vote for the Democratic presidential nominee at the party’s national convention this summer. Hiring the leadership of a state party doesn’t appear to break any campaign laws, but it indicates Bloomberg’s intent to effectively purchase political support, said Brendan Fischer, the federal reform program director at the Campaign Legal Center. “This does seem to fit a longstanding pattern of Bloomberg using his billions to help generate support among political elites,” he said.
Rooker is one of two members of Bloomberg’s campaign staff who also sits on the Democratic National Committee’s rules committee, which recommends rules for the convention, the convention agenda, the convention’s permanent officers, amendments to the party’s charter, and other resolutions. In November, the month he entered the presidential race, Bloomberg gave $320,000 to the DNC, his first contributions to the committee since 1998. (He was a registered Republican from 2001 to 2007, after which he became an independent. He registered as a Democrat in 2018.) He also donated $10,000 to the Texas Democratic Party, where Brailey has been vice chair since June 2018, as well as $10,000 to the California Democratic Party. Brailey, Rooker, and the Bloomberg campaign did not respond to requests for comment on their hiring.
Brailey rose through the local Washington Democratic Party structure, as a protege of former Mayor Adrian Fenty, who was himself the patron of current D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, a high-profile backer of Bloomberg.
Bloomberg will appear on the ballot for the first time on Super Tuesday, March 3. His campaign has poured tens of millions of dollars into both Texas and California where there are 228 and 416 delegates up for grabs, respectively.
In California, Bloomberg has hired a number of party alums in addition to Rooker, who was also previously a vice president and shop steward for the Communication Workers Association Local 9400. Former state Democratic Party executive director Chris Masami Myers is leading Bloomberg’s California strategy, and Courtni Pugh is a senior adviser focusing on outreach to black and Latino voters; Pugh previously led Sen. Kamala Harris’s California strategy before she dropped out of the presidential race in December. Bloomberg has spent at least $46.3 million on television ads in California so far, has dozens of offices there, and his campaign has said they planned to hire at least 800 staffers in the state. (They had hired around 300 staffers by the first week of February.)
.

Bloomberg intends to own the Democratic party–lock, stock, and barrel.
He has the money to do it. The architecture of the party is so weak that he is already on the road to accomplishing that feat.
Biden’s win in South Carolina does not foreshadow other wins. He has NOT created a robust architecture for his campaign. News last night said he had one office in California–a symptom of the problem.
Bloomberg is also well-poised to claim “competency” in handling national disasters (e.g., 911 response) and health related issues, the latter in concert with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation from whom Bloomberg Philanthropies have received money. Both philanthropies had a role in the Ebola crisis, not entirely positive.
This morning I learned that the HIPPA law may be limiting the flow of information on known cases of the corona virus in the US. Noteworthy was a half-page in USA Today naming specific Trump officials and FOX news personalities (among others) who were spreading serious misinformation and conspiracy theories.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think Biden’s win in South Carolina was helpful in terms of hurting Mike Bloomberg. This is a long race. If Bernie had won a huge victory in SC and Biden had been much further back, the pressure would be on Biden to drop out, which would have helped Bloomberg.
Suddenly Biden is viable again, just days before Tuesday. Many people have voted already, but I think Biden’s victory will hurt Bloomberg.
I much prefer Biden to Bloomberg and if anyone is more likely to win a brokered convention it is Biden or Bernie and not Bloomberg, no matter how many superdelegates are “rewarded” with nice jobs. Biden is viable again and that really hurts Bloomberg.
I never understand all the conspiracy theories that the DNC is trying to promote Bloomberg or trying to promote Biden since those are two contradictory things and promoting one hurts the other one. The DNC is running a primary. While there may be some corrupt superdelegates who would have their 2nd round vote be for Bloomberg, there aren’t enough of them to nominate a guy who has only 15% of the delegates who isn’t even a Democrat. They know their voters would rebel.
I suppose it is possible that Bloomberg in the primary is just a plot to make Biden look better in comparison to Bloomberg. But I think this big win by Biden in South Carolina will make the super tuesday voters who were going to vote for Bloomberg entirely because of “electability” go back to Biden.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There are two lanes in this Dem primary: the progressive lane and the centrist lane.
Bernie and Warren have split the progressive lane.
Biden, Bloomberg, Buttigieg, and Klobuchar are splitting the centrist lane.
The same happened in 2016 to the GOP. The survivor bod the endurance campaign won the endorsement.
LikeLike
Yep, I agree about the two lanes. If the DNC was running the show, they would be more concerned about how the 4 centrist candidates were splitting the centrist lane. Instead, the billionaires were giving big bucks to Pete Buttigieg! They weren’t coalescing around Bloomberg at all. And NO ONE was giving to Biden, which is why his campaign infrastructure was so weak in states beyond SC.
Some democrats can be bought off with Bloomberg’s money. But I don’t believe that the majority of them can be when it comes to voting.
I think it is clear that Nancy Pelosi would absolutely support Bernie Sanders if he wins the nomination, even if he isn’t her top choice. But the demonizing of the DNC is a real problem for the good progressive Senators and House candidates who will be up against Republicans in November.
LikeLike
If Bloomberg bought our votes by divided up his entire fortune between all the Democrats and Independents that voted for him, how much would each of us get?
Bloomberg’s net worth is 56.2 billion.
Let’s say the turnout is huge and there are 70 million votes for Bloomberg. Trump ends up with 62 million votes.
Each Bloomberg voter would get a whopping sum of about $802 before Trump taxed it.
LikeLike
nicely said
LikeLike
saddest thing to watch as well: The DNC is apparently willing to sell itself, lock, stock and barrel.
LikeLike
We should have more rules that control how much money can be spent on an election. Perhaps we should follow Scandinavia and provide each candidate with the same amount of public money. Such a plan would ensure that all candidates would running for office on the same playing field, and it would be a more democratic process. Billionaires have an unfair advantage inserting themselves into politics, public policies and government. Their extreme wealth is a thumb on the scales of democracy and public policy. We need to get the money out of politics in order to create a government of, by and for the people.
LikeLike
We should follow Scandinavia and provide each candidate with the same amount of public money. No doubt about it. But making that happen in a country split between the overt corporate shills in the Repugnican Party and the covert corporate shills in the DINOcrat Party will be very difficult indeed.
LikeLike
At least it would be more equal. Candidates already in DC have gained exposure that more local candidates do not have. Still it is better than allowing this bidding war.
LikeLike
Anyone else here feel as I do that the race for the Democratic nomination, this year, will determine whether the fix is entirely in here in the United States?
LikeLike
Nope.
What “fix” occurred in South Carolina when so many primary voters supported Biden? Biden has support in the African-American community — a lot of support. So did HRC. I wish there could just be an acknowledgement that it is okay for everyone — regardless of race, religion, gender or certified progressive values — to vote for whichever candidate they prefer in the primary. Just because the candidate you prefer doesn’t win, or does worse than expected, does not mean there is a “fix”.
If Bloomberg gets 15% of the vote and superdelegates make the unpopular Bloomberg the Democratic nominee, then yes, that is a “fix”. But I doubt that will happen. What I am pretty sure will happen is that if anyone but Bernie got the nomination — including Elizabeth Warren — we will still hear that “the fix is in”. In fact, Trump himself has been repeating that meme to encourage progressive voters to turn against all Democrats and give him not just the presidency, but the Senate and House. After all, if the entire Democratic apparatus is as corrupt as to “fix” the election to prevent Bernie from winning the nomination, then why vote for any Democrat, period?
I think it is highly unlikely that Bloomberg would get the nomination. But there is a decent change that another candidate could who isn’t Bernie. I still believe Bernie has an excellent chance to go into the convention with enough delegates to be over 50%. But if he does not, then someone other than Bloomberg or Bernie could be chosen.
Imagine if it is Biden and not Bernie who has more (but not a lot more) delegates going into the convention. (I mean BEFORE the superdelegates are included). Are Bernie voters suddenly going to say “oh we did want the candidate who had more delegates to automatically get the nomination, so we support Biden getting it since he has a few more delegates than Bernie? Or will they say that the fix was in? Even if Warren came out as a “compromise” candidate, I suspect the public would still hear non-stop that the fix is in and do what they did in 2016 and not just vote against the “corrupt” Democratic presidential candidate, but defeat all kinds of progressive Senators like Russ Feingold because they were so sure the entire democratic party was corrupt.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Buttigieg’s withdrawal is very bad for Sanders. Biden will have the so-called “center” to himself, pretty much.
LikeLike
Warren has not gone away.
LikeLike
So, is there a chance that some Buttigieg people will shift their allegiance to Warren? A lot of them are very unhappy with her right now.
LikeLike
I picked up while browsing CSPAN this a.m. that there is a surprisingly large [surprising to a poll analyst] number of Buttigieg supporters for whom Warren is 2nd choice. He may have a broader base than centrist moderates, after all, he’s young, and gay.
LikeLike
It’s looking more and more to me as though we shall have a choice in November between an overt corporate shill (Trump) and a covert corporate shill (Biden). If that is the case, I will hold my nose and vote for the latter. Anyone but Trump.
LikeLike
I would vote for a dead cockroach over Trump.
LikeLike
A dead cockroach would be saner and more compassionate than Trump and would have a far superior cabinet. Trump can’t even fake empathy. Remember when a refugee from the fighting in Syria met with him in the Oval Office and told her of the terrible atrocities she had endured. She told him her entire family had been killed. He responded, “Where are they now?” She answered, “Dead.”
LikeLike
I wonder if there is a list of all the tweets and comments from Trump that show his lack of empathy and compassion. There’s probably enough examples to fill a book the size of War and Peace with its 1,225 pages.
LikeLike
Is it possible that Bloomberg is running for president as a Democrat to help Donald Trump win the 2020 election; that Trump and Blumberg are pretending to not like each other?
LikeLike
I despise Bloomberg, but no, that is not possible.
Bloomberg’s ads spend too much time tearing down Trump. Also, did you see Trump making himself short at his speech to make fun of Bloomberg’s height? You can always tell which candidates he believes are most dangerous by how he decides which ones to demean. First it was “Pocahontas” Warren. The entire impeachment was about Trump corruptly using his office to hurt Biden. But as Biden faded, Trump barely mentioned him and started on “Crazy Bernie”. And then when Bloomberg entered, the attacks were on Bloomberg. Notice Trump never mentions “Pocahontas” Warren anymore? If Trump wanted to help Bloomberg, he would have attacked Warren, but Trump hardly mentions Warren. And he hardly mentioned Biden recently, but I am sure the attacks will start again now that Biden has some momentum. Trump saw Bloomberg as a danger to himself for a while and focused on him.
But I do think Bloomberg does want to prevent Bernie from being the nominee. Bloomberg represents only himself — like Trump. He doesn’t like Trump and he doesn’t like Bernie. I wish someone would put him on the spot to ask him if he will support any Democratic candidate who wins the primary, or is his opposition to Trump really about himself.
LikeLike
No. I think Bloomberg sees Trump as a dangerous moron and wants to save the country from four more years of chaos, wrecking the environment, empowering nutty people.I hated his education policy and his arrogance but he’s good on the environment and public health. Also, unlike Trump he is sane.
LikeLike
When it comes to Trump, what is the next step beyond insane?
LikeLike
malignant narcissist.
LikeLike
Then Trump is a psychopathic, rabidly insane malignant narcissist with the vocabulary of an illiterate nine-year-old.
LikeLike
There should not be billionaires.
There should not be superdelegates.
Superdelegates working for billionaire candidates is as undemocratic as it gets, outside the Chinese politburo that Bloomberg thinks is democratic.
Campaign finance reform is a nonexistent thimble meant to hold back the ocean of oligarchy ruling over us with an iron frisk—I mean fist.
If an unfriendly foreign power had attempted to impose on America the Bloomberg campaign that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.
LikeLike
Bloomberg hires vice-chairs of two state democratic parties to serve as “advisors.” I heard when he hired these super delegates he told them he would pay then a million bucks apiece, “but I need you to do me a favor though.”
Favor though; quid pro quo; shameless bastards take the dough.
LikeLike
Buttigieg’s withdrawal leaves the so-called “center” to Biden and Bloomberg. I don’t think Bloomberg stands much of a chance despite the insane amounts of spending he’s doing and despite his hiring party chairpeople in Super Tuesday states to work on his campaign. Democrats don’t like the idea of someone buying the election. That means that it is looking increasingly likely that we shall have a “choice” come November between an overt corporate/oligarchical shill (Trump) and a covert one (Biden). If that turns out to be the case, I will hold my nose and vote for Biden. Anyone but Trump.
However, for too long now, DINOS who were almost indistinguishable from Republicans on bread and butter issues like Medicare for All and tax breaks for the wealthy have been able to position themselves as real Democrats by their stances on social issues. But they know what really matters to their fat cat donors. Obama and Biden could have structured the bailout so that it protected homeowners, but they chose not to. They structured it as a massive transfer of wealth to the very financial institutions that created the meltdown in 2007-08. It’s no accident that the banks are all headquartered in Biden’s home state of Delaware. So, we are likely to have a choice come November between a precipitous slide toward fascism and the Status Quo. This at a time when wealth and income disparity is at historic levels.
The more things change, . . .
Oh, and if you liked Race to the Top, you’ll love a Biden presidency.
LikeLike
Here’s Joe “Champion of the Working Man” Biden, working to protect banks and make bankruptcy, for ordinary working people, almost impossible:
https://www.gq.com/story/joe-biden-bankruptcy-bill
LikeLike
Former President G. W. Bush already made bankruptcy almost impossible for the working class. Maybe Biden will make it even harder.
“… BAPCPA made it harder for consumers to prove that they should be allowed the ‘fresh start’ of a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, in which a debtor’s assets are liquidated and distributed among creditors—with most of a debtor’s remaining debts cancelled, thus giving the debtor a ‘fresh start.’ Instead, in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, debtors are put on a repayment plan that lasts up to five years, and only after this time has past are most of the remaining debts canceled. BAPCPA’s amendments meant that many more filers fell under Chapter 13 instead of Chapter 7. The amendments to the bankruptcy code included: … ”
https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/economy/news/2008/04/17/4299/bushs-bankruptcy-legacy-three-years-and-nearly-1-5-million-bankruptcy-filings-later/
LikeLike
Biden was in the middle of this fight to make bankruptcy harder. A DINOcrat working to institute a Repugnican policy. He was the chief advocate of BAPCPA among the DINOcrats in the Senate. https://prospect.org/politics/bidens-votes-on-the-bankruptcy-bill-middle-class-joe/
LikeLike
Among other things, when BAPCPA was under consideration, Biden voted against amendments that would have allowed elderly people and veterans going through bankruptcy to stay in their homes. https://prospect.org/politics/bidens-votes-on-the-bankruptcy-bill-middle-class-joe/
LikeLike
Biden’s history sounds like another conservative wearing liberal clothing.
LikeLike
Yes. There’s a lot of this in the Democratic Party. Repugnicans doing Democrat cosplay.
LikeLike
Has anyone Fact Check this?
According to Media Bias/Fact Check, Intercept.com is rated Left Bias. That means the bias is one step away from being Extreme.
The Intercept is moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
Overall, we rate The Intercept progressive Left Biased based on story selection that favors the left and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing.
I also found the same story mentioned in Common Dreams and through the AP.
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/02/28/democratic-party-has-problem-bloomberg-hires-super-tuesday-state-democratic-vice
Common Dreams is rated with a LEFT bias further left than the Intercept.
https://apnews.com/f29d38b451889b7df31eadebf1eca6fa
The AP is the only one of the three sources listed Least Biased with Very High factual reporting.
The AP reports, “Michael Bloomberg is adding three experienced California Democrats to his presidential campaign in the state that awards the most primary delegates, including the former head of Sen. Kamala Harris’ state campaign operation.
Courtni Pugh, who led Harris’ strategy in the senator’s home state, is joining Bloomberg’s team as a senior adviser focused on paid media targeting constituency groups such as Latino and black voters, the campaign announced Friday. Bloomberg also has hired Crystal Strait, the former head of the state’s Planned Parenthood chapter, as political director, and Alex Gallardo Rooker, a vice chair of the state Democratic party, as a senior adviser.
“Srait, who also has worked for the state party and former California Sen. Barbara Boxer, said she’s joining the campaign because she believes Bloomberg is the party’s best chance of beating President Donald Trump.” …
NOTE: Nowhere in the AP piece does it say the three are Super Delegates in California.
LikeLike
You seem to have the names wrong, Lloyd. It has been widely reported that Bloomberg has added as senior advisors to his campaign
Carla Brailey, DNC member in Texas, an automatic delegate, aka a superdelegate, and Vice Chair of the Texas Democratic Party
Alexandra Rooker, DNC member in California, an automatic delegate, aka a superdelegate, and Vice Chair of the California Democratic Party
Both are on the following list of superdelegates nationwide:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_2020_Democratic_Party_automatic_delegates
The Washington Post just ran an article about Bloomberg’s strategy for a brokered convention. But this is not really news. Of course he has such a strategy, but it’s a fallback position.
LikeLike
Has Bloomberg registered as a Democrat yet?
LikeLike
Probably not.
LikeLike
Bloomberg staying in the race is only going to hurt Biden. Bloomberg staying in the race has no effect on Bernie’s support.
It makes no sense to me why anyone could think that the DNC has a secret plot to help Bloomberg win, and the DNC also has a secret plot to have Biden win.
LikeLike
DNC doesn’t strike me as a strong- or single-minded enough org to have a “secret plot.” They seem more like anxious gamblers, shifting strategies sweatily as the game advances.
LikeLike
The DNC is exactly like the AFT and other teachers’ unions. That’s why I find it ironic when so many teachers want to paint the entire Democratic party with one (very evil and corrupt) brush without any recognition of how much harm that does to both the truth and any ability to have a more progressive future.
Thus, there is legitimate criticism: “I don’t like Randi Weingarten publicly endorsing Elizabeth Warren and I think that isn’t a good idea and is unfair to the other 2 candidates”. That is very reasonable criticism to make.
Then there is the criticism that only serves to make the public turn against the teachers’ union. “Randi Weingarten endorsed Elizabeth Warren because she is corrupt and the entire teachers union is a corrupt organization whose sole purpose is to do the bidding of the rich and powerful oligarchs who give them their marching orders and know the union will serve their oligarch masters and keep them in power and Randi did it just to destroy our beloved Bernie so the oligarchs would be happy.” That isn’t just criticism of Randi Weingarten’s endorsement of Elizabeth Warren — instead that criticism simply serves to convince the public that the entire AFT union is a corrupt entity that should not be supported under any circumstances.
I don’t think the way to having a more responsive AFT is to convince all voters that the entire AFT is very corrupt so that those voters elect the right wing anti-teachers’ union right wing Republican politicians who will destroy those unions, and those empowered right wing Republicans now pass laws to make unions illegal, and out of that total destruction of unions will come a new progressive teachers union.
Does anyone really believe that destroying the AFT, making the public hate and despise the “totally corrupt” teachers’ union so that the voters empower right wing politicians whose goal is to entirely destroy the union, is the way to have a more progressive teachers union?
I don’t. Nor do I think that is the solution to having a more progressive DNC. Destroying the one thing that the far right neo fascist movement wants to destroy in the name of making it “more progressive” is an invitation to the takeover of this country by the far, far right. In fact, the far, far right has been running a propaganda campaign to convince the public that the teachers union and DNC are two of the most corrupt entities in this country. But most voters didn’t believe it until they heard so many teachers and democrats telling them that it was true.
Both organizations have flaws. That is the nature of the beast. I have no idea why the AFT is not doing what apparently all the teachers on here want them to do, but I doubt very much it is because everyone at the AFT is corrupt and answers to some oligarch master.
And the same goes for the DNC.
Convincing the public that the AFT and DNC are two of the most corrupt organizations ever is doing the right wing Republicans’ work for them. And if you can see the nuance in why the AFT can do some good things that are very important AND some things that are aggravating and wrong, then I hope people will see that nuance when it comes to the DNC. There is no secret plot by the DNC to elect Bloomberg or even Biden. And there is no secret plot by Randi Weingarten to help Warren or the anti-Bernie “oligarchs” who give her the marching orders.
LikeLike
Randi laid out her reasons for endorsing Elizabeth Warren. The AFT will make a decision when it is ready, and it is not ready. Although some here have made derogatory comments about Warren, I disagree. I met her privately about five years ago in her office. We talked for half an hour. She was the smartest elected official I had ever met. She listened. She really listened. Look, I will vote for the Democratic candidate, whoever is running against Trump. But no one should smear Warren. She is a brilliant and extremely capable person.
LikeLike
Warren is my 2nd choice and isn’t that far off from my first choice, Sanders.
LikeLike
I don’t endorse in the primary, Lloyd, but I must say that Bernie’s appreciation for Castro’s literacy program threw me for a loop. While Fidel was improving literacy, he was murdering his allies in the Revolution.
Bernie also spoke highly of Mao, who did so much to raise millions out of poverty. He forgot to mention the millions that he murdered.
LikeLike
Mao managed to turn the people against each other so the people were doing all of his murdering for him.
Millions died many by suicide to escape the insanity of Mao’s Cultural Revolution, and when Mao decided it was over, he activated his army and sent all of the teens known as the Little Red Guard, that had been doing most of the killing and torture to labor camps where many of them died.
Bernie must be ignorant of what Mao did to admire Mao like that.
For instance, Mao ended all the addictive drug problems in China in one night. He had the army round up about a million people that were the drug dealers and had them executed. The users were sent to camps to get clean and were warned if they started to use opium again, they’d be shot, too.
To redistribute the land from the landowners to the peasants, Mao let the peasants set up kangaroo courts and about 800,000 landowners were found guilty of crimes and executed through those peasant trials.
Those are only two examples. There were many more.
LikeLike
I am with you NYCPPP; I think that the conspiracy theories and smear tactics only undermine our chances to defeat Trump. It’s bad enough when we get carried away trashing Trump, glorying in using his penchant for derogatory nicknames. When we do it to our own candidates and organizations, we sink below Trump’s level.
LikeLike
The worst thing for Democrats to do, whatever their faction, is to form a circular firing squad.
I don’t know if this country could survive four more years of Trump.
LikeLike
I’m not sure what you’re going on about, nycpsp. I’m certainly not smearing the AFT, or the Democratic party. But I think it’s OK to criticize our national committee for their apparent lack of both organization and vision, this time around as well as last time. We deserve better. Fortunately, both Sanders and Warren have plenty of both. Not sure about Biden, organization-wise, but I think I get his vision.
LikeLike
Bethree, the way you lay it out is perfectly acceptable and reasonable. No conspiracy theory or name calling. Just an honest critique.
LikeLike
I’ve always imagined the Democratic Party like a wild flock of hyper kindergarteners that all have attention deficit disorder and are running wild in all directions.
When I think of the GOP, I imagine what it must have been like to be a member of the Nazi Party under Hitler or the Communist Party under Stalin.
LikeLike
I am now growing my skepticism that DNC and DFER are two peas in the pod.
LikeLike
With the withdrawal of Mayor Pete & now Klobuchar, both are throwing their support to Biden, so I think it is becoming clear as to the DNC preference…& it’s not Bloomberg, no matter how much money he spends (& I would be glad to see that–a lesson to be learned: no one can buy their way into the WH). In terms of the upcoming primaries, I think it’s hard to predict outcomes, but we’ll learn soon enough how the wind blows–like, tomorrow (well, almost today) night if, it is hoped, there is no hint of shenanigans–such as voting machine malfunctions, obfuscation, voter purging, etc., ad.nauseum.
As for Warren–I’d always liked her (wished she’d run in 2016)–but I think her downturn in #s began almost right after the debate in which she accused Bernie, then refused to shake his hand, then asked him, “Did you just call me a liar on national tv?” Since both of them are the Progressive candidates, I know a lot of people who backed her then jumped ship. I was pretty stunned (& not much stuns me these days). I hope she recovers, but she also needs to mend fences. Since then, I am constantly, constantly finding my mailbox filled w/w-mails from “Elect Democratic Women.” One thing I credit (& not much else) HRC with is that it seemed she learned early on in the campaign that “playing the woman card” (or the gender card) isn’t helpful. As a woman, I am offended that people
think that “it’s time”…no matter who the candidate is. Honestly, I wouldn’t mind at all to have Warren as president, but it would be because of the person she is, not because she’s a woman. I want the person who can do the best for everybody, regardless of that person’s gender. Anyway, just sayin’…
Now it’s March 3rd: as aforementioned, we’ll see…
The Nation just e-mailed that they have endorsed Bernie, with a lengthy & cogent analysis as to why. Worth reading (& they sent it free, so it doesn’t count against the amount of free articles you can read before you have to subscribe!).
LikeLike
Saying, “It’s time for a woman,” is more a “Gimme a break” statement. There is an unconscious (?) bias against women when they are judged by different standards than men. It may just be a turn of phrase, but it’s there. I am not sure the reaction to Warren’s calling Sanders out would have been the same if she was a man. Inccidentally, I don’t remember any resolution to that little contretemps being reported. Apparently the ugliness between the two was being fueled within their campaigns until it was realized that the two would probably just end up hurting each other. Somehow Sanders came off looking like an angel and Warren took the heat . Your analysis points to that conclusion.
LikeLike
DNC = Desperate Never-Bernie Calibrations.
Watch as the jumbled moderates swiftly claw their failed political ambitions into the next level of personal opportunism.
All done sacrificially and shamelessly, of course, in the name of party unity and electability.
LikeLike