Most of us pay our taxes. Most of us are amazed to learn that some very profitable corporations pay no federal taxes. Some corporations move to states where they pay little or no state taxes. Their tax avoidance strategies starve our schools and other vital public services.
This article from the New York Times lists major corporations that make large profits and pay no federal taxes.
It’s a topic that several presidential candidates, led by Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, have hammered recently as they travel the campaign trail, spurred by a report that 60 Fortune 500 companies paid no federal taxes on $79 billion in corporate income last year. Amazon, which is reported to be opening a center in an abandoned Akron mall that will employ 500 people, has become the poster child for corporate tax avoidance; last year it had an effective tax rate of below zero — receiving a rebate — on income of $10.8 billion.
For decades, profitable companies have been able to avoid corporate taxes. But the list of those paying zero roughly doubled last year as a result of provisions in President Trump’s 2017 tax bill that expanded corporate tax breaks and reduced the tax rate on corporate income.
“Amazon, Netflix and dozens of major corporations, as a result of Trump’s tax bill, pay nothing in federal taxes,” Mr. Sanders said this month during a Fox News town hall-style event. “I think that’s a disgrace.”
These are the 30 most profitable companies that paid no federal income taxes in 2018. In many cases, the companies also received tax rebates that could be used to reduce their tax burdens in other years.
Corporations’ ability to whittle down their tax bills has long been a target of criticism by Democrats, and this presidential campaign is no exception, particularly among left-wing candidates who argue that corporations should be accountable for wage inequality and its impact on low- and middle-income workers.


And industry wonders why they have a skills gap.
https://www.cio.com/article/2382776/careers-staffing-is-the-technology-skills-gap-fact-or-fiction.html
LikeLike
Corporations and the wealthy really deserved the big tax cut. [Sarcasm] This country is going crazy. Nobody should get $12 million each year when workers’ wages have been stagnant for decades. This is the type of thing the GOP salivates over.
…….
Among Highest Paid CEOs Are Discovery’s Zaslav, Disney’s Iger
Pay for chief executives rose to a median of $12 million last year, including salary, stock and other compensation.
ASSOCIATED PRESS
PUBLISHED 24 MAY 2019
Here are the highest paid CEOs in the S&P 500 index for 2018, as calculated by The Associated Press and Equilar, an executive data firm.
The AP’s compensation study covered 340 executives at S&P 500 companies who have served at least two full consecutive fiscal years at their respective companies, which filed proxy statements between Jan. 1 and April 30. Some companies with highly paid CEOs do not fit these criteria…
https://www.snopes.com/ap/2019/05/24/among-highest-paid-ceos-are-discoverys-zaslav-disneys-iger/
LikeLike
America’s pretense at capitalism is a fraud.
LikeLike
Exactly right.
LikeLike
It’s not capitalism.
It’s crapitalism
They take our money and then crap on us.
LikeLike
Off with their heads . . . .
LikeLike
Corporations do not pay taxes. They never have, and they never will. See:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2011/09/22/corporations-do-not-pay-taxes-they-cant-theyre-not-people/#174ad05d6222
All corporations just pass of their taxes in the cost of their products. Only the final consumer pays taxes.
Taxes are a cost, just like raw materials. When a consumer purchases a product made by a corporation, the consumer pays all of the costs. Including the taxes.
LikeLike
But corporations make huge profits.
You define the term “corporate tool.”
LikeLike
Charles doesn’t have the capacity to be a better human being. However, he would be better positioned to make coherent arguments if he understood the information posted by the Open Markets Institute.
LikeLike
Corporate welfare- the U.S. network of roads, fire protection, law enforcement and the judicial system, food banks and healthcare for employees who are paid inadequately, international security which enables commerce, work force training, K-12 and college, FEMA, CDC,…
LikeLike
From the following study: https://microeconomicinsights.org/benefits-corporate-tax-cuts-evidence-local-us-labour-markets/
“Our analysis suggests that the largest beneficiaries from a tax cut would be the owners of firms (40%). . . . This implies that cuts to corporate taxes are likely to increase inequality.”
LikeLike
If what Charles says is true, then it necessarily follows that the corporation that pays no taxes has an unfair advantage over other corporations that do because the one that pays no taxes does not have to add the tax to the cost of production and hence can offer it’s goods and services at a lower price.
There is a name for this situation: crony capitalism.
By the way, here’s another subject near and dear to Charles’ heart
LikeLike
That may be true Charles. By that logic last year when the tax burden dropped by 34%, corporations tuned over those excess profits to the employees?. No they did not. They used those excess profits to lower prices on consumers? I must have missed that. They invested those excess profits in new pant and equipment? I and the commerce dept. must have missed that one too, as there was no investment boom. They turned those excess profits into share buybacks for investors and larger compensation packages for the CEO and the management team? Yeah that’s the one.
So I am with you. How about we raise taxes on capital investment to the marginal tax rates. Then while we are at it we can add on a few surcharges for all the Government services a corporation receives. Like limited liability for those investors, or Patent protection. And high om my lefty list is restrictive labor laws that I assure you have kept a few CEO’s heads planted on their necks instead of laying in a bucket
LikeLike
Exactly right, Joel. The ownership class used the tax cut for a big payday for themselves. But this was the idea all along, as you know. Just after this tax cut passed, Donald Trump went down to Mar-a-lago and had dinner with a bunch of his wealthy friends and told them, “You all just got a lot richer.” https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-mar-a-lago-christmas-trip/
LikeLike
Bob Shepherd: This lying POS actually has some people believing that the tax cut benefits the middle class.
…………………………………………………………
The president himself on Sept. 13 — long before the bill was finalized — said the wealthy would not benefit from the GOP tax overhaul.
“The rich will not be gaining at all with this plan. We are looking for the middle class and we are looking for jobs — jobs being the economy,” Mr. Trump said.
LikeLike
Well, this will come back to haunt him during the debates. He knew it was a lie. So did Ryan and McConnell.
LikeLike
Carol,
He is a POS, but those in the Congress and the Senate who support him or don’t resist him are equally to blame. Most of everyone in D.C. (not all) are monsters.
LikeLike
Robert Rendo: I totally agree. His supporters in Congress are putting up with a lot in order to get what they want. They want court judges to bring us back to the dark ages and to have Roe vs. Wade demolished. Probably most of the conservatives dislike gays and trans people and have no problem with cutting their benefits. They work to get more money for the wealthy and stomp on the rest of us. There is no money for Medicare for All, increasing payments for Social Security nor any will to increase the minimum wage higher than $7.25 an hour. Trump is their kind of guy.
I hope that privately they know he is an idiot, but he gives them what they want to achieve.
LikeLike
Carol M,
I agree with you. They know his is a dirtbag, but it’s worth it to them because they are getting what they want.
There is plenty of money for Medicare for All and for SS increases, which Obama helped to freeze. It’s never matter of resource. It’s a matter of will and empathy, of which the pols in D.C. have little to none.
Their karma is all coming back to them . . . .
LikeLike
You seem like a good, patriotic American, Charles. You’re looking out for the American consumer. Keep in mind that the American consumer is also the American worker. Workers need higher wages and a better social safety net. Surely, you must want a better life for your American neighbor instead of ten yachts for the DeVos family and whole Hawaiian islands for Jeff Bezos. We’re giving tax rebates to Coors, for crying out loud! I think we workers can afford a few extra cents for a beer for a better life. Halliburton shouldn’t get tax rebates to afford to spend so much lobbying people like Donald Trump and Dick Cheney for more rebates and more oil wars.
LikeLike
Halliburton gets paid with billions of tax dollars but pays no taxes.
The same was true for Boeing for many years.
These companies put welfare queens to shame.
LikeLike
“C” said, “Corporations do not pay taxes. They never have, and they never will.” and “All corporations just pass of [sic] their taxes in the cost of their products. Only the final consumer pays taxes.”
That is straight up libertarian crapola, direct from the people who consider taxes to be theft and think that businesses should not be taxed. Let the “free” markets reign supreme so they say.
If the corporations pass on the cost of taxes to the consumer, then maybe the consumer will stop buying their product which has become too costly. But they are not being taxed or they are not paying their fair share in taxes and they are not lowering prices even with all the gifts they receive from their bought and paid for political lackeys.
LikeLike
I made a typing mistake. Corporations pass off their tax costs, just like they pass of the costs of the raw materials, and other costs of their products.
Econ 101: When a person buys a product, the person pays all of the costs of that product. The raw materials, the cost of the factory. The utilities to operate the factory. The labor to make the product, the transportation to bring the product to market, etc. ALL of the costs to produce the product are reflected in the final price that the consumer pays.
Taxes are a cost of production. Just like the electricity used by the machine that made the product. Just like the costs incurred to transport the item from the factory to the retail store. All of these costs are added together, when the consumer purchases the item.
It is more accurate to state, that the corporation collects taxes as an agent of the government. The corporation is charged a cost (tax) by the government. The corporation factors that cost into the price that is charged by the product. And then the tax cost, and the raw material costs, and the transportation costs, and all of the other costs, are passed on to to the consumer.
NO corporation pays taxes. No corporation ever will.
LikeLike
Charles
I already said that in theory you are correct. So again how do they decide which stake holder gets what. How much does the Share holder get. How much does the management team get. How much do the workers get to share in their profits. How many services and at what cost do they sell products to the consumer.
So I have no problem with passing on all taxes to the share and bond holders and taxing them at the same rate as tax payers pay on income rather than a gains or dividend rate. And of course that rate should be higher when the Government is restricting the actions of a free market. A libertarian like you should agree that Government should not be tipping the playing field. s
The easy examples are in Tech or Pharma. Government granted monopolies are given to the Pharma industry for drugs that would sell for a fraction of the cost without a patent. Sometimes in the case of a life saving drug hundreds of times what it would sell for as a generic in a free market. And as a hole, half of the research costs are funded through NIH, the Defense Department or another Government agency.
Should that share holder be taxed a rate equivalent to his share of profits on a patent protected drug, over the meager profits on a generic.
LikeLike
Charles is struck in first year Econ ideology, similar to those unable to advance out of remedial math.
LikeLike
Linda
I am stuck in econ 101 as well
“Economics is who gets what when and how”
How the goods, services and tasks are distributed in any given society.
“Politics is who determines who gets what when and how ” Harold Lasswell 1936 .
You will probably find that on the introductory page of many Economics and Political Science texts.
As such there are, never have been and never will be free markets. The Walton’s, the Koch’s and the Mercer’s understand this very well. These champions of Libertarian hogwash spend a fortune on controlling the Politicians who set the rules( their dreaded “R” word regulate) of the Markets to operate in their favor.
LikeLike
Come on, Diane. Give Ryan, McConnell, and the President some credit. Do you know how difficult it is to craft legislation that will ensure that a company that has 10 billion in profits will have no taxes due? Masterful.
LikeLike
Yes. I know that Trump didn’t have anything to do with it. But he did play President on television during the crafting of that legislation, and he approved it.
LikeLike
Unfortunately, this is not unique to Trump or the Republicans.This has been going on for a long time now, under both Republican and Democratic Presidents and Congresses. For the first 4 years of the Obama presidency, Boeing actually had a negative Federal tax rate, meaning it got money back. Over the entire duration of the Obama Presicency, Boeing paid an effective Federal tax rate of only 8.4%.This despite the fact that they were making billions from Federal contracts.
Congress is probably most responsible because members of Congress are the ones who benefit, in some cases directly through their “investments” (Aka, insider trades)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I read a report once that said that the average Congressperson goes into the job with a net worth of about 250K and is worth millions eight years later, even though the job paid (at the time) “only” $165K. But of course this has nothing whatsoever to do with insider trading. LMAO.
LikeLike
Insider trading is a perk none of the politicians discuss.
LikeLike
Politicians not only have access to information that the rest of us don’t have, but they also pass laws that affect the companies that they and their relatives and business associates may be invested in.
LikeLike
“Insider trading is a perk none of the politicians discuss.”
Do you mean like buying up acres of property around Interstates and then pushing funding for building an exit & assuring the property is rezoned commercial?
Or passing legislation giving real estate developers tax breaks for buying depressed properties, followed by school boards closing the public schools in poor areas, and then, like magic, luxury apartments pop up like mushrooms around the spanking new charter school?
LikeLike
So where is Trump or his shell corporations on the list?
And, his family?
And, what did these companies – particularly those new to the game – contribute to the campaign and how many trips to Mara Lago?
Local school districts and cities are going crazy over giving tax breaks or “tax incremental financing (TIFs) to lure businesses their regions. Many have said their done with it and lost the new business in the process.
All politics is local – as the expression goes.
City and state outcry is loud – and yet they turn blind eyes and sell their souls to a President who does the exact same thing.
Whether this has gone on before or not – the “culture of excess” and reverse-Robin Hood is prominent enabling the rich and while … wait for it… leaving children behind.
LikeLike
re: SDP 5/25 4:06pm post: “Congress is probably most responsible because members of Congress are the ones who benefit, in some cases directly through their “investments” (Aka, insider trades).”
I assume the benefit you refer to is campaign donations. I like to trace the problem back further. Gross inequality started in earnest at the end of the ‘70’s & proceeded apace w/loosening of regs (+ defunding oversight of existing regs) on banking, brokerage, corporations [anti-trust, taxation et al], & campaign finance, plus blatant union-busting—i.e. the whole “trickle-down” package. That sent $ shooting to the top so quickly that already by early ‘80’s the revolving-door between govt & industry was in full swing, & by ‘90’s we’d spawned enough billionaire-+ CEO’s to ensure a long future of industry-bought legislation.
That paradigm combined w/globalism & digital revolution cinched the crushing of nearly all unions, the loud sucking sound of corporations offshoring mfg & low-level service jobs that could by done by phone, & for corporations deigning to stay here, $ pulled out of training-on-the-job, as well as corporate $ for education feeding the labor market, & any other public goods not required next quarter by short-term accounting methods [ushered in during same period & contributing to a return to boom-bust cycles typical of 19th-early-20thC unfettered capitalism].
It may take the threat of socialist revolution to tame the bloated elites over-invested in this fiasco. If I were king of the forest, I’d suggest a “plea deal” for the elites, consisting of gradual moves back toward democracy, starting immediately w/a 3-prong program: (1)strict campaign-finance measures: donation limits, banning of PACs & superPACs, w/related reform of 501(c)3&4 laws, repeal/ legislative work-around of Cit-United decision. (2) 10 yrs’ tax returns for all candidates for office or proposed appointees (including judicial) reqg Senate confirmation, plus annual submittal/ review thereafter [take that, insider trading]. (3) new ethics measures including 5-yr waiting period between significant corporate-held position & legislative, executive or judicial govt office [in either direction], plus 5-yr waiting period for those leaving govt office on more-than-nominal honorariums for speeches etc.
At that point I’d rest for just a few years, warning the [hopefully depleting-deflating elites] that the next big move—if it wasn’t already underway in a legislature now freed to follow its constituents’ druthers– would be twofold: (1) earmarking a %age of corporate profits for public works/ goods in their hdqtrs & branch states, & (2) structuring corporate budgets to cap admin salaries, w/excess to be distributed fairly among all employees.
LikeLike
Diane,
This is the most ignorant post you have ever published. Shame on you.
Corporations are PEOPLE. Treat them with respect and dignity.
People don’t pay taxes.
Oh, wait a minutes. Maybe I’m confused. People do pay taxes. People are not corporations. Corporations are corporations, but corporations are also people. People are not incorporated as civilians, but corporations as people who may or may not be private citizens are incorporated, but they are still people. People pay taxes, and since corporations are people, they pay taxes too.
Right?
Wrong.
Maybe people should pay taxes to corporations. They kind of already do by taking up corporations’ fair share of taxation. Maybe corporations should pay taxes to the people. That might not work since corporations pay taxes to the government, but that can be like paying taxes to corporations because the government is in a stranglehold by corporations come time for elections and lobbies. In fact, corporations simply cut and paste their legislative language right into federal and state bills without any editing from greasy palmed elected officials who pass those bills. It’s true. Just ask ALEC.
I mean, are we really the United Corporations of America? Maybe the government should pay taxes to the people, but in a way, it really does exactly that by bailing out too-big-to-fail corporations that actually fail, and those corporations are people, aren’t they? Maybe people should pay taxes to people, but that would mean they would be potentially paying taxes to corporations since corporations are people also.
I’m sorry.
I’m very confused.
Someone help!
Okay, Diane, maybe yours was not a shameful posting today.
But I am very confused. Head is spinning . . . . .
LikeLike
Kim will keep his promises to Trump? Trump is an empty-headed lame brain. Kim looks out for himself. Trump must still think he is entitled to a Nobel Peace Prize.
………………………………………..
Trump Opens Tokyo Visit With a Tweet Sure to Unnerve the Japanese
President Trump played down North Korea’s recent tests of short-range ballistic missiles, undercutting declarations by both Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and the president’s own national security adviser.
…“North Korea fired off some small weapons, which disturbed some of my people, and others, but not me,” Mr. Trump wrote on Twitter from his hotel in Tokyo before a round of golf with Mr. Abe in nearby Chiba. “I have confidence that Chairman Kim will keep his promise to me.”
As it has pursued on-again, off-again denuclearization talks with North Korea, the United States has been focused on the North’s attempt to build nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missiles that could reach the United States mainland.
But Japanese officials are worried about the sort of “small weapons” Mr. Trump dismissed — short-range missiles that could strike Japan and are often pointed in its direction…
LikeLike
IQ45 is spouting off his brilliance.
………………………………………………………………………
Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump
North Korea fired off some small weapons, which disturbed some of my people, and others, but not me. I have confidence that Chairman Kim will keep his promise to me, & also smiled when he called Swampman Joe Biden a low IQ individual, & worse. Perhaps that’s sending me a signal?
56.2K
8:32 PM – May 25, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
27.4K people are talking about this
LikeLike
“He sent me beautiful letters”. “And then we fell in love”.
Trump is a very sick man.
LikeLike
Leaving aside the question of whether corporations are people (Citizens United suggested that they were?), it should be asked if the forgiveness of taxation has produced a generation of more responsible American businesses. It should be fairly obvious that the answer is a qualified no.
Andrew Carnegie wrote in an essay that the extra wages paid to thousands of workers would not have been as much societal benefit as the library he built (this essay was in the curriculum that came to us through Common Core. Kids had to do a close reading). If the need, the concentration of wealth in the hands of the few is a good thing for communities, we ought to see communities all over America benefiting from the burgeoning concentration of American wealth. Funny, it does not look like that in Tarkio or Hazard.
There is a ring of truth to Carnegie’s suggestion. I knew a man who left a small town in Oklahoma during the dust bowl at 16, grew to be very wealthy, and endowed his beloved hometown with a library. Perhaps his story illustrates what is happening to corporate America today. Sam had been out all day in that 1930s drought, looking for wild edibles and finding none. When he got home, his mother gave him a biscuit and told him he better get out of town before they all starved. “Don’t ever let anyone tell you they will not steal,” he sermonized one evening as we talked, “They just haven’t been hungry.”
This is perhaps the biggest difference. Modern philanthropy seems to be what happens after you build a massive house, buy all sorts of expensive things, and live in a spot that will damage the environment the most. With as many people as we have who have successfully turned technology into their fortunes, we should be all living in communities with fine schools, hospitals, parks, and libraries. But this is not the case. Examples like Columbus, IN, where Cummings bankrolled the town’s distinctive architecture, are few and far between. A lot of people may use soap, but soap kings have only built soap palaces.
So it seems to me that asking people who can afford to pay for better communities either through taxation or some other method would help out. Mark Twain once wrote to Andrew Carnegie: “I hear you have come in for some money. Could you spare $1.50 for a hymn Book?”
LikeLike
#3yrtitle1teachersworktaxfree
LikeLike
Why did the NYT include the country’s major elec&gas utilities in its “Profitable Giants” paying no taxes? A full 1/3, 10 of the 30 corporations listed are monopolies regulated by public utility commissions. NYT itself had a 1/9/18 article outlining the tax breaks to utilities in Trump’s tax bill, & how those savings would be passed along to consumers. These companies serve many millions of res & comm customers, so you’re not going to notice—a few bucks off your monthly bill at most.
LikeLike
11, that is: Duke, Dominion, AEP, PSEG, First Energy, Xcel Energy, WEC, DTE, PPL, Ameren, CMS
LikeLike
Enron’s not # 12 on the list.
LikeLike
Nor was it a public utility
LikeLike
I just signed a petition demanding that the Senate stand up for the LGBTQ community and pass the Equality Act – will you sign, too?
In a historic act of resistance to Trump’s homophobic and hateful agenda, the House of Representatives recently passed the Equality Act to extend civil rights protections to the LGBTQ community and ban discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation.1
But the fight to win full, equal rights under the law for everyone is far from over.
The Trump administration can wage war against the LGBTQ community because there are no explicit legal guarantees of their civil rights. Now, it’s on the Senate to take a stance against bigotry and ensure protection from discrimination for the LGBTQ community. Can you add your voice in support of the Equality Act?
https://act.credoaction.com/sign/Equality-act-senate?sp_ref=493431089.4.196747.e.632955.2&referring_akid=32703.1912996.CthfMc&source=mailto_sp
LikeLike
I wrote this under a previous Nom de plum, Horatio Algeranon, at the height of the BP oil volcano in the Gulf, but it applies to all large corporations which firmly believe that they have the unalienable right to Independence from all sovereign states (which includes the right to despoil the environment as they see fit and/or refuse to pay taxes on money earned abroad as Apple, Microsoft, Google and other corporations did for many years before Trump lowered the rate from 35% to %15%)
“The Declaration of Corporate Independence”
When in the Course of oil drilling, it becomes necessary for one Corporation (BP) to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with The Small People (how BP chairman Carl Henric-Svanberg referred to the oil spill victims) , and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and fundamentally un-equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of The Small People requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all Persons (and that certainly includes corporations according to the US Supreme Court) are absolutely not created equal (and certainly not equal with pelicans and dolphins), that some are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life (yachting), Liberty (to censor photographers, reporters, scientists and others at will) and the pursuit of Happine$$
That to secure these rights, Corporations are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the Board of Directors, That whenever any Form of Government (eg, Plaquemines Parish) becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of The Big People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government (headquartered offshore), laying its foundation on such principles (maximizing profit$ and minimizing losses) and organizing its powers in such form (no photographers or others within 65 feet of boom or beaches or cleanup workers under threat of fine and/or jail time), as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety (minimize future jury settlements) and Happine$$.
Prudence (The Small People buy our gas), indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that Corporations are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses (from The Small People like Billy Nungesser, Andersen Cooper and even Jimmy Buffett) and usurpations (Georgianne Nienaber and other photographers trying to get photos of oiled pelicans), pursuing invariably the same Object (information that might help mitigate the oil impacts — and act as evidence in future court cases) evinces a design to reduce them (The Big People) under absolute Despotism (legal regulations in place but not currently being enforced), it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new (Coast) Guards for their future security (minimize liability).
We, therefore, the Representatives of BP plc, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the Big People of these Conglomerates (BP, Transocean, Halliburton), solemnly publish and declare, That these United Conglomerates are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent of the United States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the American Clown, and that all political connection between them and the United States, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent Corporations, they have full Power to create oil volcanoes, apply Corexit, burn sea turtles alive, contract Alliances (eg, with the US Coast Guard), establish press blackouts, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent Corporations may of right do.
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence (and a few well placed judges), we mutually pledge to each other our Lives (yachting), our Fortune$ and our sacred Honor (His Royal Heinous Tony Hayward, CEO of BP)
LikeLike
SomeDAM Poet: I’m impressed. You should run for office. The GOP would welcome you with open arms. You might even get asked to come to the Oval office and eat hamburgers and french fries.
LikeLike
I hope so.
I love Freedom Fries
LikeLike
I also wrote this one on a similar subject (although I suspect it will get me no invitations or Freedom Fries) again under the Horatio Algeranon nom (with a lot of help from Don McLean)
“Tarry Pipe”
— rendition of “Starry Night” (by Don McLean)
Tarry, tarry pipe
Taints our water black and grey,
Leaks out on a summer day,
With tars that show their darkness in the soil.
Shadows on the hills,
Soils the trees and the daffodils,
Foils the bees with the oil spills,
In blackness on the slowly dying land.
Now I understand what you tried to say to me,
How you rallied for humanity,
How you tried to make us see.
We would not listen, we did not know how.
Perhaps we’ll listen now.
Tarry, tarry pipe.
Flaming towers that brightly blaze,
Swirling clouds and smoggy haze,
Collect in former skies of China blue.
Climate changing too, farmers’ fields of wilted grain,
Weathered faces lined in pain,
Are roiled beneath the pipeline’s tarry sands.
Now I understand what you tried to say to me,
How you rallied for humanity,
How you tried to make us see.
We would not listen, we did not know how.
Perhaps we’ll listen now.
For we did not trust you,
But still your claims were true.
And when no dope was left to hype
Up that tarry, tarry pipe,
It took our life, as poisons often do.
But you could have told us Keystone,
That pipe was never meant for more
Than profits for a few
Tarry, tarry pipe
Praises sung in Congress halls,
Shameless Feds in Capital malls,
With lies that waste the world you can’t forget.
From the shysters that you’ve met,
The oil men in Armani clothes,
The silver tongues of bloody Roves
Have oiled and poisoned all the virgin snow.
Now I think I know what you tried to say to me,
How you rallied for humanity,
How you tried to make us see.
We would not listen, we’re not listening still.
Perhaps we never will…
Not incidentally, Trump has recently brought back the Keystone XL Pipeline from the dead.
LikeLike
Cincinnati has five Fortune 500 companies,. one of these is Kroger. This year the CEO of Kroger, Rodney McMullen, made $11.7 million and that includes a $2.7 million bonus 7.5 times the size of his bonus last year.
The median pay for a Kroger worker is $24,812.
Kroger got $400 million in tax cuts from Trump.
The CEO announced a plan for the tax cuts. One third of the Trump bonus would go to raise the starting minimum wage from $8.00 an hour to $10.00 and hour. Kroger workers are unionized. That was the best they could get on salary.
LikeLike
Trump has spent over $1.75 million of taxpayer money to renovate the WH. Obama paid for changes out of donations and from his own pocket.
It costs $3.4 million for security every time Trump decides to go golfing at one of his US resorts. He definitely has no problem wasting our money.
……………………..
How much can a president redecorate the White House?
But though the White House’s exterior has remained fairly consistent over its 200-year lifespan, the inside has seen drastic changes. Given that all presidents make the White House their home for their tenure as Commander-in-Chief, it stands to reason that they would want to decorate the interior to their personal tastes….
Federal funding is provided by the American taxpayers, so it’s natural that citizens would be curious about how much funding our sitting presidents are allowed to use to redecorate their new home. Courtesy of the White House Historical Association, here are a few of the decoration budgets allotted to previous presidents (not adjusted for inflation):
· John Adams (1800) – $14,000
· Andrew Jackson (1833) – $20,000
· Calvin Coolidge (1925) – $50,000
· Bill Clinton (1999) – $100,000
As of 2019, the $100,000 allotment for each administration still stands. However, some presidents throughout history — Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama, for example — elected to forgo spending taxpayer money on renovations and paid for all changes with donations and money from their own pockets.
More recently, Donald Trump has already spent over $1.75 million in federal funds on White House renovations. Spokespeople for his administration declined to comment on where the money came from or what it was for.
https://blog.triviagenius.com/how-much-can-a-president-redecorate-the-white-house/
LikeLike
Obama should have painted it black, just to tick off the Republicans.
LikeLike
Trump’s weekly golf trips have cost taxpayers over $100 million. And he criticized Obama for playing golf occasionally.
LikeLike
I used to get Amazon Prime, primarily to watch videos on my computer & hot spot, but I cancelled it when Amazon raised the price. It was around the same time that it was publicized that Jeff Bezos is the wealthiest man in the world and I learned then of Amazon’s business practices.
Not long ago, I found out that Amazon has a special Prime for Poor People, which is less than half price and for which I am qualified. I got it but often felt guilty about that because I’m able to place an order of any price, not pay for shipping and get it the next day, such as a very low priced item that’s coming today –even though it’s Sunday.
Most of the time, Amazon uses their own delivery service now and it’s actually quite astounding. For example, when I tracked an item scheduled to arrive recently, I was shown a GPS map demonstrating where the delivery truck was currently located and which showed that they had 6 stops to make within a one block radius of me before getting to my door. I was shocked to see that there were so many Amazon customers in my middle class neighborhood (I’m at a transitional living facility for homeless people).
Even though I am a disabled senior and I was retired and working two jobs at the time, I became homeless because I owe money for taxes and student loans and three federal government agencies were taking my income from me. Now that I know that IRS actually gave Amazon a REBATE instead of making them pay taxes on billions of dollars in profits, I’m not feeling so guilty about my Prime for Poor People. (It’s taken four years to resolve but fortunately, the Feds recently acknowledged that I’m a hardship case and can’t afford to pay them anymore now…)
LikeLike
This has actually been going on for more than four years. I became homeless 4 years ago and lived in my rusted out old car w/no a/c or heat for awhile, before going to a homeless shelter. However, the government started taking my income 7 years ago. (It’s very difficult for homeless people to get back on their feet when their credit report indicates they’ve been evicted and the government is garnishing their wages and has a lien on them.)
LikeLike
This is off topic but something that isn’t widely known. [Welcome to the ‘land of the free’.]
……………………………..
Quartz: Saudi Arabia’s abortion laws are more forgiving than Alabama’s
By Ephrat LivniMay 25, 2019
The United States prides itself on being the land of the free and the home of the brave, a place that protects individual liberty and prizes privacy. Yet the freedom of women in the US is increasingly being threatened by highly restrictive abortion bans, passed at the state level, which violate the US Constitution. These laws make the legal codes of many Muslim-majority societies in the Middle East and North Africa seem more free, a fact that may surprise freedom-prizing Americans.
Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported this week (paywall) that the abortion bans just passed in Alabama and Georgia are more restrictive than prohibitions in about half of the Muslim-majority countries in the Middle East. Leila Hessini, vice president of the Global Fund for Women, which promotes gender equality initiatives worldwide, tells the publication, “There is not the same level of fervor, violence, and attacks on women and providers as in the US—we’re not seeing right now in the Middle East and North Africa a desire to make laws more punitive and more restrictive for women who need abortions and providers. We are seeing that in the US.”..
https://qz.com/1628427/saudi-arabias-abortion-laws-are-more-forgiving-than-alabamas/
LikeLike
The solution to the abortion debate is simple.
Women should simply stop sleeping with men in these backwoods legislatures until the men guarantee to women the right to make their own choices about their own bodies.
You can be sure that you would see all these “religious” men changing their positions quicker than you can say “sex starved”
And the beauty of this approach is that if the backwoods boys renege on the agreement at any time, the women can resume their “boycott” (so to speak).
I think it would be particularly effective if it were carried out by the wives, girlfriends and mistresses of the men sitting on the Supreme Court.
“I’m sorry, John. No sex for you until you agree to uphold Roe V Wade.”
“Yes dear, of course. Now can we do it?”
LikeLike
Joni Ernst, the Koch’s hand maiden, is not alone in helping men to yoke women.
Oppression succeeds because subjugation is at the foundation of Catholic and evangelical dogma.
LikeLike
You are right.
The Pope may be the worst offender in this regard (to say nothing of a pedophile protector.)
Just a few days ago, he likened any abortion — even of a sick fetus — to hiring a Hitman
And of course, he also opposes birth control.
Religious extremism of all types causes untold harm in the world. It does not matter what the religion happens to be.
The absolute worst ones are those who (like the Pope) actually believe they have been chosen by God.
LikeLike
All too true, especially regarding powerful religious men, but I’d like to think that the Lysistrata approach might actually work with laymen who have a heart and don’t want to become rapists.
LikeLike
Trump is happy about the way N. Korea is going? How many people are being put in camps to starve just because one family member said something inappropriate such as, “There isn’t enough food.” Trump admires dictators and wishes he had that same power.
……………………..
Trump in Japan: US president meets Emperor Naruhito…BBC
4 hours ago
…Mr Trump also spoke about relations with North Korea, reiterating that the country had “tremendous economic potential”.
He called its leader Kim Jong-un a “smart man” and said he was “very happy” with the way North Korea was going….
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-48418894
LikeLike
I would never have expected Howard Stern to say this about Trump. I agree that Trump is in need of psychotherapy but he’ll never accept that he is mentally unbalanced.
………
Howard Stern: Trump was ‘traumatized’ in childhood and needs therapy
Sarah Toce
Uploaded on May 27, 2019
LikeLike
So the system is “rigged”. Who knew? … The wealth disparity in this country would make Marie Antoinette blush.
LikeLike
It’s worse than many people know. While Trump was able to lose over a billion dollars, still maintain an opulent, self-indulgent lifestyle and not have to pay taxes for years, I owed considerably less money but the federal government came after me.
I had gotten a work-from-home teaching job because I became disabled and needed to pay the rent and eat. When I inquired about getting disability income because I couldn’t work in the field anymore, the government said I wasn’t qualified because you have to not be able to work to be eligible and I had figured out a way to work.
I had no family to help me and I began to struggle when my rent was suddenly raised $400 per month and I didn’t have the money to move, so I sold off my valuables just to survive. Then IRS had my employer send ALL of my paychecks to them (which went on for years). I was finally able to secure a second work-from-home job but that income was irregular and unpredictable, so when I was eligible to retire, I put in for SS. Then SS sent all of my retirement checks to the IRS for nearly a year, while the Department of Ed garnished the checks from my second job, so I couldn’t pay my rent, was evicted and became homeless.
I did not make nearly as much money as Trump, nor even as much as most people, despite being highly educated, because I worked primarily in non-union education jobs (so my SS is low). According to a report from the US Census Bureau, referred to in updated article from 12/18 entitled “Lifetime Earnings Soar with Education” located here: https://www.thoughtco.com/lifetime-earnings-soar-with-education-3321730
“…over an adult’s working life, high school graduates can expect, on average, to earn $1.2 million; those with a bachelor’s degree, $2.1 million; and people with a master’s degree, $2.5 million.
Persons with doctoral degrees earn an average of $3.4 million during their working life, while those with professional degrees do best at $4.4 million”
This covers the ages between 24 and 65, or just 40 years of work experience. I’ve worked since I was 16, so I’ve been in the workforce for over 50 years and I have grossed less than $700K total. So despite all my college degrees, I still have a long way to go before I earn what the average high school graduate has made in their lifetimes, yet I’ve been fodder for the federal government. I think that’s finally over now, and I feel lucky that we don’t have debtors jail. However, since my SS is not enough to live on, I can never really retire or feel financially secure.
LikeLike
homelesseducator: How awful what you’ve had to go through. My circumstances were never that bad.
I went overseas to work and saved quite a bit or I’d have a pension that isn’t enough to survive on. Teachers are not treated very well. My Social Security isn’t enough to pay for Medicare. Each year I have to write a check for the difference.
I had to stop working at age 62 because of a rare nerve disease that kept me from hearing well enough to continue teaching music. Fortunately, the school had insurance that paid me $36,000 a year until age 65. That helped me.
It is frustrating that Trump, a pathological liar and a thief, was able to keep up a luxurious lifestyle while screwing everyone who worked for him.
LikeLike
Homeless educator
It is unconscionable that you have had to go through what you have.
It makes me sick to hear about it.
It is also unconscionable that so many teachers have to work 2, 3 and sometimes more jobs to support themselves because a bunch of bastard politicians and the voters who put them in office have decided that teachers are not worth anything.
You really have to ask yourself about the value of a society that does not value it’s teachers because not valuing its teachers means a society does not value its children.
I thank you and all the other teachers in this country for the invaluable service you provide despite being overworked, underpaid and generally treated disrespectfully.
LikeLike
homelesseducator: Thank you for posting here. I am appalled by the circumstances that have led to your homelessness & financial insecurity. It could happen any day to any one of us–just one catastrophic health issue away from insolvency.
I know so many people who were thrown into a pit of financial hardship &–despite hard work & resilience–have been unable to climb out.
Since you write so well, I would hope that you could find someone (Barbara Ehrenreich? The author {is it J.D. Vance?} of Hillbilly Elegy?) who could help you write a book (from reading your posts, it seems that you have more than enough material as to your life & experiences, thus earning some income which, hopefully, would not be seized by the government (put it into offshore accounts!).
Actually, I am not joking, & if someone reading this can help h.e., please give her/him some contact information here.
I am hoping that something good happens for you very soon, & I’m sure Diane & the majority of those reading her blog do, as well.
In as rich a country as America, NO ONE deserves to be homeless & financially insecure.
LikeLike
Thank you so much, retiredbutmissthekids, Carolmalaysia and SomeDAM Poet! I really appreciate your kind words and empathy.
When I was looking for a pro bono lawyer to help me handle this, I was told by some that I’m “not a sympathetic character.” I looked for years and never did find a lawyer. Fortunately, I’ve gotten a lot of guidance and assistance from a network of very caring social service workers and, with their support, I was empowered to basically just deal with it.
Others have encouraged me to write about it, too, but I don’t want my students to know about this. There’s a stigma and stereotype associated with being homeless. It’s very embarrassing to end up like this…
LikeLike
homelesseducator: It’s a crime on our society that this could happen to you. If European countries like Denmark and Finland can care for their people, there is NO reason that this country is so tied up in verbiage against caring and helping those in need.
There is no excuse for lame brains like Trump taking advantage of the system and corporations getting tax cuts, making billions in profits and paying no taxes. The scream of ‘socialism’ is heard every time someone like Bernie exposes the truth. How frustrating to all of us who understand what is happening.
Trump was correct when he said he loves stupid people. Who else would vote for him but those who have been brainwashed.? Who would vote for someone as evil as Mc Connell?
LikeLike
BTW–I–& probably many of you–received a fascinating (packed w/info., for those unfamiliar w/the Walton family) e-mail (May 25th) from the Bernie campaign that he is going to attend the Walmart shareholders’ meeting in Arkansas in a few weeks. As per usual, he intends to speak truth to power.
Anxiously awaiting to hear what happens…
LikeLike
I find this interesting. A news anchor of a English state owned Chinese TV station has a run-off with a Fox person.
…………………………
From Inkstone: in Hong Kong
The Chinese state media anchor taking on Fox News
May 28, 2019
Two decades later, Liu is a leading anchor at the main English-language channel of China’s state television. Over the weekend, she went under the global spotlight again for agreeing to debate Fox News host Trish Regan on the US-China trade war.
While Americans regard Liu Xin as a spokeswoman for the Communist government, in China, she has emerged as an intrepid national heroine who is defending her homeland against an increasingly hostile West….
https://inks.tn/deq?utm_source=email&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=share_button
LikeLike
I’m NO expert on the economy but even I knew this tax cut was a bunch of baloney that was meant to help the wealthy. I guess we are supposed to be surprised.
“The research service is an in-house think tank for members of Congress, offering authoritative, non-partisan policy and economic analyses.” I’m sure this is ‘fake news’ to the GOP and the Orange Moron.
………………………………………………………
GOP Tax Law Doing Little For The Economy, Even Less For Workers: Congressional Study
05/28/2019
The sweeping tax law Republicans enacted in late 2017 is definitely not paying for itself and has not significantly boosted the economy or increased wages, the non-partisan Congressional Research Service said in a report.
But in line with what critics cautioned, the measure triggered a wave of corporate stock buybacks that benefited investors more than anybody else, according to the new study.
“While evidence does indicate significant repurchases of shares, either from tax cuts or repatriated revenues, relatively little was directed to paying worker bonuses, which had been announced by some firms,” CRS economic policy experts Jane Gravelle and Donald Marples wrote in their report.
The research service is an in-house think tank for members of Congress, offering authoritative, non-partisan policy and economic analyses.
Shortly after President Donald Trump signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ― which reduced corporate taxes by 40% to a 21% rate from a 35% rate ― dozens of U.S. companies announced they would give their workers bonuses. Republicans hailed those announcements as proof that workers would benefit from their giant corporate tax cut.
But it turns out that even the most generous assessment of corporate bonuses ― a conservative group counted more than $4 billion worth of the largesse ― amounted to 2% or 3% of the value of the corporate tax cut. And the law might not even deserve credit.
Article: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/gop-tax-law-bonuses_n_5ced9ad0e4b0ae6710585605
LikeLike