This is an oldie but goody.
In 2014, Bill Gates spoke to the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards and called on teachers to defend the Common Core standards. The article notes that Gates had given the organization at least $5 million since 2010.
My favorite part of the speech is when he compared standardization in education to the value of standardized electrical outlets.
Lyndsey Layton reported for the Washington Post on the speech:
Standardization is especially important to allow for innovation in the classroom, said Gates, who used an analogy of electrical outlets.
“If you have 50 different plug types, appliances wouldn’t be available and would be very expensive,” he said. But once an electric outlet becomes standardized, many companies can design appliances and competition ensues, creating variety and better prices for consumers, he said.
If states use common academic standards, the quality of classroom materials and professional development will improve, Gates said. Much of that material will be digital tools that are personalized to the student, he said. “To get this innovation out, common standards will be helpful,” he said.
Now if children were toasters or microwave ovens, Gates would be right. Every toaster needs standard electrical current and outlets.
But if every child is different, then standardization makes no sense.
I don’t want to hurt Bill Gates’ feelings by saying this, but I think he is making a very bad analogy.

Gates is not an expert in teaching and learning. His perspective comes from the tech world. Gates fails to understand that students are not widgets, electrical outlets or computer code. Teachers know that individuals are different and that not all learners learn the same way. Gates’ interest in standardization has more to do with his interest in selling “personalized learning” than helping students. Standardization is in line with Gates’ interest in making more money through cyber depersonalized learning. Standardization works well in computer formatted instruction, but there is no legitimate evidence behind this assumption.
LikeLike
Personalized learning is all about reducing the involvement of persons and turning kids into gritful robots. It needs to go the way of Microsoft’s paperclip avatar, with which it shares a great many ridiculous, offensive characteristics.
LikeLike
Gates is just another rich boy who wants to insure his income flow. He has NO CLUE about what good teaching/learning is.
I bet he has NOT even read John Dewey’s or Howard Zinn’s work. They are ABOVE Gates’ head.
LikeLike
Standardization for children makes as much sense as food trucks for “choice’ to solve all our educational problems. Where is the creativity and love of learning in the standardization craze that destroys both? We need human contact with teachers who know how to teach and reach even those kids with problems. Computers do not take their place.
I’m tired of billionaires thinking they have the smarts to solve all problems simply because they have money.
Trump thinks ‘choice’ is the way to solve educational problems and stands behind Betsy. Trump is a prime example of money doesn’t equate to having any ability. This rambling makes no sense at all.
………………………
Trump has had to issue this reminder on numerous occasions: “I went to the Wharton School of Business. I’m, like, a really smart person.” (July 2015); “I’m, like, a smart person.” (December 2016); “Trust me, I’m, like, a smart person.” (January 2017); plus, of course, this classic from July 2016:
“Look, having nuclear – my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, okay, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart – you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, okay, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I’m one of the smartest people anywhere in the world – it’s true! – but when you’re a conservative Republican they try – oh, do they do a number – that’s why I always start off: went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune – you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged…..”
LikeLike
I read with interest until I got to this statement, “Much of that material will be digital tools that are personalized to the student”
And of course, who will be designing those digital tools at great expense to schools?
Bill Gates was educated in private schools where there was undoubtedly a great deal of individualized learning supervised by adults in small classes. Public education does not have entrance requirements, small classes, and kids that have the resources at home to promote optimal learning experiences in and out of school. You take the child on his journey from the point where he is ready to depart. Sometimes that requires many resources that have nothing to do with technology. Gates needs to spend a year in a classroom before he makes these sweeping generalizations. While I would agree that the curriculum for kids in Mississippi should not be that much different than a child in California or New York, we need to take into consideration many other factors.
LikeLike
Personalized education. What an Orwellian phrase!!! Aie yie yie. All about replacing education as humane transaction between teacher and student with command and control via computerized instruction and databases for surveillence/tracking.
LikeLike
that would be surveillance. How I wish one could edit posts in a thread on WordPress! But this is a case in point. What happens with computerized instruction is that one becomes subject to the machine and its programming.
LikeLike
Agree except I’d use the word interaction instead of transaction.
LikeLike
I was thinking of the term as it is used in psychology rather than in commerce.
LikeLike
What is the difference in usage then? Transactional Analysis? Wasn’t that a discredited method from the 60s-70s? Help me out, Bob.
LikeLike
My point is simply that teaching is an interaction between persons, and one of those persons can’t be replaced, productively, by a machine.
LikeLiked by 1 person
People like Gates definitely think of schools as places for transaction$ to occur — between school and tech company.
LikeLike
What misguided nonsense. Really, really evil. Thanks to this stuff, English class has pretty much disappeared all around the country. In its place, we have test prep classes in which students practice, over and over, answering multiple-choice questions about random, isolated snippets of text. Horrific.
But this idiocy is to be expected from the guy who championed stack ranking at Microsoft. What damage he has done to our schools!!!! It’s tragic.
“I believe in standardizing automobiles. I do not believe in standardizing human beings. Standardization is a great peril which threatens American culture.” –Albert Einstein, quoted in “What Life Means to Einstein,” by George Sylvester Viereck, October 26, 1929.
Education deformers love asking, “What’s your alternative to standards and testing?” They expect stone-cold silence in response. Sorry to disappoint. Here’s an alternative to top-down, invariant, inflexible, mandatory, amateurish “standards” like those foisted on the country, with no vetting whatsoever, by Gates and his hireling David Coleman:
in place of the grade-by-grade bullet list, a few general guidelines (a very broad framework–perhaps four or five principles), continually revisited and critiqued, that provide the degrees of freedom within which real curricular and pedagogical innovation can occur
and
open-source crowd sourcing of alternative, innovative ideas. In other words, we could have
Competing, voluntary standards, frameworks, learning progressions, curriculum outlines, reading lists, pedagogical approaches, lesson templates, etc.,
for particular domains,
posted by scholars, researcher, curriculum developers, and teachers to an open national portal or wiki, and
subjected to ongoing, vigorous, public debate and refinement
based on results in the classroom and ongoing research and development,
freely adopted by autonomous local schools and districts
and subjected to continual critique by teacher-led schools–teachers who are given the time in their schedules to subject those, and their own practice, to ongoing critique via something like Japanese Lesson Study.
LikeLike
Bob
Have you ever read “Einstein: Ideas and Opinions” ?
It has several essays by Einstein laying out his ideas about education (along with many other topics).
It is really remarkable how timely his views still are today.
Einstein’s ideas were very much shaped by the authoritarian schools and society he experienced in his youth.
He understood the importance of a school atmosphere that fosters creativity and imagination and that deemphasizes testing.
One could use Einstein’s ideas as an outline for the type of school system the US should strive to produce.
LikeLike
Yes, in fact. I have a copy of this. The education essays are fascinating.
LikeLike
Our entire school system could and should be based on this one quote from Einstein, which encapsulates what education should be all about
“The most valuable thing a teacher can impart to children is not knowledge and understanding per se but a longing for knowledge and understanding, and an appreciation for intellectual values, whether they be artistic, scientific, or moral. It is the supreme art of the teacher to awaken joy in creative expression and knowledge. Most teachers waste their time by asking questions that are intended to discover what a pupil does not know, whereas the true art of questioning is to discover what the pupil does know or is capable of knowing.”
— Albert Einstein
LikeLike
The Coring of the Six Hundred (with apologies to Alfred, Lord Tennyson:
LikeLike
Imagine education conducted by a free people, with guidance, under conditions of autonomy and respect.
Or imagine autocracy under the New Feudal Order run by masters of the universe like Gates–schools where prole children learn obedience and gritful approaches to inane tasks in preparation for a lifetime of obsequiousness and servitude.
LikeLike
Even in educational analysis we find Bill Gates’ work is full of bugs. Don’t buy it.
LikeLike
There are bugs and there are features.
Bugs you can squash, but features are more difficult to get rid of.
Common Core is a full length feature, unfortunately.
A Creature (from the black lagoon) Feature, but a feature nonetheless.
LikeLike
In San Mateo, CA we are reaping the benefits of another standardization effort, NGSS. Please read about it here:
LikeLike
Gates wants to standardize in order to personalize?
Who can argue with that logic?
LikeLike