The for-profit Chester Community Charter School has been a continual source of controversy. The founder, a lawyer, was one of the biggest donors to Republican Governor Tom Corbett and served on his education transition team. He made millions by supplying the goods and services needed by the school. The charter school, which claimed excellent test scores, drew more than half the students in its district, leaving the public schools teetering on the verge of bankruptcy. By state formula, the charter school is paid more for each special education student than the district is paid, further impoverishing the district since the funding comes out of the district’s allotment of state money. In recent years, teachers have had to work without salary until state aid bailed out the district.
Now the school and its staff stand accused of having systematically cheated on tests.
The Notebook in Philadelphia reports:
A former testing coordinator at Chester Community Charter School, the state’s largest bricks-and-mortar charter with more than 3,000 students, has been sanctioned by the state for “systemic violations of the security of the PSSA exams” over the five-year period between 2007 and 2011.
The school was under scrutiny for testing irregularities by the Pennsylvania Department of Education as part of a statewide cheating scandal that broke in 2011.
CCCS is operated for profit by a company owned by Vahan Gureghian, a major Republican donor and power broker who was among the largest individual contributors to former Gov. Tom Corbett’s campaign and a member of his education transition team. During his term, Corbett visited CCCS to tout it as an exemplar of high-quality education for low-income communities.
Now with two campuses, CCCS has drawn more than half the K-8 students who live in the Chester Upland School District.
The state’s disciplinary action against the former coordinator, Patricia A. Sciamanna, was for violating testing rules during years that CCCS was struggling to meet federal student proficiency targets used for critical decisions, including whether a charter should be renewed.
The Pennsylvania Professional Standards and Practices Commission (PSPC) suspended Sciamanna’s instructional and administrative licenses, as well as her eligibility to work in a charter or cyber charter, for two years….
The school’s statement reiterated its longstanding position that PDE has made no determination against the school itself in regards to cheating.
“The PDE closed its review of CCCS in September 2012, with no finding of wrongdoing by the school,” the statement said.
That month, a letter from PDE sent to CCCS, however, cited “overwhelming evidence of testing irregularities” and required the school to adopt strict testing protocols.
CCCS is now one of nine districts or charters in the state on an “open watch list,” meaning that its test administration continues to be closely monitored and supervised by PDE.
Test scores at the school plunged under new security measures and have remained relatively low since.
Although much of the public attention around adult cheating on standardized tests in Pennsylvania has been focused on Philadelphia schools, the statewide investigation launched in 2011 probed suspicious results in 38 districts and 11 charters across Pennsylvania.
One was CCCS.
In July 2011, the Notebook and NewsWorks reported on a state-commissioned analysis showing widespread test score irregularities at dozens of Pennsylvania schools in 2009. In response, the Pennsylvania Department of Education commissioned a further analysis of PSSA results from 2010 to 2011, then launched an investigation into those whose results was most suspicious. CCCS was flagged multiple times for an unusually high number of wrong-to-right erasures on the test booklets.
The investigation went on for more than a year. The September 2012 letter, sent by then-Deputy Education Secretary Carolyn Dumaresq, recounted how PDE initiated the probe “based on the statistical improbability that the students made these erasures themselves.”
But PDE then allowed the school to conduct its own investigation, “which did not yield clear conclusions notwithstanding the overwhelming evidence of testing irregularities,” the letter said.
In February of that year, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer, CCCS attorney Francis J. Catania had written to Dumaresq that the school’s investigation “uncovered absolutely no evidence of testing improprieties or irregularities” – instead establishing that “improvements in PSSA test scoring are the direct result of hard work, innovative educational programming and persistent preparation by the students, teachers, administrators and parents at CCCS, and not some purported nefarious conduct or ‘cheating.'”
Catania suggested the erasures were due to test-taking strategies taught to the students.
Nevertheless, after the school reported the inconclusive results, “PDE returned to complete its investigation,” according to Dumaresq’s letter. PDE then spelled out strict testing protocols that the school said it would follow, including 24-hour security cameras where the tests are stored and in all classrooms in which students take them. In addition, PDE sent outside monitors to supervise all test administrations.
Through its history, CCCS struggled to make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), the test score and performance targets under the federal No Child Left Behind Act. The school made AYP in 2004 but then fell short for four years in a row from 2005 through 2008.
A fifth year of failing to meet targets would have triggered sanctions under NCLB, including a potential change in management.
The scores climbed in 2009, and for three years in a row, through 2011, they were high enough for the school to earn Adequate Yearly Progress status, an indicator that enhanced the school’s credibility in the Chester community. The school’s enrollment saw continued growth.
After the strict test protocols were put in place in 2012, proficiency rates at CCCS plummeted by an average of 30 percentage points in every grade and subject. In letters to parents and the media, the school blamed the drop on budget cuts.
Since then, scores have remained low – similar to scores of some Chester-Upland district schools.
That district has been in dire financial straits for decades, most recently exacerbated by its huge payments to CCCS and two other charters. Due to quirks in the state charter funding formula, the district sends $40,000 for each special education student at a charter, a figure that far outstrips any other in the state and has helped to virtually bankrupt Chester schools.
This fall, when it was unclear whether Chester’s district schools could afford to open their doors, Gov. Wolf sought a rescue plan for the district in which, among other actions, the payments to the charters for special education students would be lowered to $16,000. The charters, including CCCS, agreed to accept a payment of $27,000 per student as part of a compromise plan that was approved by the courts…
The settlement with Sciamanna was the result of a negotiation. The state Department of Education, which brought the complaint in October 2013, had initially sought permanent revocation of her credentials but settled for the two-year suspension.
A review of the state’s website listing disciplinary actions against Pennsylvania educators shows most of those implicated in the cheating scandal in Philadelphia received harsher punishments than did Sciamanna. For example, the five Philadelphia School District teachers identified by the state for disciplinary action in 2014 – Radovan Bratic, Michael Reardon, Phyllis Patselas, Alene Goldstein, and Deborah Edwards Dillard – all had to surrender their teaching certifications.

Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
LikeLike
Diane, let me say that this is exactly what we are talking about when we claim there are statistical ways to determine if either cheating is occurring or if students are giving an honest effort (kids scores vary dramatically from test to test). It can be done. In fact, there should be standard algorithms similar to those employed by the IRS to identify schools that warrant further review each year.
And let me also say there is no place for cheating in any school, charter or otherwise. Violators should be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law since they are essentially stealing from kids. Both civil and criminal penalties should apply.
LikeLike
How much time and effort are public schools going to spend on this testing, Virginia?
Now we need an elaborate security system and a new category of expert contractors to hire? When do the costs start outweighing the benefits? Never? We can pour an unlimited amount of money and work hours into this?
What does this do the culture of “school” for children and teachers? The clear implication is no one trusts them to do anything so they must be continually monitored by external forces.
Read the investigator’s report on the Atlanta schools sometime. Ed reformers missed the point. The point of that report was testing obsession had created an absolutely toxic environment for teachers and students. They were afraid all the time. The place was so fear-soaked it must have been miserable.
“Security” isn’t the problem. Turning schools into data reporting centers and making everyone complicit in this insanity is the problem.
LikeLike
Virginia,
Read this old post written by a retired building principal and maybe you will begin to understand why schools can’t operate successfully using business or military models.
“The central problem (tragedy) with current reform is treating education as a production/manufacturing industry instead of a coping organization. The goal of a production industry is to reduce variation in processes in order to manufacture a product that customers are certain will perform according to expectations and/or specifications.
In a coping organization (schools) you are confronted with uncertain inputs, uncertain processes, and uncertain outcomes. Added to the inability to control inputs, processes, and outcomes, what parents are looking for in schools are instructional programs that increase variation in outcomes—to further develop the unique abilities, talents, and interests of their children.
For this reason, as Deming attempted to point out, but which our school leadership and political class still don’t understand, is that managing a production industry and managing a school require entirely different set of intellectual and organizational tools. Not understanding the fundamental differences between manufacturing and educating is the reason that all the intellectual and organizational tools of reform—quantifying teacher “efficiency”, merit pay, common, one-size-fits-all standards, high-stakes standardized testing, increased rigor, and curriculum alignment—that the Duncan, Coleman, and Gates are implementing WILL FAIL, and in fact will result in the dysfunctional outcomes Deming describes in his books—cheating, low morale, drop outs, early exiting of teachers, etc.”
So, stories like this one should surprise no one. And regarding charter “success” – probably just the tip of the test driven iceberg.
LikeLike
virginiasgp,
IMO, your statements reflect an inflated sense of self.
The salaries of public employees are a matter of public record.
Do you work for one of the vulture philanthropist-funded groups, and do they pay you an amount that gives you a false impression of your worth?
LikeLike
And, of course, the head honcho, Vahan Gureghian, skips away. I’m sure he is disgusted and devastated by the unethical behavior at his school.
LikeLike
Giving Tuesday- I want Gates, Broad, the Walton’s, Bloomberg and, all of the schemers donating to politicians, to give America, back its public schools.
LikeLike
The Pennsylvania charter problems are under-examined, along with Michigan.
I don’t know about the western states, but this idea that is promoted that Ohio is a one-off is nonsense. The one and only difference is 1. the problems in Ohio became impossible to ignore, and 2. one newspaper started investigating and the rest followed.
The absolute lack of concern for existing public schools in ed reform is stunning. Public schools in Ohio are quite literally put at a disadvantage in order to serve the “choice sector”. Here’s a story out of Akron where public schools are cutting back bus service for their own students in order to pay for the “choice” sector. Not one lawmaker can be bothered to advocate for the public school kids. They’re unfashionable, an afterthought.
http://www.ohio.com/news/break-news/10-city-schools-now-receive-no-busing-as-akron-must-cater-to-29-charter-private-schools-1.644180
LikeLike
If Utah is an indication of charters in the west, then there is NO accountability either. Charters in Utah get preferential funding and are so secretive that no one really knows what’s happening. There’s a Gulen school in the state and a bunch of schools run by Academica.
LikeLike
Are any of the ed reformers in Pennsylvania concerned about what’s happening to public schools as a result of their work, or do those schools not get an advocate in government? Why not? Is it lobbyist capture or ideology?
LikeLike
Wasn’t the Democrat in Pennsylvania elected based on his support of public schools?
I hope he wasn’t lying to those voters. Time to follow thru.
LikeLike
The tentacles of corruption left by Tom Corbett remain a problem for the commonwealth. Even though Tom Wolf is trying to restore trust in government, he has to deal with many remaining corrupt legislators in state and city governments.
LikeLike
Maybe he could really break the mold and be the Democrat who supports public schools.
That would be new and different.
It’s not like Democrats are winning at the state level on their anti-public school platform. Maybe they could try something else.
LikeLike
The big GOP power broker is Vahan Gureghian.
Sent from my iPhone
>
LikeLike
I think seven years’ jail time is the going rate for test cheating, amiright?
LikeLike
Charter promoters in government continue to protect charter management companies from ANY public oversight:
“Eighteen bricks-and-mortar charter schools — 4.8 percent of the total — committed to posting their spending data on OhioCheckbook.com, according to Mandel press secretary Chris Berry. He noted the online schools had been inadvertently left off the list but letters later went out to them.
“We don’t plan on sending (the letter) to the (charter school) management companies as the online checkbook is not intended for private sector business expenditures,” Berry said.”
It’s just such nonsense. There can’t be any transparency without looking at the management companies. The fact that there’s a legal entity called “the charter school” means absolutely nothing without looking at the management company. It’s yet another misleading dodge from privatization enthusiasts and yet the Obama and Kasich Administrations continue to shovel piles of public money toward this legalistic parsing and ducking and weaving.
http://www.mydaytondailynews.com/news/news/state-regional-govt-politics/state-treasurer-asks-charter-schools-to-put-financ/npYzG/
LikeLike
This posting is rich in the rheeality and reality of self-proclaimed “education reform.”
For example, reapers of $tudent $ucce$$ avoiding such inconveniences as the burdens of ethics and honesty and decency by incentivizing the wrong behaviors and disincentivizing the right ones. A critically important “secret” sauce: the not-so-secret practice of leaving the investigation of possible malfeasance to the possible malefactors.
¡Voilà! Rheephorm in all its wondrous and creatively disruptive gory! *Er, “glory.”
And transparency, accountability, responsibility? Mere bagatelles that are so, like, 20th century…
Hence in keeping with mainstream rheephorm’s worst pedagogical/business/management practices is the fear and loathing of Campbell’s Law. Google this blog but his basic point was stated earlier, and more succinctly, by Charles Goodhart:
“When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.”
Covers all sorts of situations with different political and societal and philosophical colorations, from pig iron in China to Potemkin Villages in the now-vanished Soviet Union to “ghost cars” in the Los Angeles PD and emissions detectors in cars.
Today’s LATIMES, business section, headline on page 1, “Wells Fargo’s sales tactics are reportedly under investigation by the U.S.”
One paragraph: “Los Angeles City Atty. Mike Feuer in May filed a civil suit against Wells Fargo, alleging bank employees opened unauthorized accounts and used other illegal tactics to meet rigid and unrealistic sales goals.”
Link: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-wells-fargo-probe-20151130-story.html
But such “rigid and realistic sales goals” couldn’t possibly have anything to do with “rigid and unrealistic closing-the-test-score-gap goals” now could it?
Again from todays’ LATIMES, READERS REACT:
[start]
To the editor: The No Child Left Behind law gets undeserved credit for making schools pay attention to students living in poverty. (“Finding the sweet spot of reason in evaluating schools and teachers,” editorial, Nov. 27)
Experienced educators have always been aware of the effects of poverty and know which schools and students are the most impacted. Also, educational research has confirmed the negative effects of poverty on learning for decades.
Recommending more precise measurements to identify needy schools is like recommending that fire departments invest in expensive and highly accurate thermometers so that firefighters get the exact temperature of dangerous and rapidly spreading fires before trying to put them out.
Instead of spending billions on unnecessary testing, let’s invest in protecting children from the impact of poverty by expanding and improving food programs, improving healthcare and building better libraries in high-poverty areas. The best teaching in the world has little effect when children are hungry, sick and have little access to reading material.
Stephen Krashen, Los Angeles
The writer is a professor emeritus of education at USC.
[end]
Rheephormsters: you fatten pigs by weighing them.
Anything else is evil and racist and is an existential threat to the USofA.
Any question why I call them edufrauds and edubullies that reflexively resort to the sneer, jeer and smear?
😎
LikeLike
Quoting Rev. Jesse Jackson (Dec. 1, 2015, The Progressive Populist), ” …$3.7 billion has been larded onto charter schools…with virtually no accountability. The result is often a simple rip-off.” And now, Arne Duncan has shipped another $71 million to expand charters in Ohio.
LikeLike