I often get comments by teachers that move me close to tears. This is one of them. In the best of times, what the writer says would not be remarkable. In these times, these words remind us how education can be powerful and why these days it is not, it is just filling in the blanks.
I thought that several years ago the NCTE had come out with a position or paper arguing that rubrics were not appropriate for several reasons. I tried rubrics for several years and found them to be limiting and the products that I received in Social Studies, English and Humanities courses to be less than what I knew the kids could do. It’s a natural human thing to want to please and then focus on doing what is defined in front of you ala a rubric and stop. “Little Boxes” rings in my ears.
I adopted Leonardo DaVinci 7 Principles as a guide and was especially attracted to Sfumato usually translated as “Up in Smoke” meaning to embrace ambiguity, paradox and uncertainty. Great things are produced and discovered when you open the door to possibilities and leave some things undefined. When I did that, there was difficulty adjusting as kids had been trained to give the right answers. My response was there may be none and that I was more interested in originality, creativity and being able to explain and defend one’s thinking. En Garde!
However, once kids realized that they were full partners in their learning and that most anything was possible, they brought me to tears with their work. I have been lucky to work with teams of colleagues that shared this philosophy in public and private settings here in Houston and around the world. We shared a belief also that rich, engaging teaching and learning was the best way to inspire kids and the test scores took care of themselves. All test prep and no play makes Johnnies and Janes dull kids.

High School authors published in The Concord Review fly without rubrics, too, but they do have exemplary history research papers written by their peers to read, to inspire them to their best efforts. Will Fitzhugh, http://www.tcr.org; fitzhugh@tcr.org
LikeLike
I was beginning to believe that I was the only one who found rubrics limiting and often inappropriate. I suppose they make grading simpler and they give students a list of what exactly must be completed and how, but they don’t leave much room for creativity and interpretation.
In my school, we are expected to have rubrics for everything. I have bucked the system and it’s mostly worked out for me because I teach such a small specialized group (ESL). However, I have been amazed with the level of complexity my students incorporate into their work when I simply give the directions and possibly show an exemplar or two.
I wonder if our data-driven, standardized assessment loaded world has infected everyone so thoroughly that we have limited our students to meeting standard and completing all the mandates in the little boxes, rather than given them the opportunity to step beyond the boxes and produce creative quality solutions to the problems we pose in our classrooms.
LikeLike
I especially note her use of the word “teams” in the last sentence. Inspiring indeed.
LikeLike
Yes! Rubrics make for clean grading, but they tend to limit students to “checklist” thinking and products. Wait! Could we be setting them up to be the future leaders in the corporate reform movement? I will be looking into this writer’s approach.
LikeLike
Wonderful post! Ahhh … teaching and learning how they should / could be.
LikeLike
“’Little Boxes’ rings in my ears.”
I sometimes wonder if there might someday be a future Pete Seeger singing about the exploits of those who will be out there fighting the GERM over the next decade.
LikeLike
For years now I have quietly concealed my skepticism about rubrics. I thought i was the only one who was unenthused by them and I have harbored the insecure feeling that my antipathy for them meant that I was an irresponsible teacher.
And now I see I was not alone!
LikeLike
It seems like that’s the point of a lot of this reform — to make teachers feel alone, because voicing concern about certain strategies is so often verboten.
I suspect it’s the reason PD is often so terrible — so much top-down, packaged presentations, when I learn so much more from observing other teachers and sharing ideas.
LikeLike
Diane, thank you for publishing this letter.
Rubrics have a way of making learning more prosaic; I found myself tweaking them, to include a box for creativity when I assigned skits my foreign language classes.
Doesn’t that sound weird — assigning a certain amount of points for creativity?
I find rubrics grading strangely awkward, and find a holistic grading approach easier to handle.
it’s sad to realize that teachers must work in such a dogmatic, top-down system where there is little room to discuss which strategies actually work well.
LikeLike
I found myself adding a fudge factor to rubrics. Breaking assignments down into parts seemed to lead me to focus too much on those parts. Frequently, the assignment as a whole was obviously worth more than the sum of the parts. It’s like the blind men and the elephant. Each man has a distinct “view” of the elephant, but you need to experience that elephant in its entirety to appreciate its majesty.
LikeLike
A tension here, is that like anything, a bad rubric is bad. Just like a bad activity will inhibit student learning or a bad classroom environment will inhibit student participation, a bad rubric will inhibit student creativity. In many cases, rubrics are being designed for teachers, not for learners. If a rubric is being designed to help grading, odds are that it’s not a quality rubric, rather just a scoring mechanism that has little to do with student learning and more to do with evaluation.
Do good rubrics exist? Absolutely. Unfortunately, they’re time consuming, hefty, and often not readily available on flashy websites. In the absence of a quality rubric, we are forcing a student to wait for external feedback to improve the quality of their work. A quality rubrics is the documentation of a conversation or thinking about what constitutes quality, not necessarily what counts as an A. I will defend a quality rubric any day of the week and twice on Sundays but I will not defend a bad rubric, because well, bad rubrics are bad.
More about what makes a quality rubric quality: http://qualityrubrics.pbworks.com/w/page/3772580/guiding%20principles I have a couple of examples of turning a bad rubric into a quality one if you’re curious about what looks like: http://qualityrubrics.pbworks.com/w/page/45251934/Evolution%20of%20%20a%20rubric%20-%20Part%20II
LikeLike
I think there is a middle ground here. I use rubrics but they are based on what my students have issues with – so my rubric for general assignments might be just six boxes – with standards such as “I used a complete sentence,” “I used a blue or black ink pen or typed my paper.” “I avoided simplistic or slang words such as cuz, bad, good, etc)
I don’t fill in a bunch of boxes- the rubric is just a reminder of basic standards for their assignment. For more complex assignments, I might add ” I supported my opinion with evidence.” But I two have had the problem of seeing a great assignment that is a bit different and doesn’t quite fit a rubric, so I try to make my rubrics more general.
LikeLike
And Florida is jumping on the rubric bandwagon….
Marzano calls them “scales.”
LikeLike
Marzano is an edupreneur sell out.
LikeLike
Some version of a rubric can be very helpful to students. When I taught composition i got around the issue by giving each paper three grades: one for following the writing process (prewriting, a substantial and readable first draft, participation in peer and self editing, a second draft, and, for some essays, a “publishable” draft), a second grade for whatever technical skill(s) we were working on (i.e. use and underline at least four correctly punctuated compound sentences and three complex ones), and the last one for “quality.” I wouldn’t give them a rubric for the “quality” grade. Instead I read to them how Persig and his students arrived at an understanding of it in, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance.
LikeLike
I have often used a story from “The Sideways Stories From Wayside School”. It’s about a boy named Joe and how he comes up with a wrong answer to a math question.
I have used it to introduce a rubric that I personally set up (because I hated the general rubrics) so students would know there are many ways to come up with a correct solution. If you ever marked the 5th grade PAM test, students lost points for forgetting a symbol or not putting the answer in a complete sentence. So for reasons like that, I had to put those elements into the rubric. Again, it’s all about test prep.
Rubrics should be a guide, not a grading system. This is why I am also opposed to Danielson.
LikeLike
My oldest son’s ad ice to his brother concerning math homework was to solve the problem using a method that was not intended by the teacher.
LikeLike
Advice, not ad ice.
LikeLike