Want proof of systemic racism in the United States today? Look no farther than this article by Annie Waldman, who wrote the following article for ProPublica. She tells the story of a district that was abandoned by the state; a district that whites fled from; a teacher doing her best during a year of COVID; and the idiotic state policy of imposing a third-grade retention policy in the midst of the pandemic.
The teacher, Ashlee Thompson, was a graduate of the Benton Harbor Public Schools. She had other career choices and other districts where she would have been paid more. But she chose to teach elementary school in Benton Harbor. In addition to the stress of teaching students who were far behind, she had another burden:
The Michigan legislature had chosen this year, of all years, to enforce a strict new literacy law: Any third grader who could not read proficiently by May could flunk and be held back.
For Benton Harbor, a small, majority-Black city halfway between Chicago and Detroit, the implications were immense. As Thompson screened her 35 students that fall, she realized 19 were not at grade level. She worried that holding them back could do more harm than good, and studies supported this fear; it could bruise their confidence, lead them to act out and even decrease their odds of graduating from high school.
As if Thompson did not have enough to worry about, there was this: The existence of her entire school district hung in the balance, and with it, the very fabric of her hometown.
For the last quarter century, schools in Benton Harbor had struggled to survive as students fled for charters and majority-white districts in neighboring towns. Because a district’s funding is tied to its number of students, Benton Harbor’s budget shrank. It cut academic offerings, froze teacher pay, closed school buildings and consolidated students into crowded classrooms. As its resources eroded, so did students’ performance on tests.
Michigan had found a remedy for such ailing districts: dissolving them. It had happened eight years ago to two other majority-Black cities, Inkster and Buena Vista. Students were absorbed into surrounding districts without a guarantee they would be attending better schools. Inkster residents, who feared losing their sense of identity, scrambled to start a museum so that their children would know they had once rallied at homecoming games around the Vikings football team.
This existential threat has loomed over Benton Harbor since 2011, when former Gov. Rick Snyder began to consider whether the state should install an emergency manager to run the city’s schools, a takeover Inkster once faced before it was ultimately dissolved.
Will majority-black, under resourced Benton Harbor schools survive? There is little evidence that the children will benefit if the district is dissolved. Disruption—not better education—is the name of the game. No one remembers why someone thought it was a good idea to dissolve struggling districts or to hand them over to emergency managers or to let the state take control. Those strategies are relics of a generation of failed reforms.
This year I had a bright black 7th grader who could barely read (many of my white students can barely read either). Helping him pass was one of my main goals this year. For months, he rarely logged on to Zoom classes. I called home multiple times. Finally reached the relatives who were raising him, after which he started attending. But his camera was usually off and he continued to fail to do any of the assignments. When I could send the rest of the class off into their own breakout rooms, I would keep him in the main room with me and we would watch the day’s video lesson together. I found that his comprehension of the video would quickly break down (which shows that his problem was not just reading comprehension, but language comprehension), but if I stopped it often and checked his understanding and filled in gaps, he would quickly get it. He was bright; he just lacked a lot of background knowledge that more privileged kids get at home. But I could not do this everyday, and unless I did this, he would skip the work and play video games. I (and his other teachers) kept calling home, and emailing, but the relatives seemed unable to keep him off the video games. He ended with something like a 15% average, and I’m afraid he learned almost nothing this year.
I’m told kids are resilient.
What the heck does that mean? I hope you just forgot the snark alert. It’s going to take more than resilience for this kid to graduate with any sense of accomplishment. Right now he doesn’t have either the emotional maturity or the self awareness to recognize the opportunities he is missing. It is sad when they have given up at such a young age.
I think FLERP is still angry that the schools were closed and people kept telling him that kids are resilient. Snark.
As Diane notes, “Kids are resilient” was a common response to concerns about what’s been happening to children who have not been inside a school for over a year. I assume the phrase will make a comeback this fall.
I assumed there was snark since I generally feel like I know where you are coming from. With my own children long gone and never having had to deal with the ridiculous realities of education in a large city, I was missing the context for the comment.
Most kids are resilient. This is true. If you have healthy communities with social and economic safety nets…. a short-term change in the way school is delivered should not be traumatic for most students.
What ponderosa is describing can not be fixed only by the type of schooling offered by our data based systems.
The situation she describes is deep and I am guessing (though I don’t know the situation) the school shut down shed a light on these types of situations rather than contributed to them.
You are to be commended for trying. One teacher cannot solve all to the problems that face the community. Someday, perhaps this student will look back at your efforts and appreciate the personal attention you gave. This has happened to me many times throughout my career. Some tiny, forgotten token of personal attention has been brought to my attention by a former student.
What I feel for is all the middle school teachers whose students are usually incapable of recalling such attentions. The students cannot often recall these efforts of appreciate them due to their development.
You may be right, Roy, and I appreciate your expression of sympathy. But I’m not really concerned if he appreciates my attentions; I’m concerned about all the kids like him who are not succeeding in school, and the fact that nobody seems to have plausible solutions. Integrate the schools? This black boy is in a district that’s 80% white. Lack of integration is not the root of his troubles. Give diversity training to white teachers like me? Give me a break. End poverty? OK, but isn’t there something more that’s within their power that schools can do? As I say again and again, my hunch is that we cannot elevate kids like this unless we infuse them with lots of background knowledge early in life. Lack of background knowledge is at the root of his frustration and failure, and his frustration and failure fuels his lack of effort. Knowledge-rich curriculum used to shrink the achievement gap in French public schools until they adopted an American-style skills-focused curriculum, after which schools worsened the achievement gap. This monumental revelation, revealed by E.D. Hirsch, which is of such relevance to the equity debate, is unfathomably ignored. Maybe Hirsch and I are wrong, but at least we’re talking about the nitty-gritty of how minds develop. Until we start looking harder at the mechanics of cognitive growth, we will never achieve equity. But it seems the loudest voices on this topic are ignorant of and uncurious about these mechanics. They’re peddling untested, unproven cures, like anti-racism training. In this, they’re like Donald Trump peddling bleach injection to cure COVID.
@ponderosa. Agree that there must be something schools can do … because fighting the root causes isn’t going to happen overnight.
“Lack of background knowledge is at the root of his frustration and failure..”
When I think of gaps in “background knowledge” ….. I think of building it with experiential learning. This starts with early childhood experiences. Early childhood programs that are rich, with quality, well-trained, nurturing caregivers…. and is rooted in play and infused with nature-based education – is what is needed. In areas where families are unable to provide this foundation…. this needs to be a priority of where we spend early childhood money.
Any system that allows large numbers of students and funding to go elsewhere will wind up with only the neediest and poorest students being left behind. Choice systems allow the schools to do the selecting of those that are relatively inexpensive to educate. The expensive and difficult to educate are left behind in underfunded public schools without the resources to help these students. Continued diversion of public funds into private schools is no solution, and neither is state takeovers. These abandoned students are the result of failed public policy. In a well funded public school these students would get the programming they need to help them. So-called choice is bad public policy that serves the “strong” and ignores the “weak.” Public schools ensure that all students receive adequate service and that there are professionals that can help all students according to needs. Yes, GW, school choice leaves the “leftover” students behind.
“No one remembers why someone thought it was a good idea to dissolve struggling districts”. In 1959, after Brown v. Board, the state of Virginia thought it would be a fantastic idea to skirt desegregation by shutting down the entire school system in Prince Edward County for five years. Black students had no public schools available, and were shut out of the private segregation academies created for whites only. This shameful racist legacy lives on in low-quality voucher schools, and has now become part of the de facto segregation and inadequate support and funding that we see in POC schools today. https://virginiahistory.org/learn/historical-book/chapter/closing-prince-edward-countys-schools
As I have suggested before, a merger of the mostly African-American Benton Harbor School District with the mostly white St. Joseph School District next door would be a good first step and help to reduce the systemic racism in public education.
How do commenters here define “systemic racism”?
When a public system, such as the law enforcement system, the penal system, the school system, the transportation system, and so on, consistently treats people perceived to belong to different races dramatically differently, and action sufficient to change that is not taken, that is systemic racism. Its a system behaving in a racist manner. The motto above the entrance to the Supreme Court reads, “Equal Justice under Law.” When that motto is violated by a system, then that is one type of systemic racism. But you can find it in other systems, too. Consider the system for granting loans for buying homes. Blacks and whites with equal credit are treated differently. The blacks are more likely to have their applications denied, and they pay more, on average, in downpayments and interest. And check out what was true in the past in housing in the U.S.:
Systemic racism: if a well dressed white man walked into a convenience store and paid for cigarettes with a fake$20 bill, what do you think would happen? The clerk would say, “Excuse me, sir,are you aware that this $20 bill is counterfeit?” In GeorgeFloyd’s case, the clerk called the police. Four of them responded. If it were in a white neighborhood, do you think the officers would immediately handcuff the man, throw him to the ground and put a knee on his neck? I don’t think so.
Perfect, Diane.
Systemic racism is embedded in laws or regulations, and the way they are enforced, in a system or institution . For example…. if environmental laws and regulation enforcement differ in Flint Michigan than say, Holland, MI…. and the difference causes poor citizens of Flint to have polluted water and not one acts…… but yet they would act if the water was polluted in Holland.
Well that is an example of systemic racism.
This is the video that I meant to post:
It seems to me impossible, given our country’s history, to untangle racism from classism. I was listening to some interview on CSPAN (wish I could provide cite): an author provided cites of systemic racism, and what I heard was a list of the ways economic burden stymies upward mobility.
Yes, racism—mostly systemic & historical—means a highly disproportionate number of African Americans are poor. That study is important to history and consciousness-raising, but doesn’t clearly point the way to social solutions. We need to be laser-focused on improving the distribution of wealth and opportunity for upward mobility, period. The racial conversation will be healthy as long as it does not take our eyes off the ball. It too easily can devolve into oligarchs’ fave phenomenon, peons squabbling over crumbs that fell off the banquet table.
p.s., by ‘historical,’ I don’t mean it’s no longer happening. I mean that African Americans start from way behind due to history 1619-1965.
“It too easily can devolve into oligarchs’ fave phenomenon, peons squabbling over crumbs that fell off the banquet table.”
Love the analogy, which seems to really fit your description/feelings about the argument over G&T. I see the application to lots of situations in which people feel defensive or unjustly attacked. It is obvious in the reactions of some white people to BLM slogans. It is so important to see the issue as underlying systemic racism in policy rather than just a finger pointing exercise that labels all white people racists.
Totally agree with this. “The racial conversation will be healthy as long as it does not take our eyes off the ball.” – well said.
R.I.P., Hal, and thank you.
ah, this was back in January. sorry.
A microcosm, the essence of which is, “Try anything, just don’t touch poverty. Just don’t stop blaming it’s victims.”