Hundreds, soon to be thousands, of teachers, scholars, parents, and students signed a statement denouncing House Bill 3979, passed by the Republican legislature and signed into law by Governor Gregg Abbott. It bans honest and accurate teaching about racism in American history or other courses.
TEACH Coalition
Statement on Texas House Bill 3979
We are a collective of teachers, professors, community workers, parents, and students across Texas who are committed to teaching the histories of race, racism, slavery, and settler colonialism. We strongly oppose the new law signed by Governor Greg Abbott that prohibits educators from teaching about the history and social impacts of systemic racism in the U.S.
Silencing the discussion of any aspect of these histories in our classrooms goes against the professed values of freedom and equality offered to everyone under the United States Constitution.
We stand firmly in solidarity with freedom in education for students and with protecting academic freedom, which is fundamental to any society that believes in equity. Texas House Bill 3979 is a blatant attempt at political and governmental overreach. It was not written in consultation with teachers and students and is an authoritarian directive that interferes with education from a partisan viewpoint.
We cannot understand our present without understanding our past. Knowing the truth of the origins of the U.S. nation-state requires acknowledging the full truths of settler colonialism that took land from Indigenous peoples, forcibly displaced them, and decimated their populations. It also requires understanding the full facts about the transatlantic slave trade that brought Africans in bondage across the Middle Passage to lives of enslavement. The wealth of the U.S. was created by the enslaved labor of millions of Black people who were never paid for their work and who lived their lives in unfreedom. We are still living with the visible consequences of this tragic and violent past. Teaching systemic racism allows us to see how housing, health outcomes, access to education, wealth, clean water and air, all of these aspects of life that are fundamental to freedom and happiness remain severely curtailed along racial lines.
HB 3979 means that teachers cannot safely teach, for example, the facts of Juneteenth, a key event in Texas history which has just been declared a national holiday; the facts of Jim Crow laws that legalized racial segregation; the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882; the facts of the forced removal of Indigenous peoples from their lands; Executive Order 9066, which led to the internment of tens of thousands of US citizens of Japanese descent; and the present-day facts of racialized inequities in the U.S. All of these and many more aspects of U.S. history must be part of students’ education if we are to learn from the past.
These historical facts are not a threat to anyone who believes in justice and equity. Learning about these histories is difficult and can be uncomfortable, but failing to deliver fairness and equal opportunities for all children is not merely uncomfortable: it is damaging to everyone and perpetuates the traumas and inequities of the past into the future. Knowing the truths of slavery and colonialism is not divisive: it will give us all the understanding needed to abolish systemic inequities and to bring us together. Armed with knowledge and truth, we can all work in community for a better future.
Learning the truth about the past, especially about how their communities have been affected by racism, helps students to understand the world around them, to value the contributions of their own multicultural, diverse society, and to acquire the racial literacy needed to navigate professional, academic, and civic spaces. Students want to develop this understanding and gain this knowledge, and they need this education in order to succeed in our multiracial society that should ideally respect all communities equally.
We recognize that the current legislation in Texas was mobilized by well-funded and highly influential political forces that seek to erase the work of scholars who study the impact of racism in U.S. history. These organizations perpetuate the false narrative that racism was not a foundational aspect of this state’s history.
We stand in full solidarity with Texas teachers who teach the truth about U.S. History and who encourage students to seek justice, equality, and freedom, especially for communities that continue to experie
About Republican government in states like Texas –
“There is nothing left of this Republican party.” What remains is undemocratic and anti- Republic. The party engages in fraud on the American people.- Former Republican Representative from Florida as quoted today at Huffpo
They eagerly wave the flag, and they are conservatives that conserve nothing. So many on the right no longer support the Constitution, although they believe they do. They are bull headed, regressive jingoists, not patriots.
Agree.
“jingoists, not patriots” — frustrating that so many, even the media, get those two mixed up
conservatives who conserve nothing
precisely, and well said
Teachers: It is your DUTY to be John Scopes here and teach your students the truth about race in the United States.
This is the moment when circumstances call upon you to stand up and do the right thing.
Scopes was actually not teaching in violation of the Tennessee law. In conversation with a couple of guys who wanted to put Dayton on the map, he agreed to deliver a lesson on evolution in a car to a kid. The agreement was that the kid’s parents would then sue him, bringing the law to test. They figured people would then hear about Dayton. They really got their wish, with HL Mencken tailing against the southern “boobs” and Vanderbilt poets rising in the publication of The Fugitive to defend the South and its agrarian tradition.
If the petition above correctly assesses the Texas law, every American History teacher will violate the law when they teach WWII, because the Japanese internment camps are standard mention.
It is nonetheless the duty of every teacher to respond to this legislation by teaching the truth about race in America, in the past and now. THIS IS THE MOMENT THAT CALLS TEACHERS TO DO THE RIGHT THING. THIS IS THEIR DUTY.
The attack on truth requires this in its defense.
First I’ve heard the bit about the boy in the car, Roy. Scopes used a textbook, required by the state, that contained a chapter on evolution and said that he had reviewed with his students, in class, the chapter and a chart on evolution from that chapter. He also, contradicting himself, said that he didn’t remember whether he had taught evolution but that if they could prove that he did, he would gladly stand trial for it. This willing civil disobedience is precisely the kind of thing that this Texas law, and other like it, requires–but more, far more, than Scopes did, admittedly. The only proper response to this evil censorship is to make the real story of race in America a major focus of one’s classroom instruction, for the very act of thee passing of such legislation is more than ample evidence that such instruction is needed.
Darn. I’m sorry. I forgot to thank you for this interesting historical note, Roy. Fascinating. What is your source? I would love to see it.
It is indeed the duty of teacher to teach the truth. I recall a conversation I had with the mother of a family I was fond of in my youth. I was suggesting that entry into the Vietnam War was I’ll advised and guided by business interests. She was beside herself, suggesting that I had become a communist. Troubled at the disagreement and generally being upset by harsh feelings, I went to my mentor. Dr McCash, a bulldog of a man, declared emphatically: “you have to arm yourself with the truth.”
As for the story of the Scopes trial, I believe the source to be Ray Ginger, Six Days or Forever: the case of John Thomas Scopes. I might have the title wrong. It has been a long time since I read anything about the affair, but that is my memory.
Ray Ginger also wrote a lot of other good history.
Also, on the Vanderbilt “fugitives” I cannot recall where I got info. Too many books and articles to go with lectures. Growing up near Vanderbilt it was hard not to hear about those guys.
I got the title wrong. The tag was Tennessee vs JT Scopes. I have now displayed my mental laxity for all to see. I looked it up on the “giggle”, as a friend calls that now reviled search engine. There were other secondary sources as well, and I have read the trial transcript. The interesting thing about that is that conservative interpretation of the trial transcript suggests that Bryan destroyed Darrow in a withering defense of Biblical scholarship and gentlemanly firmness. Lawrence and Lee did not see it that way in Inherit the Wind. Nor did I see the transcript as a vindication of fundamentalism. This anticipates modern philosophical division in political life.
This latter point suggests to me that we need to start efforts to challenge these laws against course content with the same intensity the conservatives go after abortion rights. As I said above, CRT is an interpretation that we have a difficult time inserting into a survey course for more than a couple of minutes. Much of this is due to the nature of survey courses. In my world history, for example, I have the dual responsibility of teaching the idea of how imperialism produced modern boundaries in Africa and the Far East and getting the children to understand the great degree to which Europeans behaved as though they believed they were morally superior. That is quite a job.
This leads me to call for Ghandi-style teach-ins where like-minded students and teachers assembled under the auspices of local administrations to disobey the law en masse. Getting a superintendent to go in with that is a long shot at best.
But will teachers rise to the occasion . Especially in those states that are partaking in a modern day book burning? And what percentage would that be.
I hope so. Otherwise, half a generation will have skipped the most important parts of U.S. history. Come to think of it, most of the country has been skipping history to narrow curricula down to high stakes test prep for years, so this will grow a danger we’re already soliciting. It’s up to teachers to refuse test prep and it’s up to teachers to refuse censorship. There are risks involved. Every teacher must be strong that we all may be strengthened.
It was announced on the news that my Florida school district will hold three in-service workshops for the teachers on the CRT ban. What a way to start the school year!
LeftCoastTeacher
1/2 a generation lost would be an improvement from where we are now.
I hope you are right , just call me skeptical.
A few will, I suspect. And those will make an enormous impact.
I plan to teach truth in history and geography just as I always have. Heck, I’ve been threatened twice, so I guess I do it again.
where’s the statement posted for others who want to sign?
Consider Putin’s strategies and how they interplay with the Koch network’s efforts.
“Russia documents reveal a desire to sow racial discord.” Is the Koch network’s involvement in the CRT issue fanning the flames? Is it anticipated that the number of White people raging against Black people will outnumber the coalition for equality?
Putin could sow discord based on religion. He doesn’t. The Koch network promotes conservative religion which is a shaky 40% of the U.S. Putting potential votes for GOP politicians like Vlad’s puppet, Trump, in jeopardy by rocking religion’s boat makes for poor strategy.
Projected numerical values and game theory possibly explain what we are seeing and not seeing.
Biden axed Trump’s proposed fascist indoctrination curriculum, so this business about CRT, which was NONEXISTENT IN K-12 SCHOOLS, is just the ruse to reinstate that. The Repugnicans are DESPERATE to indoctrinate the next generation because they know that right now, young people are overwhelmingly against them on every issue. If they don’t do something, these pugs, our know-nothings, will go the way of the Know-Nothing Party.
Your first sentence!
Just another example of how the “education reform movement” doesn’t deliver for students who attend public schools. All of the people pushing this stuff are ed reformers in good standing.
You’re really under no obligation to take direction and guidance on public schools from people who work full time running political campaigns that harm public school students.
Find and hire people who believe in the basic concept of public education and who value public schools and public school students. These folks simply deliver nothing of practical value for our schools or students. No one has any duty to continue to hire them.
They’ve now gone one step further – the new slogan is “defund public education”. These are the people who insist they’re working “for public school students”? No they’re not and that’s blindingly obvious to anyone outside their echo chamber.
Pay particular attention to the timing of this political campaign- they launched this just as public schools were recovering from covid and attempting to prepare for next year. They are now actively harming students who attend public schools.
After reading Mike Pompeo’s latest quote about CRT, I’m curious if he holds the record as the stupidest person to have held the position of U.S. Secretary of State. He may also hold the record for being the most tribalistic.
It’s a real shame because it could have been a productive and positive period for public schools- they finally have a US President who supports public schools and is willing to fund them – and instead we’ll now spend the next 6 months embroiled in some ridiculous battle over the critical race theory boogeyman.
Can anyone point to ANYTHING these warriors against public schools EVER deliver for public school students? It’s all 100% downside for our students. They’re either using public schools as proxy for their opposition to the existence of labor unions or using public schools as proxy for yet another trumped up “culture war” battle.
The common theme is this- they never perform any actual positive or productive work on behalf of public school students. The ideology differs slightly between the various factions but the common thread is “nothing for public school students”.
Maybe this will be the breaking point and public schools will finally, finally break from the ed reform echo chamber and go their own way. I certainly hope so. Supporting this “movement” has become incompatible with supporting public school students. One can’t do both.