Tom Ultican, retired teacher of advanced mathematics and physics, studied the Ed-Tech industry, which now passes itself as “personalized learning.” He reminds us that Ed-Tech is first and foremost about business and profits, not learning.
He writes:
Not all edtech is negative but it is important to remember that private companies are in it for the money. Giant corporations and private equity firms require return on investment. Improving education comes in second to making profits and everyone in the business knows that the real edtech gold comes from data mining.
Dr Velislava Hillman is a visiting Fellow at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). In a post on the LSE blog she writes,
“It is hard, perhaps impossible, to go to school and not be registered by a digital technology. Cameras wire the premises; homework is completed using one business’s software application (eg Microsoft Word) that may be embedded onto another business’s platform (shared via Google); emails, bathroom trips, assessments, parental backgrounds – all feed into digital systems that are owned, managed, used and repurposed by hundreds of thousands of invisible business hands.”
“Edtech companies thrive on digital data.”
People keep saying not all edtech is that bad. What is good edtech? What tech can I use that doesn’t bleed personal information to expose my students and me to surveillance and profiling? I have a document camera that I can hook up directly to a projector, so that I can show what I’m writing to the class. That’s a mild improvement. Everything else is on the internet. Everything else is being tracked.
We adopted CPO Foundations of Physics materials for our high school physics program and it came with excellent lab equipment (especially photogate timers accurate to 10^-6 second). This was good technology. I also worked with a math program called College Preparatory Math. It was developed by researchers at UC Davis and math teachers from several western states. The graphing utilities, TI86 graphing calculator lessons and the homework hints associated with the practice problems were all examples of wonderful uses of technology. Both programs used technology to assist the learning rather than trying to replace the teacher. Interestingly both programs were designed to be used with groups. Technology can be great but for that to happen classroom teachers should be consulted in the design and development.