This is the final installment in Sue Legg’s series about twenty years of school choice in Florida. She is the former education Director of the Florida League of Women Voters and was assessment and evaluation contractor for the Fl. DOE for twenty years while on the faculty at the University of Florida.
She writes:
Twenty Years Later: The SociaI Impact of Privatization
Privatization of schools in Florida is about more than money. It reflects the ebb and flow of the common school movement originating in the 1830s which promoted a free public education system to assimilate the millions of immigrants arriving in the United States. Resistance came from political, religious, and social divisions, elements of which persist even now. Florida, now the third largest state must assimilate its growing immigrant population. The public schools include 2.8 million students who are 38% white, 33% Hispanic, and 22% black. Ten percent are English Language Learners. These demographics may well change Florida’s politics. There is a majority of younger and ethnically diverse people many of whom tend to register to vote as independents.
Charters and private schools represent 22% of the Florida student enrollment. Charter enrollments are 42% Hispanic and 20% African-American. The tax credit scholarship program enrolls 38% Hispanic and 30% African-American.
Numerous research reports e.g. Brookings, CREDO Urban Study, and Florida Department of Education raise concerns about the academic benefit of choice programs. Few examples exist where charters outperform similar public schools and proportionately more charters do less well. The social consequences of choice are even more serious as documented in the 2017 Florida State University Collins Institute’s Report on Patterns of Resegregation in Florida Schools.
The ‘separate but equal’ doctrine adopted by Governor Jeb Bush in 1999 has undermined diversity in schools. Schools with low income and high minority status tend to receive ‘D’ or F’ school grades, for which they were blamed, sanctioned, and made targets of charter school takeover programs.
The major findings of the Collins Institute report document the social impact of choice. The economic and racial segregation documented in regular public schools is even more severe in charters.
• About one third of black and Hispanic students attend intensely segregated schools (90% single race).
• Sixty percent of Florida’s children qualify for free and reduced lunch (FRL). Black and Hispanic students are 1.5 times more likely to experience double segregation by race and economic status.
• Charter schools over enroll Hispanic students (42%), and these students typically have from 10-20% fewer white students than in public schools.
• Black students are more likely to go to extremely segregated schools than Hispanics.
• Only in 8 districts did charters enroll at least 60% of FRL students.
• Most districts enrolled higher percentages of students with disabilities and English as a second language than their charter schools.
Accountability: Florida is masterful at self-promotion.
In April 2018, the headline for Governor Scott’s press report on NAEP results was: Florida Students Lead the Nation in Reading and Mathematics. While Florida’s schools fourth grade NAEP reading scores ranked 6th nationwide, they fell to 26th on the eighth grade. It may be no coincidence that the spectacular rise in fourth grade NAEP scores coincided with the implementation of third grade mandatory retention for students who are not proficient on the state assessment. A contributing factor to the drop in eighth grade scores is that about one half of the children on private school scholarships return to public schools after third grade. The high school graduation rank is 38th which may in part be due to requirements that students pass an algebra I exam and an English Language Skills test to graduate.
Florida also touts the improvement rate of ‘failing public schools’. Of over 4000 public schools, 35 received a failing grade in 2018. Yet, the legislature passed a law mandating a state takeover of failing schools by designated by charter management firms. The 2018 failure rate for Florida charters is much higher (30/365 schools).
Resistance to the Impact of Choice is Growing.
Progress through the courts is slow but necessary to make change possible. The Florida League of Women Voters won a Supreme Court decision in 2016 to redraw legislative districts. It won again in 2018 to allow early voting on college campuses, to block a confusing proposal to create a separate statewide independent (charter) school system, and to prevent the current governor from naming new members of the Supreme Court on his last day in office. The Citizens for Strong Schools’ Supreme Court hearing on school funding and quality is November 8th.
The court of public opinion looms even larger. The common school movement arose out of the need to address inequities due to immigration, religion, and school funding. Free public schools were seen as the best way to build a sense of the civic responsibility needed to support our new democracy. Will the voters, not only in Florida, once again recognize the value of the public interest over self interest in our public schools when it matters most?
Kudos to the Florida League of Women Voters for their research of the issues related to public education. Their website is packed with information on issues facing voters. It is one of the few places where citizens can seek information without political hype or spin. When they take a stand on an issue, it is generally against the loss of democracy the politicians seek to impose on the people of the state. Their political activism is commendable. They keep a watchful eye over the manipulative representatives that seek to shift public funds into private corporations, and they understand the immense value of public education.
Florida is a pioneer in school choice for families. You can always tell a pioneer. They have arrows in their backs.
Also frauds, self dealing, scams, average performance.
“The economic and racial segregation documented in regular public schools is even more severe in charters.”
This also seems to be the intended consequence of Florida vouchers and the charter industry. I have no doubt that Jeb Bush launched this process with help from the legislature.
This four part report is well-crafted and a sad tale. Thank you Diane and Sue for this publication.
Numerous research reports e.g. Brookings, CREDO Urban Study, and Florida Department of Education raise concerns about the academic benefit of choice programs. Few examples exist where charters outperform similar public schools and proportionately more charters do less well.”
Don’t worry. Ed reformers have this handled. The moment they succeeded in jamming thru voucher initiatives they dropped their exclusive reliance on test scores and started insisting they were about “the whole child”
As “choice” increases, “accountability” decreases. By design.
At the end of this the only schools that will be held accountable for anything are public schools.
It’s easy to predict where ed reform is going- just look for whatever policy benefits charter and private schools. If that means they have to jettison “accountability”, they will.
Look at the outcome they want- privatization- and then see what adjustments have to be made to get there. That’s what they’ll do.
Accountability was useful for a while to knock out public schools. Once it’s no longer useful they drop it.
They do not seem to care about the dismal results of choice. They just keep buying the right group of politicians to impose more choice on students, even if there is little demand for it.
You see it across the ed reform echo chamber. It was about “results” until they got their policy preferences- now it’s no longer about “results”, it’s about “:choice”
They just plug one or the other in as needed. If the schools aren’t “better’ according to their own metrics, no matter! They just substitute “choice” as the goal.
You can get an A in ed reform metrics JUST for cheerleading charters and vouchers. That’s all that’s required. Just count up charter and private school students and if it goes up, well, they succeeded!
The more contractors, the better the grade.
When charters and vouchers did not produce higher test scores, reformers moved the goal posts. Test scores don’t matter. Parent satisfaction does. If that number does down, they will create another marker.
Also, be clear that public schools can’t win under the rules of the game. If your public school improves it is not because of anything your public school did- it is due to the charter or private school across the street.
The “analysis” is laughable. They’ll look at a city they control and if they mention public schools at all (rare) ANY gains those schools make is attributed to “choice”.
So start with this: “charter and private schools are better” and then do any backflips you have to to “prove” that the beliefs they started with are correct.
Public schools can’t win this- even success won’t get them credit.
If you’re a real university researcher and not a Gates employee, wouldn’t you want to compare public schools in cities ed reformers DON’T control with public schools in cities ed reformers DO control?
If public schools gain as a result of ed reform wouldn’t the way to show that to be to look at public schools that haven’t adopted the dogma?
What’s the control for this experiment? Wouldn’t one have to look at “privatized state education system” v “public state education system” to compare?
Florida before reform and Florida after reform isn’t a comparison at all. It’s a depiction of one approach- privatization.
Did these commissioned reports deal with either the district public school choice programs, or the dual enrollment (high school/college credit) choice programs that have operated for decades in Florida?
Florida has for decades been a leader in these opportunities.
If so, what did the report say about these programs?
The topic is resegregation and you can see what the Collins report says here. http://collinsinstitute.fsu.edu/sites/default/files/lcitoughchoices.pdf
Oh, Joe, I see you like vouchers, too!
So much for our charter champion.
No, Diane,I strongly oppose vouchers. I asked about whether the report(s) that I think you said you commissioned had included information about district public school choice programs and about dual high school college/ credit programs.
I don’t consider either of those to be voucher programs.
Do you?
Sue Legg is an expert on Florida education issues. She was in charge of assessment for the Florida Department of Education for many years. Recently, she was education director of the Florida League of Women Voters. She knows more about the consequences of choice in Florida than you or me. I didn’t tell her what to write. Why don’t you ask Betsy DeVos or Jeb Bush to Commission the report’s you want?
Sorry, Diane, apparently I was not clear. I was simply asking if any of the reports discussed district school choice programs (such as alternative schools or magnet schools) or dual credit.
These are school choice programs that have existed in Florida for many years. I thought Dr. Legg might have written about them, as they are part of what’s happening in Florida.
I did not tell Sue Legg what to write.
The Florida League of Voters has been tracking charter school fraud, corruption, and legislative conflicts of interest for several years. It has been especially concerned about the negative effects of charters on public schools. Several key legislators have financial interests in charter chains. They never recuse themselves.