Another post by the reader called “Democracy”:
Part 2
A new player in this realm is Lauren Powell Jobs, who has “an M.B.A. from Stanford University‘s Graduate School of Business and experience as a fixed income trading strategist at Goldman Sachs, she is the founder and chair of the Emerson Collective. The collective, which does not maintain a website, focuses on using entrepreneurship to advance social reform and find solutions to help under-resourced students in America’s public schools, according to one description. She also serves on the boards of the New America Foundation and Teach for America.”
Powell Jobs is tied to the New America Foundation (funded by the Gates and Walton Foundations) and Teach for America (funded by a host of conservative foundations and big banks). She has helped to fund a “network of small private schools” that has extensive staff ties to Teach for America, and she helped to finance the purchase of Amplify from Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation. It appears that Powell Jobs’ conception of “reform” is really not very different from that of Whitney Tilson, or Wendy Kopp, or the other ed “reformers.”
The network of schools Powell Jobs is helping to fund seeks to apply a “reform” formula “… to private, public, and charter schools across the country. Of course, they’re also money-making operations.”
See, for example: http://www.wired.com/2015/05/altschool/
About 10,000 public schools have applied for the Powell Jobs’ XQ Super Schools grants. I know of one in central Virginia that is under consideration for $2 million a year for five years, $10 million total. This school system touts itself as “visionary,” and has had strong, undisclosed connections to the tech company SchoolNet, which was purchased by Pearson. The school division has thrown millions at technology, and recently converted all of its high schools to STEM “academies,” never mind that there is a nation-wide glut of STEM workers. And people in the community don’t bat an eye.
The top executive at Powell Job’s “reform” entity is Russlyn Ali, a former top aide to Arne Duncan, who is also ensconced as a “senior partner” with Powell Jobs.
Ali formerly worked for the Education Trust and the Broad Foundation. She supported No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top. She wrote that California should not suspend Common Core assessments because “The Common Core provides the promise and the opportunity for California to again lead the country in education.” Otherwise, she asked, “Will America be ready to compete?”
It’s pure nonsense. But many in public education have responded enthusiastically to it. They respond even more enthusiastically – it seems – when the STEM (science, technology, engineering, math) bogeyman is invoked. Go figure.
Powell Jobs also heads up College Track, which “provides tutoring, SAT and ACT preparation and college counseling” to low-income students, Interestingly, according to its tax filings, College Track “qualifies as a publicly supported organization.” It receives money from the Emerson Collective – another Powell Jobs education enterprise, which is organized as a LLC and does not have to publicly report its donations – and from JP Morgan Chase, venture capitalist John Doerr, and Summit 54, a Colorado organization conceived in the wake of ‘Waiting for Superman’ and dedicated to the proposition that “Our education system is not preparing our students for jobs of the future” and “this is having a detrimental effect on our economy.”
Holy Mother of God. Why does anyone believe these people?
This is what education “reform” – especially technology-oriented “reform – has shaped up to be.
It’s not a pretty sight. And it cannot be healthy for public education.
“Preparing for jobs of the future” by using more educational technology? I don’t think so, unless all those jobs are just data-manipulation and void of creating real goods and services (in a “digital economy” that does not grow food or make items???).
We will always need farmers and manual laborers, which are both the foundation of all economies. What happened to vocational education in this country; what is archaic with the need to teach cooking and farming and animal science? What, we all one day will be on computer with a 666 implanted in our brain, working for “the man” and being policed by the same? Are we heading toward the Matrix?
I tell my students the best and most noble job is either growing food or healing bodies, and one doesn’t necessarily need a lot of technology to do either; though is as a tool it improves the efficiency or production then it is useful.
What good is a world of coders if nobody is plowing fields and picking crops?
Aldo Leopold would scoff at the idea that technology must be the number one goal of our education, pedagogy and lives.
“Preparing for jobs of the future” by using more educational technology? My first thought when I read this is that we are missing the “work” part of jobs. The work ethic of today is youth is very low.
There is a part of me that think that they might learn more by a work-based learning program that involved manual labor task such as hauling hay, digging ditches, or building fences. At the end of the day, they will be able to see a tangible result for the effort they put into the work. When they get to a point of earning a degree and have a career that is more mentally taxing than physically then they will have a perspective on what work really is all about.
When we more spend to time trying to teach “short cuts” and not teaching work ethic we are focusing on the wrong things.
This and the previous posting…
Technology: for profiting off of, and controlling, OTHER PEOPLE’S CHILDREN.
Reminds me of the old saw: “Beware of fools with tools.”
😎
They can leave the tools, then I can ignore the fools, I will be busy making something.
Another problem with Silicon Valley and other corporations is that they are holding billions offshore to avoid paying taxes. The rest of us working folks pay our fair share while they have a tax avoidance scheme in play. They pay lobbyists to make campaign donations to our representatives to continue to allow corporations to continue their tax avoidance scheme. They are not satisfied with their billions. They want to reshape the nature of our democracy to suit them. That is why we are now an oligarchy that continue to chip away at any contribution and benefit to the common good. http://ctj.org/ctjreports/2016/03/fortune_500_companies_hold_a_record_24_trillion_offshore.php#.V_5mIMnDhZ0
So many big corporate tax evaders then join the chorus of those complaining that our pubic school system no longer produces creatively educated students.
Whoa! Why doesn’t anyone see the obvious? Schools are, to use a Trumpian word, huge purchaser of goods and services, many of which are under long term contracts. “Reform” is about getting access to the process of developing, awarding and receiving contracts. Technology is a big opportunity for private capital to get access to lucrative, long term monopoly like contracts. Using philanthropy and the rhetoric of reform is a way to get into that process.
This is happening right now in Oakland; big announcement by the district that the XQ Project (XQ? How much did they pay a consultant to come up with this nonsense?) via Ms. Jobs is awarding a $10.5M grant to build, you guessed it, another charter high school, Summit Elevate, that the district doesn’t need. And the district made the announcement before the charter had come up for a vote by the school board. When you read the school description (Art! Architecture! Science!), it sounds a lot like Oakland Technical High School, but without all the new, shiny, expensive personalized learning (computers, software, computers, software, did I mention computers and software??)
These people seem to have nothing but money, ego, and time to spend incubating the Next Great Thing for education, when they know nothing about education.
They just know how to sell computers and software. Seriously, electronics salesmen know more about education. Used car salesmen know more about education than these people. Billionaires would all list “salesperson” as their occupation on the forms if they paid taxes. It could be funny if it weren’t so upsetting.
Blaming teachers is too easy. Being entranced by the black screen is too easy. Believing the sales pitch is too easy. Actually parenting or educating someone in the city is complicated and difficult. It’s parents’ desires for shortcuts and shiny paint jobs upon which sales and marketing connivers prey.
The long ‘Wired’ article on AltSchool was enlightening. It was all about how challenging, exciting and fun AltSchool is for its teacher-facilitator-program developers. By the end I was scanning in vain for a description of the student experience.
Just a 2-sentence testimonial from a precocious nerd (an admitted ‘outlier’)– and a brief note of concern that the program is being developed around students unrepresentative of the intended end-users (kids at under-resourced schools). Plus a photo of tots at computers w/facilitators hovering & engaging them in conversation– hardly representative of staffing at under-resourced schools.
Founded by Google man Ventilla, current major funders Zuckerberg & LPJobs, AltSchools here are described as a venture-fund experiment anticipating profits down the road. I guess that would be from schools w/ a profound lack of teachers, books, blackboards, chalk, paper & pencils. But lots of hardware, software, wiring/ wi-fi/ bandwidth provided by gullible voters whose taxes are held in thrall by paid-off legislators.
I have some major cognitive dissonance, contrasting this picture of wealthy kids and their gaggle of venture-paid teacher-techies engaged in heady collaboration to create a tool that I know will be implemented as seen in very different photos– silent groups of as many as 50 plugged-in kids per barely-trained monitor.